๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BettyO1 (California)
Posts: 104
Posted:
When there are issues with the board on election process (such as with proxies, ballots, inspectors, etc), how can it be challenged and election possibly voided - writing the board (likely to ignore challenge), small claims court, other courts (which?), hire legal help or other alternatives? In other words, what are way ways to resolve issue in CA in order of increasing leverage/severity?
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Civil Code ยง1363.09. Civil Action for Violations

(a) A member of an association may bring a civil action for declaratory or equitable relief for a violation of this article by an association of which he or she is a member, including, but not limited to, injunctive relief, restitution, or a combination thereof, within one year of the date the cause of action accrues. Upon a finding that the election procedures of this article, or the adoption of and adherence to rules provided by Article 4 (commencing with Section 1357.100) of Chapter 2, were not followed, a court may void any results of the election.

(b) A member who prevails in a civil action to enforce his or her rights pursuant to this article shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, and the court may impose a civil penalty of up to five hundred dollars ($500) for each violation, except that each identical violation shall be subject to only one penalty if the violation affects each member of the association equally. A prevailing association shall not recover any costs, unless the court finds the action to be frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation.

(c) A cause of action under Section 1363.03 with respect to access to association resources by a candidate or member advocating a point of view, the receipt of a ballot by a member, or the counting, tabulation, or reporting of, or access to, ballots for inspection and review after tabulation may be brought in small claims court if the amount of the demand does not exceed the jurisdiction of that court.

Corporations Code ยง7616. Action to Determine Validity of Election

(a) Upon the filing of an action therefor by any director or member or by any person who had the right to vote in the election at issue, the superior court of the proper county shall determine the validity of any election or appointment of any director of any corporation.

(b) In the case of a corporation holding assets in charitable trust, any person bringing an action under this section shall give notice of the action to the Attorney General, who may intervene.

(c) Upon the filing of the complaint, and before any further proceedings are had, the court shall enter an order fixing a date for the hearing, which shall be within five days unless for good cause shown a later date is fixed, and requiring notice of the date for the hearing and a copy of the complaint to be served upon the corporation and upon the person whose purported election or appointment is questioned and upon any person (other than the plaintiff) whom the plaintiff alleges to have been elected or appointed, in the manner in which a summons is required to be served, or, if the court so directs, by registered mail; and the court may make such further requirements as to notice as appear to be proper under the circumstances.

(d) The court, consistent with the provisions of this part and in conformity with the articles and bylaws to the extent feasible, may determine the person entitled to the office of director or may order a new election to be held or appointment to be made, may determine the validity, effectiveness and construction of voting agreements and voting trusts, the validity of the issuance of memberships and the right of persons to vote and may direct such other relief as may be just and proper.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
The time to challenge the procedure for an election is as close to the event as possible, perferably right at the meeting. Since the election should have a "teller" or group of people who are validating the process, including verifying the voters, counting votes, etc. etc. - that's who answers the questions at that time. Hopefully, the ballots have been saved.

If circumstances are revealed later (such as suspicions of election fraud) you can call a Point of Order and challenge the election results at the meeting closest to the election. State your case. Don't be surprised if the chair refers you to another person to go over the results. Most likely the board will not go into election processes at a regular meeting, but will give this "mess" to someone to sort out with you.

The board is obligated to get back to you with a report or rebuttal to you - all this should be in the minutes.
SusanS9 (California)
Posts: 56
Posted:
If there are problems with equal access to media at start of election, ie campaign inequities, challenge it immediately by writing to board or at regular meeting? What would happen to election?
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BettyO1 on 11/12/2009 8:23 PM
When there are issues with the board on election process (such as with proxies, ballots, inspectors, etc), how can it be challenged and election possibly voided - writing the board (likely to ignore challenge), small claims court, other courts (which?), hire legal help or other alternatives? In other words, what are way ways to resolve issue in CA in order of increasing leverage/severity?

My recommendation is to advise the Board in advance of the election on proper procedures to use. Have you considered volunteering to be on the nominating committee and/or the tellers committee?
SusanS9 (California)
Posts: 56
Posted:
Election is underway.
SusanS9 (California)
Posts: 56
Posted:
What possible action would there be that would void the election, for a new start?
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SusanS9 on 11/13/2009 8:48 AM
What possible action would there be that would void the election, for a new start?

It's a crap shoot, what is egregious enough for one judge to stop or overturn an election, isn't enough to make another judge blink. Note the statutes say they may do this or that not that they must. There was a posting here a week or so ago of a judge who stopped an election because the HOA prohibited a member from nominating themselves.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Some reasons for declaring an election null and void:
a quorum not established for the meeting
unintelligible ballots
illegal votes cas by legal voters
lack of notice of election to members

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here