Quote:
Posted By KirkW1 on 12/13/2008 4:46 PM
I would be a nig proponent of submeters regardless of the impact on myself. I think it is the only fair way to go. As a note, the year after I moved to a house the apartment complex I was in started charging a water surcharge based on the size of unit. It is just as well I was moving out because I just wouldn't have gone along with it. The idea that the amount of water used is tied to the size of the unit is a fallacy.
But as others have pointed out, you will need to check your governing documents before embarking on this process. It may need some sort of change to the wording.
Kirk,
I agree, billing/paying according to use is the fairest way.
But, being from CT and familiar with Chapter 828 which governs HOAs, I'm not sure Bob's HOA can sub-meter regardless of what the HOA documents say. My understanding is that in CT all assessments have to be equal. I believe Section 47-257 requires assessments to be apportioned among the units in the same manner the "allocated interests" (and votes) are, so for the assessments to be unequal, the votes would have to be unequal. I think it best to have the HOA lawyer look at this one.
We faced a similar issue with regard to trash collection. The HOA pays for trash collection, but the residents who are away in the winter (the "snowbirds") believe they should not have to pay for trash collection while they are away because they are paying for a service they aren't using. We've been told the only way to do that is for the HOA to no longer provide trash collection as an HOA provided service and have each unit owner contract separately for trash collection. However, the unit owners overwhelmingly do not want to do that, so here we are.
One way around it I see is to have the water company split the system and make the HOA no longer the "middleman" and have the water company bill each unit directly. Then water service becomes just like any other utility; electric, gas, telephone, whatever.