๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

KW3 (California)
Posts: 146
Posted:
Hi, I am a new BD of a HOA in CA. I am learning to serve my HOA effectively and professionally. So may I ask you all seasoned BDs here to share your knowledge and experience on how to handle your management co and the contract with them?

In our HOA case, according to the state (CA) law and the HOA Bylaws/Decoration, "no management service contract can be allowed for a term more than 1 year except ..."

Since I am still a rather new BD, I don't have much knowledge about how the BOD handled the MC and the contract with them. But I do know that the HOA has been "under the control" of the same only MC for 30-40 years since the beginning of the HOA. I couldn't find anything recorded/mentioned about renewing/approving the management service contract every year (or sometime before). Is this a somewhat normal and usual practice for a HOA to acquire management service? Does your BOD change/renew/approve your management co every year? Or like our BOD that seemed to let the management contract automatically renewed every year?

BTW, I already requested the MC to provide a copy of the contract for review. Post new findings here if exist.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
I suppose the contract doesn't really matter unless your having trouble with the management company (MC). Are you? Or are you just nitpicking?
RickW (Illinois)
Posts: 169
Posted:
We renew our management company contract every 2 years. Our HOA is 10 years old. We changed management companies 4 years ago when we became unsatisifed with the management compnay we had a contract with at the time. While we aren't changing management companies we are renewing our contract with them which I feel is a good thing.

I agree with the other poster, if you're not having negative issues with the management company there may not be any reason to question anything.

I view management companies in a few ways...1)The professional services they provide...2)The cost of their services...3)The rapport the association board has with the contact person from the management company...4)The manner that our contact person deals with any and all homeowners who might contact the management company...

I would also add that #3 & 4 are very important. If the rapport and relationship is positive, your contact person can be a great source of knowledge and can also get things accomplished for the association.
KW3 (California)
Posts: 146
Posted:
Rick & Steve,

I and another new BD (and many homeowners) do have negative issues with the MC and as I said our BOD (the other 3 BDs) has been/is under the control of the MC. Now I believe our 'life' term contract with the MC must change/end. It's the matter of how and when. Still need others' input on this matter. Thanks
KW3 (California)
Posts: 146
Posted:
Forgot to mention: you may read more of my our case in the thread: "Cost for financial review".
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
KW,

Since it is state law and also a requirement of your gov docs, your management contract should only be for a period of one year. That doesn't mean it cannot be renewed each year, but the contract itself can only be for one year. Also, the contract should NOT automatically renew each year. The BOD should decide each year whether they want to obtain new bids for a mgmt co or to renew the existing contract. Even if the contract is renewed the terms may be different, such as an increase in the monthly fee; therefore the board should make a review and decide accordingly. On the other hand, if there is no contract then I suggest the board ask for one immediately. I've heard of mgmt co's being on board for a long time, but never 30-40 years. Perhaps it IS time for a new mgmt co. No wonder the MC wants to -- and does -- run the show!!
KW3 (California)
Posts: 146
Posted:
Hi Mary,

First I want to apologize to you and Richard for mixing up addressing your names in my post in another thread "Upcoming Board Election".

Now as I remembered from CA state law and HOA gov docs that the management contract is required to not exceed a one-year term and read your response, I went back to check the requirement and unfortunately I could only come up to this (in the Declaration): Section xx.yy "Management Agreements: Any agreement for professional management of the HOA, or any contract providing for services by ..., may not exceed a term of 1 year, renewable by the parties for successive 1 year period, and shall provide for termination by either party without cause ..."

And now I couldn't find the similar code in CA state law which I strongly remembered has a "unless ..." clause at the end. I have excluded the 'unless' clause for being inapplicable to our HOA and the MC at the time I read the code. I feel now it's critical to make sure the 'unless' clause is inapplicable. I would like to ask people here (especially or not, the Californian) for helping me find the state code under either Non-profit corporation law or Property law. Appreciate your help.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
KW,

I didn't see anything in the Davis-Stirling Act and doubt contracts are addressed in the nonprofit corp statutes. I would go by what your bylaws say, in that a mgmt contract must be for only one year but can be renewed.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Contracts Limited to One Year

Virtually all CC&Rs have a one-year limitation on contracts entered into by the association. This limitation is required by the Department of Real Estate (Cal. Admin. Code, Title. 10, ยง2792.21) to prevent the developer from obligating the association to long-term contracts that may favor the developer but harm the association.

