Quote:
Posted By DonnaS on 08/24/2009 5:06 PM
Margaret,
In my experience rewritting a set of documents, the Articles of Inc should contain how the Board numbers and term limints and percentage of votes for elections, etc. Then the Bylaws are a more explicit set of how to's for elections, term limits, etc. So in other words, to add to the bylaws, you will need to address the Articles as well. As long as you are getting a vote out for one item, it is totally easy to have them both done at the same time.
Our Articles don't say that much at all -- just the parameters of the HOA, its purposes, and membership. Several sections simply refer to the Bylaws and Declarations. These Articles of Incorporation specify a BoD of 3 Directors but specifically permit that to be changed by amendment of the Bylaws, and they contain nothing about terms, limits or voting details, other than cumulative voting is prohibited. So, although the Articles take precedence over the Bylaws and Declarations, there's not much there to conflict with those. I suspect this is the usual situation.
Quote:
Posted By MargaretA2 on 08/24/2009 5:10 PM
Thank you very much. Our CC&Rs say we must have 6 members on the board, President, Vice President, Secretary Treasurer and 3 directors. We believe that to mean that all 6 are "directors", 3 of which will be officers. It goes on to say that the board may elect officers in accordance with the Articles and By-laws as the same may be amended from time to time.
Ergo, I think amending the bylaws to allow for staggered terms is not inconsistent with the CC&Rs. BTW, the bylaws state that they may be amended or repealed and new bylaws adopted by a majority of the directors.
Your reading of the 3 Officers plus 3 [implied at-large] Directors seems reasonable to me, as does the Board electing the officers from among the Directors, but other things look a bit strange. Please, could you post-quote those provisions of the Bylaws, here?
If you amend your Bylaws to stagger terms, then I would also change the number from 6 to 5 or 7. A common and recommended practice is to have an odd number of members of any governing body, in order to reduce the likelihood of tie votes.