💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

GioR (California)
Posts: 1
Posted:
Hi everyone, this is the first time I write. My question is how long should a president of the hoa should be on the seat ,I mean with all the trouble they get into, who wants to "volunteer" for many years unless they are doing something fishy..
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Gio,

Something fishy? Maybe no one else will step up and run for the office? You have a set of Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws that tell you about your officers, how to elect them, how to remove them from office and probably terms that the office can be held. Many documents do not limit terms in office.

Has yours gotten "into trouble"? Tell us what you are looking to find out.

TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
Why do I volunteer, year after year, for my association? Well, if I didn't NO ONE would. Another reason, I want to protect my property values. Another reason, I like learning new things.

Do you suspect something fishy, JUST because of the length of time someone has served?
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Why would someone stay on the board for a very long time, maybe even as president?

He/She is doing a good job.
The job is easy for this person
No one has stepped up to replace him/her
He/she wants to protect property values

The Board is supposed to act as a team.

No ONE person should have so much power that he/she is considered doing "fishy" things.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
I have been on my board for over 12 years.

I have been president for 3 years in a row, off for three while another member is pres, then on for 3, then off for 3, now I'm on the first of my next 3.

The reason? Only myself and one other member/director even bothers to step up to the "seat."

It's only fishy in that no matter what we do, we can't get any other "volunteers," and we consider it an investment in maintaining our property values.

If you think it's so "fishy," then step up to the plate (seat) and give it a try.

JudyM5 (Ohio)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Gio - I don't know if you're on the BOD or were on the BOD and got off for some reason or if you're just a disgruntled owner. In almost all associations, it is like pulling teeth with a spider web to get people to serve on the BOD! If your documents have multiple year terms, that may be why someone is remaining on the BOD. And, when those terms expire, if no one else steps up to serve on the BOD, those BOD members whose terms are expiring may have to agree to serve another term in order to have enough BOD members. If you're not on the BOD, why don't you throw your hat in the ring in the next Annual election and get on the BOD? If you do that, you might find out why someone keeps staying on the BOD year after year. I know from personal experience of serving as a BOD officer for 10 years that alot of times people who run for the BOD have a personal agenda . . . they want something approved, installed, or changed in such a way to benefit themselves. Once they get what they want or when they don't get what they want, they're finished with the BOD. If you are knowledgeable, informed, dedicated, involved, and responsible, you find yourself continuing to be on the BOD in order to guard against such selfish motivation. Plus, if you've done alot of work and brought an association back from the brink of disaster because of bad leadership, you don't want to watch all the progress that's been made unravel because of an incompetent BOD.

As a PM, I jokingly tell people that they can plan on staying on the BOD "until they die or sell." Personally, I think that EVERY owner should have to serve at least one year on the BOD. It would certainly open the eyes of the people who want to gripe about everything, but don't want to be involved in any of the solutions, whether on the BOD or not! I also happen to think that everybody should have to attend at least one year of college. And, I feel that a couple of years of being in the military should be mandatory for every person. So, as you can see, I firmly believe in "walking in somebody else's shoes" before spouting opinions. If you think that there is a problem person(s) on your BOD, "walk" in their shoes by serving on the BOD for at least one year and then see if you still think that they're a "problem" or "fishy". Or, are they simply doing what has to be done to keep your association running the way they are mandated to do by the documents and your state laws? The only way for you to really find out is to get in the middle of the situation that you think is "fishy" and see if there is really something "fishy".
JudyM5 (Ohio)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Michelle - Way to go!! Until somebody's done what you and I have done, they don't know what is really involved!! Under the 20% rule . . . 20% do all the work . . . that means that only one person on a 5-member BOD is carrying the load for the BOD . . . and for the association. Fortunately, there's usually 2 people and sometimes 3 people who are really involved. The other BOD members just show up for the meetings . . . sometimes!
JudyM5 (Ohio)
Posts: 36
Posted:
Gio - I just can't get away from your posting! "With all the trouble they get into" . . . in my 13 years as a BOD member (10 years) and a PM (7 years), I've never gotten into any trouble! "Why would they want to "volunteer?" Where would the world as we know it be without volunteers?! Volunteer firemen! Volunteer missionaries! Volunteer doctors and nurses on foreign missions! Volunteers in homeless shelters and soup kitchens! Volunteer parents in classrooms! Volunteer coaches for young people's sports programs! Volunteer parents at school festivals, school sporting events, etc.! Attorneys who "volunteer" to do pro bono work for people who can't afford legal services!

Why would they do this (be on BOD) unless they were doing something "fishy?" Everybody who posted a response to your question has given you many reasons why someone serves year after year. I bet Michelle would tell you that during her 13 years on a BOD that she's gone out of her way to make sure that things are done on every other unit in the community before they're done on her unit in order to avoid any perception of "fishy!" I know that I've done that!!

What do you think is fishy? Do you think that the association's funds are being embezzeled? Do you think that this person is getting paid for their service? Or has this person just made you mad and you're now "fishing" for support of your accusations?

If you want constructive feedback from this forum's participants, you will need to be more specific about what you think is "fishy."
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Trust me it's not "altruistic." I volunteer altruistically in other areas, working with Alzheimer patients, making and distributing hand-made blankets to children in illness or trauma, mentoring at a local Gilda's house to other cancer survivors. . . among other things.

