💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
How do annual members' meetings differ from board meetings? At board meetings after the agenda is taken care of anyone attending can speak for three minutes but only after the agenda has been addressed. We have a disgruntled homeowner who has promised to make our annual meeting a messy, embarrassing event. While we don't want to take away his right to speak what are the constraints on members addressing the owners at an annual meeting?
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
You would have to look to your governing documents, and possibly state statutes, to make a clear distinction on the difference of the two meetings.

In our community, Annual Membership Meetings are for the primary purpose of electing board members. We are mandated by our documents to have a minimum of one per year, and it is to occur on the first Monday in March.

Other than the election of board members, we can develop almost any agenda we care to.

Usually we have annual budget report, annual violation report, annual capital projects report, and any other status reports from any other committees, such as the Architectural Committee and Lake Security Committee.

On occasion we've had CC&R amendments to vote on.

The president conducts the meeting, the vice president and secretary open and count the board of directors ballots, and all the residents in attendance pretty much just sit there and nod.

Sometimes they ask questions. Important things like, "Can we have pansies at the front entrance this year instead of petunias?"

Board meetings, on the other hand, are attended only by the board members. If a member does have a specific issue they want to address, then can request some time on the agenda no less than by the end of a traditional business day on the Friday before the Tuesday meeting (we hold board meetings the first Tuesday of every month. That's not specified in the governing docs, but it was a schedule the board developed on its own). The homeowner is then usually given a time slot, usually at the beginning of the meeting, and they have roughly 10 minutes and must leave before the rest of the meeting is conducted.

Otherwise, homeowners don't attend.

Board meetings are pretty much for us to do the day-to-day business/decision-making of the HOA.

RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Ellen, only Board members are allowed to make motions and vote at Board meetings. Members may make motions and vote at the Annual members meeting and at special members meeting (some HOAs require they make their motion in advance and be on the agenda).

The constraint on a member addressing the owners at an annual meeting are:
1) being recognized and given the floor by the Chair;
2) allowed to make a motion;
3) if the motion is seconded, the Chair should allow them to speak first during discussion on their motion; and
4) the time can be limited for them to have the floor to discuss their motion and they do not have to be recognized again.

This parlimentary procedure can constrain them to about a minute to make their motion and 3 minutes (or less) to discuss their motion. If they continue to talk beyond the time allowed the Chair can stop them.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Roger,
Correct me if I am wrong Roger.

In addition to your post, isn't it correct that the Annual Meeting is not a Board meeting, it is an Owners Meeting. You speak of the Chair, but I expect you don't mention the Board because the Chair can be anyone selected by acclamation at the meeting. In other words, the Board does not have to preside. At the start of a Members meeting, a recall meeting or a special meeting the Chair can be selected from the floor with the required majority.

I think I learned this on the site, but God knows where it may have come from.

DonaldM3 (South Carolina)
Posts: 132
Posted:
“At the start of a Members meeting, a recall meeting or a special meeting the Chair can be selected from the floor with the required majority.”

Isn’t that a bit risky, Robert? Wouldn’t you want to assure that the moderator knew how to run a meeting? If you failed to in that regard, the meeting could quickly run amuck. Our PM runs our annual HOA meeting and does a good job. I would not, on the other hand, want to have the PM run board meetings. The difference here is that the PM gets their direction from the BOD not (non-BOD) HOA members.
SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:
Ellen, since you are in FL, and I believe you live in a condo and your HOA is governed by FL 718, I'd highly recommend the following book: "A Practical Guide for Officers, Owners, Realtors, Attorneys, and Directors of Florida Condominiums" by Peter M. Dunbar, Esq. eleventh edition 2008-2009. It has all the recent changes to FL 718.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobertR1 on 01/12/2009 12:36 AM
Roger,
Correct me if I am wrong Roger.

In addition to your post, isn't it correct that the Annual Meeting is not a Board meeting, it is an Owners Meeting. You speak of the Chair, but I expect you don't mention the Board because the Chair can be anyone selected by acclamation at the meeting. In other words, the Board does not have to preside. At the start of a Members meeting, a recall meeting or a special meeting the Chair can be selected from the floor with the required majority.