Once the developer has turned over control of the association to the membership, the CC&Rs may be amended to eliminate the restriction altogether or to change it to 3 or 5 year contract limitations depending on the type of vendor. This allows the association to negotiate more favorable contracts for elevator maintenance, cable TV service, etc.

JulieA2 (Washington)
Posts: 1
Posted:
My questions to you are: 1) Have you talked with existing Board members about the management contract? 2) have you researched in the Minutes re the contract approval? 3) Are you also looking at other existing contracts? If so, where and when have they been approved? 4) have you looked at your audits? 5) have you reached out to your association counsel? S/he may be quite knowledgeable on this matter if it is a large enough contract (and I believe it is?)

Management firm contracts should be approved as often as they renew. This issue rests first and foremost with your Board(s). My suspicion is that you got on the Board with the specific agenda (not that that is a bad thing) to review management. Noting the time you have had the contract and your location, I have a pretty good guess which association you reside in. My suggestion is for you to a) talk with existing Board members, b) go through the minutes, c) make an appointment to speak with your mgmt. company representative. Do each of these without preconceived notions.

Good luck -
KW3 (California)
Posts: 146
Posted:
Hi Julie,

Quote:
My questions to you are: 1) Have you talked with existing Board members about the management contract? 2) have you researched in the Minutes re the contract approval? 3) Are you also looking at other existing contracts? If so, where and when have they been approved? 4) have you looked at your audits? 5) have you reached out to your association counsel? S/he may be quite knowledgeable on this matter if it is a large enough contract (and I believe it is?)

My answers: 1) yes, 2) some, still searching, but keep contract as main issue, not approval of the contract, 3) ?, 4) ? (don't know have any audits), 5) association counsel??

Quote:

My suspicion is that you got on the Board with the specific agenda (not that that is a bad thing) to review management.

My main and specific agenda for getting on board is on line with another new BD: to fundamentally improve HOA's finance -- of course it includes reviewing management.

Quote:
My suggestion is for you to a) talk with existing Board members, b) go through the minutes, c) make an appointment to speak with your mgmt. company representative. Do each of these without preconceived notions.

Thank you for your suggestions. I already tried them, at least to some extent if not completely.
KW3 (California)
Posts: 146
Posted:
An update to the management contract: I acquired a copy of the MM contract. First, I found it awkward that the contract was signed (by probably the builder/developer and the MC) 26 years ago and never been changed/amended! Here is the section for 'TERM':
This agreement commences on the first day of July, 1984, and unless earlier terminated in accordance with subsequent provisions of this Agreement, it shall remain in effect for a term of twelve (12) months and shall automatically expire on the last day of June 30, 1985. This contract will automatically renew unless canceled in writing by either party 60 days prior to expiration date.

-- I believe due to the "automatically renew" clause, there have been no whatever review, change, amend, or approval from Association side (or MM side) for the past 26 years! That was/is what happened/is happening. Can anyone suggest anything we can/would do about it, or anything flaw/violating laws in this contract Term?

I'll reveal/discuss other part of the contract later.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
KW, there had to be some review unless the MC is still working for its 1984 fee. If you want a legal opinion you need to get the BOD to ask the HOA attorney or pony up the money yourself. If you want the MC gone, which is the impression I get then you need to make a motion to terminate the contract and get it passed in time to give the required notification. Just because the MC has been there since 1984 does not make them evil or controlling. If you have a specific complaint, quit dancing around and lets hear it.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
KW3 (California)
Posts: 146
Posted:
Glen,

Quote:
KW, there had to be some review unless the MC is still working for its 1984 fee.

What kind of review there could be? Do you mean "change fees"? If so, there must be some amendment or at least record showing the change and approval, right?

Quote:
If you want a legal opinion you need to get the BOD to ask the HOA attorney or pony up the money yourself.

Maybe I just want some input as to how many other HOAs hold their MM contract with "automatically renew" term? And their opinion? What is yours?

Quote:
If you want the MC gone, which is the impression I get then you need to make a motion to terminate the contract and get it passed in time to give the required notification. Just because the MC has been there since 1984 does not make them evil or controlling. If you have a specific complaint, quit dancing around and lets hear it.

I have no intention to make the MC gone without legitimate cause and without benefit to the Association. I don't understand why am I seen dancing around here, like to show off something? In the matter of fact, I am trying to learn all these HOA stuff so I can better serve our HOA (all owners) as a BD. Sure I have complaints about the MC and I know many owners do too. But I don't see it right/prudent to just bring the complaints here to "your hearing" and take your judgment. Anyway, I hope I can be here to learn from all people HOA-related and hopefully the experience all you here would share. Thanks

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here