As I stated before, the reason I volunteer as an HOA board member is to have an active role in the protection of my property values.

Maintaining the integrity of the governing documents is a crucial element to that.

I may not personally care, for example, if certain "signage" is allowed or not, but if the documents say signage is not allowed, and the residents don't feel strongly enough about it to amend, then I will actively maintain the integrity of that and any other restriction that is listed and enforce against violations.

As a board member, I can also actively better ensure that the common areas are properly maintained, that street signs are replaced, that insurance is maintained, etc etc etc, ad nauseum.

That's why I "volunteer."

My home is a huge investment. In these tough economic times, with home values slipping, anything and everything I can do to keep my home value from hitting the toilet, I will do.

Sorry you don't feel as strongly about your investment. But then, it's residents with a similar passive attitude that I'm trying to stem the tide against.

So I'm hardly surprised.

KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
The reason I ran for the board is because I wanted to ensure that we started off on the right foot. But I will say that some people enjoy governance. Why do people run for City Council? In my city it is unpaid and they have very long meetings. I doubt that too many people spend a lot of time thanking them.

Perhaps it is that they enjoy "being in control." There are many people who take the headaches as part of the course. The trade off is well worth it to have their voice in the community. Many of them simply enjoy being a key part of some power structure.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Judy,

From what I read of your post you seem to make several good points. However, I found it difficult to read without paragarphs and everything running together so I didn't finish reading it.

Wonder if others felt the same?
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Michele,

Kudos to you for everything you do. It's such a shame we don't have more interested owners such as yourself. I guess it will never change. We have folks that sit on the sideline and do nothing but complain and then we have diamonds such as you. Congrats!
MarianneG (Indiana)
Posts: 170
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EllenS1 on 08/05/2009 7:04 PM
Judy,

From what I read of your post you seem to make several good points. However, I found it difficult to read without paragarphs and everything running together so I didn't finish reading it.

Wonder if others felt the same?

Yes, I also quit reading Judy's post after a time, and that's too bad because I probably missed some of those good points.

This is my second year on the BOD, cureently as president, and my term ends in September. I'm considering whether to run again. This has truly been an interesting experience. I have enjoyed learning how an HOA runs (learned a lot from this forum BTW), and I do feel somewhat altruistic in that I knew I had a skill (producing an accurate, interesing newsletter) to offer. At the time I ran for the BOD no one else came forward to do a good newsletter.

Like some others, I am glad for the opportunity to do all I can to protect my home's value. At times, when someone angrily fills my ear, I may feel like quitting, but another day comes along and a different resident thanks the BOD for something we've done. So, there are ups and downs -- mostly ups.

Being on the BOD is a perfect opportunity to meet and get to know the neighbors. It's also a chance to help put into place some much-needed projects, and as so many others have said, it's rare for residents to step up to the plate to do the work required of a BOD member. Someone has to make the time, feel competent enough to take on the job, and do so with integrity. Who better than me? or you, Gio?
MarianneG (Indiana)
Posts: 170
Posted:
After going back to read Gio's original post, another thought occurs to me. I think it is possible for one to hold a certain office on a board so long that objectivity is lost. It's easy for a person to become so invested that the office becomes "mine" rather than the community's. I like Michelle's plan of 3 years on and 3 years off, or rotating offices among board members every so many years.
KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
I also like 3 years on/ 3 years off plan...

The Association I deal with has had the same board for almost 9 years. I think they had gotten very comfortable in the positions, as well as possessive. I am certain that their time in the position gives them an advantage in being familiar with how the government works (in relation with HOAs), but I think that it is not a matter of staying in the position for too long, but the wrong people ( staying in the position for too long (on part because there is a shortage of volunteers).

My Association's last election was very poorly run. According to those in attendance, they asked people to raise their hands, not writing down a single total, saying their proxies were enough (governing documents do not allow proxies). These proxies that they circulated appointed the board in control of the vote and only listed the current board member's names. A neighbor of mine called up the board requesting to be put on the ballot and they were told that there was no need... the board was full.

MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Kevin, that stinks. Veritably.

But to clarify, I have been a board member non-stop for over 12 years.

I have been president 3 on, 3 off.

I have held all four positions at one time or another.

And yes, the 3-off was when the position was cycled by another member who has been on almost as long as I have.

EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Kenin, Have you read your bylaws? I am also in Florida and our bylaws call for specific terms for all the officers of the board.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
I don't mind long-serving board members, but that presidency needs to rotate!

One of the problems we have is that at election time, the previous president is cast aside. I'd like to see him/her serve on the board as a general member. Our past presidents are dumped. I think there is just too much knowledge that leaves too quickly.

TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
I really like Susan's idea of keeping the most recent past president on the BOD. In my real job, our BOD is structured with a seat (voting) for the Past-President. In my real job, we have an Executive Committee, which is made up of SOME of the BOD (I work for a non-profit, and our BOD is 18 people), and the Past-President is a member of the EC, but not a voting member. Just a voting member on the BOD.

But, I must say, I'm one of those long-serving Presidents...and I would give it up in a heartbeat if someone else were to step up to the plate. In all honesty, I do almost nothing AS THE PRESIDENT, except run the meetings. (Yes, we're tiny...19 units).

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here