💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

SarahO (Ohio)
Posts: 26
Posted:
I have noticed Don Nordeen posting that he is a former board member of a voluntary HOA in Michigan. I too belonged to a voluntary HOA in MI and currently reside in OHIO. My question is why can a voluntary HOA run smoothly in MI and not in OH??? I am baffled. The HOA in Mi was much larger 700 homes vs 200 and the only common areas to maintain were traffic islands,signs and a small playground. The HOA also had the streets plowed through a private contractor since the township only plowed and salted main roads not subdivision streets all seemed to work well and there was an 80-90% of the residents who paid the annual dues for these services. Here in Ohio we live in a lake community. There is a lake dam spillway etc to maintain beside the park/playground that gives everyone in the neighborhood access to the lake for fishing etc. and the signs that need maintenance. We can barely get 50% of the residents to join the association. Unfortunately there is no reference to a HOA in our deeds and the former developers son still own the lake and the other common property mentioned.The HOA does its best with limited funds to keep things clean,repaired and in the case of the lake when ther is one stocked with fish, aereated and the algae controlled. None of the family lives at the development as they once did and the son just wants to unload things on the HOA even though there is not a means for the HOA to do so. The dam etc is over its shelf life so to speak and for the past 3 years the lake has dried up in the heat of summer creating a whole new set of problems. The lawyer that the HOA has hired to deal with the situation with the developers son,twnshp. county etc has recommende that everyone sign a contract agreeing to a HOA and then file the contracts with the county as an attachment to the deed. Kind of a way of going back and doing what should have been done 50 yrs ago. Unfortunately how do we convince these people who have had a 50 year free ride to sign on? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
You asked: "how do we convince these people who have had a 50 year free ride to sign on?"

People take action if you hit their kids or their pocketbook.

How is the lake and dam and other common areas tied to the property values of the entire subdivision? Who wants to buy a home that is located near or on a dried up lake? In short, only when the homewowner can see that he has a vested interest in the community will be contribute to it.

You have a huge challenge, and in this economy, I think you have at least 3 years before people will even listen to the idea of taking on mandatory obligations, much less things that are on their last leg (the dam).

In the meantime, get the owner to take more responsiblity. The residents are not going to "volunteer" to take care of someone else's things for long.
SarahO (Ohio)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Thanks for your response Susan, we do have a lawyer negotiating with the owner for the repairs to be made but the lawyer costs money and it doesn't seem fair that people are chipping in for dues and a lawyer and others are getting a free ride and hopefully the eventual restoration of dam and lake.
I would like to hear from the gentleman from MI who belonged to the voluntary association is there anything a voluntary association can do to insure that common areas are maintained?
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Well, Sarah, that is the nature of a voluntary assn. Frankly, I've always wondered why the few that pay continue to do so when the majority are getting a free ride.
DonN (Michigan)
Posts: 357
Posted:
SarahO

I did comment on a post about voluntary associations, but I reside in a development with a mandatory owners association. It has many of the same problems described on HOA Talk.

SarahO (Ohio)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Thanks for responding, just thought you might have had some insight as to why the voluntary assoc. in Mi seemed to run smoother. I do know at one point the realtors in the area were tired of some HOA being mandatory and others were not so they just made sure that everyone who wanted to sell a home or was buying a home were up to date with the dues. There was a definate increase in members to be sure after this action. We asked the realtors association here if they would send a notice to their members that this development has a voluntary assoc. and they refused. We have a real problem with new residents moving in and no one ever mentions a HOA until the Welcome Committee arrives on their doorstep and often times they are not greeted so warmly as one might think!
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
SarahO,
First I don't think there is a magic bullet.

Which means, education is the key probably. Are there any benefits to being a mandatory member of the Regime? Use these and create others. Be innovative and be in the limelite with newsletters etc. Probably the best bet is to develope a sense of neighborhood, which means interaction between all owners. I think it will take a concerted effort, it will happen little by little and it will take time, but the fact is, in some way, you are going to have to change some minds, that is hard but doable with persistance.

