πŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JimR14 (Colorado)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Is is possible for a HOA board to change the road dedication on a plat from "roads are for public
access and utilities" to "roads are for exclusive use of property owners"? The plats have been
in effect since 1987 and are in Colorado. The subdivision was formed with the 35 acre
exemption so the plats were not approved by the county commisioners. The HOA is attempting
to change the plats with a 50% plus one vote. I believe it would take 100% approval by
the property owners to change the roads from public access to private access. Could I get
opinions on this and the reasoning? Thanks
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Jim,

I believe the county would have to approve this move afterall the roads are now owned by them. However, I wonder why does your BOD want to take on this added expense for the assn? Do they really know how much it costs to maintain roads?
JimR14 (Colorado)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Mary,
The county has never accepted the road dedication so legally the roads are still owned
and maintained by the HOA. The roads have been open to the public since 1987 and the
HOA has declared in a lawsuit (concerning access)that the "roads are open to the public".
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Jim,
I expect the lack of response here is due to confusion. From your two posts Jim, it appears there is already some history about this problem. The HOA declaring the roads are open to the public in court has to be considered. Tell us why this happened with a time line. Are you saying there was at one time a court order for the county to accept these roads as to maintenance? You also state that the roads are not under the County Commissioners because they are less than 35 acres. What does that have to do with county roads? Are all roads in the county under this edict? Does this mean that those roads in a developement under 35 aacres are private and those over 35 are public? Have you personally gone to the county office and got a written report of the Commissioners position? What does your county council say?
JimR14 (Colorado)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Robert,
In Colorado you don't have to go through the county for approval on a subdivision if the lots
are 35 acres or bigger. That is the case here. When the subdivision was formed they used this
exclusion. I contacted the county last week and they said they have no jurisdiction
because of the 35 acre exclusion. My question is can the HOA change the public nature
of the roads with only a 50% plus one vote. I would seem to me that since they have been
open to the public for so long it would take a 100% vote of the property owners to make a
change to the plats. This move would drastically change the rights of property owners.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Jim,

Now I'm really confused!!

In your original message you said the HOA wants to change the roads from public to private. Now you say the roads ARE owned by the HOA but have been declared public access. So which is it -- are the roads public or private? I think we need a little more background info. Perhaps start with an explanation of the 35 acre exemption.

Thanks!
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Jim,
Who pays to have work done on the roads? how are the roads platted on the Master Plan of the development, are there easements along this roads, who mows the area alongside the roads?

You state the HOA has declared the roads to be public at some prior court case. How can the HOA declare them to be public, are you implying they were platted as "private" at some point? I doubt the HOA can just say, ok, this land is public land subject to the control of the county without some court records being made. If the HOA has said, we will allow public access to these roads, then the HOA must own the roads.

Well Mary and I are both confused, which is hard to do, as she is confused a lot and I have to post and keep her straight. A burden I gladly accept as a service to my fellow man/woman.

If all this is simply a question of how the HOA can restrict passage on these roads and they own the land and maintain the roads., I would assume you need to go to the county and find out how you do this for these particular roads.
I don't think it is solely the vote of anyone that will determine if this can be done. I would imagine there may be right aways involved and it doesn't make any difference what you do, those restrictions will stand. First establish that you all do indeed own the properties, have deeds to prove it, have county approval to do what you want to do, and abide by State law on how you declare the land to be private, if it is public.

