JamesC (Maryland)
Posts: 282
Posts: 282
Posted:
We have a nine member board, and this Monday, is the Annual Meeting. We will be voting in a new group of three homeowners to serve for a three year term.
We are confident of replacing three current members with three new ones.
Not to come across as having a battle field, but the current board has done nothing for the community in the past three years.
Our monthy board meeting will follow the Annual meeting when we will decide the officers.
We, the good side will have four votes, and the other side, bad ones will have four votes. (kidding, but true)
The new member who we (the good side) want to nominate to be the President will not be able to attend the meeting, because he is a detective, and is required to attend a conference that night.
His would have been the fifth vote.
Here is the question: Since there will be a four to four tie, on both the Presidents, slot, and the VP slot, is it allowed, or proper per the rules to forgo holding the appointments until the following month (June) when he will be able to attend the meeting?
Thanks:
Jim
We are confident of replacing three current members with three new ones.
Not to come across as having a battle field, but the current board has done nothing for the community in the past three years.
Our monthy board meeting will follow the Annual meeting when we will decide the officers.
We, the good side will have four votes, and the other side, bad ones will have four votes. (kidding, but true)
The new member who we (the good side) want to nominate to be the President will not be able to attend the meeting, because he is a detective, and is required to attend a conference that night.
His would have been the fifth vote.
Here is the question: Since there will be a four to four tie, on both the Presidents, slot, and the VP slot, is it allowed, or proper per the rules to forgo holding the appointments until the following month (June) when he will be able to attend the meeting?
Thanks:
Jim