💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
To All,

Another topic I often see in the forum is the question of reserves. I just finished reading an article in the magazine "Common Interest" which is a publication of the Connecticut Chapter of the CAI. You may find the information below interesting:

According to this article Fannie Mae has recently tightened up their lending requirements for borrowers that intend to buy new or existing homes in condo and HOA communities. Freddie Mac is expected to do the same. As you may be aware, many banks and other lenders often sell their mortgages to Fannie and Freddie, and so will have to meet the new requirements when making loans. These new requirements will affect the ability of developers to sell new homes, as well as the ability for homeowners to sell their existing homes in HOA communities. The new rules will require lenders to perform full reviews of the financial strength of HOAs rather than the limited reviews and spot checks as had been sometimes done in the past. Among some of the requirements under the full review are:

1. That the HOA have an "adequate" budget.
2. That the budget allocates at least 10% of annual revenues to reserves. (How many HOAs do that now?)
3. That the HOA holds funds equal to the deductible under the master insurance policy.
4. No more than 15% of the assessments are delinquent by more than one month.

Under the new rules, Fannie May also wants HOAs to be primarily owner occupied and will not approve investor loans unless at least 51% of the units are occupied by their owners (as either primary or second homes), or, in the case of new developments, are under contract to be built for such owners.

One of the most important issues seems to be the 10% reserve requirement. According to the article, lenders selling their loans to Fannie and Freddie will not finance homes that do not meet the requirement. However, the article does state that the association may be able to obtain a waiver if they can provide an acceptable reserve study that clearly demonstrates a lower percentage is adequate.

Food for thought.
JohnB7 (South Carolina)
Posts: 176
Posted:
Yep - they will not lend unless the assoc. follows GAAP

While a reserve fund may not be legally required is is required under GAAP

(generally accepted accounting principles/practice)
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JohnB7 on 12/11/2008 8:38 AM
Yep - they will not lend unless the assoc. follows GAAP

While a reserve fund may not be legally required is is required under GAAP

(generally accepted accounting principles/practice)

John,

Can you provide a link to that specific requirement of GAAP? I'm not doubting what you say; but would just like to read it and copy it for my own personal use.

Thx!
JosephW (Michigan)
Posts: 882
Posted:
Here's are some articles:

http://www.provincetownbanner.com/article/news_article/_/62634/News/12/4/2008

http://www.condo-hoalawblog.com/2008/08/articles/oregon/new-fannie-mae-condo-lending-rules/

Can't find anything yet about GAPP, but it would make sense in order to provide the full review that they are now requiring.

Joe

Joseph West
Official HOATalk.com Sponsor
Community Associations Network, LLC
www.CommunityAssociations.net

*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
PeterB1 (Florida)
Posts: 257
Posted:
I find the following parts of the original posting most interesting:

+ ...perform full reviews of the financial strength of HOAs.
I think it would be virtually impossible for any organization (private or government) to do a review of each HOA or condo prior to a sale. A review is not done in a day or two. Further, the data in many (most?) cases will not be available.

+ That the HOA have an "adequate" budget.
In most associations, the Board itself cannot determine if there is an 'adequate' budget.

+ That the budget allocates at least 10% of annual revenues to reserves.
Many associations do not have, use, or understand reserves.In many places, there is no legal requirement for reserves.

This sounds more like a wish list of good association management than a realistic appraisal of pre-sale conditions. I strongly doubt that anything like this will occur in the near future.

Of course, this is only my opinion.
BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PeterB1 on 12/11/2008 12:11 PM
I find the following parts of the original posting most interesting:

+ ...perform full reviews of the financial strength of HOAs.
I think it would be virtually impossible for any organization (private or government) to do a review of each HOA or condo prior to a sale. A review is not done in a day or two. Further, the data in many (most?) cases will not be available.

+ That the HOA have an "adequate" budget.
In most associations, the Board itself cannot determine if there is an 'adequate' budget.

+ That the budget allocates at least 10% of annual revenues to reserves.
Many associations do not have, use, or understand reserves.In many places, there is no legal requirement for reserves.

This sounds more like a wish list of good association management than a realistic appraisal of pre-sale conditions. I strongly doubt that anything like this will occur in the near future.

Of course, this is only my opinion.

The article is from a reputable magazine and does not read as if it's a wish list, but fact. There is also another article on the subject posted at

http://www.condo-hoalawblog.com/2008/08/articles/oregon/new-fannie-mae-condo-lending-rules/

It has been in the news for the past few months that Fannie and Freddie are toughening up their rules to attempt to prevent the the sort of things that have contributed to their present financial mess. So, this should come as no surprise.

1. If the HOA cannot provide the data the lender requires to provide the review required by Fannie Mae, too bad. If that lender is planning on selling (or thinks that in the future it may sell) the mortgage to Fannie or Freddie, or to another lender, then they will not be able to approve the loan. The buyer will just be out of luck.

2. From the article it appears that the HOA will need to supply historical financial data and budget information to the lender. The board doesn't need to be able to determine if the budget is adequate; the lender will determine that based on the information provided. Although, the article does state that it's not clear what is meant by "adequate" or how it will be determined.

3. The article acknowledged that many HOAs don't understand or have reserves, and that many reserves are inadequate. It seems from the article that will just have to change and boards are going to have to learn to understand reserves or hire someone who does.

