💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DianeW (Maryland)
Posts: 147
Posted:
Our annual meeting is tomorrow. Today someone mentioned that proxies do not count towards establishing a quorum and that they only count towards voting issues. We sent out a proxy to be returned if one was unable to attend the meeting and think we have enough proxies to hold our meeting tomorrow with the number of attendees expected.

What is the correct thought on this?
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Diane,

More often than not, proxies can be used to count toward the quorum. Your bylaws and/or articles of inc. should give you the answer. Mine say (under "quorum"), "The presence, either in person or by proxy, of the Members holding a majority of the votes. . .".

BTW, the only FL state statutes of help is 720.306(1)(a) which states a member voting ". . .in person or by proxy. . .".
DianeW (Maryland)
Posts: 147
Posted:
We just adopted bylaws a little less than a year ago and our bylaws are vague in that area, among others. We will need to do some tweaking. Thanks. We just want to be sure we are operating properly.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Who was the "someone" and can you ask that "someone" to point to where he/she is getting his/her information?

I would find it highly unusual that proxies would not be allowed for quorum.

BB5 (Missouri)
Posts: 145
Posted:
Check out Roberts Rules of Order according to them a proxy does not count toward a quorum only those present at the meeting (unless of course your by-laws say differently).
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
BB5,

If the OP's gov docs do not require Robert's Rules to be used then it doesn't matter what they say. Gov docs and state law rule.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

BB5,

Florida Statutes on Proxy use overrides RRoO. Those Statutes must be followed and the governing documents will state how and what the proxy must be used for. The gov. docs may also say that proxies may not be used.
DianeW (Maryland)
Posts: 147
Posted:
Meeting accomplished but question still remains for next year. Our bylaws read similar to the FL state statutes in that a person may vote in person or proxy but under quorum, our bylaws read: "The percentage of voting interests required to constitute a quorum shall be 30% of the total voting interests. If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the majority of the members represented at the meeting in person, or by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter, shall be the act of the members unless otherwise provided by law or these bylaws." We interpret "voting interests" to be eligible voters.

We either need to lower the % required in our bylaws or put in that proxies can be used to establish a quorum. That seems to be what I am hearing from everyone. And we do not have to follow RRoO. That is actually how the issue came to the forefront initially.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Diane,

In reading the section of your bylaws that you posted, proxies CAN be used to count toward the quorum. The quorum requirement is 30% of the "voting interests" who shall cast their vote in person or by proxy. If proxies are counted toward the vote then they must be counted toward the quorum, IMO.

If the required % of members voting was meant to eliminate those members NOT in good standing, it would say a % of the "eligible" members. But, when it says a % of the "voting interests" that definitely means all the members of the assn.

Remember that if you change the quorum requirements you will be drastically cutting the number of members it takes to elect the board members and anything else that the quorum is for. For example, if there are 100 members in your assn, the quorum is 30% with a majority vote to pass an issue, that means only 16 members (16%) could effectively elect the board or pass an amendment to your community documents. 30% x 100 = 30 x 50% + 1 = 16 That, in itself, is rather low; however it will be even lower if you change that quorum requirement to 20%, which would mean only 11 members (11%). 20% x 100 = 20 x 50% + 1 = 11 Just some food for thought about reducing the quorum requirement and as long as proxies can count toward the quorum there shouldn't be a problem. However, if the BOD is insistent that it doesn't then I would definitely recommend amending the bylaws to state that proxies do count toward a quorum instead of changing the quorum requirement. I've always been of the opinion that it should take at least a majority vote of the members to amend the community documents.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:


Diane,

I agree with Mary in her interpretation of your By-Law. It is written to be confusing but the use of proxy and quorum are in the same sentence. I see it as proxies presented at the meeting count towards the quorum. A proxy is like having an invisable member present at the meeting. He is there in paper form only.

"If a quorum is present, the affirmative vote of the majority of the members represented at the meeting in person, ((OR BY PROXY) and entitled to vote on the matter, shall be the act of the members unless otherwise provided by law or these bylaws."
DianeW (Maryland)
Posts: 147
Posted:
Thank you Mary. So a quorum would be established by 30% of the "voting interests". In our case 147 lots=44 in attendance by person or proxy. We have one individual holding 45 lots out of the 147 that is ineligible to vote because of failure to remain current on dues. So his proxies may be used to establish a quorum but he may not vote on issues. So when voting occurs, the majority of the remaining eligible members determine the outcome. Am I understanding correctly here?
DianeW (Maryland)
Posts: 147
Posted:
And thank you Donna as well. I was typing when you sent your reply and missed it till after I hit send.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Diane,

It depends upon what your docs say about voting -- you only posted the quorum requirements. If it says "all members eligible to vote" then, yes that would only be those members who are in good standing.

Wow! Who is this person who can afford to buy 45 lots but can't afford to pay the assessments on them? Hope you're going after him!
DianeW (Maryland)
Posts: 147
Posted:
Voting is allowed by all eligible members including votes by voice, written ballot, general or limited proxy. Eligible members are members current with paymet of all dues and special assessments. "All votes of members in good standing at meetings shall be subject to the quorum requirements of these bylaws." Voting is not allowed for lots determined to be unbuildable due to local or state laws.

The developer still owns these 45 lots and has owned them for an eternity. He had to turn the control over to the Association when 60% of the lots were sold which happened right before the real estate market, and our area, went south. He officially turned over control at our Annual Meeting in 2006. Since that time he has sent us payments but not enough to cover all 45 lots. We have been allocating the monies equally among all lots which leaves him in arrears on all 45 lots because his payments do not specify which lots he is submitting payments for. He has failed to communicate with us regarding any matters and continues to ignore us and our lawyers. We have placed liens on 15 of his most valuable properties. The remaining have little value due to wetlands issues which he has failed to provide confirmation of as well. Until we receive confirmation the lots are unbuildable, we must continue to bill him which is wasting a lot of time and money.

We just adopted bylaws in 2009 and are learning our way through all this. This website is a wonderful place for me to learn. Thank you all.
DianeW (Maryland)
Posts: 147
Posted:
And our lawyer has sent an intent to foreclose letter on the 15 lots currently having liens. The developer has 10 more days left on the 45 day letter.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here