💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

GloriaL (Georgia)
Posts: 195
Posted:
Here in our little HOA/POA, we are dealing with one HomeOwner who is delinquent on this year's Annual Dues. Each year, they have habitually paid very late, like MONTHS late, after getting three notices and finally our President knocking on their door personally. This year as we are now part of the GAPOA, the BOD decided that enough was enough, so after the initial bill went out (with the consequences of not paying itemized), then a courtesy email reminder that they were now delinquent (again with the consequences itemized), then a demand letter from our attorney (the expense of which was added to their Annual Dues, plus late penalty), they still have not paid. We also sent them two more letters from the BOD, with emails, telling them if they don't pay by July 15, 2009, we will initiate a lawsuit on behalf of the Association, at their expense. Now the HomeOwner's attorney is claiming that they are not part of the HOA/POA...seems so dumb to me (they had paid each year and voted at the Annual Meetings)...but that is their stance.

Our BOD is meeting this weekend to discuss what steps are next. I do not believe that there is much choice. I believe we will have to front the lawyer fees and procede with the lawsuit, seeking payment, get a judgement and garnish their wages/income/etc.

My feeling is that we will be opening up a can of worms if we do not finalize that they are part of the Association, and attempt to get the delinquent funds. Not just to collect their paultry Annual Dues of $330, but to ensure that they are adhering to our CCRs in its entirety.

Has anyone dealt with this type of issue? I know that delinquencies have been discussed at length, but this twist of not being part of the Association is new to me (oh, their rationale is that the builder didn't register the deed transfer properly...)

I always appreciate the many points of view offered here.
Thanks,
Gloria
TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
I guess my first question...

DID the builder/developer register the deed transfer correctly? Are you 100% sure? I mean, 1,000,000% sure? Enough to think about fronting a lawyer money before checking with the county?

I won't have any more questions until that one is answered. That's a big one. Regardless of whether the troublesome owner has paid assessments in the past.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
What is the definition of "Member" for your HOA?

A single Member can't just "drop out" of the association.

Are you condo, single homes?
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Quote:
(oh, their rationale is that the builder didn't register the deed transfer properly...)

Dig up the previous deed and give it to your lawyer. This is a perfect example of why we do tons of title searches in New England.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Gloria,

A little clarification regarding your statement that the builder did not register their deed transfer properly would be good. I've never heard that excuse for not being a member of an HOA b/4!
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
So if the deed transfer was not properly registered, doesn't that mean that according to the most recent properly registered deed the land still belongs to the previous owner (the builder)? Maybe you should see if you can contact that owner and ask him to remove the people who are squatting on his property. Or just drop the hint that that will be your intention if they want to continue with this claim.

MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
I'm afraid I would call their bluff and file the lawsuit (you can do this in small claims court) for a judgment.

I would also file a lien.

Actually, I would file the lien FIRST, then the small claims.

You don't have to prove they ARE part of the HOA. Your PVA/plat records and your CC&R definitions should take care of that for you.

They will have to convince the judge that they are not part of the HOA.

GloriaL (Georgia)
Posts: 195
Posted:
On the very first page of our CCRs, it states the "..certain real property lying and being in Land Lots xxx and xxx of the Second District, XXXX County, Georgia, which real property is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof; and;
.... and to this end desires to subject the real property described in Exhibit "A" to the covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, charges and liens hereinafter set forth, each and all of hwich is for the benefit of said property and binding upon and inure to the benefit of each owner thereof, ..."

it would seem to be that since the Association is platted and registered with the county, the entire thing is part of the HOA, and when a Lot is sold the CCRs run with the land. I know that they are the names on the deed, as per the city tax records. Our attorney said they researched the claim, and they are part of the HOA. The attorney is awaiting the BOD's decision on whether to proceed. IMHO, I don't believe we have much of a choice, although our $$$$ are tight, and we may have to front the attorney fees and wait for the judgement to collect.

We are 27 single family homes, total Annual dues amounting to $8,910, from which we pay utilities, insurance, maintenance of the front entrance, and TRYING to create a reserve fund to cover our entrance sign, stone columns, fences, landscaping, sprinklers.

I don't know how they came up with this strategy. Seems like an exercise in futility and only the lawyers make money...