If you can do it or declare it or re-instate it or change anything is certainly a call for the county to make and a very good (read expensive) lawyer to prepare and process. Let me ask you this: Can your HOA build a fence all the way around your property as deeded, and put in security gates?
JerrellC (Florida)
Posts: 83
Posted:
Jim you say the roads on the plat was never dedicated or accepted by the county as public roads. I wonder why the HOA would want to have the roads as private because of the additional liability for a private road, additional expense for insurance, and additional tax on the land if the road becomes private. Do you want to put in gates to establish a gated community? Also it has been open for over twenty years. That is the period for a prescriptive road right of way in most states as it is in Florida. Florida also has a law where the road can be established as a public road after four years if it is maintained and mapped by a survey and by resolution the governmental agency (city,county,or state) can proclaim it as a public road to the extent of the maintained right of way. I don't remember the specific statuate but I have seen the statuate used with a map drawn showing the road in two different counties. This is one way these agencies establish a public road without having to pay compensation to the land owner when a road is being widened. These lots you speaking of also seem to be extreamly large. Do these lots have a landing strip for small aircraft incorporated with the lots? there is a development in palm beach county Florida that does have this arrangement in their plat but the lots are only about 2 1/2 acres each. Just as a point of information. JerrellC
JimR14 (Colorado)
Posts: 10
Posted:
First off thanks for all the help here. The roads are owned by the HOA and maintained by the
HOA. The plat though states the roads are for public access. In a lawsuit concerning an
easement, a District Court Judge ruled that the roads are open to public access enven though
the HOA owns the roads. Now the HOA it seems, has decided to ignore the Judge and they
are having a vote (property owners) to have the wording on the plats changed as I have described
above. They are trying to do this with a 50% vote plus one. I believe ALL property owners would
have to vote to change the plat wording not 50%. Hope this clarifies somewhat.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Jim, Why would anyone think this would override a Court decision? I think changing the wording on the plat will be meaningless even if 100% of the owners approve.
JimR14 (Colorado)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Thanks Roger. I agree. But it was my thought that the ONLY possible way to change it
would be for ALL the property owners to agree. Not 50%
JerrellC (Florida)
Posts: 83
Posted:
Jim I agree with Roger since the court has proclaimed the roads as public then they are public. The origional plat may have language stating that the roads are for the public and an exceptance of the plat by the county. Generally most states and courts accept the terminology roads shown on the plat are public means they are in fact dedicated to the public in the fee. But there has been cases exactly the opposite meaning that the roads are an easement subject to public to use them. We had a case in Dade County, Florida where the county passed a resolution to accept the roads as being dedicated where the plats did not specifically state the roads are dedicated to the public. This was for very old plats from the 1800's to the 1960's. Most counties in Florida now require a dedication statment and an acceptance by the governmental body. As for reverting back to a private road the HOA will probably have to a petition for all the people that uses the road and also the county would have to accept it as a private road. This would probably have to be in a replat proceedure with a map drawn by a surveyor to be presented to the county. You would also have to get clarification to the title of underlining bed of the road from a land title company. This is similar to a road closing proceedure. I still don't understand why the HOA would like to undertake the additional expense and liability of owning the road. JerrellC, A retired former Florida Surveyor and I also worked in a title insurance company.
JimR14 (Colorado)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Jerrell,

I contacted the county zoning and planning and this was there response:

"That subdivision is a 35 acre sub which was not signed off by the County Commissioners so that means that we have no jurisdiction over it. This is a civil matter that we can’t do anything about. It might be in your best interest to contact your attorney."

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Robert,

You know Jim is rather new here, so be careful when you "jokingly" say I am confused a lot and you have to keep me straight. Methinks it may be the other way around! You devil!!
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Jim,

Two questions, if I may.

1) What reason did the judge give for his decision?

2) What is a "35 acre sub" and why wasn't it approved by the Co Commissioneers?
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Jim,
Mary is right, she has to keep me straight. I jokingly said she was confused, I confess that was wrong, I should have gotten serious and told you the truth.............she is perfect. The "devil" made me do that.

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
OOOOOOOOOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPs ,,,:o,:0,,;)
JimR14 (Colorado)
Posts: 10
Posted:
The Judge said the roads are open to the public because 1) The HOA admitted in a response
to a summary judgement that the roads are and have been open to public access, 2) the plat
stated the roads are for public access and 3) the is nothing in the covenants stating the
roads are private. The appealate court affirmed the decision.

