💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BarbaraD6 (Florida)
Posts: 347
Posted:
We're having pool problems again. Someone suggested that failure to obey the rules(which they pass by after they open the gate) will be considered trespassing. I can't wait to hear your thoughts on this. We're a Florida townhouse community.
Barbara
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
That's a jump - failure to keep rules = trespassing?

No, it's just a failure to follow the rules. Reason for withdrawal of privileges, I'd say.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
I dunno.

I guess it all depends on how the information on the sign is written.

If it invites in only people who follow the rules and says something like, "by passing through this gate you agree to follow the above rules. Failure to follow rules will result in your invitation to enter the property null and void and you must leave the area immediately or be considered a trespasser."

In that case, then, yes.

AnnJ2 (Colorado)
Posts: 120
Posted:
Sounds like a suggestion with simply an incorrect word choice.
AnnaD2 (Florida)
Posts: 960
Posted:
Barbara, we're asking that question, too. Sort of. We have a couple of people who are blatantly violating the pool rules. One of them brings a carload of people from another neighborhood to swim on the weekends and they all swim in their street clothes; a rule violation. The rules are posted right next to the pool.

One attorney we talked to says we can "tresspass" the owner and the guests from the pool if they break the rules. Yet Florida Condo Statutes do not give us the right to ban them from the pool for non-payment of maintenance fees.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Barbara,

I really don't see how one has to do with the other. Failure to obey rules means you are being disobiedient. Trespassing means you are going somewhere where you have no legal right to be. Ridiculous!!!!
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
Maybe not so ridiculous. Assuming that the HOA has the authority to revoke a homeowner's privilege to use the pool for not following the posted rules, then once the homeowner has lost that privilege they no longer have the legal right to enter the pool area. If they continue to do so, they could be considered to be trespassing.

However, I don't think they could go from rule violation to trespassing in one step. I would think that the homeowner would need to be notified of the loss, and even given the ability to request a hearing first.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
IMO, the only way the BOD could do this would be to send a violation notice informing the member they are in violation of not following the pool rules and if it happens again their pool privileges will be revoked and they will be in violation of trespassing if they enter the pool area.

What I'm wondering is what is the point in calling it trespassing? Does trespassing carry a higher penalty?
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
I agree that the BOD would have to start by sending a violation notice with the trespass warning, and there would probably be additional steps involved as well.

As to why call it trespassing, what else could be done? If the Board has revoked their privileges but they enter the pool area anyway, what recourse would the Board have? Revoke them again? Maybe assess a fine if the HOA is allowed to fine, but my guess is that they wouldn't pay without a battle, and in the meantime you still have the problem behavior. By removing their right to use the pool AND invoking trespass, the HOA would then have the ability to get the police involved if necessary and have them physically removed from the area.

BTW: this is actualy very timely for me. We received a complaint from a homeowner about some inappropriate behavior at our pool yesterday. Seems some teenagers started going way beyond what we used to call "heavy petting" while there where families with young children in the area. A member of the pool committee was called and he threw them out, but the homeowners who were at the pool want further steps taken. We'll start with a letter to the parent of the teen involved (identified through our access logs) and then go from there.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Dwight,

I still have a problem with calling it trespassing. Remember we're talking about a member of the assn. I'm sure the CCRs state a member's right to use the amenities can be suspended if he is in violation of the docs, but I doubt they say he can be charged with trespassing if he still tries to use the amenity (this case the pool). I think this is a slippery slope! And, I certainly would not get the police involved on this one.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Maybe so, Mary, but his "guests" may be trespassing, especially if the rules state that people who disobey the rules must leave the pool area immediately.

RaymondL1 (Texas)
Posts: 8
Posted:
I am president of our HOA in San Antonio TX and asked a teen who was below our our posted age of entrance(16) to leave. He did not live in the nieghborhood while I was with my family on Memorial Day. This young man had been asked to leave several times before. He brought his friend's father who did live in the nieghborhood and was not paid up on his dues unbeknownst to me at the time. The resident was asked to leave the pool after he started getting right in my face and very confrontational with me about the other young man who was asked to leave. At this point , I as president and a resident concerned for my family deemed this person as a threat to the saftey and welfare of everyone at the pool that day and told this leave based on his violation of the rule that anyone creating an unsafe atmosphere at the pool could be asked to leave. I told him he needed to leave or I would call the police. He proceeded to knock the phone out of my hand at which point I went to the office he followed me and then proceeded to assualt me until four residents pulled him off me. When the police were called they echoed many of the same sentiments I have seen on this sight regarding our inability to enforce what they called house rules. It's like its the wild west these days. My position is even if he was a member in good standing the board does have the authority to ask any member to leave its premises for rules violations that endanger others, or any action the board feels is inappropriate. So to what extent does the courts recognize HOA rules violations as a right to ban residents from the use of the facilities, if any?
Of course in my case assault charges were filed against the resident and perhaps a protectve order limiting this residents legal physical distance from me or our facilities. In any event I am sure this has not been litigated at the Supreme Court level or will it ever be, which means alot could be interpeted differently depending on your jurisdiction or local ordinances. It is important for us to remind our elected officials that it is important for them to remember HOA's beyond election time. I for one belief HOA's and the people that run them should have the same protections as elected servants and laws and ordinances that support our work!
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
You may well be able to ban people from the pool. You may have every legal right to do so. (I would say it would depend on a combination of state laws and your documents.)

