💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
Yes, it's TracieS again...

Our yearly members' meeting (and BOD meeting) is at the end of next month. For those of you who've read the issues I have with our association, you know it's going to be a big meeting for me. I already mailed a spring letter to our owners, and in the notice, I gave them the date/time/location/purpose of our meeting. I have to mail out a "formal" notice of the meeting within two weeks to meet the rules regarding notice of meeting for our by-laws, and in that mailing, I include the agenda, the proxy information, the location/date/time, etc.

Here's a draft of my agenda... Does it make sense? I'm following the outline of previous agendas for our association, but I'm really expanding on the new business. Does it "flow"?

Call to Order
Roll Call - Proxies - Quorum
Proof of Notice (Colorado specific requirement?)
Reading/Approval of Minutes
Financial Report (this is me as the "acting" secretary/treasurer)
Manager's Report (this is me as the Property Manager)
Directors' Reports (I'm also the President and Chair of our BOD)
Election of Officers/Directors (another time to raise hands!)
Unfinished Business - none from last year.
New Business
1. Update CC&R
2. Amend By-Laws
3. Amend Articles of Incorporation
4. Reserve Study
5. Financial Audit
6. New Law Firm
7. THA Website
8. Amend docs re: Water Bill
9. Insurance
10. Recycling
11. Corporate Seal (it's missing - who may have it?)
12. Carbon Monoxide Detectors (new Colorado law)

There's a lot of big issues they need to think about. Is it better to add some descriptive information to the agenda, so the members have a chance to think about the issue? Should I greatly expand on the new business stuff?

During the Manager's report, I'm going to drive home the issue of the CCIOA, SB 100, SB 89, SB 1359, and how our association is not compliant with ANY of them. I'm also going to have copies of all our documents at the meeting, so we can BRIEFLY discuss how out-of-date our founding docs (Articles of Incorporation, By-Laws, and CC&R) are, and then discuss the process of coming into the 21st century.

Thoughts, input, advice...all greatly appreciated, even if it's only $.02!

TracieS
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
Well, looking things over, I think you should serve lunch. I don't see how you will fit that much in without serving a meal.

But really, are you sure you actually need to amend your documents? Most state legislatures have enough sense to write the laws to simply supersede certain rules that you have. For example, you don't have to amend the CC&Rs to allow political signs. You simply stop issuing violation notices (and/or removing the signs).

As a note, you may want to check into the legality of you being both secretary/treasure and president of the Board. Many states have laws prohibiting this. (Look at your non-profit laws.)
AnnJ2 (Colorado)
Posts: 120
Posted:
Tracie,

Most likely you have way too much on the plate and will lose the interest of most of them after the financial report. The agenda is standard and looks fine but the new business needs to be either reduced and have another membership meeting or send out a draft of what your speech woudl ahve been to go with the annual. You are not in a position to put anything on the table yet, I don't think, that the membership can actually get their hands around and unless I am mistaken you have nothing for them to vote on. Maybe at this meeting it is simply a time to esplain what an association actually is and how it functions and its relationship to the State Laws as they effect your association. And by the way you are missing some of the laws that have passed. go to Hindman Sanchez's site and you can find all of them. But you have the three most critical CCIOA, SB-100 and SB-89.

any meeting that lasts longer than 1 1/2 to 2 hours loses its audience and the last half has little to no impact on the majority.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
IMHO - an Annual Meeting is a meeting of the Membership and not a time to introduce new issues of such huge subject matter.

In a nutshell, the board should talk about what it has accomplished and what issues it is dealing with now, and what the suggested goals for the future might entail. (Remember, this may be a out-going board, since you are also having elections)

Your New Business list is way to long and involved. It only needs to be announced that the board will be establishing committees to deal with those subjects. Then ask for volunteers to be on these committees, so the issues are seen through some eyes other than the boards.

You also need a time for Members to speak. This is, remember, THEIR meeting.

TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
I appreciate the input, and I know it's a big agenda.

The problem I have - this is our only meeting all year. It's the only meeting of the members/owners and it's the only meeting of the BOD. We have 19 units, but a few people own several units.

Here's our breakdown:
- 1 person owns 4 units - she will send her proxies to me, as she hasn't attended a meeting in years.
- 1 person owns 3 units - she may or may not attend, but she will not serve on the board, nor does she have any concerns.
- 2 people are in the process of selling their units, so I don't think I'll even get proxies from them.
Let's see, that brings me to 9...
- 2 units are behind on dues, so they can't vote (DOES THIS CHANGE MY QUORUM COUNT????)
- 3 units are owned by members of the same family. One person will come to the meeting with the proxies for the others, and that one person will usually be goaded into serving as VP.
- another owner will send me one proxy.
- another owner will send me one proxy.
- finally, two other owners may or may not show, but they won't serve on the BOD.
- last, but certainly not least...me.

So, I'm betting that 4 people show up, but we'll have a quorum due to proxies.

KirkW1 - yes, I'm pretty sure our documents need some refreshing. They haven't changed since 1989, still list the two classes of membership, and we don't follow them. We either need to follow them, or update them. Also, I'm the elected President, and our by-laws allow the office of S/T to be held by one person. I'm not the elected S/T, just the acting S/T. Violation notices - what are those? I've never issued a violation notice... Political signs have been shown to be free speech, and I'm a huge proponent of our constitution and the individual freedoms we enjoy as Americans. Our association is so informal, I can't imagine what type of violation notice I would ever issue.

AnnJ2 - yes, it's big. But, with so few people, from Roll Call to New Business usually only takes about 10 minutes. ARE YOU KIDDING ME? I'm missing even MORE laws that we're not compliant with???? I'm not even sure what to say about that, other than, jeez-o-man...is it ever going to end??? You're right in that there's nothing for the "membership" to vote on, just the BOD to release funds to being compliance with the laws I knew about...

SusanW1 - yes, it will be a fully outgoing board, but we'll vote the exact same people back in. Committees? I can only get 4 people to the meeting (including ME!) and I have to strong-arm people to be a figurehead and hold office so we can at least comply with that bylaw... I do agree that perhaps I'm heaping too much on, and make it more of a "these issues need to be explored and resolved". The members haven't spoken in the 6 years I've been attending these meetings, let alone being involved and on the board. I'll add a line item to the agenda for member time, but I doubt it will be used.

I think I'll revamp the New Business to the following:
1. Statutory Compliance (this will include CCIOA, SB 100, SB 89, and whatever others I'm missing, along with updating founding documents to be in compliance with state laws regarding common interest properties and non-profit corporations.
2. Operations (this would include the reserve study, financial audits, taxes, legal, website, insurance, etc).
3. Amend for water bill - this is a needed amendment, but who knows when we'll actually amend. Perhaps after legal advice on our documents.

Would that be a better, less intimidating way of handling this quagmire?

TracieS

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Tracie,

I agree with the others, in that your agenda is much too long. IMO, a number of the new business agenda items aren't even matters for the membership to vote on, much less even discuss, i.e., reserve study, financial audit, new law firm, website, insurance, recycling, corporate seal, carbon monxide detectors. Also, if you are proposing amending the gov docs simply to comply with current state laws, IMO that is totally unnecessary and a wasted effort.

Regarding your manager's report. What is the reason for alerting the membership to the fact that the board has not been compliant with state statutes? IMO, this will only cause discension and solve anything. I know you are in an unusual situation by wearing three hats, that of a member, a board member and the PM. If you are unable to separate the 3, perhaps you should consider taking off one or even two of those hats! IMO, wanting to stir up the membership over their inability to conform to the state laws, would be something a disgruntled member would do -- certainly not the PM or a board member!
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
A PROPERTY MANAGER should be hired. You don't have an active enough board or membership to run this HOA. A small executive committee can oversee the PM, and get a yearly report, .but the day to day activities should be taken over by someone.
TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
Hi Susan,

I absolutely agree! I'd love to hand off the PM responsibilities, so I can focus more on the "theoretical" issues facing our association. I'm more of a brain person, less of "put it into practice" person. I'd like a lot more time to study the laws and our founding documents, as well as research our document/association/corporate history.

