💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
I was wondering what people's opinions are of alcohol being served at HOA board meetings.

Obviously nobody would support a wild drunkfest, but what about one or two glasses of wine?

My opinion is that there should be no consumption at all during an HOA board meeting. It is just not "professional," and to me, despite being a volunteer board, and certain level of professionalism is required.

My wife thinks I am crazy and that there is nothing wrong with a glass or two of wine being served.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
I wouldn't just from the liability issue; if a BOD member gets stopped for DUI or has an accident on the way home the Association could come under fire. Even if they ultimately prevail it could be costly. Even in different social clubs I have been member to and regularly serve alcohol (have permit to serve) it was never served during a meeting.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:


ABSOLUTELY NOT!!1 IF THE bOARD WANTS TO ENJOY ALCOHOL AFTER THE MEETING IN AN INFORMAL SETTING, THEN YES BUT DURING A MEETING? THAT'S A FIRESTORM WAITING TO EXPLODE. You must have some non drinking members and for them to see their Board , even sipping wine, is fuel for them. It's not professional not Kosher and just basically not acceptable
TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
I have to concur. While I'm sure you're all adults, (etcetera, etcetera), it just looks inappropriate.

Why take a chance? Meet at a local bar after the meeting, or at someone's house... Don't make the association liable.

JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
I very rarely drink (though I have no moral issues - just don't like the taste or the side effects).

I am newly elected to our board and was surprised to see wine being served at each board meeting we have had. If I found out a company that I am invested in serves alcohol during board meetings, I would be outraged - the same should hold true for an HOA board meeting in my opinion. All the same reasons apply.
JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
I should add that board meetings are held at the private homes of the board members. I don't think that has any bearing though.
TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
You may have an uphill battle here... Something along the lines of ..."But we've always done it this way...".

Approach it from different angles...Just some suggestions...

- Liability - what if someone gets in an accident on the way home? Maybe your BOD all live in your association now, but that will not always be the case.

- Financial - does the BOD pay for the alcohol? If so, that MUST stop ASAP. If the association pays, then I want to move there, because you guys are obviously rich!

- Setting the tone - shouldn't BOD meetings be a time when your BOD is exercising its fiscal responsibility to the association? Is that entirely possible while getting a bit of a buzz? Fun can be had, but...not too much fun! (And if you're going to my BOD meetings...NO FUN AT ALL!)

Finally...maybe your BOD meetings should be moved. Do you have a common building/rec center? Coffee Shop? Diner? Is there a public library nearby? My library offers meeting rooms at no charge to non-profit organizations.

I can assure you that the BOD members of most Fortune 500 companies would NOT serve alcohol DURING a meeting. I'm sure the champagne flows afterwards, but NOT DURING.
LarryM3 (California)
Posts: 37
Posted:
Although it is a bad idea, there have been meetings that I sure could have used a drink !!!!
Larry
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Larry's,
Always a bad idea to have BOD meetings a private home. I would not attend nor would I attend if alcohol is served. Personally I have good reasons, publicly, I think it shows lack of maturity and consideration. Now if you have a HOA that requires owners to drink, I wish you luck. Chances are you are going to have to face the fact someone is going to sue your butt at some point. Do they drink at your city Fathers Meeting? Would you condone your church elders spending your tithe's all the while hoisting a few. No difference. It is an immature action, not a mature action.
JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TracieS on 09/28/2009 1:33 PM
You may have an uphill battle here... Something along the lines of ..."But we've always done it this way...".

That will be the main argument

Quote:

- Liability - what if someone gets in an accident on the way home? Maybe your BOD all live in your association now, but that will not always be the case.

Agreed

Quote:

- Financial - does the BOD pay for the alcohol? If so, that MUST stop ASAP. If the association pays, then I want to move there, because you guys are obviously rich!

No "refreshments" are paid for with HOA funds - always by the host of the meeting.

Quote:

- Setting the tone - shouldn't BOD meetings be a time when your BOD is exercising its fiscal responsibility to the association? Is that entirely possible while getting a bit of a buzz? Fun can be had, but...not too much fun! (And if you're going to my BOD meetings...NO FUN AT ALL!)

Agreed
Quote:

Finally...maybe your BOD meetings should be moved. Do you have a common building/rec center? Coffee Shop? Diner? Is there a public library nearby? My library offers meeting rooms at no charge to non-profit organizations.

