💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

LindaD4 (South Carolina)
Posts: 12
Posted:
Should B O D meetings be open to the public? We have a community meeting in April and then some time allotted during election for open floor discussion. Two residents were raising a stink beacause there is not an open invitation for the monthly B O D meetings. Personally, I do not feel these should be open to the public. I would appreciate your comments on this matter. Thank you.
JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
Linda,

Do your docs have any advice, such as meetings in general of BODs specifically? Ours are silent as to Membership attendance at and notice of BOD meetings, so we keep them private.
LindaD4 (South Carolina)
Posts: 12
Posted:
No, they say nothing in that regard
JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
Forgot to mention:

If one or more HOs asked to attend a BOD meeting, we'd be happy to have them join us if they had some comments or concerns to share with us. Maybe even let them stick around for anything we discussed until it came to any "sensitive" matters we felt weren't appropriate for outside, inquiring minds.
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
If you have nothing to hide, then why hide it? Or, if you are handling things in a responsible and friar manner, then why not open the door up?

Certainly there will be items that need to be dealt with in executive session. But those should be relatively few things. Among them would be dealing with delinquent accounts. Also, anyone who is dealing with a violation should be granted executive session time if they desire it.

But closed meetings give rise to suspicion and distrust.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
no, they should not be open to the public. the only people who should be there are the board members, other elected officials, representatives of business/vendors with a need to be there (management company, landscaper, attorney, etc.) as needed, shareholders/owners, and invited guests (as required). Jane, Joe, and John Q Public have no rights to be there. Why should they be allowed? What purpose does it serve to let the public in?
BryanG1 (Florida)
Posts: 43
Posted:
Here in Florida, it is required that all Board meetings be open to all members of the community. Although we are permitted to have what are considered "Executive Sessions", which are closed to the general members, where items like fining and violations are discussed. No voting can occur during an ES though.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Linda - let's confirm terms:

Members do not = general public i.e. guy off the streets.

Members = homeowners and members of the associattion.

Having Members observe and/or take part in Board meetings is sometimes done. Often there is a time for member input at board meetings. I have even heard of Members participating in debate time when ther is a motion on the floor.

Some boards do not allow any Members present. The Members elected them and trust them to do the job. It is not "mass rule" it is "governance by a board.'

What do your bylaws say?

Roberts Rules says that only the members of the assembly should be in attendance of their own meeting. That would mean the Board only has Board members at its meeting - unless others are invited.

"Public Meeting" would only be required of your HOA if you were in discussion and/or voting on an issue where the municipality or lcoal governmental entity had an interest, i.e. deainage ditch or sewer line gouing thru HOA prpoperty.

GeorgerwilliamsW (Indiana)
Posts: 975
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BryanG1 on 10/20/2008 1:48 PM
Here in Florida, it is required that all Board meetings be open to all members of the community. Although we are permitted to have what are considered "Executive Sessions", which are closed to the general members, where items like fining and violations are discussed. No voting can occur during an ES though.
Florida tends to regulate condo and homeowners associations more as governmental entities, rather than private corporations. It is a recognition of the potential for abuse and their role as private pseudo governments.

I see value to both closed and open meetings. In Hoosierland statutes are silent as to open or closed meetings.
BonnieE (Illinois)
Posts: 338
Posted:
Hi Linda,

Check your state laws and governing docs. In IL, BOD meetings are open to the members (owners) – except as described below. In addition, Master Association BOD meetings (comprised of condos and single family homes in my situation) are also open to all owners (Sec. 18.5 of IL Condo Act, below).

Our meetings are not open to the general public nor to renters.

Bonnie

See pg. 17 from:
http://www.ksnlaw.com/resources/documents/IllinoisCondominiumPropertyActJune2008.pdf

(IL Condo Act)

(9) that meetings of the board of managers shall be open to any unit owner, except for
the portion of any meeting held (i) to discuss litigation when an action against or on behalf of the
particular association has been filed and is pending in a court or administrative tribunal, or when the board of managers finds that such an action is probable or imminent, (ii) to consider information regarding appointment, employment or dismissal of an employee, or (iii) to discuss violations of rules and regulations of the association or a unit owner's unpaid share of common expenses; that any vote on these matters shall be taken at a meeting or portion thereof open to any unit owner; that any unit owner may record the proceedings at meetings or portions thereof required to be open by this Act by tape, film or other means; that the board may prescribe reasonable rules and regulations to govern the right to make such recordings, that notice of such meetings shall be mailed or delivered at least 48 hours prior thereto, unless a written waiver of such notice is signed by the person or persons entitled to such notice pursuant to the declaration, bylaws, other condominium instrument, or provision of law other than this subsection before the meeting is convened, and that copies of notices of meetings of the board of managers shall be posted in entranceways, elevators, or other conspicuous places in the condominium at least 48 hours prior to the meeting of the board of managers except where there is no common entranceway for 7 or more units, the board of managers may designate one or more locations in the proximity of these units where the notices of meetings shall be posted;
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Linda,

