💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MindyD (Arizona)
Posts: 47
Posted:
We are only 50 units here and apathy runs high here also. We have a president who is just the most awful and nasty disposition guy. The neighbors that I know all feel the same.
I am not on the board and our management co. does not go out of its way to be helpful either, I don't know what to do. There are so many little things that have been done that are questionable, and not legal that I feel it should be brought to someones attention and when you do you are shown to the door.
Besides the fact that our president is a jerk, he is not doing things with our best interest at mind. The president is wanting to spend money on a project that is redecorating instead of repairing now that the building he and the other two board members live in is fixed, Ooops, that's right the other two members resigned months ago. I would like to know that they would use a scale of importance but I am not seeing it.
Anyhow, I believe he needs to go. I know his name is not on the deed, and there is a lien on his unit. How do I do this? I know if I don't dot my I's and cross my T's, I will regret it. I don't know all the legal stuff but I feel he could really hurt us financially.
Any suggestions how to handle this properly:
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Yes.

Step One: Read your governing documents thoroughly. All of them.

Step Two: Read them again.

Step Three: Research any parts of the governing documents that you don't understand.

Step Four: Follow all the sections in your governing documents that shows how to recall a board and then do it.

In between the various steps, it would be helpful if you could garner support from members as well as read and understand all the sections that will inform you for sure if the "president" is within CC&R guidelines or not.

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Mindy,
Michelle has given you some great advice, best to follow, again and again.

But in addition I detect you meed to change your mind set and start looking at you prediciment in a different slant. How do you do this. You can start by gathering up a couple, and that's all you need for now, of folks that think there is a problem. You meet for coffee and chit chat and kick this around until it becomes clear what your mission is going to be. Obviously it is something you all agree on but the rub might come on how to do it. You all have to keep scratching until you can say, aha, this is what we want to know and this is how we are going to do it. Everyone get on the same page and spread the word anyway you can. You want to let people know where your conviction is, you have to tell them, and you will pick up a follower once in a while. Then you get it all down on paper so you all can refer to it and reinforce your mission and you take it to the Board and dump it in their lap. Record the meeting, take notes and ask productive questions, don't argue, don't fight, take notes. Thank the board for their time, state that your group will get back to them after digesting your notes and recording. Have another meeting with your group, see where you want to go now, same procedure as before. If you can propose resolution to the board and they don't make an offer, wait a few days and call a townhall meeting and lay out you plan to the owners.
Believe me, you do what Michele says, follow this plan to fit your circumstances and you will have plenty to get started with. It's not fun, you make enemies at times, you will make friends also, keep the high road, don't hide, be open and things will happen.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
I would add, I wouldn't be too worried about the president right now, if he is not legal, you can bet he knows it, not matter what he says. Go around him or go through him, but get your mission on the road.

Also be prepared that you may have no problems, but when you dig, if you got problems, and you are smart, they will bubble up from all kinds of information, such as justifying his position with your documents and the court house records which are public info. It gets attention if he is ineligible, because from that moment it is all the owners responsibility to step up, and if they don't they are messing with their livelihood. Always a personal opinion, nothing more.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobertR1 on 06/02/2009 5:39 PM
It's not fun, you make enemies at times, you will make friends also, keep the high road, don't hide, be open and things will happen.

So true! Words of wisdom!
DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
Mindy,

Michele and Robert give good advice. I'll just add this. Where are your board meetings held? Do you have a clubhouse or are they in a board members home? If they are held other than in a privated residence.......start going to them. You need to hear and see first hand what takes place at meetings. Get others to join you. You will not only learn what is or isn't happening but the current President will also feel the heat. Don't lose your cool and remember to smile. Nothing irks people that hate you like a good smile thrown back at them.

Too many people want to remove their board without really being honest with themselves that they will need to step upt to the plate and take over. It's easy to remove a board, the hard time is getting people to fill the slots. Get those people first.

Have fun.

Dana
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Mindy,

I suggest you pay heed to Michele's advice. When researching your gov docs you will want to be looking for any info that might tell you whether or not this Pres is violating anything in the gov docs. That will be the ammunition you will need for a recall. Hopefully your neighbors will join you in this endeavor. There may not be a provision in your gov docs addressing a recall; however AZ does have a state law which much be followed. The statute is ARS 33-1243 (condos). I've copied below the subsection that applies to recalling a board member.