What are the main reasons that meetings should not be at private homes? To me it kind of has an element of covertness that I don't think an HOA board should have.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
an HOA is a business.
Board members are business people, and should act like same.
My company currently has a policy forbidding use of alcohol at business meetings or funtions, EXCEPT, social funtions.

a board meeting is a BUSINESS meeting, not a social meeting.

do board business. adjourn the meeting. then drink.

TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
You hit the nail right on the head. In associations, there are always going to be "cliques". If the meeting is held at the home of one "clique" person, the other ones might not feel welcome.

Some questions for when a meeting would be held in a private home:
Is there appropriate, business-like seating?
Are there a lot of distractions (TV, kids, pets)?
Are there pets in the home (allergies)?
Would guests need to take off their shoes?
Is the home a smoker's home?
Will alcohol be served?

Any "yes" in the above (except for appropriate seating), for me, would make me NOT attend the meeting. Too informal...too much like an informal get-together.

Sounds like you've got a good head on your shoulders, Joel, and I think you're in the right to try and raise the level of professionalism currently exhibited by your BOD.

Also...as someone else on this board says...just because "we've been doing it that way for years" does NOT make it right (acceptable/legal/moral/etc).

When our association moved meetings from a private home (outside of our association no less!) to the library, attendance WENT UP! Move your meetings to the library, and the alcohol issue becomes moot.
GordonD1 (California)
Posts: 131
Posted:
I agree. ABSOLUTELY NOT. No alcohol at board meeting. Board meetings should not be conducted in private homes.

Respectfully,

Gordon
AnnaD2 (Florida)
Posts: 960
Posted:
Wow! Let me give you a background of MY association.

Our original board (after takeover from the developer) was comprised of ALL drunks. Low-class, scumb-bag people. It was the NORM for all the board members to conduct meetings after they'd gotten home from work and "had a few". That was before the "sober" people got on board and realized that a bunch of drunks were running the association.

It took YEARS to weed out those people. The last guy to be on the board was a low-life scum bag who missed 75% of the meetings because by the time the 7:00 meeting rolled around he was too "sick" to show up....because he'd gotten home from work at 3:00 in the afternoon and started popping beers as soon as he got home.

I (personally) have cocktails every day and being on the board has proven to me how important it is to NOT mix the two!!! There are times to "relax" and times to stay "focused"....and board meeting are not the time to intermix the two. The two things need to stay seperate.

Board meeting....socializing. NOT in the same time frame.

Please don't call me LUSH....I'm not. I just know how to relax...on my OWN time....and how to devote other time to this association.
JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
OK - I need to show this to my wife. By my count it is zero for, eight against - and for the exact reason I suggested.

It is very rare that I am proven to be right, so just so there can be no doubt in her mind anyone that thinks alcohol can be served please speak up.....
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Okay, then, I'll be the odd gal out.

A single glass of wine or even two is not that big a deal, and the fact that the meetings are held in director's homes is also no big deal. I hardly consider it rising to the level of cliques.

For many years we held the board meetings in directors' homes, rotating each month from one director to the next on the list.

Most of the meetings, no, I take that back, all of the meetings took place after work and after dinner.

They lasted for about an hour, and there's not a lot of wine slugging back in about an hour.

Depending on who was hosting for that month, wine might be available, soft drinks, crackers cheese, brownies, cookies, fresh fruit, cheesecakes. . .hmmmmm now I kinda miss those meetings! We hold them now in a local government center who provides the meeting room free of charge. We switched because of continuity between successive administrations, more than anything. And the government center does not allow any food or beverages in the rooms after 6:00 pm (because the facilities maintenance staff is gone and won't be able to clean up in case there is an accident).

We are all adults, wine is an adult beverage, and I recall a time when lunch meetings in the corporate world always included a martini or two. They were out of fashion for a decade or so, but I have seen them returning with wine at the lunch meetings.

I, personally, don't drink wine, so I would never partake. But I would hardly find offense or even unprofessionalism in my peers who do and did.

My only comment would be that I think it would be inappropriate for the HOA to pay for the wine.

JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
To me, making decisions with other people's money (because that is essentially what happens at most HOA meetings), is a huge responsibility. Quite often it is large amounts of money, and decisions can have long lasting consequences. Every effort should be made to insure that everyone making the decision is in sound state of mind.

Alcohol being consumed opens the door to question the state of mind of the board members making these decisions. You can end up with association members that have a grudge, or association members that are never happy with a board's decisions and if they catch wind of the fact that alcohol was served at these decision making times they will attack. Why even allow it to be a question? It is so easy to just not serve alcohol. It is much easier to defend yourself by saying that "NO alcohol was consumed" versus "alcohol was consumed, but not enough to impair anyone's judgment."
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
With all due respect: Hogwash.

