💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JamesE4 (Texas)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Our HOA is on Canyon Lake, Texas, and is basically a residential community. Recently, we have one owner/realtor with three large houses which have been for sale for awhile. The homes are vacant, but the properties have been advertised on internet sites such as VRBO.com as weekend vacation sites. They are all waterfront homes, and are in the middle of several quiet houses. We have had many complaints from their neighbors. Our deed restrictions state that we are a residential community and businesses are not allowed, but does not specifically cover vacation rentals, which our board regards as a business activity.

Last weekend, 2 of the homes had at least 10 rather rowdy young men in each of them. Memorial Day weekend may be even worse.

Does anybody have any previous experience with this situation? Is it possible to ask the website to take down these advertisements?
JosephW (Michigan)
Posts: 882
Posted:
Vacation rentals are a business. Also, you can check to see if the owner is paying the appropriate taxes for hotel-type rentals. Most local governments have their fingers in that for taxes, inspections and permits. You might let the local taxing authority know. The board should have or adopt a policy that allows reasonable leasing in these tough times. Use the document language "In keeping with the residential aesthetics of the community and condidering that commercial enterprises are prohibited, leases must be for a period of at least one (1) year.......The association shall have the right to notify a tenant if the owner is in default on their assessments and may require the tenant to pay those directly to the association and deduct them from lease payment at no penalty to the tenant. These statements shall be required to be placed in any lease of a home in this community. Tenants are to be given a copy of the association documents and the owner shall obtain their signed agreement that they have received the documents and shall abide by them while living in ____association. The association shall have the right to assess a fine in the amount of $____ for each and every violation, for every 30-day period that the owner is in violation, against the owner for failure to abide by any or all of these conditions".

Have your attorney make sure you can do this, clean it up and then put it in place. You have no authority over someone else's web site, but if you have the appropriate policy in place prohibiting short-term rentals, you can try putting the site on notice and see what happens.

Talk to the police about the kids. Let them know that you're working on prohibiting the short-term rentals and would appreciate their assistance in keeping the serenity of your community.

Joe

Joseph West
Official HOATalk.com Sponsor
Community Associations Network, LLC
www.CommunityAssociations.net

*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
You might be able to get the owner to stop with a letter from the attorney. But if that doesn't work, you should be prepared to lose a court battle unless you have some sort of rental restriction.

There is an HOA in my town that recently lost such a case. The covenants stated that the neighborhood was single family residential. There were standard business rules in place that have withstood court cases in Texas.

The problem is that property rental was not considered a business per say. In fact, if you extend that, then you could (and would have to) ban all rentals because they would be a business. Even though they are obviously short term rentals, at the heart they are rentals. And without something directly addressing rentals, you won't have much to stand on.
JamesE4 (Texas)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Owner does not appear to be willing to stop with the attorney's letter. Could you tell me the county or town in which the case you mention is located. It would help to have our attorney research this case, especially since it happened in Texas. Thanks
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
I don't know about Texas, but you might also want to look in Las Vegas, Nevada. If I remember correctly, there was a condo there not too long ago that was involved in a "Vacation Rental" arrangement. Some unit owners went to court and got it shut down. There were several stories about it that were on the front page of HOATalk, so you might be able to look through the archives to find it.
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
I don't know if this will help, but I did a quick look and found one story about the condo that I was thinking of:
http://www.lvrj.com/news/42378512.html
This particular story is about some other issues at the condo, but it does mention the 'illegal hotel' operation that was going on. If you search for the condo mentioned in the story on the lvrj.com website you will find other stories about the situation.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
James,

Frankly I don't know how you can fault or even prevent this person from advertising their units as rental properties. After all isn't that how he has been using them? If he has 3 propreties, he can't be living in all of them. I would recommend taking Joseph's advice in that the BOD should adopt a rental policy. In the policy it could be stated that any advertisements for rental of the unit shall not state it is a rental property. If any member wants to rent their property they must agree to the rental policy. If it is not signed and returned to the BOD that owner is in violation of the gov docs and can be fined accordingly.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Adoption of a rental policy is your real only tool that will stand up in court. My Florida association has a 2 times per year with a 6 month as the minimum time for a lease. Some seasonal places allow a 3 month minimum so whatever works best for you. But short term rentals always fall under a busines or lodging code for municipalities and are taxed as such. That means weekly or monthly rentals and that should cover your situation and this owner.
JamesE4 (Texas)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Thank you all for the input. The Deed Restrictions state 'All lots shall be used for residential purposes, except lots designated for business purposes' These were written in 1978, and to change the Deed Restrictions requires at least a 75% vote of the members. The Board's interpretation is that short-term rentals are a business, but the phrase above appears rather weak. We are contacting our a attorney for a more informed opinion.
Kirk W1 mentions a POA in Texas having a similar problem with bad outcome. I have tried to search for this case, but have come up blank. Any further help?
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
James,

Here's is my interpretation of the deed restriction:

1) "residential purposes" means a property can only be used (including be rented) as a residence (meaning people living in it). It does not mean a residence cannot be rented, it just means a lot(home) cannot be used to conduct a business, meaning the property owner would have to rent the home to someone who will be living in it, not using it for a business office.

2) "business purposes" means a residence cannot be owned or rented to house a business enterprise, i.e., a doctor's office, etc. Many assn's have business properties that are a part of the assn and perhaps this could also have applied to the declarant/developers rental office at the time the s/d was being built.

I don't know what the mindset of your board members is but I hope they take into consideration the fact that there may come a time when a property owner has no choice but to rent his property. There are a number of circumstances that would cause this. Therefore, I don't think it's a good idea to want to ban rentals outright. As I and others have mentioned, a rental policy is the best way to tackle this problem. IMO, it's up to the city/county to determine whether or not renting one's home is considered a business. There may be some homes that have been purchased by investors for business purposes but there will also be other homes being rented out of necessity. I think it would be rather hard for the board to determine which rentals would fall into the "business" category.
JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
I agree with Mary.
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
The case I was refering to was in Sachse Texas. Most likely it was Colin County. While I don't know the official HOA name, the neighborhood is known as Woodbridge.

As for your percentages, I believe that you could amend with 67% vote. Unfortunately, our laws are very goofy and it is awkward at best to figure out if some of the chapters apply to you. But check the laws at:
http://tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/pr.toc.htm

DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

All,

There was a big court case down in Key West where a HOA allowed some short term rentals in this very touristy City. The CITY had rental restrictions codes and fought the HOA. The different twist here is that the City lost the case and owed the owners involved a huge amount of money because the State Supreme Court ruled that the City laws were unconstitutional. A twist!!!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here