Don't underestimate the importance of not being able to meet Fannie & Freddie requirements. I know that from first-hand experience. When I was searching for a mortgage for my present home I was denied by one lender (and I have excellent credit) because the HOA was a new development without any financial history and it didn't have Fannie Mae approval.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By PeterB1 on 12/11/2008 12:11 PM
I find the following parts of the original posting most interesting:

+ ...perform full reviews of the financial strength of HOAs.
I think it would be virtually impossible for any organization (private or government) to do a review of each HOA or condo prior to a sale. A review is not done in a day or two. Further, the data in many (most?) cases will not be available.

+ That the HOA have an "adequate" budget.
In most associations, the Board itself cannot determine if there is an 'adequate' budget.

+ That the budget allocates at least 10% of annual revenues to reserves.
Many associations do not have, use, or understand reserves.In many places, there is no legal requirement for reserves.

This sounds more like a wish list of good association management than a realistic appraisal of pre-sale conditions. I strongly doubt that anything like this will occur in the near future.

Of course, this is only my opinion.

Ohio attempted to tackle this problem in COA's before the mortgage meltdown. It was done because BOD's were holding assessments too low and depending on Special Assessments which was causing families to loose their property when they couldn't come up with the S/A amount on short notice.

5311.081 Powers and duties of board of directors.
(A) Unless otherwise provided in the declaration or bylaws, the unit owners association, through the board of directors, shall do both of the following:

(1) Adopt and amend budgets for revenues, expenditures, and reserves in an amount adequate to repair and replace major capital items in the normal course of operations without the necessity of special assessments, provided that the amount set aside annually for reserves shall not be less than ten per cent of the budget for that year unless the reserve requirement is waived annually by the unit owners exercising not less than a majority of the voting power of the unit owners association;

(2) Collect assessments for common expenses from unit owners.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Joe,

Thx for the links; however, as you say, no mention of GAAP requirements. Frankly, I'll be surprised that GAAP makes this requirement. We'll see if John will prove me wrong!
NancyM2 (California)
Posts: 249
Posted:
Group ~ I feel our budget is "top heavy" I just did a survay on neighboring communities and found we have 17% of our budget going for LEGAL ~ with no legal suits pending. Even though we do allow for 10% for reserves. I wonder if this would effect our standing with morgage companys.

Other communities allowed 5% to 7% for legal.

NancyM2

NancyL4 (California)
Posts: 60
Posted:
This is what I found on the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) website.

Future Major Repairs and Replacements

50-2 A common interest realty association shall disclose information in its notes to financial statements about its funding for future major repairs and replacements. Disclosures about such funding shall include all of the following:

1. Requirements, if any, in statutes or the common interest realty association's documents (or mortgage or governmental bodies funding requirements, for example, Federal Housing Administration often has such requirements) to accumulate funds for future major repairs and replacements and the common interest realty association's compliance or lack of compliance with them

2. A description of the common interest realty association's funding policy, if any, and compliance with that policy

3. A statement that funds, if any, are being accumulated based on estimated future (or current) costs, that actual expenditures may vary from these estimates, and that the variations may be material

4. Amounts assessed for major repairs and replacements in the current period, if any

5. A statement indicating whether a study was conducted to estimate the remaining useful lives of common property components and the costs of future major repairs and replacements.

Common interest realty associations that fund future major repairs and replacements by special assessments or borrowings when needs occur shall disclose that information.

Required Supplementary Information

50-3 Common interest realty associations shall disclose the following as unaudited supplementary information:

1. Estimates of current or future costs of future major repairs and replacements of all existing components, such as roofs, including estimated amounts required, methods used to determine the costs, the basis for calculations (including assumptions, if any, about interest and inflation rates), sources used, and the dates of studies, made for this purpose, if any. There is no requirement for common interest realty associations to obtain studies prepared by professional engineers. The estimates may be made by the board of directors or estimates obtained from licensed contractors.

2. A presentation of components to be repaired and replaced, estimates of the remaining useful lives of those components, estimates of current or future replacement costs, and amounts of funds accumulated for each to the extent designated by the board.

I didn't post the link because you need a login for their site.
DavidW5 (North Carolina)
Posts: 565
Posted:
The Virginia Property Owners Act 55-514.1 specifies:

"B. To the extend that the reserve study conducted in accordance with this section indicates a need to budget for reserves, the association budget shall include, without limitation:

1. The current estimated replacement cost, estimated remaining life and estimated useful life of the capital components;
2. As of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the budget is prepared, the current amount of accumulated cash reserves set aside, to repair, replace or restore capital components and the amount of expected contribution to the reserve fund for that year; and
3. A general statement describing the procedures used for the estimation and accumulation of cash reserves pursuant to this section and the extent to which the association is funding its reserve obligations consistent with the study currently in effect."
JohnM3 (Florida)
Posts: 288
Posted:
Have you noticed members that every state in the union has its own ways of doing things and its own requirements. Keep that in mind when making statements about rules and best practices
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
John,

Just curious to know why you are ressurecting all these old messages that have had no activity for over a month? Is there nothing current that interests you? Perhaps you can come up with something new???
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
I. for one, would appreciaite some clarification on these NEW laws that Frannie and Freddie are tightening up. Am I wrong when I say that one of the crumbling stones of the lending industries was Fand F's neglect in enforceing the rules they had on the books, contributed to the sub prime mess. I think the only ones that didn't fall in line may have been FHA and VA, but I am sure there are others
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By RobertR1 on 01/25/2009 7:38 PM
I. for one, would appreciaite some clarification on these NEW laws that Frannie and Freddie are tightening up. Am I wrong when I say that one of the crumbling stones of the lending industries was Fand F's neglect in enforceing the rules they had on the books, contributed to the sub prime mess. I think the only ones that didn't fall in line may have been FHA and VA, but I am sure there are others

I would say: In my opinion, from what I know about it, you are wrong.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here