💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

JanD2 (Mississippi)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Our covenants are getting interpreted differently by every other board that assumes office. The problem is that the covenant details that "No mobile home, trailer, tent, barn, tree house, or other similar outbuilding or structure shall be placed on any lot at any time either temporarily or permanently." Home owners are preplexed because some boards interpret 'Mobile Homes' to also mean RV's. Other boards have not read the same meaning into the covenants.

Further, some people interpret 'trailer' as any utility trailer used for hauling. We have many utility trailers and RV's in our subdivision. