💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

SetenaN (Georgia)
Posts: 23
Posted:
we have a homeowner in our neighborhood who went up to the courthouse, acted as if he was the president of the association and dismissed liens and lawsuits that we had pending against his friends saying that theyowed nothing. He also went to the secretary of state website and paid to have his name placed on the secretary of state site stating he was the president of the association. Im sure this is a crime of some sort, but not sure what to do and canwe file charges? Yes I am in the process of seeking legal counsel, but love the ideas that come from thousands of people vs. just one.

Thanks!
Setena
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Get a lawyer ASAP and get an injunction against this person who is acting as an unauthroized officer or agent of the corporation.

MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
O my yes! That is highly illegal!

That is fraud and quite bold fraud as well!

There is NO WAY the board should stand still on this and something needs to move forward quickly.

In fact, I would start with the Secretary of State and inform them as well.

The State's Attorney General needs to know as well!

By the way, he would have needed more than a "say so" to release the liens. He would have had to have had a notarized instrument of some sort.

Big Big No No. . .
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Michele,

You said: "By the way, he would have needed more than a "say so" to release the liens. He would have had to have had a notarized instrument of some sort."

I don't think so! IMO, the recorder's job is not to determine the validity of any doc being recorded, but only to record it. It's not a requirement (at least by my Co. Recorder) that any doc being recorded be notarized.

DwightT (Idaho)
Posts: 664
Posted:
This is one that probably should hit the news. Not to bring the spotlight on the HOA, but to point it at the problems with the recording process. Unfortunately Mary is correct. Neither the County recorder nor the court clerk really have any way to verify the validity of any document that is presented to them. Having the document notarized doesn't mean anything either because all the notary can do is verify that the person in front of them is indeed the one who signed the document. That still doesn't mean that the document itself is valid or that the person signing is actually authorized to do so.

When you get right down to it, the current signature-based authorization process does very little to actually prevent this sort of thing. The best it can do is to provide an evidence trail after the event. Setena's HOA will probably be able to (eventually) correct the damage. But it is going to take a fair amount of legal effort and this homeowner is probably going to get a new horizontal pin-striped suit. But IMO the real problem is that there is currently very little that could have been done to have prevented this from happening in the first place.
GordonD1 (California)
Posts: 131
Posted:
Hi Setena:

Kindly tell us more of your story.

It is hard to believe what this homeowner did.

Why did he had to go and save this friends?

Thanks,

Gordon
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaryA1 on 10/29/2008 6:51 AM
Michele,

You said: "By the way, he would have needed more than a "say so" to release the liens. He would have had to have had a notarized instrument of some sort."

I don't think so! IMO, the recorder's job is not to determine the validity of any doc being recorded, but only to record it. It's not a requirement (at least by my Co. Recorder) that any doc being recorded be notarized.


I find that extremely hard to believe.

EVERY document filed with our Clerk's office requires a notarized signature.

Basically one is swearing to the validity of the information on the document.

The recorders don't verify the information, but if the document is NOT notarized, it can't be filed.

They DO check for the notary.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

If he signed his name on any legal document, it would be a forgery charge because he was not the authorized agent of the HOA. Get him on that one because that is definitely what he did. Can you file charges, you bet you can. Who drew up the lein papers? Most likely your HOA attorney? If so, I would think that he would be irrate and hang this bold so and so.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Setena,
If this happened in Colorado I would recommend to the Board to send a registered letter to this person. Notify and advise there will be a Hearing on these actions. After giving him a chance to explain to an independent Hearing committee the Board could fine him plus assess the costs related to correcting the liens and corporation documents. All costs would be assessed against his property if found guilty. I would do this without using an attorney. He would also be removed from being a member in good standing and excluded from using amenities until such time as all charges are paid.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Michele - you said: Basically one is swearing to the validity of the information on the document.

Sorry, that's not true.

A Notary only witnesses the signature on the documents, NOT the validity/legality of the document itself. (Although the Notary should ask if the signer has read and understood the document they are signing)

There's no way a Notary would have the expertise to know validity of ALL the documents that come before him/her.
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By SusanW1 on 10/29/2008 2:27 PM
Michele - you said: Basically one is swearing to the validity of the information on the document.

Sorry, that's not true.

A Notary only witnesses the signature on the documents, NOT the validity/legality of the document itself. (Although the Notary should ask if the signer has read and understood the document they are signing)

There's no way a Notary would have the expertise to know validity of ALL the documents that come before him/her.

I believe you may have misunderstood me. I was not talking about the notary swearing to the validity, but the person signing the document that the notary is witnessing.

For our liens and amendments and other docs that are filed, there are two signature lines. One for the officer who is authorized to release the lien, and one for the person who prepared the document.

In front of both places is a statement that they are acknowledging the accuracy and they are authorized to sign the document.

There's a bunch of WHEREASes and THEREFOREs, and some include the authority of the person signing and the details are accurate.

In other words, if they sign the document, and they are basically swearing to their authority to do so.

