FrancescaM (Washington)
Posts: 264
Posts: 264
Posted:
I need to know how common is this and if anyone else has had to deal with this type if issues. My subject as ambigous as is ...is simple.
Our board is trying to practice something that has not always been the case.... communication. IN the past years before this term our board would often be suprised during meetings with facts, numbers or actions done on thier behalf by our former President.
Our Former Prez is now doing the same... she is now a memeber at large.
Example?? We have a strict collection policy. After $1800 behind in dues, they go to collections.. our atty for processing. The HO gets a letter stating all communication must now go through them for payment plans etc. Not even our PM can help or take thier calls at this point. One HO who had really sad circumstances was behind nearly $4500 in dues. He sent our board a letter through the atty asking if we would accept his payment plan( it was an ambiguus letter, not well written with a high intensity payment plan). We recieved our board packets of info 3 days before our board mtg. Our ex president reviewed the docs inside like we all do. She took it upon herself to CALL the deliquent homeowner to "clarify" his payment plan which was scribbled on a scratch paper.. it was presented to the board in addition to the mentioned papers from the atty.
My concern? Nobody directed this individual to call the homeowner. We didn't know she did this. Our legal documents that are sent to the homeowner are asked any and all correspondence to be done through the atty at this point. However, this is just an example of the ex prez acting outside of the baord.
It is a tough issue with us. I don't beleive this is good practice if we as a whole can't follow our own guidelines set forth by our atty. Do you wonderful HOA"ers have any advice? Our board tried to explain in executive session to the MAL that this is not ok to act without our knowelege, it was more or less a shouting match... really not what we need,not productive at all.
Our board is trying to practice something that has not always been the case.... communication. IN the past years before this term our board would often be suprised during meetings with facts, numbers or actions done on thier behalf by our former President.
Our Former Prez is now doing the same... she is now a memeber at large.
Example?? We have a strict collection policy. After $1800 behind in dues, they go to collections.. our atty for processing. The HO gets a letter stating all communication must now go through them for payment plans etc. Not even our PM can help or take thier calls at this point. One HO who had really sad circumstances was behind nearly $4500 in dues. He sent our board a letter through the atty asking if we would accept his payment plan( it was an ambiguus letter, not well written with a high intensity payment plan). We recieved our board packets of info 3 days before our board mtg. Our ex president reviewed the docs inside like we all do. She took it upon herself to CALL the deliquent homeowner to "clarify" his payment plan which was scribbled on a scratch paper.. it was presented to the board in addition to the mentioned papers from the atty.
My concern? Nobody directed this individual to call the homeowner. We didn't know she did this. Our legal documents that are sent to the homeowner are asked any and all correspondence to be done through the atty at this point. However, this is just an example of the ex prez acting outside of the baord.
It is a tough issue with us. I don't beleive this is good practice if we as a whole can't follow our own guidelines set forth by our atty. Do you wonderful HOA"ers have any advice? Our board tried to explain in executive session to the MAL that this is not ok to act without our knowelege, it was more or less a shouting match... really not what we need,not productive at all.