I think I learned this on the site, but God knows where it may have come from.


You are correct Robert. The annual members meeting and special members meetings are not Board meetings. The Chair is the person currently presiding over the meeting. Usually that is the President's job. However, on occassion the President (or when they are absent the VP) needs to vacate the Chair. An example of when there needs to be a motion to appoint someone other than specified in the By-laws to Chair a members meeting is when it is a special members meeting to consider removal of all officers. Then it is prudent to make a motion to have xxxx (a predetermined competent person, such as the managing agent or an attorney) available for the members to vote on to Chair such a meeting.
GordonD1 (California)
Posts: 131
Posted:
ROBERT: YOU ARE CORRECT THE ANNUAL MEEETING IS NOT A BOARD MEETING, IT IS AN OWNRES MEETING.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Sussana,

I live in a townhome community.
SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:
Ellen, first and foremost you may want to check your Declaration to see if your community was created as a condo association.

All unit owners have the right to speak at meetings of the condo board of administration and meetings of committees of the board or the association. Rules governing unit owner participation may limit each owner to a maximum of 3 minutes or more. Sometimes the owner may be required to file a request in writing in advance of the meeting. Any unit owner may address a meeting provided the owner complies with the rules. These rules must be in written form.

Hope this helps.
CharlesN2 (Florida)
Posts: 11
Posted:
BOD meetings are open to any homeowner. Annual meetings are held for all homeowners who wish to attend. The President ( Not knowing your position) presides over any meeting. And may grant a given homeowner limited time to speak. And dpending on your situation, may request a homeowner to leave.

Just a suggestion, when you put your Annual meeting together and announce date, time and place, make it very clear that any topic or issue be presented to the BOD in writting prior to the meeting so it may be placed on the agena. Otherwise, so sad, too bad.

As our attorney once told me, sometimes you have to call their bluff! Having had to deal with it, stand firm. Others should not have to be subject to someome who I am going to guess did not read the documents he signed up for or simply just wants to obtain "their 15 mins of fame".
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Charles, two questions.

1. Who would chair a Recall meeting to recall the entire board?

2. Who would chair a Special Meeting for Cause if the cause was to question and establish some illegal activities of the Board or any member of the Board?

This is of course provided the By-law ewquirement and procedures aremet?
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Robert,
The Florida Statutes state clearly who and how recalls are done. Below is the start and answers your question.

720;303-10: Recalls
2. The board shall duly notice and hold a meeting of the board within 5 full business days after receipt of the agreement in writing or written ballots. At the meeting, the board shall either certify the written ballots or written agreement to recall a director or directors of the board, in which case such director or directors shall be recalled effective immediately and shall turn over to the board within 5 full business days any and all records and property of the association in their possession, or proceed as described in paragraph (d).

SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:
Robert and Donna, FL 720 applies to HOAs and has 40 pages. FL 718 applies to Condos and has 98 pages. They are different in many ways . Copying and pasting a small paragraph from either one chapter and taking it out of its original legal context does not necessarily offer a clear picture of how things happen in FL. There are way too many other factors to consider. The OP lives in a townhouse community and chances are her association was created as a condo assoc. In that case 720 does NOT apply to her association. In addition, disputes related to elections an recall of one or more Directors in a HOA has to be submitted to the DBPR for "mandatory binding arbitration. " Homeowners must be represented by attorney (s) who belong to the FL Bar. Trust me, it just goes on and on. The list of hurdles is huge. Attorneys I have consulted with a couple of months ago have discouraged me from it.
SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:
It just occurred to me that the this thread is about the difference between annual meeting and regular board meetings, and not about recalls.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Thank you Susanna for your addition, and Donna for the input. On a personal note Donna, now that you have bought Barbados, how do you do this stuff down there? I am guilty as many and did not specify I am talking condos.