One or two glasses of wine will hardly make one incapable of making "huge" decisions with other people's money.

Implying that one is no longer of "sound mind" or "impaired" after a glass of wine is just, well, hyperbole, in my opinion.

And our meetings generally cover considerably more pedestrian things than juggling huge amounts of "other people's money."

But even when making budget decisions, one or two glasses of wine is not an impairment.

But, again, we each have our opinions. I just wanted to make sure that mine was registered as well.

JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MicheleD on 09/29/2009 8:07 AM
With all due respect: Hogwash.

One or two glasses of wine will hardly make one incapable of making "huge" decisions with other people's money.

Implying that one is no longer of "sound mind" or "impaired" after a glass of wine is just, well, hyperbole, in my opinion.

And our meetings generally cover considerably more pedestrian things than juggling huge amounts of "other people's money."

But even when making budget decisions, one or two glasses of wine is not an impairment.

But, again, we each have our opinions. I just wanted to make sure that mine was registered as well.


How do I know that you did not have three glasses of wine? Do you keep track of the amount of wine consumed by each person there? How do I know that you are someone that never drinks, weighs 100lbs, and got caught up in the moment and had 2 BIG glasses of wine and got a buzz? How do I know you did not just come from a happy hour at work where you had 2 glasses of wine, and just had 2 more at the meeting? I know in our meetings, we have had some marathon sessions where people who only normally have one or two glasses have certainly had more.

There are a million and one hypothetical that you could come up with that are not even alcohol related (how do I know you did not get a good nights sleep the evening before?) but if you can eliminate anything related to alcohol impairment by something so easy/simple as not serving alcohol why not do it? Why let it be a question?
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Sorry, we are just going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

I can see you're pretty passionate about it by all the ridiculous scenarios you are dredging up.

How do we know that members aren't high on pot or even "prescription" drugs before they get to a meeting?

How do we know that a member isn't mentally ill?

I mean, there's only 5 of us sitting around the table. I think we would notice if someone were guzzling wine.

As I said, these are all adults. You can sit around and dream up all sorts of "what ifs," but for me it's not an issue if some of the members drink a glass or two of wine at the meeting.

You, it bothers.

Again, I don't drink wine so it doesn't matter to me one way or the other. I just don't see it as the scary looming disaster that you and others may.

EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Donna, You are so right. I don't even know why this question was posed. If a board member can't go for an hour or hour and a half meetng without drinking they may have a problem.
JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MicheleD on 09/29/2009 9:20 AM
Sorry, we are just going to have to agree to disagree on this one.

I can see you're pretty passionate about it by all the ridiculous scenarios you are dredging up.

How do we know that members aren't high on pot or even "prescription" drugs before they get to a meeting?

How do we know that a member isn't mentally ill?

I mean, there's only 5 of us sitting around the table. I think we would notice if someone were guzzling wine.

As I said, these are all adults. You can sit around and dream up all sorts of "what ifs," but for me it's not an issue if some of the members drink a glass or two of wine at the meeting.

You, it bothers.

Again, I don't drink wine so it doesn't matter to me one way or the other. I just don't see it as the scary looming disaster that you and others may.


I guess to me, and I tried to explain it in my last reply, the difference between alcohol impairment and all the other crazy hypothetical is that the question of alcohol impairment can be eliminated so easily - simply do not serve alcohol. All the other crazy hypotheticals...mental illness, drug impairment, sleep deprivation, etc. have no easy/feasible mechanism to eliminate them as questions.
AnneM2 (North Carolina)
Posts: 30
Posted:
If we're counting votes, I say 'no.' I'm from the days of dinasaurs - before computers - and I was an extremely fast and accurate touch typist on my IBM Selectric. One glass of wine and I could still type as fast but the accuracy plummeted. I don't think that one glass of wine should have clouded my judgment ... but then I wouldn't have thought it would affect my coordination either. But it did!
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Michelle,
A question? How did you get the authority to decree one or two glasses of wine is fine but anything over that isn't?

Are you saying you or anyone else can set a "drink standard" for association meetings.

Talk about hogwash!

I think the question we are trying to resolve is , Should alcohol be consumed at a business meeting of an association. There was no reference to setting a limit. So, your answer to the question is "yes", it should be allowed. Now if you want to settle how much should be allowed, isn't that a different question. It I am close to be correct, maybe you can suggest how you are going to set limitation, insure compliance and should it be included in the by-laws?
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Because I'm using common sense.