As far as police involvement, your mileage will vary considerably. Some departments don't mind pushing people around with flimsy standing. Others are more cautious and often this is a function of the population level.

The thing is that until you have taken the proper steps, then the issue is a civil issue and not a criminal issue. (And to muddy the waters proper steps will vary with the state.)

As a note, the gentleman who was attacked should push for a protection order not a restraining order. A restraining order is again a civil matter and not a police matter. I would guess that you could get a protective order for yourself and a restraining order for the facilities (unless you can convince the judge he will attack others).
BarbaraD6 (Florida)
Posts: 347
Posted:
All,
The board may impose sanctons for violations of the Governing Documents,such sanctions may include,without limitation:
suspending the violator's and any guest or invitee of the violator's right to use any recreational facilities within the common maintenance area.

Restricted activities:
-any noxious or offensive activity which in the determination of the Board tends to cause embarrassment, discomfort, annoyance, or nuisance to persons using the common area or to the occupants of other lots
-any activity which tends in the board's judgment, to unreasonably distrub the peace or threaten the safety of the occupants of other lots
I think the person mentioned "trespassing" as the police will take it serious and the violator will think twice about doing it again.
I didn't really think that "trespassing" might be a possibility. Now as I read this thread, after sending violation letters,fining, and then suspend right to use pool,trespassing could be the next step.
Thanks for all your wisdom
Barbara
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
Keep in mind that the police will not respond if they believe you are simply trying to "get the resident's attention."
MikeF4 (Texas)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Our board does criminal trespass warnings through our local police department. We mostly do it for non-residents who hop the fence to get in, but we have also done it for residents who hop the fence after hours or who refuse to leave after being asked to leave (for alcohol or another major rule violation that causes a board member to tell them its time to go).

A criminal trespass warning is simply a formal written and verbal notice to them, in the presence of the police officer, that if they return to the property it will be considered trespassing and they will be arrested. Of the 10 or so folks we have done this to over the last 2 years none have dared to return. A cool refreshing swim is not worth an arrest.

Residents we will lift the warning for after 1 year, if they request it.

www.silveradohoa.com
RaymondL1 (Texas)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Thanks for your advice I mix the terms up din't I? In any event, I certainly appreciate your comments and this website!
RaymondL1 (Texas)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Thanks for your advice I mix the terms up din't I? In any event, I certainly appreciate your comments and this website!
AlexL1 (Florida)
Posts: 305
Posted:
I have read all of the nice comments but still does not answer the very very basic problem of characters who live in the condo area but invite in 20 of their friends from some other area.. How is that to be handled? The sign says that a resident my invite in two guests.... We canot cll the police.. our hands are, in reality, tied.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By AlexL1 on 07/28/2009 8:45 PM
I have read all of the nice comments but still does not answer the very very basic problem of characters who live in the condo area but invite in 20 of their friends from some other area.. How is that to be handled? The sign says that a resident my invite in two guests.... We canot cll the police.. our hands are, in reality, tied.

Then Alex IMHO you can call the police to remove 18 of the 20. However I would discus it with the HOA attorney. The way to go if allowed in your documents may be suspension of privileges or a fine. The fine would have to be high enough to make it undesirable to continue; a $100.00 fine split between 20 people is only $5.00 bucks a head to swim but if for each additional violation the fine was raised….

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
Alex - you enfoce against the property owner. If your rules say only two guests and the owner regularly brings in more than two guests, then you revoke the pool privileges of that owner. Now he can't bring in any guests.

This assumes of course that you have some sort of access control system that will allow you to disable access for individuals. On the other hand, if his pool privileges have been revoked and he shows up any way, then now he is considered to be trespassing and you should be able to have him (and his guests) removed. If you can't get the cooperation of the police for that, it might be worth attending a city council meeting or two.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Alex,

The next time this happens a violation letter should be sent with a substantial fine attached. Also a statement in the letter informing him that if it happens again, his guests will be removed and charged with trespassing together with a $XXX fine being levied against him. In the meantime I think a discussion with the HOAs attorney would be in order to determine if there is any other action that can be taken. Perhaps just a letter from the attorney would do it.

I'm curious to know why you say "We cannot call the police." If the police are saying it's private property and they cannot enforce then I would be calling the police chief to remind him that everyone who lives on this "private property" pays his salary too!! You should not let the P.D. get away with this.

