💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
The developer of our townhome complex (small 16 units) called a meeting with homeowners and HOA requesting to turn the HOA over to the homeowners. The HOA who had been working with the developer prior to this 'forgot' to bring any financials telling us instead we could look it up online later. The developer mentioned a problem they had prior, where the incorrect lift stations were installed by the contractor but said it had been quite an ordeal, but had all been taken care of. Correct lift stations now in. Developer requested to turn HOA over to homeowners.

Since only 3 HO showed up for the meeting they are now Board of Directors. Now we find out there was emergency lift stations installed & developer never paid plumber $2,000. Developer's phones have been disconnected & mail is returned. Plumber now says he will lein each townhome. Can he do this?

HOA now says it 'just discovered' the developer owes $6000 in assessments (from the past year). Claims they didn't know this at the time of our meeting when homeowners took over.

HOA does not inforce rules. The 'one time' it did when a board member filed a complaint about a renter, they hand carried a letter to the renter telling them who filed a complaint. Which has now started a rif between neighbors. The renters in question are squatting in a foreclosed property (no HOA fees being paid), and our HOA is giving them advice on how to stay there rent free, use the pool and other facilities that we fee paying HO's pay for.

What do we need to do to replace this HOA? Do we need a majority vote? Several units are unoccupied due to recent foreclosures & 4 are owned by developer & partners. Other owners are out of state. This HOA seems to be in tight with developer.
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
You did get scammed because you didn't have a legal meeting. You should point out that a quorum was not present and thus no business took place. The developer is still in control of the HOA. Since he has a right to appoint board members, they can be board members. But they are appointed members.

Beyond that, you will need to do some due diligence before accepting things.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
For $2K, the plumber should take the HOA to small claims court.

Did you have a transition team or a consultant take you through the transfer. Someone really dropped the ball, since this Developer has left you in the lurch.

Do you have the money to pay him? Do that and then turn around and sue the Developer - IF you can find him.

DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
The HOA sent proxy notices to all HO's asking them to sign over proxy to the HOA. If all HO's not present signed proxy over to HOA would that make the quorum? How would we know for sure all HO's did sign over? The HOA seems to be covering for the developer. They actually told one new HO (now a board member) they didn't know the name of the developer....
DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
No, we didn't have a transition team or consultant. As far as I know none of us have ever been involved in an HOA before, and didn't know we should have a transition team or consultant. This was thrown at us quickly. I think we are all still in a daze.

Thank you both for answering.
DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SusanW1 on 11/04/2008 7:04 PM

Do you have the money to pay him? Do that and then turn around and sue the Developer - IF you can find him.


The developer lives in another state, and there are judgements against them there. Another Board member found out they will be in court on a certain day, and asked our HOA if we could serve them there. The HOA said we couldn't. I don't know the details, but it had to do with them being in a different state. But as I mentioned before this HOA is in tight with this developer.

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Diane - the HOA means Homeowner's Association. That IS the Board-run corporation, with the members being the homeowners.

Are you talking about a Management Company that is in tight with the Developer?
JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By KirkW1 on 11/04/2008 7:00 PM
You did get scammed because you didn't have a legal meeting. You should point out that a quorum was not present and thus no business took place. The developer is still in control of the HOA. Since he has a right to appoint board members, they can be board members. But they are appointed members.

Beyond that, you will need to do some due diligence before accepting things.

Kirk,

3 Members (+10%) of our 21 unit HOA would consitute a quorum. Here, OP says they have a 16 unit HOA, so depending on their docs, a quorum may have been present.
DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
Yes. Sorry to confuse the two, but we are green to this & overwhelmed. The HOA management company seems to be in tight with the developer & partners. The person in charge of handling our small complex doesn't seem to know anything. Indicates she will inforce the R&R, but doesn't. Paid a $4K bill to put down pine straw that was not put down (Not at our complex anyway. Maybe at one of the developer's other complexes, but we paid the bill).

How do we go about getting rid of this mgt co?
Thank you...
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
the current board of directors can fire the management company, with penalties dependent upon the contract signed. the mgt company is a vendor, nothing more, for the BOD/HOA.

DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
BrianB,
Oh my gosh... the appointed BOD's didn't sign a contract with the management company. The developer was dealing with this company b4 HO's took over. (I need to read the HOA's again to establish what the quorum is to see if we had a legitimate meeting). Assuming the quorum was met; does this mean we have 'no contract' with the mgt. co. at this time?
DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
BrianB,
What do you mean by 'with penalties'?
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Diane, the Management Company may have a valid contract with the HOA even if it was signed by the developer and the HOA should have a copy of it or they can request a copy from the MC. It should detail the duties of the MC and should have spelled out in it exactly how to terminate the contract. Typically most can be terminated without cause by notifying the MC in writing usually 30 to 90 days in advance. However some contracts, especially multi-year contracts require the payment of a penalty if they are terminated early or without cause, this is usually X number of months payments.

