Quote:
Posted By JoyceS1 on 06/17/2010 8:57 AM
I'd like to see pros and cons of bare walls out insurance for condos/HOA's.
I am not being an insurance person, but here is my understanding:
Bare Walls Coverage
This was the standard before the Uniform Condominium Act of 1980. For bare walls insurance the owner is responsible for insuring all real property defined to be part of the Unit. The problem is defining the diverse Unit boundaries and interior partition walls (common walls). It can be from the studs or unfinished walls out (owner responsible for paint); the sub-floor and underside of the ceiling; and other variations. Claims can be a long and possibly litigious process.
Original Specifications (AKA Single Entity) Coverage
This is now the standard. The association is responsible for all real property; but only to return the building and units to their "original condition", i.e., without the upgrades by the owners. The advantages are improved loss adjustment and not leaving to chance the rebuilding of a damaged Unit. Owners still need an HO-6 policy to cover their personal belongings.