FrancescaM (Washington)
Posts: 264
Posts: 264
Posted:
I am not trying to be petty here.
I am thinking that perhaps someone has dealt with this on their board or has a good idea on how to process this kind of event?
Our HOA had a small issue that needed to be ironed out before our next meeting. The board on a whole decided to meet today Saturday, not to make any motions or decisions, but to review much needed information before or next meeting. This was a "working" meeting, no decisions were made just good group work... it in the end went well. It had to do with review of our current budget and providing information in regards to what our laws requrie.. we did no formulation or decision making.. purly informational only... ( Our goal was met and information is ready to go for our meeting next week for motions yay or nay..)
We had one member who is famous for not attending or participating much outside of a normal meetings come and allow the information to be shared. At the end of our meeting the man asked.. so are we NOT going to vote on this? The board said no.. he asked why not? We had to remind him this was not a scheduled meeting with a posted agenda but rather a meeting to share information needed. ( It was imperative!)
He said, "if I knew this wasn't a regular meeting I wouldn't of bothered to come". I was at a moment of weakness and muttered.. what else is new? I apologized, but his statement threw me for a loop? He openly tried to argue some points on what we were reveiwing and taking that into consideration I can see he was conducting a meeting by himself. How is it that such important info that needed to be reviewed BEFORE a meeting can be emphasized? This gentleman often will dowse on the side of the non majority and argue about 80% the board votes to move forth. Any adivce?/
I am thinking that perhaps someone has dealt with this on their board or has a good idea on how to process this kind of event?
Our HOA had a small issue that needed to be ironed out before our next meeting. The board on a whole decided to meet today Saturday, not to make any motions or decisions, but to review much needed information before or next meeting. This was a "working" meeting, no decisions were made just good group work... it in the end went well. It had to do with review of our current budget and providing information in regards to what our laws requrie.. we did no formulation or decision making.. purly informational only... ( Our goal was met and information is ready to go for our meeting next week for motions yay or nay..)
We had one member who is famous for not attending or participating much outside of a normal meetings come and allow the information to be shared. At the end of our meeting the man asked.. so are we NOT going to vote on this? The board said no.. he asked why not? We had to remind him this was not a scheduled meeting with a posted agenda but rather a meeting to share information needed. ( It was imperative!)
He said, "if I knew this wasn't a regular meeting I wouldn't of bothered to come". I was at a moment of weakness and muttered.. what else is new? I apologized, but his statement threw me for a loop? He openly tried to argue some points on what we were reveiwing and taking that into consideration I can see he was conducting a meeting by himself. How is it that such important info that needed to be reviewed BEFORE a meeting can be emphasized? This gentleman often will dowse on the side of the non majority and argue about 80% the board votes to move forth. Any adivce?/