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Let's face it some homeowners seem to go out of the way to be a pain in the tuchas but before you slap them with a fine to punish them for annoying the BOD there are steps that need to be taken. These are required by statute in at least Florida, Ohio (COA) & California and possibly others. More importantly the BOD needs to treat those H/O's like they would want to be treated if the situations were reversed, as hard as it sometimes is. (After all we're all human or at least most of us are)

There has been talk of fining these miscreants and I have no problem with that but there needs to be a clearly defined rules and fine schedule which need to be in the hands of all of the H/O's before any fines are levied along with a manor to appeal it. You just can't make it up as you go unless you want to find yourself in court or on the news trying to explain that you are not selectively enforcing a covenant or rule. And you need to keep meticulous records to prove you aren't picking on someone or if you are that they're the only one to your knowledge that is in violation.

The point is not to raise money for the HOA but to get the H/O's to comply with what needs to be done in the easiest manor possible. I would suggest every HOA appoint a rules committee with as many H/O's on it as possible and follow the CC&R's and statues for making rules and have them vetted by an attorney. For instance our by-laws allow the BOD to propose rules but they aren't valid without 51% of the H/O's approving them. You also need to ask the attorney if you can lien for unpaid fines (some states don't allow it) or if you need to take the H/O through small claims court.

Examples:
Pool rule violation - Anyone who violates a posted pool rule is subject to the following: 1st offence - written warning. 2nd offense - $50.00 fine 3rd offense - suspension of all pool privileges for the balance of the season. If the violation is deemed serious enough to be a safety hazard the BOD may forgo the written warning and begin fining or suspend privledges.

Architectural violation - Anyone who builds or causes to be built or makes or causes to be made any modifications which requires prior ACC approval without ACC approval is subject to the following - Any structure or modification which complies with ACC guidelines and would have been approved $500.00 fine. Any structure or modification which does not comply with ACC guidelines and would have not been approved $500.00 fine and the homeowner must remove the structure or modification within 30 days or be subject to an additional monthly fine of $500.00 until the violation is cured plus attorney fees if the violation is not cured in 90 days and the Association must take legal action.

Pets - Anyone who walks their pet on common elements in violation of the approved pet rules is subject to the following:

Walking a pet off leash -1st offence - written warning. 2nd offense - $50.00 fine 3rd offense - the BOD will declare the animal a nuisance under Article ____ of the Convents and require that the animal be removed from Happy Acres HOA.

Failure to clean up animal feces -1st offence - written warning. 2nd offense - $50.00 fine 3rd offense - the BOD will declare the animal a nuisance under Article ____ of the Convents and require that the animal be removed from Happy Acres HOA.

Etc. etc. etc.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Oops, I meant follow the statutes not follow the statues as they don't really move that much.




Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
RaymondL1 (Texas)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Update

Mr. Leeper,
Good afternoon. The City Attorney's office replied today with the following information:
The SAPD would not be able to enforce a criminal trespass issue regarding the club house. Since the member was informed by the association to not be in 'good standing' with the association, then these are house rules. The member has not violated any penal code or city ordinance. If the member was disruptive or had disorderly behavior at the club house then an officer could remove the individual on a violation of that particular penal code. The member not paying his dues is failure to abide by a contractual obligation and therefore not a violation of any penal code or city ordinance. The association owns the property and would be responsible for enforcement of any internal rules.

Sounds like they don't really want to do their job?

How can security officers enforce trespassing?
JS3 (Oregon)
Posts: 12
Posted:
As a "townhouse community", does the "association" actually own the property? You folks seem to be confusing townhome/condo type ownership versus single family home ownership.

If the "association" does not own the property then each townhome owner has a percentage ownership in all "common" areas. How can you justify a theory of criminal trespass for an owner entering property that he has an ownership interest in? All too often, these HOA problems arise because the board members of a private corporation believe they are the police, judge, jury, etc. The police officer is correct irrespective of whether the HOA or the members own the property.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JS3 on 09/11/2009 7:41 AM
As a "townhouse community", does the "association" actually own the property? You folks seem to be confusing townhome/condo type ownership versus single family home ownership.

If the "association" does not own the property then each townhome owner has a percentage ownership in all "common" areas. How can you justify a theory of criminal trespass for an owner entering property that he has an ownership interest in? All too often, these HOA problems arise because the board members of a private corporation believe they are the police, judge, jury, etc. The police officer is correct irrespective of whether the HOA or the members own the property.

No. The officer is not correct, irrespective of HOA/member property ownership. At least not in OUR jurisdiction.

