💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JeffT (Maryland)
Posts: 83
Posted:
As the boards changed over the years they went through varying degrees of enforcement attitude. Several years ago they enforced nothing. The last board had the attiude to put out real strict rules and come down hard.

The new board (elected in June) is trying something in between. Instead of just ignoring a violation or immediately sending out a nasty notice of intent to fine, the new board made door hangers. If the board sees a violation or someone ready to do a project, just hanger a door hanger on the door knob with a friendly reminder of the issue and what the rules are. It is easier then going back 5 times before you catch them at home or in our case before they would answer the door.

8.5"x11" piece of heavy card stock makes three hangers. Just pre-print some with common violation like cutting the grass, reminder of getting an architectural change request, etc. Some can even have several issues with a checkbox indicator. Then when walking around and an issue is noticed, just hang a friendly reminder.

It worked this week. An illegal sign was in the front yard. The day after the door hanger was placed the sign was gone. Another was repairing a deck and then after getting the door hanger, called the board to see if what they were doing was OK.

Of course some will just ignore it and will need the nasty letter. But people do want to get the neighborhood looking good and with their busy schedules just need a nudge.

TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
Interesting strategy. Are your units all owner-occupied? How does this new board handle renters?

Definitely an interesting strategy, though!
FrancescaM (Washington)
Posts: 264
Posted:
I personally love it!!
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
Actually, I recommend against it. The first management company that our HOA used after turnover talked us into going a similar route: a pre-printed carbonless form with check boxes. The on-site PM would walk the neighborhood and if a violation was noticed, she would check the appropriate box and fill out the date and address. She would leave the original at the front door and keep the copy for our records.

Homeowners universally hated it, even if it did get compliance.

I think the biggest complaint about it was that they felt it was too impersonal without really telling them what the problem was. All they got was a check mark next to something like "yard needs attention". Not very user friendly at all.

Now our policy is when a violation is noticed, a one-page Courtesy letter is sent telling them what the problem is, the section of the CC&Rs that covers that violation, and a request to fix the problem within two weeks. If the problem continues beyond two weeks, depending on the severity we either send another Courtesy letter or we send a certified Demand letter (costs assessed to the homeowner) requiring that the problem be fixed. If the problem still is not taken care of, after another two weeks we turn it over to the attorney who sends his own demand letter (with a significantly higher cost again assessed to the homeowner) and if necessary files a lawsuit.

Most people take care of the problem after the first Courtesy letter. We've been doing this for three years now and other than people not wanting to be told that they are in violation of anything, we haven't had any complaints about the letter itself.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Dwight,

I agree with you! Any violation should be noticed in writing. The notice should not only explain exactly what the violations is and cite the applicable CCR provision; but it should state what rememdies will be taken if not cured w/i a certain period of time and also explain what the member's appeal rights are. Putting a door hanger on the offending member's door doesn't give the HOA a record of having noticed a violation. IMO, it's much better to write a letter and make certain all bases are covered.
AnnaD2 (Florida)
Posts: 960
Posted:
Dwight, you hit it on the head. We have a very, very similar enforcment policy.

If I got a "door-hang" on my knob I would think it was another pizza parlor ad and it would go in the garbage.

I don't think that is a professional approach....and it's a very poor "paper trail" policy.
JohnO6 (Georgia)
Posts: 424
Posted:
I'll deliberately avoid the discussion of "professionalism" on this topic, but I would like to address the issue of a "paper trail". Unless you are sending these letters via certified mail you have no more paper trail than a door hanger. Yes, you have a copy of what you sent, but no proof it was received. Same with e-mail (except on corporate email servers that support return receipts - which obviously is not the case in HOAs).

As a result the "paper trail" argument/concern holds no water here. A paper record of door hangers left is just as good as letter copies or emails in the sent folder.

Let's not delude ourselves on this issue.

As promised, I purposely avoided the "professionalism" issue of door hangers vs. letters
AnnaD2 (Florida)
Posts: 960
Posted:
Hmmmmmmmmm. John......I see your point....sort of.

Door hangers are usually used by apartment complexes, motels, hotels, homeless shelters, Salvation Army, or timeshare properties to let someone know that there was work done in/on/or around their unit. VERY impersonal.

You're dealing with people who OWN or bought into an association with an expectation that their property is valuable and that they have a PROFESSIONAL management company AND professional Board of Directors looking out for their interests.

Door hangers are tacky AND alert every other neighbor that there is a "problem" with the unit where it is hung. You owe it to your members to receive a mailed letter if there is a problem.

You're inviting problems if you post (for all to see) a piece of cardboard on their front door. We have "pieces of cardboard" posted on doors all over our county....and they are "Foreclosure Notices".

I don't know why you feel it should be a "scarlett letter" for ALL the neighbors to know you're going after someone? It just sounds pretty cold to me....and why don't you want to send a personal letter to someone?
MarianneG (Indiana)
Posts: 170
Posted:
Anna,
I absolutely agree with you. When I read the presenting issue, I just cringed. Whether or not one has a paper trail (mailed letter) is for me not the issue. The issue for me is whether a BOD chooses to become the HOA Gestapo or whether it chooses to encourage prople in a positive way and thus have a better chance of cooperation from the residents.

