💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
As I have posted here many times, our builder (who is also the President of our HOA) owns and rents 9 homes in our small development of which there are only 28 homes built. When the development is complete it will be just 40 homes.

He recently did not renew a lease of one tenant who was a problem in the development from the first day they moved in. Many complaints were sent to him regarding these tenants for over a year. The police were here on an average once to twice a month.

In a recent email to me from the builder/landlord he alluded that they threatened a civil lawsuit against him. He then went on to say that the HOA would not be able to afford the legal fees, etc. The email was prompted when I emailed him asking him for copies of leases he renewed, which is my right as a board member and is in our CCR's that board members must receive copies of leases 10 days after execution.

I started thinking about what responsiblity, if any, we as owners and HOA members would have if a tenant sued a landlord who rents in our development. So far, he is the only one. He is building four more units which he most probably will be renting. Recently we have been listed as a "rental community" on the website for our development much to the dismay of the owner's in this development.

My question is this: Would the owners who are members of the HOA be liable? Is he putting us in danger of liablity by renting? Can the tenant sue our HOA? or just the individual landlord?

I am in the process of consulting with an attorney next week regarding some other issues but I think I should pass this by him too.

thanks for any advice you can give me on this.

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Well Maureen this ought to spark a lively debate.

First, I assume the association has not accepted control of the development.......right or wrong?

Either way your governing documents must be read completely to try and understand what can be done. On the face of it, if this developer is trying to attach his legal bills, that resulted it his business of apartment renting, I would immediately gather your homeowners together and hold a meeting to resist this involvement. I expect he has not turned over control to the association and from where I stand, even if he has, the association is not involved with his rental problems. I doubt he could convince a Judge that the Association Corporation is responsible in any way. If you all have had turnover, the associations problems are with the developer (owner) for renting to undesirable renters.

This is not to say he may have something in the covenants that binds the owners before turn-over, but IMO, if he does, it is suspect and should be contested.

From you post, he is trying to push you all around and I don't think your position on the Developers Board means squat legally. If it does, resign, who would want anyone else to have that kind of control over them.

Just an opinion but it will be interesting to read the replies.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Maureen,
Go to court house or on line and see what this guy filed at the planning office or dept of records and see how he described the property at that time, then look for changes. Unless it was in his application to develop a rental community, I would take him to Court for breach of contract. I take it you didn't buy your property as rental property.
Also get all owners to look for Brochures and development description in any adverts that were pushed when the place was initially offered for sale. He may be able to state the individual property can be rented, but this would have to be included with a general description of the total property as a residential area. If he tries to now turn the property into a commercial rental property, he must be very desperate or I won't list the rest.

I expect he is feeling the economic heat and is looking for cash or someone to pay his bills.

Also run a search on the county court records for any public legal information, along with checking deeds on his owned property. That is all public information.

To qualify, this could all be a misunderstanding and if possible he should be given the option of answering some of these questions in an open forum with the owners present.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Maureen,

Well just think about it. If you rented your home and had a problem renter which resulted in a lawsuit, what would this have to do with the HOA? NOTHING, is the answer. However, are you certain this property is owned outright by the developer and not the developer's company? Would the lawsuit be against the developer as a private individual or against the HOA? Sometimes other parties are attached to a lawsuit even though those parties may not be directly involved in the dispute. Since you are meeting with an attorney I would certainly ask him about this. But, make certain you have all the facts regarding who owns this property. You could check that out on the Co. Recorder's website or just ask the builder who the owner of record is. In fact, I would have asked him why he thinks the HOA would be liable for his legal fees.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
I would rather not answer him. I checked the county records and the builder and his wife are owners of the property.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
Thank you so much for your advice. No, I didn't think that our development would become a RENTAL development nor did the owners who paid 300,000 to 350,000 for their homes. When I purchased my home the sales office told me (and all the other purchasers) that the builder/developer did not want this development to turn into a rental community, however, it does state in our CCR's that the builder can rent as many units he cannot sell. He is the only one renting. All the owners moved here due to downsizing their homes, however, three are fed up and are selling their homes.

Having said that, this does not mean that he should. I have several owners who would be right by my side if this ever went to court. We were all told the same thing.

The builder's rental person stated in the newspaper in January that there is a "Rent to Own Program" instituted by the builder. However, when I asked for the paperwork on it, I never got a response. The only response was from the builder who said I have NO RIGHT asking for it and it was a "harrassment policy" since I was insisting on getting this informaiton. I don't believe there is any such program.

I am hoping an attorney will straighen this out, however, I don't want to spend all my assets fighting this builder.

MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
The only reason myself and my neighbor do not resign is that noone else wants to be on the board and if so, we don't want the builder to have 5 members of his choosing on the board.

It is hard enough to keep up with him now, I can't imagine if he had all his family on the board.

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Maureen,
Once again and you have probably covered it somehwere, "Has there been a turnover to the owners," Last chance for me.

