💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Same board for many years now. They have a rule that states floors in the upper level need to soundproofed. Units also need to get a city permit with approved materials by the board before installation. Neither were done by the unit above me. I called and email the board on the day of upper unit installation. The board doesn't check materials. The flooring goes in. It is hardwood. I can hear the slightest of footsteps. When I emailed the board that day, I received a email that was sent to me by mistake, stating that I am a pain! Fast forward..the board gets sued by another owner, for the same problem on the other side of the building. The board is now in arbitration with that homeowner. I email them again as the unit above now is even louder, with parties, moving furniture, etc. They aren't from this country and refuse to talk to me in English! The board is still ignoring me, any ideas?!
DanielH1 (California)
Posts: 482
Posted:
See how the arbitration is settled.

If it is settled in the homeowner's favor, sue and go to arbitration.

If you had been involved with your Board and HOA and caught this problem at an earlier time, you would have a lot more options.

But, since the hardwood is already in, you'll have to do a lot of work to make them rip it out.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Civil Code §1354. Enforcement Rights, Attorneys' Fees.

(a) The covenants and restrictions in the declaration shall be enforceable equitable servitudes, unless unreasonable, and shall inure to the benefit of and bind all owners of separate interests in the development. Unless the declaration states otherwise, these servitudes may be enforced by any owner of a separate interest or by the association, or by both.

(b) A governing document other than the declaration may be enforced by the association against an owner of a separate interest or by an owner of a separate interest against the association.

(c) In an action to enforce the governing documents, the prevailing party shall be awarded reasonable attorney's fees and costs.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Thanks. I dont know how much more I could have been involved. I pleaded with the board to look at the floor the day they were being installed. I sent them emails as the unit was throwing trash from their previous floors coverings onto the common areas. I even knocked on the BOD's President door and she went up there and did nothing!!! I have 10 emails from that period of time requesting their help, sighting the CCR code and city code, NOTHING WAS DONE!
DanielH1 (California)
Posts: 482
Posted:
The day of construction is very late in the process. Perhaps there was no way to know beforehand. Perhaps it came up at a Board meeting. Perhaps if you had been elected to the Board, you might have had more warning. I have no idea.

But, now, your options seem limited: (1) sue somebody or (2) live with it.
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Thanks Dan, I guess! You stated the obvious. I did run for the board, I lost by one vote..it was never brought up in a meeting as the board didn't know about the installation until I told them on that day. Thr board is wrong for not looking into the situation when it was happening. I will sue...but I dont want to. I know it will increase our dues. They are already at $400.00 monthly.
JamesG (Connecticut)
Posts: 83
Posted:
There are other less extreme steps that you should start with first, but these will require action by you and then action by a board with a backbone.

You state that there is a rule that states that floors on the upper levels need to be sound proofed. Check your documents to see have the language for that rule is there. If not, ask the board for a copy of the rule. You need to know exactly what the flooring and/or sound proofing requirements are.

Even though there is a rule, do your documents require an approval by the board? Was this done? If so, request a copy of the approval letter and the specified requirements.

You state that a city permit is required before a floor can be installed with approved materials. This information is public. Go to your town hall building department and request a copy of the permit and the materials approved. I would bet that no permit was issued, but don't do anything yet.

Of course, you have no right to inspect the flooring in the unit. However, the sound in your unit gives you reasonable evidence that it was improperly constructed.

There is no way that I would live with this disturbance.

I would take to approaches.

First write a letter documenting your noise complaint, along with copies of all the email messages. Request a hearing with the board and the property manager. The folks upstairs will naturally need to attend, so it may get a little ugly. Send the letter to the board, the property manager, and the folks upstairs.

At the hearing, your objective needs to be to resolve the noise by having physical changes of some sort made. If the floor is not in complinace with your rule, or if required permission was never obtained, then board can impose a daily fine until the problem is fixed.

Second, if you determined that no permit was issued by the city, write a letter to the same people listed above, but stating your findings and that you don't really want to lodge a complaint with the city permit department, but will do so if the problem has not been fixed by a certain date. Request a written response by a date and if you do get it, then send a certified letter to the city that files your complaint and requests the city to take action to have the flooring removed or brought into compliance with the requirements.
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Thanks so much James! I can use that sort of information. I really appreciate your input. I have taken some action of which you stated. What is amazing to me, is that the board is not responding to at all. I have sent 10 emails from past to present with resources codes, city codes, request for a meeting, and nothing!!!! Thank you again, I am going to do all that you suggested. Thank you!
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Sue, might I suggest you stop sending emails and send certified letters?