Gloria
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Gloria it does happen at least according to one of the posters here. DJ from Canada reported that the builder's attorney screwed up and didn't attach the deed restrictions to his and others property leaving them as non-members in the middle of the HOA. Before you pay the attorney you might want to go to the County Recorders office and look at this persons deed (the information is available online in my county) and make sure they are members.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
GloriaL (Georgia)
Posts: 195
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GlenL on 07/17/2009 1:53 PM
Gloria it does happen at least according to one of the posters here. DJ from Canada reported that the builder's attorney screwed up and didn't attach the deed restrictions to his and others property leaving them as non-members in the middle of the HOA. Before you pay the attorney you might want to go to the County Recorders office and look at this persons deed (the information is available online in my county) and make sure they are members.

I don't quite understand this, so please be patient. I did go to our online county tax assessors and it shows a conveyance of deed owners.

It shows this property conveyed from the one builder to another builder to the current owner. Is that what you mean?

You said some other builder's attorney didn't attach the deed restriction to some properties. How can that happen? In this area, nearly every subdivision is HOA restricted (I wish it wasn't, but it is). You know that you are in the middle of this one street, how can you not be part of the HOA?

Can someone clear this up for me? I am having a hard time grasping the concept.

Thanks,
Gloria
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Gloria,

I think what Gary was trying to suggest to you is that you should take a look at the deed to make certain it says it is subject to "covenants, conditions, restrictions, assessments, charges, servitudes, liens, reservations and easements for the (name of the HOA)", or something to that effect. The problem could be that the developer accidentally did not include the covenant restrictions on the deed. If this is the case, IMO, it would take a real estate attorney to sort this out and determine if steps can be taken to correct the deed. IMO you should not proceed with a lien until you know for sure the deed has been properly worded and contains the covenant restrictions.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Gloria,

Just a thought but your atorney needs to handle this. As far as the owner not being part of the HOA I would think a copy of his Warranty Deed would show if he was when he purchased the property.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Gloria has already stated that their attorney has researched the H/O's claim and the determination is that they are a part of the HOA. The attorney would (should?) know where and how to look to confirm such a claim.

We had a resident try this many years ago.

He claimed he only paid the assessments to be "nice" and that his lot and his lot alone (in the middle of the street, too) is the only one not a part of the HOA. He made a similar claim, that they bought it from the builder BEFORE any of the plats and CC&Rs were recorded. When we researched it we discovered all the plats and CC&Rs were registered in 1997. He bought his property in 2000. Some people are just pathological.

It became an issue only when we tried to enforce some violations he had. He "bluffed" us all the way to our sending his attorney a copy of the lawsuit we intended to follow.

Then he just simply "complied," but he still insists he is not part of the HOA, but will pay the assessments and follow the rules, again, just to be a "nice guy."

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Thx, Michele. I must have missed that. So now I'll change my opinion and state that the BOD should file a lien as soon as possible. I guess some people will try anything to get out of paying those darned assessments!
GloriaL (Georgia)
Posts: 195
Posted:
Michelle, yes, our attorney has said that they are part of the HOA. Mary, we have already placed a lien for the delinquent dues. As you know, that lien would help us collect only WHEN/IF they sell the property.

The HO had said to me when I gave them a copy of the "courtesy email" advising them that we will proceed with a lawsuit if they don't comply in xxx days, they would pay the dues plus the late penalty, but not the attorney fees. I don't believe that is negotiable. There wouldn't be any attorney fees if they had just paid, like everyone else in the HOA, instead of having us chase them down and do this silly dance.

Their position is much like Michelle's HO, in that they are complying because they are being the "nice guy" not because they are obligated. The fact is that they ARE obligated to pay and to comply with our CCRs in their entirety, again IMHO.

I think we should proceed with letting our attorney handle this and initiate the lawsuit more to validate the strength of our CCRs than anything else.
I also don't want to have to continue this battle each and every year, either for collection of dues or compliance with our CCRs. As I have said, this particular HO has NEVER paid on time, and is usually two or three months late, requiring several notices and finally a personal knock on their door from our President. And our notice for the Annual Dues gives the HO 30 days to pay, so we are talking about three to four months to collect $330!! We don't have the funds for a management company and no one wants to run for any Board position, so this falls on the same four people. That is getting very old very fast.

My vote when the BOD meets will be...just sue them and get it over with!

