💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BarbaraE1 (Texas)
Posts: 7
Posted:
Valley Creek North had their charter revoked with a tax forfeiture and were warned to cease conducting business in Feb 2004.

July 2008, they tried to reinstate using SOS form 811 (Tax Clearance letter obtained stated SOS form 801 was required for reinstatement), only to be sent a letter in Aug 2008 to file the required periodic report.

Sept 2008 for failure to file said periodic report, SOS again sent letter warning VCNHOA to cease conduting business and if reinstatement was not properly filed, involuntary dissolution would occurr on Jan 5th, 2009.

The SOS followed thru with the dissolution and the corrupt HOA continued on as usual, foreclosing on 2 of the homeowners homes unlawfully.

To date there is a lawsuit pending against VCNHOA.

Also, in Dec 2009 the HOA sent out letters to all the homeowners except the ones they had unlawfully foreclosed, for a special meeting to change the name of VCNHOA to Villages of Valley Creek North.

The management companies had been split before this time as well, Village Ass Mgmt & L&R Systems.

The special meeting was also to address consolidating the management companies and reducing the quorum from 66% to 10%.

This special meeting was to change the name, as someone formed an entity with the same name Valley Creek North HOA, keeping them from reinstating and continuing on their corrupted way.

The Village Ass Mgmt is owned by a homeowner in Villages of Valley Creek No 12, but she manages all the Valley Creek HOA's except for one.

Now, I believe that this is a conflict, as this woman can charge anything to manage and no one will say anything.

Also, any homes sold in the time frame between Feb 13, 2004 and currently will have to answer to the legal system.

A tax forfeiture strickly forbids conducting business until reinstatement and placing the debt responsibility on the officers and board members until the forfeiture is reinstated correctly.

In June 2006, 4 years after the passing of the statute that the Articles of Inc and By-laws be filed with the county, this corrupt HOA filed these along with a board and not voted by the homeowners, a collection policy which included foreclosure.

Now foreclosure for non-payment of dues is serious and this type of policy for single family homes is unconscionable, but the sleezy lawyers who agent HOA's are unduly influencing the boards to pass such crap to further their crooked agenda.

Look up the tax roles of any county where an HOA lawyer resides and they have enough property to be a slumlord.

The sleezy HOA lawyers are like ambulance chasers, they collude with one another to rack up fees in excess of the norm.

These sleezy HOA lawyers also try to extort moeny from mortgage companies, threating to cloud titles unless they get their nominal fees.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Did you have a question....... or are you just venting?
BarbaraE1 (Texas)
Posts: 7
Posted:
I was sharing.

I guess you could call it venting.

And maybe a question as to how they can have some rules and not others governing these entities.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Barbara, you have to stop trolling the anti-HOA web sites and re-posting their feckless and often inaccurate vitriol. I Google searched "Valley Creek North - tax forfeiture" and got one response that matched the search criteria - this one.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here