Our meetings aren't hours long. We're lucky if they last an hour.

One or two glasses of wine is a generally accepted amount as to whether there is "impairment."

Personally, as I said, I see no problem with it.

I'm only using the "one or two" glasses because that's what the discussion was about; that's what the original poster posited.

As I said, the members are adults, not likely college students, so the likelihood of "binge" drinking at a business meeting is minimal.

I have attended many business meetings over the years, not just HOA business meetings, where alcohol is served.

I just don't see it as a problem.

Others do.

Therefore, as is probably obvious, the board members themselves can make the determination for whether they can (or will) serve alcohol, and what, if any, limitation will be imposed.

In our meetings the answer is: If the host wants to make it available and if any directors care to partake, and the quantity is left to the adult consuming to make.

DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Ellen,

Funny, this is a discussion on whether alcohol should or should not be served at the Board meetings and see how quickly it turned into "how much can be consumed? Me, the tea toatler could have 1/2 glass of wine and be asleep at the wheel in a minute so how much should not be the issue but should it be allowed.

I cannot believe that anyone thinks that it is okay. Loss of professionalism is what I think it is. Wow!! Think of the Senate or House, openly having a mug on their desks. Not saying that they don't arrive there being already snockered but openly having booze? Na ah.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

I guess that there is another point to make here. This O.P states that the Board meetings are held at someones home. NO OPEN MEETING? That makes a difference in appearances to the membership.
GordonD1 (California)
Posts: 131
Posted:
Donna,

WELL SAID IT. THANKS
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Because the board meeting is held in a board member's home doesn't mean it isn't open to the members. My former assn always met in the board members' homes because there was no place else to meet. Because AZ has an open meeting law, the meetings were always noticed and any member who chose to attend could. There generally were about 6-7 regulars at each month's meeting. Refreshments were generally available, but never any alcohol.

Frankly, I think alcoholic beverages should be reserved for social gatherings. Board members drinking at a meeting with no one present but themselves is one thing, but quite another if members of the assn are also present. I think it would just open the door to all kinds of accusations about the board's abilities especially regarding a hot topic.
JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonnaS on 09/29/2009 12:39 PM

I guess that there is another point to make here. This O.P states that the Board meetings are held at someones home. NO OPEN MEETING? That makes a difference in appearances to the membership.

O.P. here - the meetings are at a private residence, but by state law they must be open to all association members. However, the fact that it is held at a private residence certainly does not convey that association members are welcome - and there never are any - I hate that. The last meeting that ever had a non-board member at was over a year ago, and it was me, before elected to the board, because I insisted that I had the right to show up and appeal a violation notice (which I did successfully). That was when I first saw that there was alcohol and was really surprised. I have since been elected to the board, and have attended all the meetings.

I just want to make it clear, that I am 99% certain that there has never been consumption of alcohol at one of our meeting that had any impact in terms of our board's judgment. They do a good job, and are quite professional at the meetings. I just think any type of consumption sends the wrong message, it allows the question to be asked by those not present whether board members were impaired, and probably most importantly, it requires no cost or effort not to have alcohol.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Joe,
I think we understand your position.

Generally, to hold meetings at a private residence is not a good idea. But before we cast doubt on your association, it would help to know a little history, and especially what your association is and how many members. For every rule there is an exception and it might work for your HOA.

In the end it is one of those things that may appear to be ok but over the long haul will prove a problem. Make sure your documents do not give some directions about where meeting are held and if you have a state open meeting law, check that out.

As you have seen here there are differing opinions about alcohol. One thing for sure if it is not served or allowed it won't ever be a problem for the Board to have to defend.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DonnaS on 09/29/2009 12:35 PM

I cannot believe that anyone thinks that it is okay. Loss of professionalism is what I think it is. Wow!! Think of the Senate or House, openly having a mug on their desks. Not saying that they don't arrive there being already snockered but openly having booze? Na ah.

Apples and oranges. HOAs aren't government institutions, or even quasi-government. They are corporations and the board meeting is just another business meeting.

I guess being from Bourbon Country I have a different perspective.

As I said, I've been to many business meetings where people drink alcohol. The meetings rarely last more than an hour and these are adults so there's no "guzzling."

We do not have "open meeting" laws here, so that's not an issue. And we always held our meetings, as I mentioned, at board members' homes, rotating it each month, several years ago.

Sometimes there would be other refreshments, whatever the host wanted to serve, which, on occasion included wine.