And I can see differences in how procedures would play out from state to state. I believe I am close to how our associations in SC would have to handle things.

I also see no difference in recall, special, annual of Board meetings, they are all procedures to conduct Association Business.

How does this ring: For you and Donna?

The Board has no other business except Association business.
SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:
Robert, all I can say to you is that in FL there is a big difference between annual meetings of the membership (which often times have BOD elections attached to it), and regular board meetings of HOAs and Condo Associations. I just leave it at that.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Robert,

There is one big difference between meetings of the board and meetings of the members. That difference is that meetings of the board are for the board to conduct the business of the assn and only board members may vote on the issues at hand. Meetings of the members are usually the annual meeting where elections take place and perhaps a special meeting to discuss and/or vote on a specific issue. At these meetings the members vote. If you check out your bylaws you most likely will note separate sections for the two type meetings. Also, the state nonprofit corp act and HOA statutes will also separate the two type meetings. I doubt this differs from assn to assn or from state to state. Of course you are correct in saying at ALL meetings assn business is conducted and must be done so IAW the assn's gov. docs and state law (if any).
KenN1 (Florida)
Posts: 2
Posted:
Ken from FL
All owners (FL Statues and Code) at any meeting can voice their opinion about an agenda item that is about to be voted on before it is voted on. Resonable rules can be setup such duration and the President should ask if any owners want to speak before a vote is taken.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Robert asked about recalls. The O.P., Ellen has had her question answered by several posters, including Roger, who is one of our sponsors and has a M.C. which gives him expertise in this field,therefore Roberts question is is not interfering with Ellens post and should be okay, IMHO ,on this thread.

Ellen stated that she is in a villa situation which is most times a 720, HOA association. YOU assumed that she is a condo.

Roberts question warrants a simple answer. The single paragraph that I copied answers that as simple as can be--The Board heads a recall meeting, be it condo, HOA or Mobile Home association.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Donna is correct regarding how a recall meeting is conducted. I would also add that if the Pres is being recalled it would be prudent of him/her to assign the V.P. or another board member to chair the meeting. If all board members are being recalled, perhaps a member of the assn should be assigned to chair the meeting.
SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:

According to FL laws, "Condominium" means that form of ownership of real property created pursuant to chapter 718, which is comprised entirely of units that may be owned by one or more persons, and in which there is, appurtenant to each unit, an UNDIVIDED share in common elements." That's the key element that distinguishes condos from HOAs in Florida, and perhaps other states too : undivided share in common elements.

Since this thread is not about recalls I'd abstain from further posts.

EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Susanna,

We were not established as a condo association.
SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:
Hi Ellen. Glad to hear back from you. Since you told me your daughter is a member of your board (or something like that), and you most likely fall under FL 720, I'd recommended "The Law of Florida Homeowners Associations"
by Peter M Dunbar and Charles F Dudley, Esquires. Seventh Edition 2007-2008. It's easy to read and has a wealth of valuable information not to mention that cross references to FL Statutes. Unfortunately, it does show the latest changes to FL 720 that became effective this past October. You can probably find the book on Amazon.com. or, at Pineapple Press's site (Sarasota.) I'm volunteering this info for all FL folks (specially in NE FL) who may come across this thread.

JosephW (Michigan)
Posts: 882
Posted:
At annual meetings, owners have the right to speak to issues of the association. This can usually be controlled by limiting owner participation to a specific section of the agenda, and by limiting the time an individual can speak. 720 says:

"6) RIGHT TO SPEAK.--Members and parcel owners have the right to attend all membership meetings and to speak at any meeting with reference to all items opened for discussion or included on the agenda. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in the governing documents or any rules adopted by the board or by the membership, a member and a parcel owner have the right to speak for at least 3 minutes on any item, provided that the member or parcel owner submits a written request to speak prior to the meeting. The association may adopt written reasonable rules governing the frequency, duration, and other manner of member and parcel owner statements, which rules must be consistent with this subsection"

I think Ellen's real question is about the owner who promises to make things miserable at the annual meeting. How to keep that person from doing that, or letting the meeting get out of control. There is no single response that we could tell you would work. It would depend on the personality of the person, the personality of the presiding officer, the willingness of the other attendees to let the disruption happen, etc. Ideally, the person would be given a limited amount of time to vent, the presiding officer would respond quietly, rationally, and then move on. However, the problem individual often just keeps right on going, ignoring all efforts to move on, after all, what does he care about Robert's Rules. Here, the board needs a plan and often, an ally in the audience. The ally would rise to be recognized, move to close the discussion the subject, and a positive vote often shuts the person up.

