Quote:
Posted By YvonneA on 08/18/2009 4:25 PM
The way it has been done in the past is that every unit owner including the Pres, Secr, & VPres (the Board members)) are considered voting members & allowed to vote on issues & elections for Board Members.
This makes sense. This would be at a meeting of the Members -- a meeting of the Association to elect Directors.
Quote:
We barely have quorom sometimes for the meetings & wouldn't have it w/out all the Board Members present.
The Directors are (usually) also Members of the Association and also vote in such elections.
Quote:
We are incorporated & have 3 additional directors.
You could say that you have a Board of six Directors, of which three also serve as Officers of the Association. An even number such as six is unusual; are you sure it's not five or seven?
Quote:
Our by laws say each year the Board shall elect from it's members a President, Treasurer, & other such officers as the board shall see fit to elect.
It's clear that "the Board shall . . . elect" the officers. Do your Bylaws say that the Board shall elect from "its" members? That is poorly worded -- the Bylaws would be clearer if they used "Members" only to mean Members of the Association and always used "Directors" to mean members of the Board. (Our Bylaws use similar language in some places.)
Also, some Bylaws do not require officers to be Directors. Our Bylaws have the Board elect the officers (at the first Board meeting after the Directors are elected at the Annual Meeting of the Association; the President and VP must be Directors and can only hold one office, but the Secretary and Treasurer may be anyone and the same person may serve as both.
Quote:
We basically have the unit owners elect the Board here. About 10 out of 44 show up at the 4 meetings, usually the same 8 & a stragler.
So, you could have a tie for one of your Director seats, depending on how the Members' votes are to be counted.
When your Board meets, it should elect Officers according to the Bylaws. If you would like more comments on your Bylaws, could you quote directly from them, please -- give us the exact wording.
In any case, if you have a tie, then an expedient solution is to just have another vote until someone changes their mind. That should be especially easy with the small meetings that you describe. If you keep getting a tie, then you could "adjourn the meeting until [next week? next usual meeting time?]" and have another vote then. I don't see any problem with conducting your other business first, but I am not an expert in rules of order and parliamentary procedure.
Let us know if your lawyer has a different suggestion.