I write too long anyway and when I have to answer questions from two different sides it takes three times as long.

We all understand your situation as far as how difficult it is to take care of stuff like this. As far as the Board you are on that the developer controls, what is the difference of the minority. Do you all make policy and vote and run elections and set agendas? Have you ever made any positive changes with your presence on the Board. Is your saving grace that things could be a lot worse if you all weren't there? That's a guess isn't it? As a minority member of a majority appointed by the developer board, what can be worse? If you think you all are making a difference then by all means stick with it, but don't expect for him to be nice and change......he won't.

And you made several references to the cost of the lawyer. Well, your group is going to have to sit down and decide how much you all want to spend for what. You should be able to get a slice of quality time from a good association attorney, first vist, no contracts, for around 350- 500. But spend your money wisely and know exactly what you want him to answer and why. If you can get five or ten good direct questions answered, the rest of your time is gravy. You all must be prepared and stay on your toes if you are going to tussle with this guy. I suggested you canvas your members and anywhere else for written adverts that your developer has used to sell the property. I asked because I am personally aware of litigation that hinged on some 20 year old brouchures about a golf community. You said you checked property records out-------finally,have you found your filed papers for the development and have you been to the planning office? You need to know more stuff and you can't know too much and any request you make to him make it in a meeting, get it in the records as being asked. Any written correspondence and I would stay away from that, make it registered.

I really am receiving mixed signals but on the other hand you are not obligated to even acknowledge I exist, you would not be the first and the possibility always exists I don't have a clue to what I am talking about.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
We have not had a turnover from the developer. Our CCR's state 75% of homes sold (including the Declarant) or 7 years (whatever comes first).

The problem of getting control (as I see it) is that there are 19 owners (other than declarant). The declarant owns and rents 9. He is building 4 more (hopefully they will sell, if not he will rent).

There are 8 lots left that are not developed (which may be 1 to 3 votes). It does not say how votes the declarant gets in our CCR&s. It just states that he can vote on as many votes that he gets.

If I am doing the math correctly, we will not have the votes to take control of the association. This is another reason why want to seek legal advice.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Maureen,
Now, that's settled.

First, establisht the TOTAL # of home platted in your association. This should be available at the court house and will appear on the original filing. The "Master Plan" of the county in most situations.

Then specualte when that 75% # will be reached. If the developer is or has made amendments to that Master Plan or his original filings, you need to see them.

All this I am talking about is for you all to really make a concentrated effort to find out where your association stands today. I would seriosly doubt that the developer would be allowed to publicaly sell the lots as a community (Association) and then stack the deck (intentionally or otherwise) and always hold majority vote or number of votes that would circumvent the free election of the owners to govern themselfs.

You need to find out about all the documents on record at your court house that pertain to the association. Don't be pushy about it and don't hide the fact you are doing this. Get your group to go to Board meetings and ask questions and get it on record and record if necessary. Just let the developer know and your association know that some of you are asking questions. I take for granted that the developer is not providing anything other than what he wants and is not responding to owners concerns. There is an economic crises right now and he will be touched by it the same as we all are. I would not enter into any deals with him or anyone to try and right your situation. You need information and you need support if you can make a case to better your position. It's a chess game probably and the game doesn't have all the pieces on the table.

Do you all have the right to do this? Of course and if you are lucky you can end up controlling your association at little cost and a lot of effort. Remember, this developer has a bottom line, he is in business to make money, he has apparently stacked the deck or it turned out that way. He is going to control the Board the way he set it up, he is not going to give that up. But, he needs the good will of the people that purchased these homes, he does not need bad press, it costs money, he has to follow state and federal laws. He can slip over and under the documents as long as he controls, he can't control forever, that costs money also. He needs to consider the owners in the development, make him do that. As I said be open, be fair, be cool, and be smart, he will recognize that.
IMHO

MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
as always, you give good advice. thank you.

I will make a trip down to the courthouse within the next few weeks. I am also meeting with an attorney that specializes
in HOA law within that timeframe.

The only board meetings we have is our annual meeting. The residents do attend that meeting. Other than that we meet
as a group four times a year privately.

our development will be 40 homes. 30 homes sold will be 75%, however, don't know if the four that are being built
are sold or if the builder intends to rent them (since they are located in a cul de sac which are smaller homes than the original townhomes). He says he iniitated a "Rent to Own Program" which his sales person quoted in the newspaper, however, when I asked for that information I did not receive a reply. I recently received an email from the builder that it is NONE OF MY BUSINESS
asking for that information and copies of the leases and to contact his attorney since he will no longer be acknowledging mine or the other board members email.

Our development is listed on the website as a "rental community" which is not what is on the original advert (which I have from the newspaper in 2005). He is still advertising the homes as a "gated community", however, our gates have never been operational since the development started in 2005.