If I were to receive a door hanger like that on my doorknob, I would be hoppin' mad. And so far in this thread, there is an assumption that the offense, stated for all to see, on the door hanger is 100% accurate. Therefore, the scarlet-letter branding, as Anna said. Everybody deserves a chance to explain or correct the "offense" without being branded for life.
Marianne
AnnaD2 (Florida)
Posts: 960
Posted:
Thank you MarianneG!!

Anna
JohnO6 (Georgia)
Posts: 424
Posted:
Anna & Marianne -

I don't disagree with your views, I'm just challenging the supporting reasoning being, as Anna said, "and it's a very poor "paper trail" policy." That's not a good reason. Your other reasons are much more compelling.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
John,

There is no requirement that proof of delivery be made. The fact that the BOD mailed the notice if proof enough and equates to a paper trail. Legal documents are mailed every day with no "return receipt" requirement. There is no justifiable defense in claiming you never received the document.
JohnO6 (Georgia)
Posts: 424
Posted:
So then that proves my point, there is no "paper trail" advantage to letters over door hangers either as long as a record of door hangers distributed is kept.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not in favor of the door hangers, I'm just opposed to fallacious arguments against them - one of which is the "paper trail" argument.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
John,

I disagree. My response did not prove your point. A paper trail is established by mailing a notice of the violation. A door hanger doesn't tell the member what rights they have and doesn't state how long they have to cure the violation or perhaps even the exact violation (CCR article ref) being violated. Also, my impression of using the door hanger is cut down on the amount of "work" involved in sending a letter. But, if, as you suggest, a record of door hangers distributed is maintained (which would include the member's name, the date noticed, the violation & CCR ref, etc.) deflates the purpose of using the door hanger. Keeping that record would require just as much work as sending a letter, IMO. Most assn's would use a form letter requiring that the blanks be filled in which would only take a few minutes.
JohnO6 (Georgia)
Posts: 424
Posted:
We're not that different on this issue - the distinction here is the difference between the concept of a "paper trail" as a record of some communication taking place vs. "content" of that communication, which is your primary argument. Paper trail is process not content.

BTW, although it's a good practice, I'm not aware of ever having seen any CCRs that require a violation notice to detail the recipients "rights". Those rights are detailed in the CCRs as a contract that the owner entered into when they purchased the property.
TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
I guess I understand the above back and forth, but I need to refer to my documents. I don't know if posting a violating notice on the door is any more "legal" for my association than posting a meeting notice on a door (which we canNOT do). Our documents specify how to "notice" someone for something.

Also, I come in my house through the back door and rarely go out the front door. I'd miss the notice if that was how I was "noticed". Same for putting a notice in someone's mailbox on the house. No one checks those because we have one of those "mail centers" where the postman puts the mail in there, not on houses.

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
John,

My CCRs explicitly state: "In addition to all the remedies of the assn, the assn shall have the right to assess reasonable fines against any owner who violates any provision of the project document after such owner has been given notice of the violation and an opportunity to be heard with respect to the violation. . ." By stating in the notice that the member has a right "to be heard" means their rights are being detailed.

So now you've "seen" CCRs that DO require that the member's rights be detailed. Never say never; it will always come back to bite you!
JohnO6 (Georgia)
Posts: 424
Posted:
Yes, Tracie - if your CCRs include advice of violations in the definition of "notice" and if your CCRs specify how "notice" (typically reserved for annual meeting notices, proposed CCR amendments and the like) is to be delivered, then you would have to follow the CCR specified process.
RobertG12 (Arizona)
Posts: 160
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnO6 on 07/02/2009 8:33 AM
We're not that different on this issue - the distinction here is the difference between the concept of a "paper trail" as a record of some communication taking place vs. "content" of that communication, which is your primary argument. Paper trail is process not content.

BTW, although it's a good practice, I'm not aware of ever having seen any CCRs that require a violation notice to detail the recipients "rights". Those rights are detailed in the CCRs as a contract that the owner entered into when they purchased the property.

Arizona has a part of the HOA laws a provision that the homeowner may require the HOA to provide certain information that before the violation may be put in place. Most HOAs give this anyway just to avoid the issue. Part of the law states -
"Within ten business days after receipt of the certified mail containing the response from the member, the association shall respond to the member with a written explanation regarding the notice that shall provide at least the following information unless previously provided in the notice of violation:

1. The provision of the community documents that has allegedly been violated.

2. The date of the violation or the date the violation was observed.

3. The first and last name of the person or persons who observed the violation.

4. The process the member must follow to contest the notice."
JohnO6 (Georgia)
Posts: 424
Posted:
Robert et.al. - Point well made! I stand corrected - particularly as it relates to AZ law.
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
One other problem that I see with door hangers is that they can be sending the notice to the wrong person. The HOA's agreement is with the owner, and the HOA should only be notifying the owner of the violation. If the home is occupied by a renter, then a door hanger is only notifying the renter, not the owner.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here