Emails are easy to dismiss. Not that they should be, but many boards don't treat them as legitimate, formal communications.

You found that out when you accidentally received the comment by the one board member that you were a pain.

A board should never EVER make personal comments about residents in ANY communication, especially email.

Not only is it inappropriate, but it could get the board into legal hot water, too.

Obviously you need to save all correspondence, which you are doing, but I would also take a meeting with the correspondence with an attorney well-versed in HOA (especially condo-type) and see if he/she can get you started in a productive direction.

But, again, I would make sure all my correspondence with the board and/or management company is by certified or registered mail.

That alone will give them the heads up that you are not playing around. They need to take your concerns seriously.

Keep in mind, though, they may already be well into Cover Their A** mode.

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
To all,
I think all the advise here is worthy. James even wrote out the whole screen play and oh, if things would go as planned with these crazy HOA's. None the less, good posts all.
I thought I remembered this name from before, so I searched the search feature for SueL7.

I invite all to take a look. Now before I get taken out of context, I am casting no suspicion on Sue's posts. Each post must be accepted with and dealt with on the information regarding the post and that is why I compliment all on their input.

I would hope that the references I am quoting have brought some resolution the the other issues Sue has posted about. If I know the whole story, I got hung up on this mistaken e-mail Sue received. I received one from a senior State government employee and he said much the same about me. I was steamed. Next day I received an apology about the mistake and promise that there will be steps taken to insure this don't happen again. I got to thinking and what came to mind was "There but for the grace of God go I." Really we all e-mail and say things we shouldn't..........we are all guilty. Why get upset and start flailing around, it don't solve the problem and if it gets to court the judge could look on it a backhand attempt to curry favor with the court. If it is habitual like some of this Goldman Sachs stuff and points to management misconduct, that's different. What bugged me was the Board made no attempt to contact Sue, admit their transgressions and put it behind them with a promise to be more careful about personal information in e-mails. Admit that screwed up. Is this indicative of a ingrained Board? This post and the others in archives might prove helpful to get a handle on this because Sue posts the board in unresponsive. Did any of the other issues get resolved Sue. I am not putting you on the spot and you are under no pressure to answer my question.
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Hi Richard, thanks for the response. I had renters next me last time. We went to arbitration with the board as the renters were throwing cigs unto open land and there was a small fire, the owners live 2 hours away, and never were around. The board didnt do anything to help. The renters who were in a band, were also playing loud music all night long, the board didn't even send a complaint letter. So finally, we got an attorney and the board started to send out fines! That part is ok now and the renters are quiet and well behaved. But, it took legal action for the board to do anything. They are just as ineffective this time by allowing hardwood floors to go in. Another unit is suing them and his lawuit which was given to all of us to read by the board. It states the board is not enforcing the CCRs. I can't believe the board gave us the lawsuit to read. I have contacted my attorney and amazingly the board emailed me tonight about investigating the hardwood floors. Thanks to all that helped me. I probably will not be using the board in the furture due to responses like Roberts.
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Robert, the end part was a joke.I was making reference to your above email, LOL but I got cut me off. I really appreciate your concern!!! Thanks!
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Sue,
You have a inverted sense of humor. No, I mean perverted, No, I mean your sense of humor is perverted, you are probably not a pervert, no, I mean you are definitively not a pervert. Anyway you are funny!
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
LOL!!! Thanks again Rob..
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
LOL!!! Thanks again Rob..
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Sue I wasn't suggesting that you sue the Association. The section I quoted allows you to sue the neighbor directly to enforce the rule but if they truly violated the city ordnance then I would use the city to enforce. Just be aware that whatever track you take you very well could become the building pariah.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Thanks Glen. I actually cut and pasted it to the board. I sent them my first email a week ago. They didn't acknowledge me until tonight when I sent them those codes. I also told them I am being represented by an attorney too. So thank you!
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Keep us posted.
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Hi Michele,

Thanks for asking. Today, after the borad received a call from my attorney, they told us that the unit doesnt have wood floors but something else? OK, I said, since we are supposed to submit the materials before installation, please send me a copy of the flooring materials that were installed. The people have lived above me for 9 yrs and the sound was fine until the new installation. I also asked if anyone acutally viewed the flooring when it was going in? What's funny is that they were unaware of the installation until I told them. Waiting for the board's response. I will keep you posted. Thanks for your concern and help.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
They are probably going to come back with: Laminate.