Another place to look is in your (HOA) documents to see that any Covenants concerning MC's are being carried out; ours for instance prohibits a contract with a MC longer than three years. In addition Ohio law prohibits a contract with a MC longer than 90 days after transition without the approval of a majority of homeowners in a COA.

5311.25 Required provisions for condominium instruments.
(D) Unless a contract or other agreement is renewed by a vote of the unit owners exercising a majority of the voting power of the unit owners association, neither the unit owners association nor the unit owners shall be subject to either of the following:

(1) For more than ninety days subsequent to the date that the unit owners other than the developer assume control of the unit owners association, any management contract executed prior to that assumption of control;

(2) For more than one year subsequent to an assumption of control, any other contract executed prior to that assumption of control, except for contracts for necessary utility services.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
GlenL: I wasn't able to find anything in our doc's where it even mentions a MC. I'm having someone else read it now to see if I missed it. Now I'm thinking the 'with penalties' BrianB mentioned are the penalties the HOA may have to pay to terminate the contract. Am I on the right track?

DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
KirkW1: I find nothing in our doc's regarding how many members represents a quorum. (having someone else read to see if I missed it).

However, I have found another issue we need clarified. It does mention that there are 2 types of members. Class A members (home owners) have one vote per townhome owned, Class B (Declarant) have 3 votes per townhome. It states who the Declarant is a LLC. This LLC still owns 3 units.

As we understand it, the ‘Declarant/Developer’ consists of 3 people under this LLC. One of the 3 people purchased one unit under a different LLC. Since it was purchased under a different LLC is this member no longer a Class B member?

Thank you all for responding to these questions.
SharonM3 (Virginia)
Posts: 23
Posted:
Diane, check state law (in Virginia, it is the Virginia Non-Stock Corporation Act and the Property Owners' Association Act) and see what the requirements are to notify the management company that you want to come in and review financials, proxies, sign-in sheet for the meeting, etc. Ask what the charges are per page for copying anything at the MC's office.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DianeK2 on 11/06/2008 8:27 AM
KirkW1: I find nothing in our doc's regarding how many members represents a quorum. (having someone else read to see if I missed it).

However, I have found another issue we need clarified. It does mention that there are 2 types of members. Class A members (home owners) have one vote per townhome owned, Class B (Declarant) have 3 votes per townhome. It states who the Declarant is a LLC. This LLC still owns 3 units.

As we understand it, the ‘Declarant/Developer’ consists of 3 people under this LLC. One of the 3 people purchased one unit under a different LLC. Since it was purchased under a different LLC is this member no longer a Class B member?

Thank you all for responding to these questions.

Diane,

You asked: "One of the 3 people purchased one unit under a different LLC. Since it was purchased under a different LLC is this member no longer a Class B member?"
As long as this declarant is still an owner of the LLC that controls the assn he is still a Class B member. However, the declarant is considered a Class A member for any units he purchases whether purchased while the s/d is still under declarant control or not. He is only a Class B member for the unsold units. Once the declarant (developer) has turned over the assn to the members there are no longer Class B members. While the assn is under declarant control this particular declarant would have 3 votes for each unsold unit and 1 vote for the unit he owns. After turnover he will have only 1 vote for the unit he owns.

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Diane,

Concerning the matter with your mgmt co.: Some assn docs have a provision stating any contracts the developer signed can be terminated w/o penalty once the assn is turned over to the members. There may also be a state law addressing this. I suggest you thoroughly review your docs and also check out state law for HOAs. This topic would not be in the State nonprofit corp. statutes.

Now, if this provision is not in your docs or state law I would suggest contacting the developer and asking him to terminate the contract. Since he entered into the contract, IMO, it's up to him to end it and pay any penalties that might be due.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Diane,

I want to clarify a remark I made in an earlier response "While the assn is under declarant control this particular declarant would have 3 votes for each unsold unit and 1 vote for the unit he owns." You stated the declarant is an LLC made up of 3 individuals. Each of these individuals does not get 3 votes per unsold lot, instead the LLC gets 3 votes per unsold lot. However, the one declarant who also owns a unit gets 1 vote for that unit. So if he is voting on behalf of the LLC he can cast 3 votes for each unsold lot plus 1 vote for his own lot.
DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
MaryA1: Thanks for clearing that up.

