💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JanS4 (Michigan)
Posts: 14
Posted:
1 Our condo association BOD approves the budget.
2. The budget does NOT contain a line item for Major Repairs and Replacements Reserves.
3. We have never had a reserve study.
4. Assuming the co-owners approve the transfer of excess income of $100,000 from previous years in accordance with Rev. Ruling 70-604 to be applied against our current year assessments.

Question: is it permissible for the BOD to add a line item for Major Repairs and Replacement Reserves in the same amount ($100,000)? By doing so, the assessments would remain the same.

Thanks so much for any insight you can provide.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
There is no reason why the board cannot transfer this money into a separate account earmarked "reserves". The owners no not have to approve this transfer if the assn files a tax Form 1120H, which is specific to HOAs. Although not explicitly stated, the requirement contained in Rev Ruling 70604 only applies if the assn files the tax Form 1120 (the corporate tax form). You can check this out with your CPA.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Jan - are you saying you had "excess" of 4100,000 in your account and you think the association may want to apply that against the assessments, so they will not have to individually pay their assessments this year?

But the Board wants to establish a Reserve Fund with that money instead?

JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
Unless your docs state otherwise, I'd venture the BOD can direct this money to anything allowed by those docs.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
In any case, ALL funds held by the association need to be "designated."

To have $100,000 just laying around is not a good idea.
JanS4 (Michigan)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Susan -

If we had excess income of $100,000 and our corporate bylaws require the owners to vote on either 1)refunding the excess or 2)applying the excess to the assessments in the following year (in accordance with Rev. Ruling 70-604)and the owners vote to apply the excess - can the BOD then create a new line item in the budget (Reserve for Major Repairs and Replacements) to offset the decrease in the assessments?
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Jan,

What decrease in assessments?
JanS4 (Michigan)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Mary -

As an example: Budgeted assessments for 2009 = $300,000, less $100,000 excess applied from 2008 = $200,000 to be collected. An addition of a line item to the budget for Major Repairs and Replacement of $100,000 would in effect raise the assessments back to $300,000.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Jan,

I don't know who is preparing your budget but, IMO, they need help! You do not decrease the amount of assessments to be collected by the amount of excess income from the previous year. The budget line item for Assessment income is based upon the amount of the yearly assessment x the number of members. That figure should not be reduced unless the assessment amount has been reduced! The budget is prepared based upon the income expected to be received in the coming year and the anticipated expenses.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
But Jan has a point. If there are excess "undesignated" funds, they should be returned to the Members.

The Board is at fault for not doing the budget right (not planning the Revenue / Expenses correctly) AND for not establishing a Reserve Fund based on a Reserve Study.

I would be livid if I were a member of this HOA (that this board was SO off on its budget vs. actual over all this time and kept coming after me for assessments every year)

But they DO need a Reserve Fund and they will have to talk the Membership into the need for one.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
I don't agree that the excess funds should be returned to the member. In light of the fact that there is no reserve fund, these funds should be used as "seed" money to establish one. Not being familiar with the gov docs in question, I'm not sure the members would have to agree to the establishment of a reserve fund. Frankly, if I was a member of this assn I would certainly be asking how on earth we could have excess funds in the amount of $100,000 (1/3 of the assessment income!) for one year! This really boggles my mind. My assn has an $800,000 budget and I would be shocked to see an excess of $100,000 for one year. Doesn't the board keep track of the variances from month to month?
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
In our HOA, any excess (minus seed money for the new year and making sure the insurance deductible emergency fund is met) is automatically deposited into the reserve fund.
AnnJ2 (Colorado)
Posts: 120
Posted:
It sounds like a simple new designation of the income on a budget. the associaiton needs a reserve and sounds like in fact they have it they just have not designated as such. There is no extra money anywhere as I read this. Unless the owners are wanting the dues reduced by the $100K per year over all units, then what they are doing is a good thing for the association and hopefully they will now be wiser and allocate a portion of dues to the reserves each year. an association budget should be a zero balance budget with any and all anticipated excess going into reserves every year as well as a specific portion each month. If the membership is agitating to have dues reduced by this amount and using it to offset operating income for the year, then the membership needs an education in reserves and the effect of not having them in place ie. special Assessments and inability to sell or refinance. Teh lenders are getting harder on authorizing loans in associations with no or low reserve funds as well as high rental percentages.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
We get this SAME thing every year - usually from the senior citizens who want to know why we have $600,000 "in the bank" and still want dues paid.

