💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JW4 (Washington)
Posts: 31
Posted:
I am a member of a small HOA in Washington state, actually just nine units. My unit is unique and has an additional skylight that opens. At this point, it is the only ventilation in the room. Board decided that when they are replaced, at a future date, mine would be replaced with a NON-OPENING one. The Board makes many decisions based on personal opinions and sometimes not common sense. With that said at the last two annual meetings, I have voiced objection about this matter.

What is even more troubling is that the minutes for, two years, do not reflect my objections i.e. they are omitted. The only mention is that the Board will repalce skylights with all non-opening ones. I have asked now two times that the minutes be redone prior to our vote at the next annual meeting. If they do not comply, what is my recourse as an owner? It is unfortunate but the other members really do not care since it does not effect any other unit. In addition, I view their conclusion as a "de-valuation on my unit. It needs to stay the way I purchased it. I told the Board that I would bring a tape-recorder to the next meeting.

So, how would an HOA talk member handle this matter?
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Was there a motion to change the type of skylight window? THAT process should be stated in the mintues. The "discussion" is not included in the minutes, only the results.

Did the Membership vote on this - or did the board pass it at their meeting?

Insist either to see the minutes where this motion passed, or call the board on its authority to change the tpe of windows without a vote.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
JW,

Susan is correct about what should be in the minutes.

My question is: exactly what is stated in the CCRs or the architectural guidelines about skylights? If the BOD is totally changing the CCRs then a vote of the members would be required. If they are only interpreting, but not changing the meaning, then that can be done with only a board vote.
JW4 (Washington)
Posts: 31
Posted:
Thank you both for your comments.
1) The CC&R are 23 years old and do not break out the definition of a skylight, just the mention that the roof is part of the common elements.

2)The community never see minutes from a Board meeting nor are we invited--we are small. I know it is still wrong but one must pick their battles shall we say.

3)Their were 2 opening skylights in my unit, after a year fight they agreed to replace it since I could prove it was failed (air was leaking in) and just to get the thing replaced, So, I did agree that that one could be non-opening BUT NEVER the other one which supplies fresh air to the third room. In addition, I told them that their conclusion was against code--all rooms must have ventilation. Be that as it may, I would never let them change the skylight to non-opening even when I do replace the only window in the room. I sincerely feel that they cannot change the configuration of my unit which again is unique.

4)The CC&R require a 2/3 vote on any change/amendments to our documents. No vote was required or asked for.

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
JW - you must track down this change for the type of skylight that was orginally installed. They changed it for a reason (price? leakage? availability?) They must show you documentation of that change (motion made and passed) Is the Board given authority to change certain things in the maintenance of the buildings? Can you look on your property/home description to prove that you had a certain window installed, and they are oblligated to keep that, according to the purchase agreement?

If this change is due to price, perhaps you can pay the difference.

If you can show that code dictates a vented skylight, you also may have a better chance.
JW4 (Washington)
Posts: 31
Posted:
Susan,
You see this skylight in question is original from 1989 when the units were built. When we do replace the skylights either globally or due to failure then they want to replace mine with a non-opening one.
I hope this clarification helps.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
JW,
I would bet that you have some grandfather authority. You point out your skylight is unique, it opens and closes. That is what you bought. I would bet they would have to have 100% vote to change them all. They are not going to get it from you. Remember, your skylight is not like the other skylights. They are going to replace the other skylight AND your skylight. So they are not replacing your skylight, as they are the others, they are replacing your skylight with one that is like the others. They can no more do this than they can replace your roof with a roof that it different than your roof. It has to be what you bought. This is a condo, isn't it, and we are talking about limited common property (you have exclusive use), it is part of your unit like the door). I would not agree to helping pay, that's a bad idea. You want a skylight that opens, just like your neighbors want a skylight tha is like the one they bought or better, cost is not the issue. If the Board decides to upgrade skylights, they have to upgrade your skylight if they can, if not they have to put in a better skylight that opens and pay for it.
Here's the deal, if this is a condo and the Board is going to replace windows of all units, it has to be a condo. The price you paid for your unit is apportioned in your condo fees. This apportionment reflect the opening skylight, when this was set, that was calculated, and the relative price to all the other units set.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
JW,
I see from reading your initial posting again you are listed you are as an HOA. Therefore I would probably discard anything I said, if you are correct.

Washington State is a long way from SC so I suppose anything is possible. I don't want to impose but I would be helped if you can describe how nine units with a common roof and skylights are handled under an HOA charter. You must have common property and maybe you have some land that goes with each unit. It is all confusing to me, but I would like to know how it is governed. I would assume you all pay the same dues each year, any special assessment would then be equal, how about taxes and insurance and property taxes, and utilities, I guess all units are alike except for the skylight. Do you have a pool or common roads or driveways. How many members on your Board, do you elect Board members? Do you know if you fall under the same state regulation that rules HOA, regardless of size.

Good luck on you quest.
JW4 (Washington)
Posts: 31
Posted:
Robert, Indeed we are an HOA. The skylights and roof are common elements. Dues are paid as a % of interest in the ownership. Mine are lower since the square footage is less. This skylight is unique.

But I realize in reading threads from others that no matter what the Board decision, mentioned in prior minutes does not count, only a vote from memebers. No matter,the issue with my skylight is very grey at best. In a nutshell, if they indeed, at a future date, tried to replace it with a non-opening, I would turn the matter over to my attorney. None of the members will be happy because a reply will cost the HOA money over a President whom is somewhat stubborn and stupid. Hopefully, by then she will no longer be Prez.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
JW4,

Let me post the webster definition of Condominiums:

A condominium, or condo, is a form of housing tenure and other real property where a specified part of a piece of real estate (usually of an apartment house) is individually owned while use of and access to common facilities in the piece such as hallways, heating system, elevators, exterior areas is executed under legal rights associated with the individual ownership and controlled by the association of owners that jointly represent ownership of the whole piece.