A web site might be a start.
ChristineC1 (Florida)
Posts: 13
Posted:
Our association in Michigan (single family homes) is voluntary (built 20 years ago). Our dues are currently $50 a year but the letter that came this year said they want to increase the fee but are holding a year because of the economy. Ten years ago when I moved here they were $15.

Frankly, I am not paying more than $50 a year for a printed directory, bows on the street signs at Christmas and flowers at the entrances. All this while I have a 20 year old rotted wooden fence in my backyard that they "maintain" but can't afford to replace.

The key to show people VALUE! Many people, especially those deep in the sub, are not interested in a beautification projects and block parties.

Also, it is hard to sell people on things like new street signs and entrances when we here in Michigan, have seen the value of our homes plummet.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
ChristineC,
Nothing I will say is meant to upset you more or defend any actions or no actions by anyone. I don't know enough to do that.

But people are people and we do things, just as you and I elected to to buy property. At that time and for ever after we can do two things, we can try to make it better or we can pay no attention to that option, speaking our course in how we live in our neighborhood.
If we elect to try and effect change for the better we will lose some and win some.

We in this country suddenly find we are all in a hole and we must climb out. We will, no doubt of that, and probably will be a little better for having done it. But as we scramble out we can't damn all that concerns us, everything is not to blame. So take a deep breath, go find out about that fence that needs to be repaired, if it is they are no funds, find out why, can you help make things better? I suspect this will fall on your ears as a rightous a-- hole trying to live your life for you. In a way I am suggesting there are ways we can better our neighborhoods and still be a maverick and a non party goer.............I am one.
SarahO (Ohio)
Posts: 26
Posted:
I guess Robert said it all when he said"people will be people" I probably could have answered my own question as well if I considered that statement. I do think a jump from $15.to $50 is steep especially in these times but its not the bows and the flowers that are most likely the culpret it is the price of doing business,insurance rates for one have skyrocketed and I am sure if you look at the annual expense report you will see that very necessary albeit evil expense has increased considerably in the past 10 years.
I have been an active member in my homeowners association because I do value the benefits and thought everyone who moved into a development with amenities would definately be aware that someone had to pay for their upkeep anad wheter you use them or not they are still reflective in your property values. Well you know what they say about those who ass u me.
Also when times are good people don't think twice about throwing away $5 for a cup of coffee from the local coffe boutique but if times turn and we find ourselves sipping coffe on a stool at the local diner we wonder why it costs a dollar?!! Funny,people will be people and evryone has different priorites. I figure the same goes for the decrepit fence in your back yard. It is in your backyard why should the HOA care and maintain/replace it? If this is a fence placed bty the developer as part of a commons area then technically it is their responsibility but since its way back where only you see it, it is not a high priority. Have you attended any HOA meetings to ask why no more than maintenance has been done to this fence? Have you offered any constructive solutions? Yo do have this right and as a homeowner the responsibilty to do so.
I have tried to help encourage folks to realise that if we are not to continue to loose value we need to show some pride and initiative ourselves. Everyone is looking for govt handouts these days this development included, the only problem with the govt is that the govt is you! Think about it, what is the difference if you pay an extra $10 to the HOA or you have the local govt raise taxes or impose an assesment for $20 since it takes a whole lot more paperwork and time when the govt gets involved?? Remember you are the govt they are your tax dollars. Speak up and say what your priorities are to the HOA and encourage other homeowners to do the same. You had to be of like minds to settle in the same neighborhood I am sure you can't be that far off in resolving your fence issue. I can't imagine it would cost anything to remove it and when the economy turns around to pursue a replacement. Thanks to all who have responded it is always good to hear others views to inspire our own thoughts.
SarahO (Ohio)
Posts: 26
Posted:
I guess Robert said it all when he said"people will be people" I probably could have answered my own question as well if I considered that statement. I do think a jump from $15.to $50 is steep especially in these times but its not the bows and the flowers that are most likely the culpret it is the price of doing business,insurance rates for one have skyrocketed and I am sure if you look at the annual expense report you will see that very necessary albeit evil expense has increased considerably in the past 10 years.
I have been an active member in my homeowners association because I do value the benefits and thought everyone who moved into a development with amenities would definately be aware that someone had to pay for their upkeep anad wheter you use them or not they are still reflective in your property values. Well you know what they say about those who ass u me.
Also when times are good people don't think twice about throwing away $5 for a cup of coffee from the local coffe boutique but if times turn and we find ourselves sipping coffe on a stool at the local diner we wonder why it costs a dollar?!! Funny,people will be people and evryone has different priorites. I figure the same goes for the decrepit fence in your back yard. It is in your backyard why should the HOA care and maintain/replace it? If this is a fence placed bty the developer as part of a commons area then technically it is their responsibility but since its way back where only you see it, it is not a high priority. Have you attended any HOA meetings to ask why no more than maintenance has been done to this fence? Have you offered any constructive solutions? Yo do have this right and as a homeowner the responsibilty to do so.
I have tried to help encourage folks to realise that if we are not to continue to loose value we need to show some pride and initiative ourselves. Everyone is looking for govt handouts these days this development included, the only problem with the govt is that the govt is you! Think about it, what is the difference if you pay an extra $10 to the HOA or you have the local govt raise taxes or impose an assesment for $20 since it takes a whole lot more paperwork and time when the govt gets involved?? Remember you are the govt they are your tax dollars. Speak up and say what your priorities are to the HOA and encourage other homeowners to do the same. You had to be of like minds to settle in the same neighborhood I am sure you can't be that far off in resolving your fence issue. I can't imagine it would cost anything to remove it and when the economy turns around to pursue a replacement. Thanks to all who have responded it is always good to hear others views to inspire our own thoughts.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Aha,
The real tiger has awoken and is starting to growl in the right direction. Sarah, I think your post revealed great thought and good observations, I think your neck of the woods is safe and could nopt agree more, these are scary times for everyone except those that don't care. I also believe we will be in a far better place come Christmas 2009.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
It may not seem fair to you that "others are getting a free ride" but it is also unfair for an owner purchasing without RECORDED deed restrictions and/or an established HOA to be expected to join in if they don't wish to. Sort of like switch and bait. You did say the hoa was voluntary, right?
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Ellen,
I think your point is well taken. It does however point out to some degree what a mess we can make out of things when we put our mind to it. I am afraid that a lot of these problems we find ourselves in with ill-defined benefits are products of a hired Bottom line attorney to promote, save, achieve specific monetary goals of the guy that has hired him and they are both gone when the rubber hits the road and extends for a long long time.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
How can realtors make sure everyone who wants to sell is "up to date with their assessments"? If there are no recorded documents stating your subdivision is an HOA there are no dues necessary and the realtors should not state there is. That the realtors were "tired of some HOA being mandatory and others were not" is part of their job. I'm curious...how do they know homeowners were up to date with their assessments? Did they just call you? Did they contact the faux board? No wonder they didn't want to send a notice saying there is a voluntary HOA...there is no such animal and their licenses could be in jeopardy. I can understand why your welcome committee is not greeted warmly. It appears some homeowners decided they wanted an HOA but didn't want to take all the effort to make it legitimate and other didn't. If some want to chip in to make improvements..let them but don't expect unsuspecting buyers to support their efforts if they decline.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Robert,

