Quote:
Posted By RogerB on 01/21/2010 9:14 AM
Posted By DanielH1 on 01/20/2010 1:47 PM
I cannot comment on anything but to say that the inspections probably aren't worth paying extra for. Companies will be happy to charge you for them and then not do them or pretend not to see issues.
For one single family association we manage our primary responsibility is Covenant enforcement and inspections are critical. And how about when the common area consists of everything except the inside of the Units? Who inspects to determine what and when to make repairs and upgrades?
I think most would agree that inspections are critical in these cases.
Roger,
Inspections that look at the property for soundness of repair are certainly worthwhile and critical. I believe that an inspection of this type done annually or semi-annual is sufficient to determine soundness of repair.
Inspections of twice a month, in my opinion, are solely for the purpose of enforcement of rules (parking, storage of personal property, etc.). Yes, I agree that the rules/covenants need to be enforced and inspections are one way of verifying compliance -- the method used to verify compliance and how that method is applied may cause issues. They did in my Association due to the third party harping on every little violation, like a tricycle left outside overnight (once vs. repeatedly), for the perceived purpose of justifying their job.
Since the original poster stated they were looking for twice a month inspections, I cautioned to be careful what they wish for. I also agree with Daniel, that the additional cost might not be worth the animosity it can cause if performed improperly.
Tim