33-1243. Board of directors and officers; conflict; powers; limitations; removal; annual audit; applicability

H. Notwithstanding any provision of the declaration or bylaws to the contrary, the unit owners, by a majority vote of members entitled to vote and voting on the matter at a meeting of the members called pursuant to this section at which a quorum is present, may remove any member of the board of directors with or without cause, other than a member appointed by the declarant. For purposes of calling for removal of a member of the board of directors, other than a member appointed by the declarant, the following apply:

1. In an association with one thousand or fewer members, on receipt of a petition that calls for removal of a member of the board of directors and that is signed by the number of persons who are entitled to cast at least twenty-five per cent of the votes in the association or one hundred votes in the association, whichever is less, the board shall call and provide written notice of a special meeting of the association as prescribed by section 33-1248, subsection B.

2. Notwithstanding section 33-1248, subsection B, in an association with more than one thousand members, on receipt of a petition that calls for removal of a member of the board of directors and that is signed by the number of persons who are entitled to cast at least ten per cent of the votes in the association or one thousand votes in the association, whichever is less, the board shall call and provide written notice of a special meeting of the association. The board shall provide written notice of a special meeting as prescribed by section 33-1248, subsection B.

3. The special meeting shall be called, noticed and held within thirty days after receipt of the petition.

4. For purposes of a special meeting called pursuant to this subsection, a quorum is present if the number of owners to whom at least twenty per cent of the votes or one thousand votes, whichever is less, are allocated is present at the meeting in person or as otherwise permitted by law.

5. If a civil action is filed regarding the removal of a board member, the prevailing party in the civil action shall be awarded its reasonable attorney fees and costs.

6. The board of directors shall retain all documents and other records relating to the proposed removal of the member of the board of directors for at least one year after the date of the special meeting and shall permit members to inspect those documents and records pursuant to section 33-1258.

7. A petition that calls for the removal of the same member of the board of directors shall not be submitted more than once during each term of office for that member.

I. For an association in which board members are elected from separately designated voting districts, a member of the board of directors, other than a member appointed by the declarant, may be removed only by a vote of the members from that voting district, and only the members from that voting district are eligible to vote on the matter or be counted for purposes of determining a quorum.

AnnJ2 (Colorado)
Posts: 120
Posted:
beat me too it. I was going to add to check the local or state laws for anything that might bear on the question and situation at hand
JoeB8 (Illinois)
Posts: 48
Posted:
Members of our association are looking to start a petition to have our pres. removed for various reasons. Could someone post a sample of a petition regarding proper verbiage. Thanks in advance.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
JoeBB,
First Joe, check out the search feature on this page upper right and key in board recall, or keywords like that.

Second,
Get straight what you want to accomplish and why, then figure out how by reading your documents.

You may remember you did not vote your President in, at least that is damn near 100% true in associations. Your association voted him to be a MEMBER of the Board, the Board voted him to be president. So, the Board has to remove him from the presidency.

If you want to recall any Board Member, you have to follow your documents..........that's the way it is. There are no boiler plate standard papers. You may find some that will apply to others associations but that is not how to tackle your concern

Understand this: You stand little or no chance recalling anyone without support, and your documents will be specific what that support is. You need a certain % of votes to call a special meeting, in addition this meeting has to be called to do a special thing, in your case, recall the president. But I am not sure you want to recall the Board member who happens to be the president, but if you do, it must be done through a called meeting.
Now you can see, how complicated this can get. You first need to know, what you want to do, you need to have support, you need to know your documents that ell you how to do this, when you decide what is is you want to do.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Mindy,

Do your docs say a non-owner can serve on the board?
AnnJ2 (Colorado)
Posts: 120
Posted:
I have a few much older association docs that do provide for this
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Ann,
Association documents don't have old and new documents. They have one set of documents registered at the courthouse. If what is registered at the courthouse has conflicts, you have to reconcile these documents and end up with a New set (amended). If they have been amended, then this change will be the (next numerical sequence follow by: Name of association (xxxx) amended Master Deed and By-laws (most places, could be different wording) and then the date. In that document Declaration is words to the effect the registered document is the only Governing Document for the association.

Better check your courthouse and see what is there.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Joe,
I forgot to add:
Don't highjack someone's thread.
Post your concern about your association under a new thread, see discussion topics page.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Dana,

FYI, AZ is an open meeting law state. As such, Mindy has a right to attend all meetings no matter where they are held. She should not feel intimidated or that she cannot attend if the board meetings are held in a members' home.
DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaryA1 on 06/04/2009 6:29 AM
Dana,

FYI, AZ is an open meeting law state. As such, Mindy has a right to attend all meetings no matter where they are held. She should not feel intimidated or that she cannot attend if the board meetings are held in a members' home.

Even though it's an open meeting state I know first hand how uncomfortable an owner is AND how uncomfortable a less than open board can make them feel when the meetings are held in a living room or kitchen. "You dare to come into my home and tell me I don't know how to run MY association? I am the Great OZ!" At least that's what I was told by a past President when I was in "his" living room.