There are some states that have "open meeting" laws, which means the members of the assn are entitled to attend ALL meetings of the assn, which includes board meetings. Members attending a board meeting also have the right to speak about a particular agenda item before a vote is taken by the board. That is the law here in AZ. The board can close a meeting to the members only to discuss certain info, such as legal matters (actually there are 4 reasons which I won't elaborate on at this time). You should check your state laws to see if this is addressed. If there is no state law and your docs are silent on this subject, then the board can do as they choose. Frankly, I see nothing wrong with allowing members to attend board meetings. For one thing, it shows the members they have nothing to hide, while also giving them the opportunity to see exactly what being a board member entails. That alone may afford you with a little more respect.
DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
Linda,

Certain states such as Florida do have open meeting laws also called the Sunshine Law.

I'm in Connecticut and we are a small community of 56 units. We have no such law.

Board meetings used to be held at a board member's home. This made it uncomfortable to have owners present. Of course the board back then also made owners feel uncomfortable. It was like, "State your mind and get out!" Not a good way to do things.

Fast forward to this year.

A) We kicked that board out.
B) We have meetings in the clubhouse of a nearby association.
C) The times of meetings are very well publicized.
D) Any owner is invited to board meetings
E) The first fifteen minutes of the meeting is for owners to state their peace.
F) After that they can stay but they can't say anything.
G) The minutes are very informative now. I also send out letters from the President to explain things going on.
H) No owners come now because they don't feel the need to. We answer all their questions.

Linda, if you make it look like your hiding something than that raises the red flag. You now have "2" curious owners that aren't getting answers; how many more would you like?

What info are these owners not getting? They are not the enemy. (Although at least one of the two might be your association nut job, we all have one of those.) What have you got to lose by letting them come to meetings? For one thing your meeting will (should?) be more professionally run with an audience.

Dana
MarianneG (Indiana)
Posts: 170
Posted:
Linda,

I absolutely agree with Dana and Kirk. Our experience has proved that BODs can have open board meetings without jeopardizing the board's credibility, any confidentiality issues, or creating unrest among the residents. In fact, the residents' attitude toward our BOD improved considerably when board meetings were opened.

Prior to last year, our BOD meetings were closed. There was suspicion and lots of undercurrent in our community. Then, when the new board took over in Nov 07, we opened the last hour of our monthly meetings to residents who wanted to discuss an issue. We ask only that residents advise us prior to the meeting that they want to attend and the subject they wish to discuss. We meet in the free public meeting room at the local library, and we keep the first hour for board only. Our two or three "nut jobs" have really settled down because their nuttiness has been diffused by our openness. As Dana wrote, the residents are not the enemy. I believe they have a right (and maybe even a responsibility) to make their wishes/concerns/issues/suggestions known. Good luck!
DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
YEAH Marianne! You and I have some "righteous Karma" going on considering the distance between us. We run along the same plane.

Glad you saw the light and made the change to open meetings before you got ousted. LOL

Dana
JeanneK3 (Maryland)
Posts: 562
Posted:
Maryland law states that all condo and HOA Board meetings must be announced and open to all homeowners with only a few exceptions. I agree with the above comments that not to do so only breeds suspicion amongst the community. If there is nothing to hide, why hide it?
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Dana,
Just to clarify for you, The Florida Sunshine Laws DO NOT apply to HOA meetings. HOAs are exempt from Following the Sunshine Laws except in cases where the HOA and the County, City or any State governing body is involved with issues such as zoning and regulatory items which affect the HOA. There are 2 seperate statements in the Sunshine Laws which remove HOAs from being applicable to the Sun.Laws

Open meeting laws for the HOAs are listed under State Statutes 720.

I do not understand why any State or HOA Board would want any meetings closed from the general membership except where legal and personal issues are involved. As many have said, what is there to hide? Every member is entitled to know what is going on, no exceptions except the legal thing.
DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
Donna, thank you for the clarification.

I never take sound advice or corrections as a personal affront.

Dana
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Dana,

This is what we are here for and that is to share info and I never intend to take anyone to task personally. This open meeting subject gets brought up regularily. I support a thought that every State should pass minimum legislation requireing open meetings for the membership to be able to know what is going on in their associations. There are other items as well but open meetings is major important.

Sunshine laws are different from State to State. Because Florida has some major Statutes for HOAs and Condos, therefore those are the governing laws for them. Some States have no laws on the books for HOAs, leaving Sunshine Laws for the State as the only guidelines for meetings.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Marianne - you dont have an "open" meeting. You said you keep the first hour "closed" for the board members only at their meeting, and then permit Members to approach the board with their issues.

