RayS2 (Arizona)
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Posted:
Can anyone explain the protocol involved to set up and run such a meeting to remove a few directors with or without cause? Our bylaws allow a special meeting of members to be called by members having at least 10% of all class A votes. We plan to have sufficient members sign a petition requesting the meeting to meet that requirement. We will obtain all possible proxies and wondered if a single name can be used for proxy or must a choice be given of several members?
Then the bylaws state a notice of the meeting and the agenda must be mailed by the secretary or other officer. We have one officer who agreed to help, so we'll give him the signed petition. If he tells the property manager to mail it, she may not, since she may contact the president and he might tell her to ignore it. So we may do better to mail or hand-deliver it ourselves.
Who should run the meeting? Should moderator be opened to a vote to kick off the meeting? I believe our one sympathetic board member should not run it, since it is a meeting of members, not a board meeting which would impose another conflicting set of rules under another article of the bylaws. Then someone must take minutes, correct? We will use Roberts Rules.
Looks like the bylaws allow a surviving director to appoint replacements rather than the members needing to vote in same. Perhaps we should just get a show of hands from those willing to serve and be appointed. I suppose a simple letter to replaced directors is sufficient notice. Also a letter to the mgmt company.
Then the bylaws state a notice of the meeting and the agenda must be mailed by the secretary or other officer. We have one officer who agreed to help, so we'll give him the signed petition. If he tells the property manager to mail it, she may not, since she may contact the president and he might tell her to ignore it. So we may do better to mail or hand-deliver it ourselves.
Who should run the meeting? Should moderator be opened to a vote to kick off the meeting? I believe our one sympathetic board member should not run it, since it is a meeting of members, not a board meeting which would impose another conflicting set of rules under another article of the bylaws. Then someone must take minutes, correct? We will use Roberts Rules.
Looks like the bylaws allow a surviving director to appoint replacements rather than the members needing to vote in same. Perhaps we should just get a show of hands from those willing to serve and be appointed. I suppose a simple letter to replaced directors is sufficient notice. Also a letter to the mgmt company.