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Gloria,

Considering this past member's history the BOD should start the legal route of collecting as soon as possible. No more friendly reminders or waiting 3-4 months to place a lien. At least that's my opinion. Of course the BOD must operate w/i the guidelines of the assn and any state laws. Even though a lien may not be collectible until the property is sold, having a lien on one's property is not good for their credit rating. I would think this would be something most people would NOT want to have.

I couldn't find any GA statutes that apply to HOAs, except for the nonprofit corp statutes which would not include a provision dealing with assessments. If this is the case then whatever the gov docs say about collecting delinquent assessments applies. Are you certain a lien for delinquent assessments cannot be collected until the property is sold. This is contrary to the law in most states. A lien to collect delinquent assessments is most often treated differently than a lien to collect unpaid penalties for CCR violations.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Gloria,
Prior to filing a law suit, I would have your attorney send them a letter listing all charges, including their fee for that letter, and give them a deadline to receive payment. For the future develop rules of delinquent accounts which will strongly encourage payment without involving an attorney.
GloriaL (Georgia)
Posts: 195
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaryA1 on 07/18/2009 7:36 AM
Gloria,

Considering this past member's history the BOD should start the legal route of collecting as soon as possible. No more friendly reminders or waiting 3-4 months to place a lien. At least that's my opinion. Of course the BOD must operate w/i the guidelines of the assn and any state laws. Even though a lien may not be collectible until the property is sold, having a lien on one's property is not good for their credit rating. I would think this would be something most people would NOT want to have.

I couldn't find any GA statutes that apply to HOAs, except for the nonprofit corp statutes which would not include a provision dealing with assessments. If this is the case then whatever the gov docs say about collecting delinquent assessments applies. Are you certain a lien for delinquent assessments cannot be collected until the property is sold. This is contrary to the law in most states. A lien to collect delinquent assessments is most often treated differently than a lien to collect unpaid penalties for CCR violations.

Mary,

Only once before have we had to go this route. We did collect the delinquent asssessments by threathening foreclosure. It was on two builder owned Lots which to date remain undeveloped, but current on dues. However, those dues amounted to several thousand dollars. This is just this one year...so far...that is delinquent. As previously posted, this HO seems to be making a statement as the issue rather than the dollar amount ($330. + late penalty + associated attorney fees = approximately $700.) So, yes, the lien for uncollected dues is treated differently than violation penalties as we can try to foreclose for uncollected dues.

Our attorney said that with the lawsuit and judgement, we would be allowed to garnish wages, etc. to collect the dues + associated expenses.

I do like Roger's suggestion of creating Rules & Regs that would alert all HO's to the precise procedure, with $$ (although that can change with time and attorney firms).

Our BOD Mtg will decide how to proceed with this tonight. I still believe that we should move forward with whatever action the attorney advises, even if the Association must front the fee, reimbursed upon collection. This HO has done this every single year since owning the home (they are the first and only HO's of that property for six years). However, this is the first year that we are part of GA POA, and have a bit more authority for collection. I don't think they counted on that.

I am tired of chasing this down each year; tired of repeated letters/emails/phone calls/ knocks on the door; tired of numerous BOD Mtg's with this on the Agenda; tired of going back and forth with the attorney. I guess I am just plain tired of this one HO being treated like a spoiled child while everyone else in our Association does what they are obligated to do.

It gets easier and easier to see why no one volunteers to be a BOD Member.

Gloria

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Yes, this is chronic, but your attorny fees will eat up any benefit in collecting this assessment.

I would wait until is reached a full year to file a lawsuit, but file the lein ASAP (when your documents allow)

GloriaL (Georgia)
Posts: 195
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SusanW1 on 07/19/2009 10:09 AM
Yes, this is chronic, but your attorny fees will eat up any benefit in collecting this assessment.

I would wait until is reached a full year to file a lawsuit, but file the lein ASAP (when your documents allow)


If our CCRs say that the HO is responsible for all associated attorney fees, how will they eat up any benefit? Other than it being out of pocket up front, we should be reimbursed for all expenses. Correct???

EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
I agree with Roger. Also think the attorney should state in his letter that partial payment will NOT be accepted. And the attorney should add his fee for preparing this letter.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Susan,

Why do you think attorney fees for collecting should not be paid by the delinquent owner? Check out your docs. Most wouldn't bear this up.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Yup. Our docs state the legal fees, including attorney's fees, associated with assessment collection are to be paid by the homeowner.

It's been upheld in court, as well.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here