The best I've ever seen this handled is when the presiding officer lets the person vent and then moves on, totally ignoring the person, even if they continue ranting. Just keep the meeting going as if that loud noise isn't there. The board cannot lose their cool or the ranter gets what he wants.

If there is a possibility of physical confrontation, hire an off-duty cop to serve as sergeant-at-arms. But make sure he knows that you just want to keep things peaceful (one association that did this, the cop and the owner got into it and lawsuits mushroomed)

Other ideas?

Joe

Joseph West
Official HOATalk.com Sponsor
Community Associations Network, LLC
www.CommunityAssociations.net

*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Joseph,

When our association got involved in the truck enforcement issue, the normal attendence of 10 turned into 100, mostly hot headed and on a mission types of individuals. One of the H.Hs, threated to ruin the meeting and "Kick Some A--" Getting a warning prior to the meeting, we did hire a Sheriffs deputy to stand in back and just be there as a message that there would be no disruptions. His instructions were to respond ONLY to the Presidents notice of needing help.

It surely worked. The President called on the 2 leaders of the dispute to speak at their turns, citing the 3 minute Florida Statute on "Right To Speak" They spoke. The members got a much better picture of who these guys were and that basically, they were self serving. Everyone left without incident.

Everyone deserves their turn to speak but the presiding officer better keep control. If that means hiring an officer, then that is the road to take.
JosephW (Michigan)
Posts: 882
Posted:
I've mentioned this before, but it's worth re-visiting, especially for larger associations with problems - one of the best meetings I've ever seen was a special meeting to recall 4 of 7 board members including the President. The Prez gaveled the meeting to order and then turned the gavel over to a semi-retired local judge, who took the gavel and very quietly said "This is a serious meeting, and we will deal with it seriously, and civilly. If you can't do that, I'll be happy to see you in my courtroom tomorrow morning where we'll discuss it further." Qietest meeting I ever attended.

Joe

Joseph West
Official HOATalk.com Sponsor
Community Associations Network, LLC
www.CommunityAssociations.net

*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Thanks for the great story and great solution.
SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:
Joe, cute story but I'm afraid gavel use is not recommended in FL condos whether small or large. It really infuriates members, most of them retirees and "snow birds" spoiled by the tropical, laid back lifestyle.
JosephW (Michigan)
Posts: 882
Posted:
Susanna,

I understand. At some of those meetings I guess a baseball bat would be more in order.

Joe

Joseph West
Official HOATalk.com Sponsor
Community Associations Network, LLC
www.CommunityAssociations.net

*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Susanna,

Thanks for the info..I'll check it out.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Joseph,

You got right to the heart of the problem. While we encourage participation from all owners we don't intend for the annual meeting to turn into a free for all which is what this owner has threatened. I like the part where you said "have an ally in the audience recognized to move to close the discussion." I'll keep that in mind.
AnnaD2 (Florida)
Posts: 960
Posted:
Ellen, the Annual Member's Meeting quite often turns into the "Annual Bash the Board" Meeting. This year we made certain that those who complimented us throughout the year (but only to our faces) showed up and expressed their feelings to all those in attendance. When they announced the winners of the Board election those people also broke out into applause. The people who showed up to complain kept pretty quiet after that. So yes, get your supporters to show up, too.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Anna,
For future elections, please notify me so that I can come down and be your biggest fan. That's a wonderful approach to keeping the nay-sayers quiet.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Ellen,
From your post, should our readers take home the message that the way to insure proper conduct at an annual members meeting, is to plant co-conspirators in the audience, to achieve the Boards pleasure?

