💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MaarshaM (Texas)
Posts: 6
Posted:
I know this is a long one, but we need help and we do not have money for an atty. I tried to get an answer from a counselor with SCORE but it wasn't helpful. Maybe Donna can help. I have asked your opinion on something else and you all were very helpful Hope you can do it again. Thanks.

This is a Texas Homeowners Association problem: We have a resident that has violataed one of our Restricted Covenants which is: "Each home shall have a front garage which may not be used for any other purpose." We have a resident that has enclosed her garage area to make another room with windows facing the driveway; in other words there is no resemblance of a garage. We want to enforce our Covenant but since we are all new at this and without legal advice, it appears that the only way to enforce is to sue. We have sent letters and talked with her but she will not discuss and has said as much as "she is not going to do anything about it." We feel that this additional living area needs to be put back to the original garage before selling and have asked her commit to this request but to no avail. Now, our Board wants to take her to small claims court and sue for damages, which would take the form of "access to the property and the owners permission to reconstruct and restore the property to be in compliance with the Covenants.. The time of the reconstruction would be determined by the owner but prior to any transfer of the deed or her renting the property. He has gone through a reasoning and computation of damges and come up with $5,250 plus court costs. (This is sorta complex so we would not want to burden you with this unless you are willing to help us with this problem). If the property claim is invalid, then how do we protect ourselves against the owner who simply pays the $5,250 and asumes that she has paid the damage incurred by the Homeowners Association and made the Association "whole again" and she is free and clear to leave the converted garage as is? Please let me know if you are able to give advice on this subject. Thank you. Marsha Marino

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Can you describe your HOA? Detached condos? Do all homes look uniform in shape and color?

How is it that CCRs can dictate what happens within the walls of one's own home?

I don't think your CCRs intent covers your concern, but others will pipe in shortly.

MaarshaM (Texas)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Hi Susan: We are a subdivision of 106 homes. All different. We are a 55+ subdivision. For the last 20 years, wehave not had one problem with convenants but now we think we do due to the violation of the garage door being removed from the garage area. Our CCR directly state "All homes will have a garage door in the front". Let me know if you need other answers. Thanks.
JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
I'd say the HO has violated a few clauses in your docs and can be made to correct her offenses. And I'd also guess she accomplished this without the appropriate local Zoning approval and permit(s).

I'd call the Zoning Authority, explain the situation and ask what can be done. The ZA is not in the business of enforcing CCRs, but it is in the business of granting permits and signing off on the final product. I'll guess in this case they'd drop by for a look then educate the HO on her misdeed.

If the ZA passes, then use whatever fining/correction procedures your docs contain to have the space re-garaged.

Q: Do your docs contain a req. for approval for exterior modifications? If so, that would be an additional avenue to bring this matter to the proper conclusion.

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Maarsha,

From what you have written it appears to be very clear that this is a direct violation of the CCRs. When did this change occur? If it was recent the board can still take action. The first action would be to send a violation notice giving the h/o a certain period of time to cure. If that doesn't happen then a fine would be in order if your HOA has the authority to fine for CCR violations. Then it would be on to small claims court. On the other hand, if this change occurred several years ago it may be beyond the time that action can be taken. You would have to consult with an attorney to make certain on that.
PeterB1 (Florida)
Posts: 257
Posted:
Maybe another approach would get some action. Did the owner apply for and receive the appropriate city building permits? Was the modification approved by the city?

Maybe getting the government involved will bring some action.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
You would be wise to clarify this. There might be mother-in-law suites added to a lot of homes, with the economy the way it it.

If you want that space to be exclusively and always for the purpose of garage, then you' better state that better in your CCRs.
JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
My Encarta dictionary defines a garage as a space in which to store one or more motor vehicles. No mention of use for storing Mother-in-Laws. The doc language here is clear and unambiguous, if you ask me.
KevinK7 (Florida)
Posts: 1,343
Posted:
I would think that if the covenants state their must be a garage door on the front, the only issue is the removal of the door and not what is inside...

I have had friends convert their garage's into living space and kept the garage door... they had simply sealed up the area behind it and left the the door for the outside aesthetics.

Also, do the governing documents go as far as to define a "garage door"? If they do not, couldn't a garage door be 3'x6' or 10'x9' or etc... (I would see this as more of an issue of semantics if the homeowner wished to argue the definition of "Garage Door").

BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
One more thing to look at before you hit a court, what section of the CC&R's is the language about garages in? Context may well be important here: if the statement that the homes must have a front facing garage door is in a section dealing with the orientation of garages, it could simply mean that if you have a garage, the door must face the street, not the alley (it might not mean you have to HAVE a garage). If it is in a section on architectual style or modifications, it may mean you must have a garage door on the front of your house.

Make sure the context/section and authority of the statement are intended to cover what you think they are.
JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
Kevin,

The OP stated the docs provide:

"Each home shall have a front garage which may not be used for any other purpose."

The door is a separate issue, if you ask me. The quoted language is not open to interpretation.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
So . . . no "MAN Cave" in the garage?

JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
Good point, Susan. And I, for one, have never seen a garage used solely for storage of motor vehicles. And yes, many guys use them as a personal Fortress of Solitude. But you don't need a zoning permit for that, as I believe one would to convert it to a permanent living space. So I still think Maarsha's HOA has a legitimate beef and the power to have it de-Mother-in-Lawed.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
thanks John, for bringing the arguement back to specifics.. now, do we have a legal definition of what a garage is?

a place for parking cars? a place for storage of unwanted items (which, the MIL might qualify as)? a place to perform repairs, keep tools, christmas decorations, or put in a hot tub?
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
IMO,

This is just another example of a very poorly written CCR restriction. A garage cannot be used for "any other purpose", means what? And, how would that ever be enforced, except in the current case where it was obviously converted into a room. All the errant member has to do is put the garage doors back on and no one will be the wiser as to what it's being used for!
JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
Brian,

See my post above of 16 March. Dat's all I gots.
JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
Mary writes:

>>>All the errant member has to do is put the garage doors back on and no one will be the wiser as to what it's being used for!<<<

I think that horse (no offense to MILs) has already left the barn.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
I wonder if the quest to make all the exteriors of the homes the SAME is not the intent of the door rule.

I'd just replace the door, drywall behind it and do whatever in there.

Who'd be the wiser?

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here