I know that there was a period where one of our board members always brought with him a can of beer. I think it was beer. Something called a "tall boy"? He was actually only on the board as long as it took to pass an amendment to allow sheds. But he would sip on his beer throughout the meeting. Usually the meeting was over before he was finished, so he sat on the porch and chatted til the beer was empty.

JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobertR1 on 09/29/2009 5:55 PM
Joe,
I think we understand your position.

Generally, to hold meetings at a private residence is not a good idea. But before we cast doubt on your association, it would help to know a little history, and especially what your association is and how many members. For every rule there is an exception and it might work for your HOA.

About 250 homes - Nine member board - Approx. 20 years old - meetings have always been in private homes - nothing in CCRs pertaining to where the meetings should be held

To me, they should be held in a public place like a library, church etc. Holding them in a public location encourages openess and participation from association members - that is a good thing to me. I am sure I am the only board member that feels this way.

Quote:

In the end it is one of those things that may appear to be ok but over the long haul will prove a problem. Make sure your documents do not give some directions about where meeting are held and if you have a state open meeting law, check that out.

There are no directions in the docs on meeting location. It IS a state law that meetings be open for all association members to attend.

Quote:

As you have seen here there are differing opinions about alcohol. One thing for sure if it is not served or allowed it won't ever be a problem for the Board to have to defend.

Absolutely.
RickW (Illinois)
Posts: 169
Posted:
This question seems to have struck a chord LOL

I am all for having a drink, in fact I have a glass of wine next to me as we speak (well there goes my credibility on any other post I might make tonight, LOL)

The fact does remain, if alcohol is served, it opens questions that might be difficult to answer or defend. Why any member of a board would put that upon themselves is beyond me. Seriously, I don't care how much or how little you enjoy a glass of wine or any other alcoholic beverage. I don't care if you have a half glass of wine or 5 during a meeting. But, to have any alcohol during a meeting just opens up liability and questions that one does not need to open.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Joe,
How do you all handle electronic transmission to your members if requested under your open meeting Law? How do you accommodate a handicapped person wanting to attend the meeting? How do you handle executive sessions, do you clear the house to insure confidentially?

IMHO.........bad idea, last resort only.

*************************
Rick,
I don't think there is any serious objection to people drinking, just don't do it on my nickle seems to be what is being said.

I am sure you were making light when you said your credibility would be questioned because you were posting while having a drink. I doubt that will happen but if you post you were having a drink and proceeded to post ridiculous or damning, or threatening or absurd thoughts, then folks might say, old Rick needs to post when the cap is on the bottle.

Now this brings up the fact we, as a people, are used to people drinking and have witnessed what happens when you drink, that a common reaction might be: Don't pay any attention, he is half snookered. Right or wrong, that is what we think and the same could be said if the Board makes a decision the owners don't like, the reaction might be: all they do at the BOD meeting is sit around and drink.
RickW (Illinois)
Posts: 169
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobertR1 on 09/29/2009 8:04 PM
Joe,
How do you all handle electronic transmission to your members if requested under your open meeting Law? How do you accommodate a handicapped person wanting to attend the meeting? How do you handle executive sessions, do you clear the house to insure confidentially?

IMHO.........bad idea, last resort only.

*************************
Rick,
I don't think there is any serious objection to people drinking, just don't do it on my nickle seems to be what is being said.

I am sure you were making light when you said your credibility would be questioned because you were posting while having a drink. I doubt that will happen but if you post you were having a drink and proceeded to post ridiculous or damning, or threatening or absurd thoughts, then folks might say, old Rick needs to post when the cap is on the bottle.

Now this brings up the fact we, as a people, are used to people drinking and have witnessed what happens when you drink, that a common reaction might be: Don't pay any attention, he is half snookered. Right or wrong, that is what we think and the same could be said if the Board makes a decision the owners don't like, the reaction might be: all they do at the BOD meeting is sit around and drink.

Robert,
You have stated exactly what I was trying to say...doesn't matter what the decision was that was made...it could be questioned...
I think I now go delete my last 4 posts...
JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobertR1 on 09/29/2009 8:04 PM
Joe,
How do you all handle electronic transmission to your members if requested under your open meeting Law? How do you accommodate a handicapped person wanting to attend the meeting? How do you handle executive sessions, do you clear the house to insure confidentially?

IMHO.........bad idea, last resort only.

