💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MikeC11 (North Carolina)
Posts: 10
Posted:
If we have a Lien placed against our HOA(for Non Payment), what is the overall impact against each of us as members of the HOA and as individual homeowners ? Can liens be placed on our individual homes for the HOA"S non payment.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
If "we" have a lein . .

Do you mean "If there is a lein . . ."

No, your homes are yours. The lein may however, affect common grounds or amenities currently still owned by the Developer.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Mike,
Yes they can. The entire membership makes up the Hoa. You are all equal partners.

But a better question is why is there a lein placed against your HOA? Tell us about this.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Mike,
Agree with Donna, what is this about?

If it is a Mechanics Lien placed by some contractors that feels he didn't get paid enough, or somethiong like that, this goes on all the time in any business or association (business). If it is someone suing for serious stuff like discrimination, larceny, abuse, legal responsibilities, this also goes on on, no organization are free of it. Of course that is why there are lawyers and judges, etc, etc.
Your association should carry all kinds of insurance for protection, check and see what kind you all are carrying.
MikeC11 (North Carolina)
Posts: 10
Posted:
Yes, if there is a lien placed against our HOA, for non payment for our water bill, electric bill, landscapers, etc. all legitimate expenses. What impact would it have for one of us as a homeowner if we were trying to sell our house ? We are in arears financially because the developer stoped paying the subsidy as agreed in writing, signed, sealed, but no longer paying.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Mike,
I believe that laws on leining are different in every State. What I should have added, is that a possible scenerio would be that your HOA does a special assessment to cover the outstanding bills. If a H.O fails to pay that special assessment, then the HOA can lein them for not paying. I DO NOT KNOW if leins against the HOA can be used against the individual members. I Hope Not!
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Mike used the word "individual homes." Please explain more about your subdivision and "homes."

No way could a lein against the HOA, Inc. come back to take individually mortgated homes away.

Common areas, yes. Properties still under the Developer's ownership, yes. But not sold properties.

George . . .?
GeorgerwilliamsW (Indiana)
Posts: 975
Posted:
Mike you need to be careful about the posts here. There is a lot of misleading information and opinion masquerading as fact.

First, laws in every state are different. There may be a statute that deals with precisely the situation you ask about. Also, condominium laws are typically different than the statutes that apply to single family associations.

Second, anyone can record a lien on any property. It is like a lawsuit. Anyone can sue you for just about anything. So if a contractor engaged by the homeowners association is not paid, not only can it lien the commonly held property, it can also lien individual units.

However, (and this is a big however), liens on individual units in such a case are likely not enforceable and would test the temper of a judge should the lien end up in court. Courts throughout the nation are not sympathetic to such bogus, unenforceable liens. Indeed, there is plenty of court cases in which placing an unenforceable lien has resulted in a penalty judgment against the lien holder.

Now, in some states, liens for things like municipal utilities (gas, water, sewer, etc) that are paid on a common basis for the benefit and convenience of individual unit owners, may be valid. If this is the case you need to check your specific state statutes. It all depends on what the lien is for.

One of the reasons an association is incorporated is to protect individual members from liability. Stockholders of a stock corporation are only liable for the debts of the corporation to the extent of their capital investment.

If your association is incorporated, which it likely is, then a lien on your unit for, say, unpaid landscaping of common areas, is likely bogus. But it is a nuisance. Were you to sell your unit, it would take some expensive legal work over several months to get it removed. If a court found it to be bogus you could recover damages from the lien holder. But that could take years.

With all that said, if a contractor placed a lien on association owned property, it could seek foreclosure action against the association (the owner). More likely, the contractor uses a lien to force a lawsuit. In a lawsuit, a civil judgment could be entered against the association. In such a case each unit owner would be required legally to pay your fair share of the judgment, most likely, through a special assessment to the association. Were the judgment not paid by the association, then it could be forced into bankruptcy, or association bank accounts or reserve funds could be seized by the court to satisfy the judgment.

OK, now if the developer is behind in payments to the association, the association can (1) sue the developer and (2) place a lien on all the unsold lots or units. However, in the interim, other unit owners would be required to make up the shortfall through higher assessments. But, if the developer is illiquid (has no cash to pay the judgment) or in bankruptcy, then it becomes a much stickier situation. Once the funds are recovered from the developer they can be returned to individual unit owners, or, perhaps, placed in the association reserve fund.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
George,
I am a little hung up one your first sentence (pargraph) in your post. You seem to be adding coals to the fire. If you are referring to those that post here.