I must disagree with you on this one. Even if you "educate" the present owners what about all the folks who purchase in the future? The only way to solve this is to take all necessary steps to establish a legitimate HOA..not an easy task. Meanwhile the owners may or may not want to pay into the improvements they want made and that's how it should be.
SarahO (Ohio)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Ellen all of the HOA I spoke of are "real" HOA's the difference between mandatory and voluntary lies with the developer and the lack of laws regarding this prior to the early 1960's. Normally when a subdivision is being developed where there are areas in need of perpetual maintenance whether its a median strip of grass, the front signage or a lake, golf course, club house etc. The developer charges a premium for the properties that have the best access to the amenities,and subsequently less for the others but there is always a margin of profit built into the lot price. He will establish deed restrictions to preserve his vision for the development and this usually includes the issue of the HOA being the caretaker of the properties in common and thus making any HOA mandatory.Normally he will have a budget study performed and set aside adeqate funds from his profits to establish what is known as a reserve fund. The reserve fund is later transferred to the HOA who will see to any future maintenance of these properties "in common".with an annual dues from membership to cover normal operations such as insurance for the HOA bonding of the treasurer etc. as required by the state for any not for profit corporation. The developer usually transfers ownership to the HOA when 75% of the development is completed so the homeowners can begin to take part in their community.
The voluntary HOA usually arises from the same need of taking care of a common goal or property as was the case in Michigan where the township did not plow residential streets but the need existed, could you imagine living somewhere where you were responsible to plow not only your drive and sidewalk but the street so you could make it out to the main road to work?? Believe me the association was the best way to handle this.Also the developer in this case did not provide for this when he created the deed restrictions. The same happened here in Ohio,only in this case the amenities include a man made lake created by the developer for the benefit of the community.The developer must have planned on living forever because he retained ownership of these properties in common and not his distant heirs are getting on in years and do not have the means to deal with this infrastructure. A poor case of judgement on the developer but again the residents benefit through property values and atmosphere as well as recreation. Why move to an area with obvious amenities and assume they miraculously take care of themselves. Also voluntary HOA do have to apply for a tax ID # and file income tax returns even though they are run as not-fo-profit corporations,according to the states attorney general,also,abide by by-laws, retain insurance on themselves and these common properties and pay any utility bills related to these properties so you see even a voluntary HOA is very real with very real expenses. Hope this clarifies things for you. It is just unfortunate people choose to exploit the term voluntary. It just shows that a need arose and some thoughtful group of citizens decided to remedy what could be a problem down the road. All we ask is that you respect that or choose to live elsewhere.
SarahO (Ohio)
Posts: 26
Posted:
PS as far as the realtors were concerned when the disclosure laws came about not everyone was forthcomming aas to what HOA were tied to the deed and which were not and there was a law suit because a realtor sold a property where it was not disclosed that there was a HOA and the buyer was miffed and took it out on the realty co. who had deeper pockets than the homeowner who did not disclose this fact.
All we asked was because we are in an area where realty agents are not familiar with that they just let their members know that ther is a HOA here voluntary as it may be so that new owners are not shocked when a welcomming committee just trying to do a good deed gets cursed at.Totally uncalled for
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Ellen,
I thought they did have an HOA. But maybe you are referring to the people who don't pay dues as not a part of the association. I don't know what is true there, but I do agree with you that from my advantage point and not having a dog in the fight, my first impression of this kind of arrangement spells trouble and I have to question why this is happening. So, really I don't think we are so far apart and probably agree more than we disagree. Just a difference of perspectives and distance.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Sarah,
Your request seems reasonable, but I am afraid that the realtors are in business and as the sub prime market mess that is bringing down one corporation after another, is part of that business process, we can be very cautious that if you are buying you don't make the same mistake again. There is plenty of blame to go around and if you are advocating a sort of "Sunshine Laws" for property transactions I would second that and include the Buyers and sellers, along with anyone else that touches the transfer records. But our society seems to be in some area, a "don't ask, don't tell society."
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Can't some document be recorded in the public records stating there is a HOA so that closing agents will know this when they do a title search for the buyer?
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Ellen,
To answer your question and being specific for SC, but I do believe it is true with all states.
Every Business, be it profit or non profit has to be registered with the state and the listing can be pulled up on internet.

In addition, I know it is true in SC, all HOA's and Condos have to be registered at the time of activity into the public domain, when they are formed and lots are sold, all the individual associations have to be registered at the County Courthouse. It is not difficult to find, just a click away. As far as closing agents are concerned, they chase a different rabbit, all they want to get paid for is the legal transfer of property.