Is there anything the HOA can do about the (for lack of better word) 'squatters' (who were renting from the previous owner) in a foreclosed unit? The unit is now bank owned, so they have no lease, therefore pay no rent but continue to use pool/facilities the rest of the us HOA fee paying owner pay for. According to another BOD they have trashed the common area near their unit, and may be committing illegal activities on the premises.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By DianeK2 on 11/07/2008 2:38 PM
MaryA1: Thanks for clearing that up.

Is there anything the HOA can do about the (for lack of better word) 'squatters' (who were renting from the previous owner) in a foreclosed unit? The unit is now bank owned, so they have no lease, therefore pay no rent but continue to use pool/facilities the rest of the us HOA fee paying owner pay for. According to another BOD they have trashed the common area near their unit, and may be committing illegal activities on the premises.

1st) Yes Diane, i was refering to any penalty clauses in a contract/early termination fees for firing the company before the end of the contract terms. there may or may not be any in place, just something the board needs to know and consider (cost of continued business versus penalty for severing contract early).

2nd) Yes, the HOA can do a lot about squatters. First, they can follow their procedures for penalizing the owner for any violations of the CC&rs the renters/squatters are committing. The bank can say "but we dont... " but hold them to it. the property is theirs, they have an obligation to secure it, police it, etc.
then, you can call the police on them for trespassing in the common areas. those areas are for owners use only, and unless they can show their names on the deeds (or other legal proof), they are trespassing. If you suspect illegal activities, call the police. the Police enforce City, COunty and State/federal laws, not the HOA.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Brian,

Diane said these people are squatters, however, I wonder if she knows this for a fact. They were renters of the original owner; perhaps the bank is now renting to them. If they are legitimate renters they do have a right to use the common areas. If they are committing violations then letters need to be sent to the bank. I would not call the police to report them as trespassers until I knew for sure they are not renting from the bank.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
They may or may not be squatters, one thing that has been catching on around my area is companies that hire people (after an extensive background check) to move into vacant properties. The theory being that a "lived in" home will sell faster and for more money than an empty one.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
One of the BOD's said she called the bank and was told it would take 90 days from the date the bank took title before they could come out with a locksmith and police to have them removed.
EllenS1 (Florida)
Posts: 1,148
Posted:
I'd say it is high time to go to an attorney but only one who has experience with hoas. Being told the developer cannot be served suonds just like more baloney.
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
In regards to the "squatters" who were previously renting a foreclosed house, don't assume they are indeed squatters. There was something in the news feed on this site where a sheriff stopped doing evictions for banks because of the number of inocent renters. In his jurisdiction the bank was required to give renters 3 months to find another suitable place to live.

Also, you don't know that the renters have not made arrangements with the bank to continue leasing the place. (Nor are you likely to find out any of the details of this.) Unless either you own the property or have been made an agent of the owner occupancy is none of your business. Having said that, you could be a good neighbor and ensure the owner knows someone is occupying the property. What they choose to do about said occupation is the owner's problem though.
DianeK2 (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
'One' of the reasons the HOA has a problem with these people is because they have trashed the common areas of our complex. Is that 'none of our business'?
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Diane,

Any damage done to the common area by a renter is the resp. of the owner. In this situation, it must first be determined if these individuals are indeed squatters or are living on the premises with the knowledge of the lender/bank. If the latter, then the lender/bank should be informed of the violations being committed and would be resp. for any damages incurred. If they are indeed squatters, the police can be called to have them removed. Good luck on collecting any $$$ to pay for the damages!
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
Diane - I think Kirk's point was that the status of their residency is none of your business. If they are trashing your common areas, then that is what you enforce. You need to follow the same enforcement procedures regardless of if they are the owners, renters or squatters. Your first step should be to contact the owner (even if it is the bank) and let them know that the residents are causing problems. If they are illegal squatters, then it is up to the owner to have them removed.
DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
BTW: we have one home in our neighborhood that is technically being occupied by squatters. But they are taking better care of the property than many homeowners do, so who are we to complain?

In this case, they were renting from the original builder, who had a few other homes in the neighborhood as well. These people were about to buy the property from the builder when he filed bankruptcy, leaving them (and the status of their deposit) in limbo. Right now the bank is dealing with the builder and his $70M of debt, so they aren't interested in trying to collect rent that they may or may not be entitled to depending on the outcome of the bankruptcy. So for the last few months the residents have been living there without paying rent or a mortgage.

For this property we got lucky. Even though they are "squatters" like I said they are taking care of it. There were a couple of others in the neighborhood from this same builder where the tenants trashed the place on their way out. Those are going to be real fun to deal with.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here