Quote:
Posted By KirkW1 on 01/22/2009 6:07 PM
In our case there are people with the management company who sign the checks. Those individuals are bonded to protect us. We also receive a copy of all bank statements each month. Overall, I feel more comfortable with this arrangement then I would having BOD members sign the checks.
Exactly. On of our past treasurer's wrote at least 2 checks out to himself, and signed them. He resigned so we did not have to pursue ugliness.
Quote:
Posted By KirkW1 on 01/22/2009 6:07 PM
As a note, as long as there is a signature on the check it will go through and be paid initially. There is absolutely no routine checking of a signature on a check today. The only time it is looked at is if you claim the signature is not valid. Further, while you can probably get checks printed that state two signatures are required you will have a hard time getting banks to actually require two signatures.
I can back this up, too. In the course of determining how the checks got through, since at that time we
did have two signature lines on them, the bank informed us that Santa Claus could sign the check, on one line only, and it still would go through for that very reason. There is no routine checking of signatures on checks today.
Quote:
Posted By KirkW1 on 01/22/2009 6:07 PM
As for having the treasurer's name printed on the checks, that just seems to be a waste of time and money. What happens when the treasurer changes next year?
Again, this is a very good point, as well.