💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

ColleenF1 (Wisconsin)
Posts: 10
Posted:
New home owner & confused: I am in a condo home owners association in New Orleans, which adopted Roberts Rules of Order, with many changes taking place. Our condo's by-laws don't state what vote is needed to change rules only how the actual by-laws can be changed. Our by-laws, like most, say 2/3 for changing. Is it the same for rules as for by-laws if our by-laws don't actually specify what vote is needed for standing rule changes?

Also, can several rules be changed/amended with one vote or does each rule have to be voted on separately?

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Your question is so general, I am hesitant to say. (more details needed).
RONR talks about Standing Rules.

IN GENERAL , previous notice (if rrequired) and 2/3's vote

or

majority vote of the entire membership.

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
CollenF,
Robert's Rules is not part of your Documents, I'll bet. It is probably a good idea for the Board to decree that RRO should be used as a guideline for conducting meetings. RRO should never be used in any way to subvert your governing documents. It is a guideline at best, for HOA meetings.

Your Board can make rules and regulation that do not have to be approved by the membership. That can not make take any action that conflicts with your CC&R's without changing the documents, which requires owners approval. The Board manages day to day, they have to have some latitude and they are granted the authority through your documents.

You as an owner have the real responsibility of reading, understanding and taking action as directed by your documents. The Board is not the only responsible party in any association, the owners are equally responsible. In a condo, ALL have the prime responsibility of protecting the Real Property, that is what the owners own, along with the right to occupy a specific unit.

Good Boards will inform the council (owners) of rule changes beforehand, if possible, and they will also send to each owner a copy of any rule changes and yearly should distribute a clean Rules and regulations.

You catch on fast, you just need some more dedication to understand the process. Maybe you have a good Board Member that will guide you.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Robert pretty much summed it up nicely.

RULES (and regulations) are not to be confused with by-laws or CC&Rs. In may HOAs the board of directors can establish rules and regulations and often does not require a vote at all by the membership of the organization. Sometimes these are clarifications of the CC&Rs. Sometimes they address items the CC&Rs refer to but don't go into great deal about (for example, in ours, the CC&Rs require that all mailboxes be approved by the Architectural Committee for design and placement. The board made a "rule" that gives design specifications for the mailbox -- must be black, have a newspaper slot on the bottom, and made of steel, no brick, no plastic, etc)

The Roberts Rules of Order are not the same thing as "rules" by which your membership must abide.

The Roberts Rules of Order only address the hows of running the meetings, either board meetings or membership meetings.

Some governing documents require Roberts Rules of Order to be followed, many do not. If a board has adopted them, it can just as easily vote to discard them.

If you have access to your original governing documents, then it would probably be in your best interest to read them thoroughly (as boring and confusing as they can be!), and then read them AGAIN, this time underlining or highlighting certain parts.

If there are Rules and Regulations, it might also be a good idea to request a recent copy from your board.

Those probably change a bit more often than other governing documents since you are right that generally a larger portion of the entire membership must approve any changes (amendments) to bylaws or deed restrictions (CC&Rs).
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Colleen,

Robert and Michele did a very good job of explaining. I'll just address your parting question which I believe was not answered.

You asked: "Also, can several rules be changed/amended with one vote or does each rule have to be voted on separately?

I believe each amended rule, whether it be the board adopted rules, or the bylaws and/or CCR, should receive a separate vote. If all are voted on by one vote then all pass or all fail. By voting for each one, some may pass and some may fail. This is definitely the preferred way to obtain a required member vote. However, if the board is voting to amend some or all of the board adopted rules, they may choose to just conduct one vote.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Colleen you need to read all of the documents not just the by-laws. In ours the power to make rules is in the Declarations with the provision that they must be approved by 51% of the membership. Somewhere in the documents will be what powers the Board has including making rules.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
ColleenF1 (Wisconsin)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Our Articles of Incorporation read "These articles may be amended by resolution setting forth such amendments or amendments adopted at any meeting of the members by a vote of at least one-half of all the members of said corporation."

Then this Article was amended to state "These articles may be amended by a resolution setting forth such amendment or amendments adopted at any meeting of the members by a vote of at least 75%".

Our by-laws currently state 2/3.

Now I'm really confused.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Colleen, Articles of Incorporation, By-laws and CC&RS (deed restrictions) are not the same thing as Rules and Regulations that many boards are allowed to adopt.

Glen's still requires a membership vote to change their rules.

Ours do not. Nor do a good many of the associations in this area (they all pretty much pull from the same boilerplates!)

Amendments to the governing documents are not the same thing as changes or amendments to Rules & Regulations.

It might help us if you could let us know exactly which "rules" you think the board changed.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Michelle,
Our is apparently like yours. There is no member vote needed to change or add or delete a rule.

I would suggest if you have extensive or multiple changes to be made in your documents, that they be handled all at one time. We did this by a revision of our Entire documents. So now we are registered as the First amended documents.

I would be interested to know, in light of this thread, what this word "resolution" means. I am of the opinion that a "Resolution" does not necessarily require an amendment. The Board can resolve to: (as an example) Enforce the documents as written and will no longer allow for (say) pick ups parked on the sidewalk. I am not sure that the Board can resolve to change the documents........but I don't know and maybe it doesn't make a difference.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
CollenF,
Articles of Incorporation are probably State Statutes and are guidelines for all corporations licensed by the State.