In Colorado there is a 35 acre subdivision exemption. If all lots are 35 acres or more
when forming a new subdivision you don't have to have the county's approval.

As I stated above the Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed all of the district courts decisions.
It appears the HOA is acting against the courts rulings to me. But what do I know. Thats
why I am here asking.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Jim,
I hope your HOA has a good lawyer. I hope what they are trying to do is doable with 51% or any other %. Back to I hope they have a good lawyer. I would absolutely demand that your HOA present your "Good Lawyers" case to your membership and explain what is going on. Without that I would object strenuously to any attempt to involve the membership. I doubt the board has the authority to allocate funds to pursue something that is not open and clear to the membership, for the Board to declare the Board has decided is not enough with the information provided here.
JimR14 (Colorado)
Posts: 10
Posted:
I believe what the board has in mind is to change the plat dedication and then go back
and say that this is a new standard as the roads are now private and all that has happened before
is not grandfathered. In effect they are trying to wipe out 3 years of litigation that they
came out on the wrong side. Dangerous path in my opinion.
JerrellC (Florida)
Posts: 83
Posted:
JimR14 In Florida when a road is a public road and the owners want the roads to be established as private, there is a road closing proceedure you have to go thru as I said in my previous statment to you. In Florida there is a statuate that deal in traffic on roads(chapter 316) and road closings (chapter316.00825) it is quite involved. One note to mention there's no fewer than 4/5 of all the owners of record in the subdivision have consented in wtiting to the abandonment and simultaneous conveyance to the homeowners association.They also have to accept all the maintainence involved in the upkeep of the road. I don't know what your state says but as I said in my previous reply to you there is additional liability that the association will incur. Which brings me back to mine and Mary's origional question. Why does the HOA want to make the roads private? Do you want to make it a gated community after 23 years as a public road??? JerrellC Florida
JimR14 (Colorado)
Posts: 10
Posted:
For the HOA it is mostly a power play by the board. No idea of their plans. It is the
good ol boy board that runs the HOA and they don't disclose much. They have never disclosed
that they lost the lawsuit and appeal (which they started). They just take the money out of the
HOA funds. Probably in the range of $60k by now.
JerrellC (Florida)
Posts: 83
Posted:
JimR14 It sounds like your board is running wild spending you association's funds. I think it's time you people should start asking some questions on what is the board's real purpose. It sounds like they have blown a lot of your money without explaining what their real intentions are. It also sounds like they have received some bad legal advice from their attorney who may not be knowledgable in roads and easement rights. You need an attorney who has experience in all types of land laws. (Platting,replatting,vacations,zoining,prescriptive road right of ways,reservations, etc) JerrellC (Florida retired surveyor, engineer, and land title worker)
JerrellC (Florida)
Posts: 83
Posted:
jimR14 I think you may be right. I think it may be time to look into recalling your board. It's quite a proceedure but it may be your only recourse to stop the spending that's going on with your board. JerrellC
JimR14 (Colorado)
Posts: 10
Posted:
I agree completely. I believe their attorney is giving bad advise and milking the situation. Thanks again for everyones opinion.
JerrellC (Florida)
Posts: 83
Posted:
Jimr14 I agree with Robert everything the board propose's should be clear to all the members with everything they plan backed up with a thorough study costs, etc and voted on by the membership. You don't want to needlessly spend money especially to attorney's. Some of them will bleed you dry if you let them.jerrellC
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Jim,

IMO, a much better plan would be to pay heed to the judge's ruling and just let the county start maintaining the "public" roads. Perhaps the roads should not have been deemed to be private all these years. Frankly, public roads are much less costly than private roads.

Having said that, if your BOD is adamant in fighting this, IMO they really need to find a new attorney; one not associated with the case that they lost. Afterall, he doesn't have a very good track record!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • βœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • βœ“ Share your experience
  • βœ“ Get expert advice
  • βœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here