I do not condone unruliness at any public or private meeting. Would you consider this kind of action proper if it achieves your objective of silencing a legal member of the organization. It is one thing to have to employ security personnel to maintain decorum and provide protection, and in extreme cases this may be proper. It is quite another to manipulate the process of a meeting. Why doesn't a Board member make the motion if they feel it is proper? It fact it would require two allies, one to motion and one to second, and then it would go to discussion.

IMHO
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Robert,

You are so far off the charts I don't know where to begin. "Co-conspirators"? I hardly think so. Our board does not consist of dictators. We have never used security officers and won't but we simply want a business type meeting for the betterment of our association. Now, what we have here is a disgruntled owner who says to disregard the covenants and has threatend to turn our annual meeting into a messy, embarrasing event. He has sent threatening and inaccurate emails to the management company and board members, threatend a lawsuit, confronted a board member while she was walking her dog, attacked our management rep at a board meeting and I could go on. Regardless of what you think we intend our meeting to go on in an orderly way and will take whatever steps are necessary. In fact, if we didn't have so much trouble finding others for the board I would be thrilled to step down.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Robert,

You evidently missed the part of my post where I said we encourage participation of members...
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Ellen.
I understand the Boards concerns and you apparently did not read or understand my post, so I say again, I do not condone anyone disrupting a board meeting with ill intent. But, read over some of the responses to your post, and none of them mentioned your "outlier". yet you never mentioned this to them. The content of their replies was how to control their meeting. However good their intent may be. And yes when you, as representative of the board and your selected volunteers attempt to plan and devise action to control the natural process of your meeting, you can rightfully be termed "co-conspirators." I am not saying your intension's are dishonorable, I am suggesting your problem needs to be addressed, but you don't fix this guys apple cart by getting down and playing in the mud with him.

Your board is endowed with the authority to curtail this mans actions. Be it a association or an open community, we all live in a society of laws. Difficult, yes. But one further question, do you believe your actions to out class him with Board collusion will change him and make your association better? Granted it make your life easier and if that change is going to allow you as a Board to govern better, then shouldn't this maneuver be in the By-laws? I am sure your answer will be: it is in the by-laws, it allows for us to do it. Go......cull the flock, you may be able to develop the Super Association.

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
For info only.

I never ever fail to compliment the board. I might complain but your job is tough and you do good work. I pay attention and know that better than most. You are just not perfect. And God, neither am I.

But please don't ask me to come to a Board Meeting with my intent being to applaud the Board because the Board wants me to be there for that purpose.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Robert,

I must say you are confusing this issue with your claims of co-conspitors, collusion and outliers (whatever that means). We simply want a civil meeting where all concerns are addressed. Abd what exactly does "Super Association" mean.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
This goes to the idea that people will behave (or not) depending on what they think they can get away with.

If the hostile homeowners attending the meeting think or believe they have like minds there, they will be more emboldened to behave in a way that might be inappropriate.

If they think or believe they are not of the majority mentality, that the other homeowner attendees are not "on their side," they are more likely to behave themselves.

Even sometimes simply the presence of a uniformed sgt-at-arms is enough to keep them from getting too frisky.

But it's the whole idea of the "crowd" or "mob" mentality.

As long as the board is not restricting comments and allows anyone to comment, then it's not as manipulative as it appears at first blush.

It's simply setting an ambiance, a tone, if you will, with the intent to keep hostility at bay.

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Ellen, I think you may be right.
I am confusing the issue.

I will say no more here.
SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:
Good move Robert. I know Ellen does not need anymore input.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
I wasn't going to post to this thread since others have answered Ellen's original question until our self appointed moderator decided Ellen had received enough responses.

Ellen, while others have given you excellent advice on how to control your members meeting; I would like to suggest something that seriously curbed the vitriol at our member meetings. In addition to the monthly Board meetings and the Annual meeting our Association holds three Open Forum meetings a year. While homeowners are allowed to speak at the monthly Board meetings and the Annual meeting, the primary purpose of them is to conduct the business of the Association and speaking time is limited.