Which is really the same thing as a wood floor and would require the exact (or very similar) kind of soundproofing.

Or perhaps they are tile?

Either way, bad move on your board for not investigating this sooner!
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
SueL7,
Clear this up. You hire a lawyer to represent you, he calls your Board (How do you call a Board?, They, meaning the Board (clarify)told us (I assume at some point your lawyer called you or was this some kind of conference call?) Some one told us (meaning you and lawyer)that the unit didn't have wood floors, it was something else. You say (to them), "ok, I said, since we (meaning homeowners) are supposed to submit materials before installation (to the board for ??), then you asked to get a copy of the flooring materials that were used. Next relevant point is you asked (the Board?)if anyone (who would that be?) had inspected the installation when it was going in. Then you say it was funny because they were unaware of the installation until you told them. I think I recall you notified the Board about the installation when it was going in, what was their response at that time?

Now what is not jiving here and I am sure this is a communication problem, is, why you are talking to these people at all if you hired an attorney and he was aware of the chain of events? Why would YOU want a copy of the materials used? I suspect, either you got a slow attorney or you didn't commit to a purpose when you hired him, and he has done what he got paid for and is gone. I don't know? And you are back to square one. Certainly the Board is well aware of this other litigation going on over a similar issue, and all you and your lawyer came up with was the floor that went in was not wood. Don't you plan to address all this in writing through your attorney to the Board. Does the attorney you hired have an opinion, I don't need to know what it is just if he advised you of how to conduct yourself in regard to this issue? You are waiting for a Board response, is this how the board told you to proceed?
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
OMG! Thanks Michele...It is wood laminate! And you are right! It does need the same soundproofing. I cut and pasted the code from the Association of Laminates, which talks about the correct soundproofing material for the laminates which transfer sound easily. They are just like hardwood floors except a cheaper and more compressed cardboard version. I immediately sent this to my attorney and copied it the board, along with a picture (from the site) close to what the upper unit's flooring looks like! So thank you again! You guys are the best!!!!!
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Good questions Robert! I did hire an attorney. The BOD's attorney will talk to him, but hasn't yet. I am gathering all the research for my case. I am trying not to acutally sue the BOD, so I email my attoney with information and copy it to the board. The BOD sent me an email late night. But they will not tell me what the material is? The problem remains, I can hear every footstep, it is like they are walking on my ceiling! The only reason they sent me this is because my attoney called them as they requested with his info. Now they know I am serious. All they would have to do is come over and listen to the footsteps. They won't. I asked them.. They have ignored me for 8 days, until they got a call from my attoney.

Dear Ms. Sue XXXX,
We are investigating your complaint regarding the floor installation in unit #319. Though the Board was not informed of the remodeling until notified by you, we did contact the owner immediately. We received (and approved) the installation specs provided by the installer/contractor and were given samples of the materials used for the installation. In addition to using cork, foam padding was installed under the cork to further insulate the noise.

We are further investigating the issue of the City Permit and will notify you of the outcome.
We would like to know if you are currently represented by an attorney. If so, could you please provide us with his/her name, so that the Association’s attorney can deal with him directly?
Thank you
Board of Directors
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Sue,
Good luck.
I expect one of the toughest decision you and your attorney will have to agree completely on is to determine what you want to happen. Write your answers to this question down.

Clean them up and make them concise and reach accord with your lawyer. Make sure that premise guides your actions, don't get sidetracked, and realize the consequences of what will happen if you do get satisfied.

On the face of this, it appears the Board will have to be a player, so try and be fair to them, your concern is to regain your peace and quiet. Keep it simple. The tenant upstairs can solve your problem at any time. Your covenants made need to be re-written to protect the association and all this can be done outside a courtroom.

A mess to be sure. I am sure your lawyer will validate all this construction approval that the Board issued, and will confirm your covenants are followed. As I said before, a chronological record of of this stuff is essential.
DennisJ (Georgia)
Posts: 17
Posted:
E Mails can be a certified document. Go to readnotify.com. I use this software in business and it is very effective and quicker than snail mail. Also cheaper. I just put the certified notice in the subject of the E Mail so the recipient knows it is certified.