Probably the very best thing that could happen is enforcement of the requirements when someone purchases a unit in an HOA. I suspect they are requirements most places that this information is divulged at closing (at least), and the buyer and seller both attest to this notification. Certainly it should be a required procedure (law).
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Robert,

This is very confusing. I have done many closings in Florida and if nothing is recorded applying to a particular property we are in the dark. However, if there is public record of an HOA we not only advise the buyer of this but give them a copy of all the appropriate documents, covenants, etc. This works here.
SarahO (Ohio)
Posts: 26
Posted:
Ellen I understand your confusion and may be able to shed some light.
HOA are a relatively new concept and not all states even have any laws on the books regarding them Folrida is an exception. That said a little history lesson.
Back in the day before subdivisions/developments what ever your colloquialism is and condominiums. If someone wanted to build a house they went to the closest realty agent,sometimes the landowner himself and purchased the land then he had to consult with the local govt for their zoning and building restrictions as to how his house had to be situated on the land how would he provide water,well or city/rural hookup sewar or septic and so on. When the building boom hit just after the end WWII and thousands of GI's were all expected home any day with cash in hand a few businessmen had a plan. They would take that nice parcel of flat land out on the edge of town carve in new streets,bring in water and sewer lines,build several designs of complimentary styles and price ranges of homes and to make sure that everyone kept the place up they would add restrictions to the deeds,no clothes lines, no living in the basement while the home was being built(a very common occurence back then) but no time for that now these homes were going up fast! no sheds- a nice way of saying no chicken coops also another popular sideyard item of the time.You get the idea. So now you know how the first subdivision was born including its restrictions. Ok well this being the USofA where no one is satisfied unless they are outdoing the other guy, some developers found that the former farmers land has a stream running through it and if we dig a hole here put in a dam there we can get more money for our lots because there is a lake and we fill it with fish, the kids can swim, again you get the picture.Some of these folks thought ahead and said all these extras will need to be taken care of once I leave the project and go on to the next so a HOA became part of the deed restrictions. But as you know some builders/developers are smarter than others and since this was all new HOA being mentioned in the deed was rather hit or miss.Remember there are no laws until someone runs into a problem and goes to the govt to solve it.The way homeowners came up with their own idea of a HOA stemmed from collectively wanting to see improvements to what the developer laid out. In our instance they petioned the USPostal Service that they could only deliver mail to our front door mailboxes or in many cases mail slots! How many of you pick up your mail from a collection of boxes at the end of the street? This was a group of people who already belonged to the Kiwanis,the Moose,&Elks Club, The VFW The PTA the Mens or Womens society at Church, how many of you belong to any such organization today? Back then it was customary to belong to at least several, again you get the picture even though it is painted in sepia tones. These were also the days when major big money deals were not only sealed but seen through on nothing more than a handshake!! Amazing isn't it. Fast forward about 30/40 years.Condos are the rage,less land is available,no more taking care of a house even though it looks like one, you can work all day disco all night just be sure to send in the check to your HOA along with your mortgage payment and all is well.Oh by the way don't get any smart ideas of painting your front door red so you don't end up in bed with Mr. and Mrs. Jones down the street after partying all night, darn all these things look the same in the dark thought you were in your condo not the Joneses! Nope the HOA only allows the doors to be painted a subtle shade of brown or green. Well Mr.&Mrs. Jones file a complaint along with their unwelcome houseguest and neighbor with the HOA that this would have never happened if you just let him paint his door red when he wanted too! Well I am sure you can see from the colorful tone of the situation where this one is going,yep straight to court. And so it goes Jones and Brown vs. the HOA. And so the courts never have to face these folks again they draft a law and so it goes. Today there are still only a handful of states that have laws regarding HOA on the books Forida being one of the early leaders. Also many of the states that do have laws on the books only pertain to condominiums not single family homes and just wait when the feathers hit the fan with cluster housing!! I just can't wait. Now maybe you can understand where we are all comming from and why this forum is so popular
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Ellen,
Help me out. What do you mean you have done closings and if nothing is recorded you are in the dark. Am I right to assume you do a search at the court house on line or in person of the property records of all the involved property? If there is no recording, "you are in the dark". How can you close on property you have no record of? Or, does this mean if there is no indication that the property is in an HOA, you are in the dark? If the latter is true I think we have some reason for our confusion. I would believe the information about the property being a part of an HOA would be information the seller would have to provide the buyer. Certainly in a condo this information is evident on the deed and I would believe also in any HOA, but apparently not. I also believe nearly all this confusion is simple a matter of the buyer not paying attention and the seller not caring if this information conveys. This kind of a problem, if it exists should be handled by the state legislation. If you look at forclosure notices I observe there is mention of any HOA involvement but then I have no way of knowing if this kind of information is complete for each transaction. Also,of course, as far as foreclosures are concerned I would hope in any arrears are owed the association has a lien on the property and that of course would become part of the deed.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
If the buyer is paying for title ins. that fact should be stated in the report. Of course, some people stupidly do not purchase title ins.!!
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Sarah,