Colloquially, the term is often used to refer to the unit itself in place of the word "apartment". A condominium may be simply defined as an "apartment" that the tenant "owns" as opposed to rents.

Colloquially, we on this site refer to condominiums using the first definition above.

Whereas, we normally refer to Home Owners Association as members of the association owning individual plats of land (lots). The value of that land is usually assessed by the association in equal shares.

Since the definition of HOA and Condos really are different animals or maybe we can say that Condos could be loosely termed an HOA, we can not say an HOA can be defined as a Condo.

SC Law has two distinct entities when considering these two groups
1) HomeOwnersAssociations, and 2)Condominiums (Under the entity of the SC Horizontal Property Regime).

It would be interesting to see how Washington State separates the two, can you help us?
JW4 (Washington)
Posts: 31
Posted:
Robert, I would need to do some research to be technical. But I believe we fall into the former category too. It is late and I will re-group tomorrow.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
JW - you have not told us WHY they changed from one kind of skylight to another. Or hasnt' this happened yet. In any case, you need to see a MOTION to make the change, since this was original to your purchase and their changing it requires some official action by the board.

Your comments in the minutes will not be seen UNLESS it is part of a debate on the motion. And maybe even then, all the debate comments don't have to be in the mintues. The best thing to do is to write an offical letter, to be read at a board meeting, registering your concern about what they want to do.

JW4 (Washington)
Posts: 31
Posted:
No it has not happened yet. My concern was omission of my objections in the minutes. I like the idea of generating a letter to the board recapping that a decision such replacing my skylight to a non-opening one requires a vote and even then I would not let them do it. Would they cover up another owners skylight because they no longer wanted them because it has to be maintained?

Either way, if pushed my attorney would write a letter and the end result would be that it would cost the HOA money. I suspect the issue would go bye bye.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
JW,
Technically, I think you should be able to make a case about your skylight. Now, if you have no interest in anything except getting your own way and hiring a lawyer, I fail to see how we can help you. Like it or not, it makes no difference, you are a shareholder in this association you live in. Up to now, it appears, if they don't agree with you, you get a lawyer. In fact you have referred to (your or my) lawyer. Fine, you have that election,but you are asking for my help with the conviction I don't agree, you will fall back on your lawyer. You are saying the exact same thing about YOUR association. Why would you have to push your attorney, has he said he don't quite agree with you so you will "push" him to do what you want, if so, add him to the list of people you are asking for advice and are willing to ignore what he says. This skylight business , you have pushed into the background and it is now, do what I want or I'll sick my lawyer (push) on you.

Good Luck JW, you are also using your money to hire the lawyer and some of your money to pay your adversary. Better to sit down and have a little heart to heart with your board and find a compromise. That is true if you are in a Condo or HOA or don't know the difference.
JW4 (Washington)
Posts: 31
Posted:
Robert,
Thank you for your comments. Please understand that this is a two year saga. Not mentioning it in the minutes is not ok but I cannot force them to do so.

If, in fact, the Board is not equitable or neglects to follow the CC&R/ statues and uses their own opinions to get their way then yes, I will use my attorney whom specialies in real estate law/HOA. Frankly, my patience is thin when it comes to our current Board for a myriad of very legit reasons.

I will think about the advice given to date and formulate a letter nonetheless and send it. That way there is a paper trail.

Thanks!
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
JW4, If we consider your above reply, then the problem is not the rules, it is the Board. You mentioned two years. Two years is about the time it would take to get a bonifided recall of the Board set up. Read your documents about what is required to recall the Board. Some require no cause, only a % vote. However since you have to build support you must make sense and that means at the very least showing gross neglect or misconduct of the Board. There will probably be quidelines in you doc. Be careful and be accurate and be fair.

Of course the best way is to build support and with your support go before the board and challenge their flaws and actions and work out a deal with the goal of changing the Board through the democratic process.
JW4 (Washington)
Posts: 31
Posted:
Thank you and in a nutshell you are so correct.
DeniseA2 (Washington)
Posts: 15
Posted:
WA State Condo Owners:

Washington State requires Property Managers to have a State Real Estate License if they do not own the property.

Very Important. Folks must remember that property managers have access to your association funds and must be accountable for this measure and responsibility.

RCW 18.85.011
Definitions.

(16) "Real estate brokerage services" means any of the following services offered or rendered directly or indirectly to another, or on behalf of another for compensation or the promise or expectation of compensation, or by a licensee on the licensee's own behalf:

(h) Performing property management services, which includes with no limitation: Marketing; leasing; renting; the physical, administrative, or financial maintenance of real property; or the supervision of such actions.

RCW 18.86.030
Duties of licensee.
(2) Unless otherwise agreed, a licensee owes no duty to conduct an independent inspection of the property or to conduct an independent investigation of either party's financial condition, and owes no duty to independently verify the accuracy or completeness of any statement made by either party or by any source reasonably believed by the licensee to be reliable.

You can put in your property managers name/business name to verify if they are real estate licensed

http://www.dol.wa.gov/business/checkstatus.html
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Denise,

I really don't think it's necessary to resurrect every old thread from a Washington HOA member to let them know about this new law. Posting this information just one time is all that is needed.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here