BruceF1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 2,535
Posts: 2,535
Posted:
To All,
Another topic I often see in the forum is the question of reserves. I just finished reading an article in the magazine "Common Interest" which is a publication of the Connecticut Chapter of the CAI. You may find the information below interesting:
According to this article Fannie Mae has recently tightened up their lending requirements for borrowers that intend to buy new or existing homes in condo and HOA communities. Freddie Mac is expected to do the same. As you may be aware, many banks and other lenders often sell their mortgages to Fannie and Freddie, and so will have to meet the new requirements when making loans. These new requirements will affect the ability of developers to sell new homes, as well as the ability for homeowners to sell their existing homes in HOA communities. The new rules will require lenders to perform full reviews of the financial strength of HOAs rather than the limited reviews and spot checks as had been sometimes done in the past. Among some of the requirements under the full review are:
1. That the HOA have an "adequate" budget.
2. That the budget allocates at least 10% of annual revenues to reserves. (How many HOAs do that now?)
3. That the HOA holds funds equal to the deductible under the master insurance policy.
4. No more than 15% of the assessments are delinquent by more than one month.
Under the new rules, Fannie May also wants HOAs to be primarily owner occupied and will not approve investor loans unless at least 51% of the units are occupied by their owners (as either primary or second homes), or, in the case of new developments, are under contract to be built for such owners.
One of the most important issues seems to be the 10% reserve requirement. According to the article, lenders selling their loans to Fannie and Freddie will not finance homes that do not meet the requirement. However, the article does state that the association may be able to obtain a waiver if they can provide an acceptable reserve study that clearly demonstrates a lower percentage is adequate.
Food for thought.
Another topic I often see in the forum is the question of reserves. I just finished reading an article in the magazine "Common Interest" which is a publication of the Connecticut Chapter of the CAI. You may find the information below interesting:
According to this article Fannie Mae has recently tightened up their lending requirements for borrowers that intend to buy new or existing homes in condo and HOA communities. Freddie Mac is expected to do the same. As you may be aware, many banks and other lenders often sell their mortgages to Fannie and Freddie, and so will have to meet the new requirements when making loans. These new requirements will affect the ability of developers to sell new homes, as well as the ability for homeowners to sell their existing homes in HOA communities. The new rules will require lenders to perform full reviews of the financial strength of HOAs rather than the limited reviews and spot checks as had been sometimes done in the past. Among some of the requirements under the full review are:
1. That the HOA have an "adequate" budget.
2. That the budget allocates at least 10% of annual revenues to reserves. (How many HOAs do that now?)
3. That the HOA holds funds equal to the deductible under the master insurance policy.
4. No more than 15% of the assessments are delinquent by more than one month.
Under the new rules, Fannie May also wants HOAs to be primarily owner occupied and will not approve investor loans unless at least 51% of the units are occupied by their owners (as either primary or second homes), or, in the case of new developments, are under contract to be built for such owners.
One of the most important issues seems to be the 10% reserve requirement. According to the article, lenders selling their loans to Fannie and Freddie will not finance homes that do not meet the requirement. However, the article does state that the association may be able to obtain a waiver if they can provide an acceptable reserve study that clearly demonstrates a lower percentage is adequate.
Food for thought.