💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RandalR (Tennessee)
Posts: 98
Posted:
Recently attended a budget meeting with our Board about what to do about our seemingly never ending budget problems. Their plan was to turn the 44 homes that hadn't paid their 2008 & 2009 over to an attorney and let him seek a judgment against them. When we (illegally) transitioned from a voluntary to mandatory association there was a grandfather clause that prohibited the filing of liens against current owners for nonpayment of dues. This attorney was to get a judgment and pursue obtaining the judgment through every other means! Fortunately we convinced them that they would be opening a pandoras box as several residents were prepared to challenge them and the revised covenants in court.

I had an idea during the meeting that I'd like to run past you to see if any of you have addressed it with your HOA. Back at the January 2008 annual meeting the Board tried to get approval for them to lease our recreation area to the YMCA to get out from under the upkeep expenses. Fortunately we found out about it and managed to inform the neighborhood in time to stop them. It occurred to me that if they had already worked out the details on how they could let another entity come in and take over our rec area, why couldn't our neighborhood set up it's own LLC (or something similar) and let the HOA lease the pool to the LLC? If that could be done legally it could accomplish a lot! The rec area expenses could be removed from the HOA dues which would return the dues to a more reasonable amount. Since the rec area wouldn't be a part of our dues then membership should increase. The LLC could operate under a different tax structure and not jeopardize the nonprofit status of the HOA.

Anyone heard of an this arrangement like this before or know if it would be doable? Our pool is the better of the three in this township that sells outside memberships so I'm confident that we could attract enough outside members to make up for those households that would drop back to just the basic HOA fees.

Thanks,

Randal

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
So you are saying the pool would be open to the public? and expenses would be off-set by some kind of use charge to its customers/

Actually, the HOA could set this up right now. Revenues would stay close to the expenditures, so who uses the pool doesn't matter. But, you would have to consider liability, staff and insurance costs.

Why create a middle man.

Those HOAs that have a clubhouse open to the public would be a model for your structure.

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Randle depending on how your documents are worded, you probably cannot do something like this without: A - Getting enough signatures (100% in our case) to sell off an HOA asset. or B - Amending the documents to allow you to dispose of an asset which I'm betting would require 100% approval. All it would take is one homeowner to challenge this and you can probably plan to spend all of you time and HOA funds battling it out in court for the foreseeable future.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
PatrickH (California)
Posts: 204
Posted:
Hi Randal,

Instead of going through the cumbersome legal process of leasing the rec center to an LLC and opening it up to new members, why not just keep things as they are now and add some new members from the outsdie community? That process may take nothing more than a vote of approval from the current members, who may be glad to approve it to increase revenues.

Figure out how much the rec center costs each month per current member. use that figure as a guide for the fee for new members. If there are two other pools in the area that do the outside member thing, find out what they charge. Compare your fee to theirs, if the fees are comparable, you should be able to attract several new members, especially if your facility is nicer than theirs.

Keep in the mind the number of new potential members. If adding 10-20 new members helps the finances balance out and doesn't overwhelm the facility, it's a good idea. If you'd need 150 new members and that would overload the facility, then it's probably not a good idea.

Good Luck.

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Good constructive Posts folks.

You all have covered a lot.

OP sounds interested and constructive, would make a great volunteer for his community. Hint, hint!
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Randal,

On the surface, Patrick's suggestion to allow members of the outside community access to the pool may sound like a good idea; however, IMO, this income would not qualify as "exempt function income" and would be subject to federal tax. Depending upon how many people would want to join and what the fees would be may offset the tax obligation; then again, it may not.

IMO, the BOD should be looking for ways to attract the property owners who have not joined the mandatory HOA, instead they are just alienating them more by wanting to lien their property for delinquent assessments they aren't even subject to paying!! Certainly not a good thing. . . .
DonN (Michigan)
Posts: 357
Posted:
This is a slippery slope. As others have pointed out,the board likely does not have the authority to form a separate legal entity.

Creating a wholly-owned legal entity transfers some governance and management from the owners association (of which the owners are members) and another entity (of which the owners are not members). Money inevitably ends up being transferred between the two organizations. Separate accounting is required. Separate audits are required with consolidated financial statements.

To ensure that owners rights are not compromised, it is essential that the appropriate governing document for the subsidiary entity include a provision imposing all of the governing documents for the owners association on the new entity. Or better, the provision should be in the appropriate governing document for the owners association.

It is, indeed, a slippery slope. Careful thought is advised.


SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
This would be no different than a Clubhouse used for free by HOA members, AND also available for rental use by the public.

Insurance (personal and liability) would be the main issues, as would the bookkeeping. Probably a manager would need to be hired.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
I agree,
Unless some covenant forbids it I think the Board has the right to collect income from common properties. I really think they have to consider tax questions but to me that is all Greek.

I also would suggest this use of common property be covered and spelled out in the documents, either a blanklet kind of thing or specific items.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here