Wow, this sounds like a nightmare. I wish you luck.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Robert,

A closing agent does not assume a seller will pass along info as to whether their property belongs to a HOA. It's up to the agent to check title work and if HOS docs are recorded to contact the association to make certain assessments are up to date as well as anything else (liens,etc.) that affects the property. Anything affecting the property adversely must be cured prior to closing.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Mary,

I agree with you that it is well worth the cost to have owners' title insurance even tho unless it is a cash deal the mortgage company will insist on it. Now, a cash deal where the owners do not purchase title insurance is really STUPID.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Ellen,
I am so glad you are posting here.

Now for the bad part: I have been wanting to ask this question and receive a definitive answer for a long time.

I have always contended that our condo management must receive inquires regarding the sale of property by the folks doing the closing and the mortgaging. The answer is fuzzy from my condo manager. I requested formally to see the information that the lenders, primarily, request that helps them justify the Loan. Also, I expect many prospective buyers might inquire of the manager, information that they would like regarding the associations stability.
The board doesn't see any problem with what I was told but I do. The manager stated to me that there is no standard form or routine that is followed, some lenders might ask detailed information so not and some won't bother. Then he went on to say he will give out information over the phone in order to assisst the seller on the property (Owner) Something about this seems twisted, or maybe I am.
I also don't believe the management has any obligation to a seller that would entail "Help" from the management. Information would be an obligation not an elective "Help>"
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Robert,

You are so right the management company should have nothing to do with sales of the condos except to provide WRITTEN information to the closing agent as to whether the assessments are current. Not sure what you mean by "help" from the management company re selling...sounds like they may be operating as a real estate agent..dangerous. I know nothing about SC law but would think the onus is on the closing agent to provide clear title and would be surprised if the lender would settle for anything less. I doubt the lender wuld be happy to learn after closing that there were subcontractor liens against the property.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Ellen,
Thanks for your reply, you seem very hands on knowledgeable, a good thing.
This "help" is more or less a play by our manager to just demonsrate he has the best interests of all owners at heart. He is a private manager and does some things very well, is far from a dummy, and has a wide range of knowledge. I have worked with him over the years and I suppose we can see each others warts. I certainly don't think he is operating as any kind of realator , although been through that once years ago. Like all of us we tend at times to do whatever seems best for us at the moment and then at a later time come up with explanations that sound good if you don't look too closely at the problem.

I would be interested in finding out what is generally accepted that the Condo managment (in our case) routinely provides to the lender or what ever some are called now since the big debacle with the sub prime mess. Used to be you could cover all these lenders under, Bank or Mortgage Co. I don't think we have got a hold of that problem yet and it is still going on with some re-financing. Are there standard forms the lenders submit to the Condo and where could I get a copy or is this kind of information just a casual part of a closing. I have questioned some lender banks and they don't give me nothing. Wouldn't any information have to be given in writing? I have a problem with the management saying to an owner this kind of information is propriority and other owners can't get it, but they can give it out over the phone. Most of the time when I chase something down to this impasse and question the board they seem to feel I am just trying to prove a point and a sort of who cares attitude.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
Robert,

I have never heard of the lender requesting estoppel letters from a condo or hoa assn. The lender pays the closing agent for title insurance and this is done by the closing agent and is required to be in writing. We have never requested anything else (i.e. the covenants, etc which the closing agent can examine in the public records). I have just faxed or mailed a simple letter asking how much the assessments are and when due (monthly, quarterly, etc), whther they are up to date and when the next payment is due. If they are soon to be due I collect them at closing. Also a good idea to ask in the letter if there are any special assessments due or pending. I would never close on a verbal..nothing like getting it in writing.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here