We now hold our monthly meetings at the club house of a neighboring association. (I really wish they had a pool.) I feel the meetings are more professional and open that way. No owners ever seem to attend but they would be much more comfortable if they did.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Dana,

A similiar incident happened to a good friend of mine who lives in my old HOA neighborhood. The person who chastized him for speaking out at a meeting held in his home is now the treas of the assn and all the monthly board meetings are held at his home. For this reason my friend will not attend a meeting. I think it's terrible for a board member to act this way, but of course there's nothing that can be done about it especially if the other board members let him get away with it. With regard to my friend, it's even more shameful because there are only 49 homes in that HOA.
DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
We only have 56. I had been on some previous boards and it was embarrassing for me the way some owners were treated by other board members. These board members would be like, "Okay, you stated your piece, now leave." They made them feel very unwanted.

Board meetings are business and when they are held in a home they just take on a too comfortable, laid back stance wherein I feel some people treat it more like a card game then what it is.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Dana,
My opinion: You are right and so is Mary. Mary is referring to the "right" to attend the meeting and I am sure she could walk in the Pres. living room at a meeting and frankly question his tactics.

You and I. on the other had think it is fair a reasonable to expect Associations Meeting be held on a neutral site. Your selection of borrowing a community room is commendable and suits me better also. I would tend to feel intimidated, thus, I would act defensively.
Not a good idea for me.

I think Mary will say, given the choice, a neutral site is best.
TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
Our association met in an owner's (off property) home, and I think it was mostly to cut costs. I found out our local library offers meeting rooms, so that's where we're going to be from now on. The library offers the rooms for $25/hour, but we don't have to pay because we're non-profit.

Just a suggestion!
DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
Thanks Robert, I agree with Mary also to the legal aspect; it was the emotional side to it that I was trying to point out.

Other options for meeting places are local schools, churches, and some smaller town rooms are sometimes free.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Robert,

I do agree that it's best to meet on neutral ground. My assn meets in the local elem school library. My former assn always met in one of the board members home (small 49-home assn). The friend I mentioned in an earlier message always complained that we should not meet in people's homes and if we met somewhere else we would get more members to attend. So, I did some checking and found that the church that was right behind our s/d would allow us to meet there at no cost. We started meeting there but we didn't get more to attend, it was always the same members who showed up when we met in board members' homes. Then the church moved and we lost the meeting site. So it was back to meeting at board members' homes. Weather permitting, oftentimes the meeting would be held in the garage instead of inside of the home. The annual meeting, which always drew a lot more members, was always held in a garage. Sometimes the board just does not have a choice in the matter so you do what you have to do.
DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaryA1 on 06/04/2009 10:35 AM
Robert,

The annual meeting, which always drew a lot more members, was always held in a garage. Sometimes the board just does not have a choice in the matter so you do what you have to do.

You must have BIG garages in Arizona! (laughing)
DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
Oh wait.......that was your former association. It must have been in Texas, everything is BIG in Texas.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Dana,

My former assn was in AZ too; everyone has a 2-car garage. Where I live now, the majority of the homes have 3-car garages but the 3d bay is mostly used for storage.

BTW, I've never lived in TX but have visited there a number of times (Houston and San Antonio).
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Picture this:
Double car garage. HOA meeting in one side. Meth Lab in the other.
Fuzz comes, arrests the whole bunch!
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Robert,

How long have you been going w/o sleep?
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Mary,
I post here to get some grasp on reality. You think some of our posters here are screwed up. This place is a bastion of sanity, especially you, well maybe not, let me think on it.

I do seem to have a lot of late, late night posts. When I do my best thinking...........when I am asleep.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Robert,

You are too funny. You know you're always a bright spot in my day!
MindyD (Arizona)
Posts: 47
Posted:
I want to thank you all for your input, and it is very helpful. Our meetings are held in the club house but that does not make them comfortable my any means. I do have support from many other owners and they are waiting for me to make the move so I just want to go about it the correct way. I don't want to give them alot of time to work over the financial records so I want to do this where they have to answer quickly and our audit is taking forever. One question though, once he is recalled is it up to the board to fill his spot? I know the first words will be "who is going to do the job" I will keep you updated on it all but if Mary has any extra time to help me write this up, I would love it, hint, hint. Thanks All
AnnJ2 (Colorado)
Posts: 120
Posted:
You misinterpreted my statement I think. I have several much older associations 37+ years old that have documents that do allow for non-owners to serve on the board as members and not in connection with the developer.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Ann,

I've heard of many HOAs whose bylaws allow nonmembers to serve as directors. Mine state you must be a member, except for those appointed by the declarant. However, a member of the architectural committee need not be a member.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here