At the Open Forum meetings, usually held on a Saturday afternoon, the primary focus is what's on the mind of the members; in these meetings anything can be asked, problems aired, opinions expressed etc. Everyone is given ample speaking time and I've never heard anyone complain they didn't get a chance to make their point. Since these were started a few years ago the tension is down in the community and the rumor mill while still here has a harder time to start problems.

P.S. Even the "dreaded renters" are allowed to speak at these meetings.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Good post Glen,

I'll bet that Ellen will let us know when she has all of the possible information that she wants or needs. Now, I really like hearing about your Saturday open forums. Great concept and reading about your results, this would fit into Georges post on "Thinking Outside the Box" and apathy, which is the kind of stuff that we are all seeking. How to increase membership attendance at meetings (including renters). Those poor folks never get a chance to air their grievances and they surely must have some as well as the owners.
SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:
Glen, thanks for my new "title" I hear you are in freezing up there....
Trust me, Ohio is nothing like FL, certainly not like NE FL where Ellen and I live.
I have served on boards in FL and OH. I still own property in the Cinci suburbs. Can't sell it.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Glen,

I can attest to the success of those types of meetings.

We are only mandated to hold one membership meeting a year, for the purpose of holding elections and whatever other business may need to be voted on.

The board meetings are not open to the membership, except in cases where specific homeowners request time on the agenda for one reason or another.

A few years ago, after a change in some of the leadership, we decided to hold Open Forums at least quarterly to give people the opportunity to do exactly as you say.

Initially it was to allow them to have a venue to ask some very pointed questions regarding what transpired in the leadership struggle to help address the grapevine/rumor mill phenomenon.

The meetings were a huge success and, as a side benefit, we've had increasingly greater attendance at the annual meeting, we believe, as a result of the open forums.

Our HOA calls them XXXX Dialog (where the XXX is the name of our HOA), and our next one is scheduled at the end of this month, as a matter of fact.

Sometimes all people want to do is be heard.

This allows that to happen in a way that doesn't derail HOA business but yet still gives the members a sense of community.

EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Glen, This sounds great in theory but will probably not work in my hoa. We invite all homeowners to come to board meetings with their concerns but they seldom do. I think in the last 6 months we may have had one or two (out of 101 homeowners) attend.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By EllenS1 on 01/13/2009 4:44 PM
Glen, This sounds great in theory but will probably not work in my hoa. We invite all homeowners to come to board meetings with their concerns but they seldom do. I think in the last 6 months we may have had one or two (out of 101 homeowners) attend.

Offer free donuts!

I know it's silly, but sometimes the idea of getting a snack, or even a free pen, works!

We wanted to hold a more "social" meeting the first summer we started the Member Dialogs, so I went to some local businesses and asked them for donations of either free "stuff" or 2-for-1 coupons for a raffle and drawing at our neighborhood meeting. I was quite surprised at the materials various businesses donated. They loved the idea of "marketing" to the local neighborhood people.

We had a framer donate a free framed poster, a motorcycle shop donated a few T-shirts, Kroger's even donated something, but I can't remember what it was right now.

Some of the restaurants donated some gift cards. A dry cleaner donated a coupon for some free dry cleaning.

We then had drawings throughout the event.

After that, we seemed to have a better chance of getting people to come.

Oh. One time we had a over-sized blow up of the neighborhood map made and put on foam core. We placed it on an easel, and colored it in.

We then had people fill out tags that would stick to the map and put some quotes or welcome information on it.

We bring it to each meeting and everytime someone shows up who hasn't had a chance to fill in their lot yet, we give them the opportunity to do that.

It's almost all filled in right now.

Just some ideas.

MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
I didn't mean to use the term "raffle" above.

It was simply a series of door prize drawings.

Nobody had to buy any raffle tickets.

BUT, you had to be present to win. . . .

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here