Opinion by definition is not fact, it is opinion.
I don't believe anyone posting here regularly, you included, is masqerading as anything, and above all, certainly not a Judge and jury of distributer of facts. That's not what we do. Granted, we may get a little passionate about things, but it would be difficult to establish we are masking ourselves with the clothe of the judicial. Even when we post parts of our documents or parts a statute or law, we don't claim authorship or responsibility of the whatever.

Maybe I am jus being overly sensitive, I get days like that.

I also realize we do at times give wrong information and make mistakes, and it is only natural. Not all can be perfect, but be thankful knowing you walked with Lions when you can read some of my stuff, because I am never wrong.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
OP stated: "our water bill, electric bill, landscapers," have not been paid.

This really is an emergency and puts the homeowners in an awful situation.

WilliamT2 (Texas)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Ditto to the gentleman from Indiana.

Also, DON'T let "post count" numbers suggest any sort of legal competentcy.
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By GeorgerwilliamsW on 12/06/2008 7:46 AM
Mike you need to be careful about the posts here. There is a lot of misleading information and opinion masquerading as fact.

You know George, sometimes you have about as much tact as a hammer to the side of the head. In looking back over the posts in this thread, I would have a hard time saying that anybody has said that anything is "fact". Donna stated that laws on leining vary by state, which you also stated. Most of the posts have been asking for more info so that people can offer an informed opinion, which is how most threads on this site play out. Ultimately, this thread will probably end up with people explaining how it worked for them in a similar situation and advising the OP that they should probably seek local legal advice, which again is how most threads here play out.

I don't think anybody here would argue that you don't have valuable information to offer, but when you open a post with statements like that, I think all you really accomplish is alienating the other people here.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

William,

Our Disclaimer----"General Legal Notice: The content of forum messages are from the posting member and have not been reviewed nor endorsed by HOATalk.com. Messages posted by HOATalk or other members are for informational purposes only, are not legal or professional advice and do not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Most posts are from personal experiences.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DwightT on 12/06/2008 8:40 AM
Posted By GeorgerwilliamsW on 12/06/2008 7:46 AM
Mike you need to be careful about the posts here. There is a lot of misleading information and opinion masquerading as fact.


You know George, sometimes you have about as much tact as a hammer to the side of the head. In looking back over the posts in this thread, I would have a hard time saying that anybody has said that anything is "fact". Donna stated that laws on leining vary by state, which you also stated. Most of the posts have been asking for more info so that people can offer an informed opinion, which is how most threads on this site play out. Ultimately, this thread will probably end up with people explaining how it worked for them in a similar situation and advising the OP that they should probably seek local legal advice, which again is how most threads here play out.

I don't think anybody here would argue that you don't have valuable information to offer, but when you open a post with statements like that, I think all you really accomplish is alienating the other people here.

I second THIS post,

AND Donna's

Quote:
Posted by DonnaS on 12/6/2008 12:04 PM
Our Disclaimer----"General Legal Notice: The content of forum messages are from the posting member and have not been reviewed nor endorsed by HOATalk.com. Messages posted by HOATalk or other members are for informational purposes only, are not legal or professional advice and do not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Most posts are from personal experiences.

AND Robert's.

Quote:
Posted by RobertR1 on 12/6/2008 8:16 AM
I am a little hung up one your first sentence (pargraph) in your post. You seem to be adding coals to the fire. If you are referring to those that post here.

Opinion by definition is not fact, it is opinion.
I don't believe anyone posting here regularly, you included, is masqerading as anything, and above all, certainly not a Judge and jury of distributer of facts. That's not what we do. Granted, we may get a little passionate about things, but it would be difficult to establish we are masking ourselves with the clothe of the judicial. Even when we post parts of our documents or parts a statute or law, we don't claim authorship or responsibility of the whatever.

In fact, while I have nothing on topic to add to this post, I don't think I saw a single reply that was much different than George's was to begin with. Except the other posters didn't start out trash-talking about everyone else's comments. . . .

WilliamT2 (Texas)
Posts: 8
Posted:
Where's RW1 when you need him?

I doubt any of you have had ALL these "personal experiences" from which you derive your opinions.

SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:
WOW, I just came upon this thread. There have been times when I found some of "the usual suspects" here to be too arrogant almost defiant giving "instructions" to posters. I was a bit taken aback about this attitude and expressed my opinion only to be chastised.
Well, I think these "usual suspects" have recently toned down their comments and are now more cautious and sensible. I do appreciate the wealth of information volunteered on this forum by folks that offer their time and talent to answer or try to guide inexperienced people in the right direction. AMEN.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Susanna,

I guess it is human nature to posture ones self in a defensive position when one is challenged and someone writes in an aggressive tone. Most of the regular posters have had experiences in HOA matters and that is what drew us to the site to begin with. When someone comes on with an attitude that none of us know what we are talking about, it causes mostly negative conversation amoung that person and those who have lived and dealt with HOA situations.

There is a wealth of knowledge here and if we don't know the answers, most will say so or look it up and give it their best shot. But there is no need for taking someone to task with a verbal lashing.

If you got chasitsed, it may have been your turn as most of us have also been taken down a peg or two. Your posts have gotten very interesting and challenging to try and help you find answers for your own situation. It can be fun and rewarding but it must be a two way street of niceness. I guess some still have to learn that a better way is ease up on the approach

DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
Donna, I believe we are way overdue for a "group Hug". I'm feeling a lot of tension here.



Dana

PS I have never experienced the above issue so I'll just sit back and watch the kids play on this one.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Dana,

Group Hug
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SusannaM on 12/08/2008 4:18 PM
WOW, I just came upon this thread. There have been times when I found some of "the usual suspects" here to be too arrogant almost defiant giving "instructions" to posters. I was a bit taken aback about this attitude and expressed my opinion only to be chastised.
Well, I think these "usual suspects" have recently toned down their comments and are now more cautious and sensible. I do appreciate the wealth of information volunteered on this forum by folks that offer their time and talent to answer or try to guide inexperienced people in the right direction. AMEN.

Or maybe you're just not as sensitive as you used to be.

I think us "usual suspects" have ALWAYS been "cautious and sensible," and I'm trying for the life of me to figure out who among the Usual Suspects posts arrogant instructions.

I do think some people come in here with a bit of a chip on their shoulders and, couple that with the inherent nature of written communication not containing additional cues such as tone of voice and other non-verbals, and their not knowing the "usual suspects" as well as the "usual suspects" know each other, there's bound to be some misunderstandings and over-reactions at times.

I have yet to see a more "senior" poster (in terms of numbers of posts or length of time here) purposely or haphazardly provide information or guidance or advice that is NOT somehow couched in a typical "your mileage may vary" disclaimer.

I think the regular posters invariably go out of their way to make it very clear that the information they are providing is OPINION only (for the most part) and is based on THEIR experiences in THEIR HOAs or COAs and in THEIR local jurisdictions.

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Right on, Michelle! And I also second your second of Dwight's, Donna's & Robert's responses to George's tongue lashing. It's not the first time he's said those words -- you'd think he's never made a wrong statement! I, myself always try to preface many of my comments with "IMO" so the reader's will KNOW I'm stating my opinion.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
William T,
I suppose that could be said of any human being over the age of six months, don't you think.

At least our personal experiences include hours and hours of listening to what is posted on this site. I am not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but some of this stuff has got to rub off on me. But, I admit I have only lived in association for something like 37 years, and 20 of that has been in the same association. One thing this has taught me is I don't know very much, but I know a little something.
SusannaM (Florida)
Posts: 366
Posted:
What happened to Mike in NC , the owner of this thread about liens against HOA ???
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Sussana,
As you probably know there are two threads here that Mike started.
This appears to be the second one. I am not sure the first thread can be reconciled with the second as it appears to me to tell two different stories. I am dizzy from flitting back and forth between the two and since Mike seems to have disappeared, maybe it doesn't matter. This is my first impression when I was trying to answer your question and I will see again if it makes ant sense.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MikeC11 on 12/05/2008 9:09 PM
Yes, if there is a lien placed against our HOA, for non payment for our water bill, electric bill, landscapers, etc. all legitimate expenses. What impact would it have for one of us as a homeowner if we were trying to sell our house ? We are in arears financially because the developer stoped paying the subsidy as agreed in writing, signed, sealed, but no longer paying.

Depending on the laws of disclosure in your state, you might need to let prospective buyers know of the liens and the financial situation of the HOA upon the attempt to sell your home. even if you weren't required to by law, it's a sticky wicket, if you honestly knew the new owner might be on the hook for additional costs, and didn't mention it in the "full disclosure" portion of your seller's contract.

It seems to be to be a potential negative to selling.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here