We had to educate them again) about the Reserve fund and the 20 year plan that it must meet- BOTH of these requirements are in our bylaws.

In the OP's post, the Reserve fund has NOT been established and this money APPEARS to be undesignated, so the Members are sniffing around, wanted it to off-set their dues.

Yes, the Board can establish a reserve fund now, but it's like a day late and a dollar short . . . heck, they don't even know if $100,000 is too much or too little.

Very bad in the "vision for the future" department on the part of the board
JanS4 (Michigan)
Posts: 14
Posted:
To clarify: We have never had a reserve study; a reserve has never been budgeted/established; and our bylaws require compliance with Rev. Ruling 70-604.

As nearly as I can determine Rev. Ruling 70-604 gives two options: 1) refund the excess (as in send a check) or 2) apply the excess to the next year's budget. Transferring the excess to a reserve is not sanctioned by the IRS.

Hope this helps - and thanks to all for your input.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Jan,

I find it quite interesting that your bylaws would reference Rev Ruling 70-604. Can you post that bylaw article for all of us to read?

As I stated earlier, that ruling only applies if your assn files a tax form 1120 (corporate form). Also, can you cite the revenue ruling, or any other ruling of the IRS that says excess income cannot be transferred into a reserve account! Thank you.
JanS4 (Michigan)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Mary -

Rev. Ruling 70-604 does NOT pertain to our taxes - Form 1120-H has always been filed. We are required to follow its provisions solely because of the Corporate Bylaw which states:

"At each annual meeting of members a report shall be presented setting out the amount of excess assessments for the immediately preceding taxable year determined pursuant to the provisions of Revenue Ruling 70-604, as amended by any subsequent Announcement or Ruling of like substance and import, together wth a statement setting out the balances in the various reserve fund accounts as of the last day of such immediately preceding taxable year. The members shall then determine by majority vote whether to refund or rebate to the Co-Owners all or any portion of the excess assessments allocated to the general fund for such immediately preceding year and all or any portion of the reserve fund accounts, whether arising out of excess assessments for the immediately preceding taxable year or years prior thereto. To the extent any portion of such excess assessments and reserve fund balances are not refunded, they shall be retained by the Association for the current taxable year for the purposes previously authorized until the next succeeding annual meeting of members held pursuant to these by-laws."

An excellent article by Gary Porter, CPA discusses in detail 70-604. The link to the article is www.porterandcompany.com/Articles/IRSReconsidersRevRul70-604.pdf.
The next to last paragraph on page 2 is most pertinent.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Jan,

I find this provision of your bylaws to be quite ludricrous. Whoever wrote this apparently had no knowledge of IRS rules pertaining to HOAs. To require the members to vote to receive a "rebate" from excess assessments is one thing but to extend that authority to the reserve fund is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard of. Then to state that this authority is based on the provisions of Rev Ruling 70-604 is even more ridiculous since it may not be beneficial to the assn to file the tax form 1120. I would recommend your BOD request the members to vote to have this article stricken from the bylaws as the requirements stated therein are not in the best interests of the assn.

I've read the article by Gary Porter, which only reinforces my opinion that this ruling only applies to assn's filing the tax form 1120.

With regard to rebating excess income to the members, Title 26, Section 528 of the IRS Code states: "no part of the net earnings of such organization inures (other than by acquiring, constructing, orproviding management, maintenance, and care of assn property, and other than by a rebate of excess membership dues, fees, or assessments) to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. . ."

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here