He has also had his attorney (which is his nephew or cousin) send me letters stating that I am approaching potential buyers not to buy which is RIDICULOUS. I never see any potential buyers and I don't know about renters until after they move in and if and when I get a copy of their leases.

The builder is just trying to "bully" me and the other board member and it has to stop. That is why I am seeking legal advice. I will go there with all my questions and try to get my money worth out of him.

Do you have any suggestions of what I should ask besides the obvious???
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Maureen,
First, I think it is vital that you have copies of the documents the developer filed at the county office (Planning office for one. Most of these county employees are helpful and knowledgeable and will point you in the right direction. Your lawyer will need to know this, save yourself some money and do his preparatory work if you can. He may even agree to give you a list of documents he needs and will let you research them if he feels you can do the job or he has to pay someone else to do it. See if he will work with you, explain cost is a factor but you will pay what is necessary, as long as you stay away from long term commitment.

Read your documents and highlight very specific passages you don't understand. Don't pick and when you find something confusing write down what bothers you, don't rely on memory.

The lawyer is going to ask you want you want? He will probably say something like, "What do you want me to do for you?" Very, very important you have a clear concise answer to this. So list your concerns on paper discuss it with others if you deem necessary and refine it down to; "If he finds out this for me and clears up my doubts of the moment, where does that leave me? Articulate your conclusion to the lawyer and ask for his critique."
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
thanks for the advice. I will keep you informed how it all turns out.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Maureen,
I want to handle this God awful position you and your fellow members seem to be in. I have to ask why are you all putting up with this. This is not criticizm of you, it is directed to all of you. All Board meetings are closed. What does State Law say and what does non-profit association law in your state. I doubt anything in your documents will make a difference as the developer still controls, IF he controls by statute. Keep in mind, this is not a battle between you and the builder. You are a member of a Homeowners Association and I certainly would keep copies of any messages from him or his attorney and reflect you are doing that. His accusations are also to the owners all.
Maureen, I and others have posted here many time about how important it is to understand where we, as owners, fall in the hierarchy of HOA associations. Certainly the Board is out front with action items and should be allowed to manage the business, end, the day to day operation. But we, as individuals must and have agreed to accept responsibility of the association. Fight, battle, scheme, make poor managements decisions, allow entrenched non-functioning Board and Management to ride roughshod, someday, sometime, the people have to speak, and they must speak as a member of the whole, like it or not. The sooner owners realize they are responsible, not to the developer and not to the Board, but to the association, progress will come. You will never get all owners on the bandwagon, but think for a moment: how many people are driving the train now? The minority is, be they owner or Board or management. The Holy Grail is to find those owners that understand where their responsibility lies and will make that commitment to the whole. They really are the power. It's not easy but there are thousand of HOA's that operate like a private business and they get the job done.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Maureen,

From the messages you've posted I'm of the impression you have 3 main issues with the builder:

1) He is advertising the development as a "rental community" which is contrary to how it was advertised when you purchased your home.

The developer may or may not have the authority to change the type of community being built. In AZ the developer must submit a public report to the Dept of R.E. which would state what type of a community is being built. If he wants to make changes he would have to file an amended report which would have to be approved by the Dept of R.E. I don't know what the laws are in NJ, but I doubt the builder would be allowed to do what yours has done (change it to a rental community) here in AZ. This is something the attorney should be able to advise you on.

2) He is buying and renting his units and perhaps renting spec homes still owned by his development co.

You stated the CCRs say he has the right to rent units he cannot sell and he should also have the right to rent any units he owns outright, unless the CCRs contain a "no rentals" clause. I see this as a non-issue.

3) He has sent threatening letters to you falsely accusing you and your husband of trying to influence potential buyers.

This is a matter between you and the developer only. Perhaps the attorney can demand proof of his allegations. If this does result in some legal action between you and the developer I would think it would seriously compromise your position on the board. In fact that may already be the case as it's quite apparent the developer regards you somewhat of a trouble maker. Frankly I don't know how effective you can be to the members as a board member. The developer may just shut you out completely if you pursue legal action against him.

Maureen, I know you've had nothing but good intentions throughout this whole "ordeal". I just think you're caught between a rock and a hard place and may just have to choose between being a board member or not.
MaureenM1 (PA)
Posts: 344
Posted:
Robert,

I hope with all the advice you have given me, and after I meet with an attorney who specializes in HOA law I will have
a better understanding of all of this and will be better equipped to do something about it.

LarryK1 (Washington)
Posts: 32
Posted:
In addition, you may want to think about the potential increase in your HOA dues as a result of being deemed a "rental community". For example, in general, the association's insurance premiums go up as a result of being a rental community versus an owner-occupied community.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
In addition,
Check FHA, and others common providers of mortgages and see if they don't have some sort of cap on the # of rental properties in an association above which they will not provide mortgage money.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Larry & Robert,

The rental caps to which you refer only apply to condo developments. I believe Maureen lives in a planned community as she stated there will be 40 "homes" when the community is built out.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here