An "open" meeting would be subject to viewing (and sometimes particpation)by the Members for the entire time, from when the presiding officer called the meeting to order, to the ajournment.

Instead, Marianne, what you have is a portion of the board meeting designated for "Member input."

MarianneG (Indiana)
Posts: 170
Posted:
Hi Susan, Oh, OK. Whatever it's called, it is sure working well here. I guess we could call the first hour an Executive Session? Except for the few disgruntled former board members who were voted out of office in Oct 07, residents here tell us over and over again how pleased they are with the present board's activities. Residents demonstrate their community interest by their participation in social events, volunteer opportunities, and attendance at the annual meeting (67 households out of 115 in a 55-and-older community where several residents are housebound). Of course, that is not all attributable to the member input hour. However, I think that the board's ATTITUDE of openness is key to people feeling their ideas and participation are valued.

MarianneG (Indiana)
Posts: 170
Posted:
Dana, I agree. From your posts, I believe we DO share that "righteous Karma." We're devinitely on the same sheet of music. Right on, sister!
DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
Marianne, I don't think we qualify as sister's. I could be your brother! Even though my wife and I have our bad days I'm not quite ready for the sex change just yet.

I do feel honored that my comments on this message board seemed so intelligent that they could have only been made by a woman though.

LOL

(Mr.) Dana
DanaB1 (Connecticut)
Posts: 319
Posted:
Hey Linda, have we helped to change your view?

Dana (Mr.)
MarianneG (Indiana)
Posts: 170
Posted:
Oh I love it! I actually wondered when I wrote the comment, but took the chance. I am honored to call you brother!!!!! Keep writing your insights on this board. You have much wisdom to pass along.
Marianne
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
The one thing I would suggest is that you allow residents to attend and listen to the first hour if they wish. They can't participate in any way though. The exception would be to go into executive session except when you are discussing items of a sensitive nature.

I suspect that you would find few would bother doing so. But it is an open demonstration that you really don't have anything to hide.
EdwardB2 (Florida)
Posts: 1
Posted:
DonnaS:

We are an HOA with approximately 250 homes.
Our members have been under constant attack from the Board (and officers) of "our" HOA.
I can write a book (as wordy as "War and Peace" on the questionable activities of this board.
They hold closed meetings, and fail to give proper notice to the membership.
At the last closed meeting, They put thru an $ 18,000.00 tennis court renovation.
Three proposals were tendered, (all from tennis court contractors) and awarded the contract to
the contractor with the highest bid.
The "proposal" was for $ 18,000.00 and offered a "formal" written contract (upon request).
They failed to produce this "formal" request and (apparently) proceeded with the work.
NO MEMBERS of the HOA were made aware of this project.

The "lowest" bid was for $ 12,000.00.

When questioned about why they "awarded" to the highest bidder, the president sent back an
E-Mail stating when a project is awarded, "three bids are NOT required ("by Law").
She also said "any contract" can be awarded (with-out) bids, "as long the contract is under
10% of our total budget".

My answer was WHAAAAAAAAAAAAT !

We are in Florida, and operated under Florida Statute FS720.

I am pursuing the Management Companies tactics, and am going to the DPR (Dept. of Professional Regulation) this week to address these transgressions.

Three minutes are "awarded" to members, and only one (three minute) presentation is allowed
per (monthly) meeting can you (or any other HOATalk member) give me guidance, on this subject?

SharonB6 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 70
Posted:
In our declaration it specifically states that homeowners do not have the right attend the meeting unless invited. So I guess we are lucky it was clearly spelled out.
GrahamM (Florida)
Posts: 3
Posted:
As others have stated, here in Florida we are required to open the meetings up to members of the association. I also agree, that if you have nothing to hide, then this should not be an issue. With regards to allowing member input during these meetings, you should check your associations governing documents. According to our associations documents, the only time a member has a right to speak is at the annual membership meeting & election. Even then they are technically required to submit in writing prior to the meeting their desire to speak and state on what specific topic they wish to speak. The board does reserve the right to limit the time they may speak within reason and not less than 3 minutes. However, in our community we are a bit more lax on this issue. We encourage members to attend all meetings. In doing so we feel it instills confidence in those that have been elected and helps to curb any suspicions members may have regarding how the community is being run. During our monthly board meetings, we open up to the floor at the end of the meeting for member input. In doing so, this allows the board to maximize productivity during the meeting, while still allowing feedback from the community.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 388
Posted:
Graham,

Regardless of what the gov docs states,in AZ all meetings of the assn are open to the members. The members have a right to speak at a designated time during board meetings and also have a right to speak before the board votes on a particular issue. The board may limit the number of members speaking on each side of an issue if there is a large number of members wanting to speak.

My board allows the members to speak at the beginning of the meeting. I have never seen a member ask to speak before the board votes on a particular issue. Frankly I doubt that most members even know what the law allows them to do!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here