Your Declaration and documents can be more severe than the states statute but not less severe. But, the association can amend their documents, they can not amend the states requirements.

It would take a good lawyer to figure out some of this technical stuff but what I stated will apply almost alsways.......IMO
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Robert,

IMO, a resolution is the same as a rule except that a resolution is a more formal way of stating a decision or expression of opinion regarding a particular matter. A resolution is full of "whereas'" and "wherefores" and is signed by the BOD. IMO, it just looks more legal! And, no, the board cannot resolve to change the docs, that would require a vote of the members. Just as a rule cannot be inconsistent with the gov docs; neither can a resolution.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ColleenF1 on 08/31/2009 9:14 AM
Our Articles of Incorporation read "These articles may be amended by resolution setting forth such amendments or amendments adopted at any meeting of the members by a vote of at least one-half of all the members of said corporation."

Then this Article was amended to state "These articles may be amended by a resolution setting forth such amendment or amendments adopted at any meeting of the members by a vote of at least 75%".

Our by-laws currently state 2/3.

Now I'm really confused.

Colleen,

Each govening document (articles of inc., bylaws and CCRs) should have a provision stating how that particular document can be amended. Usually the articles require a vote of the members to amend. The bylaws of many assn's can be amended by a vote of the BOD; however, some assn bylaws do require a vote of the members. The CCRs can only be amended by a vote of the members. Most assn rules can be amended by the board because they are adopted by the board w/o a vote of the members; however, as Glen has stated, there are some assn docs that may require the members to vote to adopt them which would mean the members would need to amend them. You need to read each of your gov docs to determine how they can be amended. Your CCRs should contain the provision regarding enacting rules.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
And . . she needs to tell us what rule she is talking about. Rule for what time the meeting starts? Pool rules? ARC rules? Parking rules? Sometimes the board charges a committee to set rules for its oversee.

The OP's question was just too vague.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Yes, Susan. I agree. I was attempting to get Colleen to reply to that as well.

WHAT are the rules or rule that is being talked about here?
ColleenF1 (Wisconsin)
Posts: 10
Posted:
We have our Articles of Incorporation, By-Laws, then our associations "Rules and Regulations". Our rules and regulations state such things as speed limit, pets not permitted in swimming area, parking, etc. but also boat and lake rights. Specifically the one in question is changing one of our rules and regulations that gave members permanent rights to a shore station/boating slip until the home changes owners TO taking away a member (who has two) shore station spots and basically stating that now those members do not have a right to two spots, they can now only have one.

My concern for these members is what are they to do with their boats, their shore stations, etc. Does an association have a right to take away something that was voted on as permanent? Basically they are making people lose their assets.

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Colleen,

Are you calling the CCRs (covenants) the rules and regulation? The title that would be on the document is: "Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions, Assessments, Charges, Servitudes, Liens, Reservations and Easements". The CCRs contain all the restrictions and to change them would require a vote of the members. I would think the rule you are talking about would be in the CCRs. If so, the board cannot amend this doc w/o a vote of the members.

IMO, if the shore station/boating slips are limited I see nothing wrong with limiting each member to one. Is it really fair for one member to have more than one and another member to not have one at all?
ColleenF1 (Wisconsin)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Apparently what the association is calling Rules and Regulations should be called CCR's.

Is it fair? Is it fair to be given these slips b/c at the time there was no wait list, have the owner go make the purchase of a boat and shore station, pay for dues, pay more for pier improvement (which just happened last year), be promised their will be no changes to boating assignments (stated when pier improvement was taking place), etc. There will never be enough slips for everyone in the association and not everyone wants one.

I'm not even one of the members with even one boat, and I still think this is wrong. Its fine moving forward--from now on all members can only have one boat slip, etc.--but to take away just doesn't seem right.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ColleenF1 on 09/01/2009 8:25 AM
Apparently what the association is calling Rules and Regulations should be called CCR's.

Is it fair? Is it fair to be given these slips b/c at the time there was no wait list, have the owner go make the purchase of a boat and shore station, pay for dues, pay more for pier improvement (which just happened last year), be promised their will be no changes to boating assignments (stated when pier improvement was taking place), etc. There will never be enough slips for everyone in the association and not everyone wants one.

I'm not even one of the members with even one boat, and I still think this is wrong. Its fine moving forward--from now on all members can only have one boat slip, etc.--but to take away just doesn't seem right.

First of all, we cannot continue this speculative conversation any further until we know exactly which area is being discussed, your deed restrictions (the "rules" that are registered with your deed) or the accompanying Rules and Regulations that boards typically have the ability to devise and amend without membership vote.

But to answer you SPECIFIC question above, yes, I think it's fair. No one made them go buy a boat.

If there are residents with 2 spots, when there is a wait list, how fair is that to everyone else?

There are lots of reasons why rules such as those can (and will) change over time. But if there is a need for more spots, it's ridiculous to think someone can hold onto TWO spots forever.

But again, your question on fairness is subjective. And that's my opinion
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Michele,
I think your position is subjectively fair.

If the Board has the authoirty by covenant of any kind to assigned the space they have the authority to take them away.

Our parking restrictions say one space per unit, all other spaces common. Over 27 years some end up with two. Now we are in process of abidding by covenants. Seems to wrok better if spaces are taken away upon sale of property and renumbered.

So far some threats of legal action, as far as I know no real legal action against board. Tough job, but Board decisions, if in documents. If not, write new covenants.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here