Is that not perjury, then, especially if they have their signatures notarized?

The notary only swears that the person who signed it provided the proper documentation to prove who they were. I was not referring to this signature. The document MUST be notarized, but the signature that they are notarizing, THAT person, by signing, is make certain declarations by their signing it.

If the person signing the instrument is not authorized to do so, then that person is the one who is in trouble.

In one set of liens we filed, I had not put the Document Prepared By: sig block on it, since I was the person both signing as my authority (as an officer of the corp), verifying the accuracy of the information (as treasurer) AND the individual who prepared the document. My signature was notarized, but I had not included a "Document prepared by:"signature block; I only signed the body of it as treasurer.

The clerk handed it back and told me she could not file it without the Document Preparer block filled out and notarized.

So back home to the word processor I went and back to the notary I went.

RobertZ1 (Michigan)
Posts: 66
Posted:
Our small HOA, had a couple of homeowners and a single BoD (member at large) notice a special meeting of the HOA members. The BoD member at large sent notices to members, then was was sent notice to stop this action, due to her "operating outside of her scope and authority." She did not, then we had these same group of individuals having members believing they could hold this meeting!

They (same group) even took over thepo box of the HOA and started a HOA bank account, all with a letter they created and they stated was the minutes of their HOA member meeting, signed by them. SHOCK of SHOCKS! This was accepted by the USPS and a financial institution who froze our accounts, and only when we (HOA)tried to make a deposit, did the recognized BoD Treasurer find out about the compromised HOA account. We went to the USPS and found they had posession of the po box over about a week (we only check for mail once a week).

All this, without notary or state filed information. We (BoD) even had to explain to members why Charter Documents did not allow these acions. It became frustrating explaining to members that the documents that govern the HOA are for all, not just the BoD members, due dilligence meant that we (BoD) had the responsibility to follow it and so does anyone who fights it.

Needless to say, it was very involved, and still not over. Legal actions and future legal actions for all of our troubles...make me wonder why the police and prosecuters love to use the excuse of "civil violations." Now thw HOA has to face all costs because they (local/municipal) have turned a blind eye (had they stopped the first trespassing violation and property destruction) with backing of our HOA rights.

We have been told to file against these individuals for all damages (financial) in small claims and make our demands to the police department to follow up on our earlier police reports and have these individuals charged for their felony actions.

This all stems from a basic belief by some, that it's easier to do what you want, then to ask and follow the rules and laws, that everyone is NOT equal under the law, needless to say FRAUD was committed and since this happened a great deal of slander by the non-BoD group.

Where do we go, to get satisfaction for the members, and the good name of the BoD, who are out the members money that it cost to defend against all this, and the actions associated with these vigilantes?

Yes, I am outraged, but there should be consequences, beyond a sorry, from a few of the members, but not all of those involved!
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
This is positively obscene.

I certainly hope you can right what was done wrong and that you can bring successful charges against the perpetrators.

What on EARTH were they thinking??
RobertZ1 (Michigan)
Posts: 66
Posted:
In our HOA situation:

It came down to, control by a few and ignorance, by most of the general membership, of the Charter's actual words and direction. Those that helped create, adopt and get approval of the documents and it's rules, ignored them.

Those that did not know all that was written and the obligations of the Charter, took their information from the few who said they knew them. Our insurance provider took exception, and said, follow the written document, if not, when and if you make a claim for your HOA you will be found in violation of your policy and your very own documents NO insurance coverage made us respond for the sake of all the members protection and privileges.

Most folks (members and non-members)never took the time to read and understand the Charter. The current BoD had to follow the advice and direction of outside counsel andour insurer applying the rules equally. thus the upset and upheavel. Those that ignored the Charter were told no more, that started the whole of our problems.

I guess the idea was that if you didn't like what the Charter said, you ignored it and told others to do the same if they wanted to support your ideals. The BoD became plantiff's to support and follow our Charter.

The real issue...do you know your own Charter Documents and the obligation by the BoD for their own protection to adhere to the and follow them completely, less you become responsible for your own BoD actions and legally liable for your own HOA's with no D&O (directors and officers) insurance for your actions, because you ignored or disregarded your documents?
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
While filing a police report is a good thing to do, do not expect them to solve all of your problems. And many times they are just the wrong place to turn (outside filing a report). After filing a police report, you must turn your attention to the prosecuting authority. And in the US, this authority is expected to be separate from the police authority.

Having said that, I think you would find that the original post and Robert's are very different animals. In one case a person filed a false court document. The other a group of people attempted to take control. It would take a lot more to prove criminal action in the second issue.

Part of what we fail to realize is that the reason some matters are not pursued is simply because the prosecutor's office has a very limited budget. If you want to change that, then get your neighbors to sign a petition to the correct authority asking the budget be increased. Be sure to include a statement that you are prepared to pay more taxes.
JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
Kirk,

A bit off-topic, but my impression is that the police (local, state, federal) are often an arm of the prosecutor's operations. For instance, the FBI is part of the DOJ which is run by the Attorney General.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here