Baldy
SueL7 (California)
Posts: 30
Posted:
Thanks Dennis, excellent information.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DennisJ on 04/29/2010 6:58 AM
E Mails can be a certified document. Go to readnotify.com. I use this software in business and it is very effective and quicker than snail mail. Also cheaper. I just put the certified notice in the subject of the E Mail so the recipient knows it is certified.

What an interesting site/feature!

Thanks.

Oh, like the sig line. Fits me now too!
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
To all,
I went to readnotify.com and when to contact us button.
Sent an e-mail asking if their method of notifying meets the same legal requirements of notification as the accepted much used method of certified , return receipt requested snail mail. If they answer, and why not, I will post what the reply is. I am hoping that some kind of formated e-mail could be used. The reason I did this is because this is a company running a business and I am concerned that if they can sell a certified e-mail to satisfy a legal requirement of notification, why everyone would not have access to this same format.I have no idea about any of this and just interested. If it satisfies the courts, maybe we would adopt it also, don't know about that either.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Robert1,
Here is the rely you got from readnotify.com.
Sounds good to me.
************************************************
Hi Robert,

Yes - you can use our certifications in courts of law. When you send a certified email, it is digitally signed and time stamped by our servers. These certificates use cryptographic algorithms - which can be verified using a number of public sources. If the email is altered in any way, the verification will fail. So, in short - sending a certified email proves that you sent what you did, when you did. Even if the recipient chooses not to open the email, you can prove that you did send it.

We also track delivery of your emails, so you can also find out (via your recipients own mailserver) whether the email was delivered or not. This is very useful; as the recipient may claim they didn't receive your email - but you can prove it was delivered.

The best way to see how it works is to send some tests. First, register for a Free trial, then send an email to a third party (not you or your computer though please) by appending their email address with .certified.readnotify.com (eg; [email protected]) If you want to turn Delivery Service Notifications on (so you get a receipt when the email is delivered): Log in -> My Account -> Notifications and Reports.

All the best!

Regards,
DennisJ (Georgia)
Posts: 17
Posted:
Thought I had researched this but I figured it is better to hear it from the "horses mouth". There are also many other features like retracting e mails and deleting them if they are attempted to forward or print. I primarily use the read notify to determine if a person got the e mail and read it. Then I know if they chose not to respond and can follow up to find out why and if there is a problem. I also let them know I do this as not to lose their trust.

Baldy
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
If you testify, you can testify that you received or sent these e-mails and the readnotify or similar system. The court is then going to have to figure out whether or not it's proper to consider the e-mails or not. Other considerations affect their admissibility; in particular, what they are being introduced to prove. It is impossible to say one way or the other whether the Court is going to admit them or not until they are proposed to be admitted to evidence to prove something in particular, the other side makes its objections, and the court decides how to rule.

Other sites similar to readnotify:
http://didtheyreadit.com/
http://www.spypig.com/
http://sneakemail.com/
http://www.mstag.com/
http://whoreadme.com/

Me? I'll stick to good old certified mail. Its low tech, and everyone understands it. Keep it simple stupid. (wink)
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
I work in IT, including having worked on email systems. These services are not going to work completely as advertised.

These services work by adding a special 'header' tag to your message that requests a delivery receipt and/or a read receipt. The idea is that when your mail server delivers a tagged message to your mailbox, it will send back a delivery receipt, thus informing you that the message has been delivered. Similarly when you open a tagged message, your email client will automatically send back a read receipt.

However, not all mail servers support delivery receipts, and not all mail clients support read receipts. It's entirely possible that a tagged message that you sent was delivered and read, but you will never get either confirmation because the recipient's server/client does not send back the receipts. You may have sent the message, but that doesn't mean I received it.

Further, it doesn't take much to spoof a receipt. It would be possible for me to send a message through one of these services, then turn around and create a completely bogus receipt message to send back through the service thus "proving" that the message was delivered and read, even though the real recipient never saw the message that was sent to an inactive account that is rejecting messages.

With that bit of doubt, it wouldn't take much to get their validity thrown out in court. I'm with Steve - stick to certified snail mail. It's not perfect but it's still better than relying on email delivery.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here