Our Metro Police Department will cite and/or arrest people for criminal trespass if we sign a criminal trespass waiver. The Police Department will then also provide us with a trespassing sign that indicates the same. The Metro Police Trespassing Notice sign states: Be informed that you are trespassing on private property, per a letter of agreement with the XXXXX Metro Government and the XXXXX Metro Police Department, upon which you have no legal right to enter or remain upon. You are hereby ordered to leave and vacate this property at once and you are further ordered to remain off this property unless you are invited by a resident having standing to do so to be upon said premises, in which case you are a temporary guest. Under KRS 511.080, criminal trespass 3rd degree is a violation, punishable upon conviction by a fine of up to $250.

The waiver reads as follows and is on file with the Metro Police Department:

Authorization of Property Owner, Lessee, or person in charge XXXXXXXXX Residents Association.

In order to promote Public Safety and Health and to insure the protection of private property, I, ___________ give the following authorizations to the XXXXXX Metro Government and the XXXXXX Metro Police Department.

1. I, ______________, residing at ____________, am the owner-lessee or person in charge of the real property located at ____________, City, State.

2. I, ______________, hereby give my permission and authority to the XXXXXXX Metro Police Department and its agents and officers to act as follows:

A. To enforce any trespassing violations on my property located at: _________________

3. I, _____________, further authorize the XXXXXX Metro Police Department and its agents and officers for the purpose of enforcing the laws against trespass (KRS Chapter 511) to order, on my behalf, persons not duly authorized to not enter or to leave the land and property located at: ________________.

4. I, ____________, relieve the XXXXXX Metro Police Department, its officers and agents of any liability in connection with actions taken under the terms of this authorization. I further do not hold them in any way responsible for incidental damage to my property and land which may occur as part of their enforcement actions.

Signed.
Dated.
Notarized.

What this gives us is the ability to have the Police Department enforce trespassing by any unauthorized persons, meaning people we determine to no qualify for admittance. So this allows people who have been banned through our governing documents to be removed or cited for criminal trespassing through our local law enforcement. This gives THEM the authority to act on our behalf.

DavidC24 (Florida)
Posts: 31
Posted:
We are a gated community and our pool area is fenced in with a locked gate. We give each member (lot) a un-reproducible key, with lot number on key, that opens the gate to pool area. When following up on suspected trespassers, they must show the key; otherwise, they are trespassed. It works fairly well. As with anything the HOA has to enforce that confrontational in nature, it is more difficult to pursue. I always caution members to be safe first, then call police and Board in that order.
MissyS (Florida)
Posts: 73
Posted:
Another option

We were having the same problems. We are not able to fine the offenders so there wasn't a deterrent for them to stop their behavior. In desperation we purchased a security system which includes card access to the pools and clubhouse and 10 cameras. Violations are documented and anyone violating the rules is sent a warning and if they break the rules again we simply deactivate their amenity card. We purchased the entire system using a leasing company. We pay $425 a month and we will own the system at the end of 5 years. Our docs allow us to deactivate the card for non payment of dues. Amazing how many owners who were always running a month or two in the arrears paid their dues right before summer lol. Also has helped with owners renting their townhouses. We've had several renters upset when they realized they were paying their rent but the owners weren't paying their dues. We no longer have any owners with renters behind in their fees. This is one of the best decisions the board has ever made!!
DavidC24 (Florida)
Posts: 31
Posted:
I want to do something like that, could you send info on your system. Thanks.
AlexL1 (Florida)
Posts: 305
Posted:
Yes, Missy... where is such a company that does that type of leasing?
MissyS (Florida)
Posts: 73
Posted:
When I’m at the office tomorrow I’ll get the information on the leasing company. Is it OK to post it?

We have 3 card access systems at our 2 pools and clubhouse. We also have cameras at both pools and cameras inside and outside the clubhouse. There are 2 cameras at the entrance to record tag numbers. The software is excellent and easy to use. It allows us to set different times for entering each zone. Zones would be the pools and clubhouse. When anyone uses their card there is a log showing the name, date and time of entry. There is also a 20” monitor that shows the cameras in real time and a DVR for recording to document any violations. In the very beginning we had numerous cars broken into and we were all excited when we did a search and saw the people going from car to car checking for unlocked doors. We hit the wrong button and by the time we realized what we did wrong the tape had been recorded over. Hard lesson learned. Since then we have provided cds to the police on two occasions and there were convictions. As poor as our association is, I never thought we’d be able to afford such a system. Still can't get over we're only paying $425 a month. In 3 years it's ours.
DavidC24 (Florida)
Posts: 31
Posted:
I look forward to it but if you cannot post here, please free to email to me at [email protected]. We are looking at IP Video camera system with online storage. We can view the videos on a secure webpage at anytime, live and recorded. Couple that with an card access system would be fantastic. Ar the cards used for the entrance gates
too?
AlexL1 (Florida)
Posts: 305
Posted:
Missy

The name of the compnay you use is not really important but what I would like to know is the TYPE of company that does that.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here