Unfortunately, our dues are quite low ($75/month), and to hire a professional company would require us to almost double our monthly dues. I pay about 2 bills per month, and I make one or two bank deposits per month. I walk my dogs, so I'm always looking at the property, and our contractors are quite reliable. At this time, a professional management company is probably just out of the question for us. A few years ago, we sent out RFPs (this was before my time, so maybe things have changed...I'm guessing not) to professional management companies. With our 19 units, we only got one company to respond and the costs were outrageous. Professional management companies, by and large, want to focus on the bigger properties.

I do appreciate the suggestion, though. Hopefully, one day, we'll be able to hire a company.

TracieS
TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
Hi Mary,

You asked what is the purpose for alerting people to the fact that we're not in compliance. Well, in my eyes, I was hoping that by raising these issues, I might get at least one person to stop being so complacent and who might help me right things. This is NOT a case of "the last board/PM were so horrible, and now look at what I have to deal with?". It's a case of "wow, laws have changed considerably, and we haven't noticed. Let's get things fixed now before we get fined/sued/lose our non-profit status/etc."

Was I hoping incorrectly? I know our owners, well, most of them anyway. They won't be too concerned about HOW things got this way, just that we start getting them fixed. Our owners are laid-back and really just want to live their lives without too much hassle. I don't think this is going to "raise a hornet's nest" or anything even close to that. They know I'm not disgruntled, and they also know that I truly am acting in the best interest of the association (which means I'm working to PROTECT THEIR PROPERTY VALUES!!!!).

Thoughts?
TracieS
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Tracie,

Well, by stating your motives and how you think the members feel, you've just reinforced my opinion that this issue should not be brought up to the membership. This is a board issue and should be discussed and resolved by them.
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
Here is the way I see it (worth the price yo paid for the advice).

You likely need 2/3s of the units approval to change the documents. That makes 13 units. You have accounted for 12 to 14 of the needed votes. (By the way those behind on dues can vote on this part.)

With the exception of yourself nobody seems to care. (Or at least they don't care enough to do anything.)

Given all of this, I would simply alert the owners that to keep things legal some changes need to be made to the documents. Tell them that you will be working with an attorney to get together proper wording and such for the documents.

Then after you have a chance to put together the amendments, work to get your needed 13 signatures.

Really, cut to the chase and give them the "Reader's Digest" version. Make the meeting short and cut to the point.
TracieS (Colorado)
Posts: 460
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KirkW1 on 05/28/2009 7:11 PM
Here is the way I see it (worth the price yo paid for the advice).

You likely need 2/3s of the units approval to change the documents. That makes 13 units. You have accounted for 12 to 14 of the needed votes. (By the way those behind on dues can vote on this part.)

With the exception of yourself nobody seems to care. (Or at least they don't care enough to do anything.)

Given all of this, I would simply alert the owners that to keep things legal some changes need to be made to the documents. Tell them that you will be working with an attorney to get together proper wording and such for the documents.

Then after you have a chance to put together the amendments, work to get your needed 13 signatures.

Really, cut to the chase and give them the "Reader's Digest" version. Make the meeting short and cut to the point.

By Jove, I think this might work! I tend to "overprovide" information, but I really think they'd just give me the "smile and nod". You know the smile and nod...when someone just smiles and nods because they're either ignoring you or not paying attention...

I need to remember - broad brush strokes unless they ask for the detail.

Outstanding advice for my cyberpennies...

TracieS

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here