Robert - you are preaching to the choir. As I have stated I am completely opposed to having the meetings in a private residence. Unfortunately, that makes the vote 8-1 to keep the meetings in a private residence. If I were to point out the issues you raise (which are ones I have already considered) the answer would be that they would prefer that association members do not attend and making it easier for them to attend would only encourage them to attend. It goes against everything that I believe but my say only counts for 1/9 of the opinion.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Yikes Joe,
One more post before bed.
Don't even think about taking this other than a constructive remark. Your elected position is not to serve the Board but the members. You represent all the members, you and your board members must protect the association above all else, even above the majority vote. Having meetings as you do is putting the association in harms way. Maybe you can't change the Boards mind, but you do not owe the Board your vote, make your exception at a Board Meeting, make it as a motion and try to get a discussion and vote on the subject. Make sure your voice is in the record and the vote is recorded. Maybe there is a way to get around this with your board because of personalities and you should try that, but bottom line, you are under the gun to protect the association. I expect you think you have to try, I agree and if you lose, you lose, but you will still be on the Board, tomorrow is another day and there will be a new fight to fight. Change never stops happening in an association, some good, some not.
JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
Do I get a prize if my first post ends up generating 3 pages of responses?

I will settle fine bottle of wine!
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JoelM1 on 09/29/2009 9:11 PM
Do I get a prize if my first post ends up generating 3 pages of responses?

I will settle fine bottle of wine!

Sorry no, I think six pages is the current record.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Joel,

Would that bottle of fine wine be served at a board meeting?
JoelM1 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 61
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaryA1 on 09/30/2009 6:40 AM
Joel,

Would that bottle of fine wine be served at a board meeting?

I don't know...alcohol at a board meeting seems wrong to me. I will start a new thread to see what others think.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Joel,
Don't even touch the computer Joel.
We have already gone from a glass or two of wine to a Bottle of fine wine.
Maybe if a five member board, one bottle or a nine member board two bottles.
Annual meeting time would require a Delivery of ten cases. Incidentally, it has not been raised, but if a Board member can consume wine at a members house, and may even be served the members wine, do the owners attending the meeting get free wine also?

We have a non-equity club owned by de3veloper, they have a club advisory board that has several non voting members as advisers. When you go to meeting you sit a far end of room and the meeting is conducted while they serve the head table lunch. Audience gets water with or without ice. So if you want to ask a question, you at times have to listen to someone talking with their mouth full.
I think is is strange and in a way humorous. :0
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
We need a new host. Our current host only offers water.

Seriously, we do meet in a home because that is what is available on a regular basis. (Well that and 9:00 am on Saturdays at the nearby library.) Trust me, I have looked and looked. A nearby golf course allows us to use their clubhouse but they close at sunset.

But back to the booze(wine), I would say that it would be better to not partake. But if the host does offer it, it should be offered to any non-members who do happen to show up.

By the way, nobody (other then the BOD) in our neighborhoods seem interested in attending our BOD meetings. In fact, with three positions open for election we had three candidates at our last meeting. And that was only after I pointed out that without a third candidate we were free to choose whom we wanted to fill the position.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Kirk,
You also have given one very good reason not to have meetings in houses.

I think as far as this site goes, it can be said we should avoid as much as possible meetings in the home and the same can be said about alcohol.

Just my eval from postings.

Wish I could help about apathy, other than to hang in there, times will change with a little push and interest.
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
I would love to not meet in a house. But we just don't have another place to meet that is close to the HOA itself.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Kirk,
Have you thought of a Church, School, Library, County or City building, Local Boys and Girls Club, Service organizations (American Legion,etc), private room at a restaurant, YMCA, lots of businesses have Meeting rooms, try a real estate office, private business. Would part of your reason for meeting in a home be because it is more convenient and that is the way it has always been done? It's a bad idea, but the decision is still left to the Board. The concern here is the Board may get into trouble they don't need to get into.

Just a suppose: If a judge had to access the functions of the Board and the Board had always met in a home and the meeting was conducted as a social affair with hosts serving whatever, that judge may be very critical of the Board and weight his judgment against the Board. Not saying it has happened, don't know, but, the Board would likely have to explain their past actions.

There are all kinds of different scenarios, as you well know, and it could be there is no other recourse in some instances. We have had a few associations as small as four members, so I think they have to make adjustments also.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
This all started with alcohol at meetings which is a no brainer. Anyone who cannot do without alcohol at a meeting lasting one to two hours should not be on the board.
AnnaD2 (Florida)
Posts: 960
Posted:
Ditto Ellen! I think the majority of people posting to the original question agree with you.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Anna, Ellen,

Add me to the list. Donna

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here