💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

HaroldS (Arizona)
Posts: 906
Posted:
A local HOA says they do a complainance review of a property when it goes up for sale. (Is that SOP?) Before this owner can sell, they are attempting to force him to remove a sidewalk running from the driveway to the back yard, that he says was installed by the previous owner. (We're talking 7-8 years ago.) The HOA will not admit they were either never given or have lost the ARC files from when the Builder controlled the HOA, but that fact is known by a few people, so they have no way of knowing if it had been approved by the builder. Nevertheless, they want him to tear out that sidewalk. He refuses and says it is the HOA's problem to prove it was never approved and since they lost those files, there is no way they can be certain that it had not been approved by the builder.
Your thoughts, please on this situation. And do other HOAs do a complainance review when a property goes up for sale? Harold
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Harold, I believe the HOA is not acting in good faith. If the sidewalk has been there 7 years without notifying the owner of a violation then it would be ridiculous to try to enforce it now. Doubt any judge would find against the owner plus if suit prevented a sale the HOA could be counter sued and probably the owner would win.

Compliance review before a sale is a terrible policy IMO. Compliance reviews should be done on a continuous period basis.
HaroldS (Arizona)
Posts: 906
Posted:
Thanks Roger. I agree. What is your feeling about lost ARC files? Who has the burden of proof that permission was ever granted or not? Especially for a second owner who probably doesn't have the original documents either. I'm thinking now that it is a good idea to give your HOA file to a new owner, but I wonder how many people do that. Harold
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
In the US (except for Patriot Act, and certain RICO laws), the accuser bears the burden of proof.

So, if the HOA makes the claim, then they must prove.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Harold, it is my understanding that in Colorado if a modification has been known for over 1 year the association would lose at court. However, I have no knowledge of an appealate court case which confirms this. ARC files are often misplaced or lost when homeowners handle ARC matters. As an owner I think it is best to keep all approvals in case the association challenges a change since their records can be misplaced or lost.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here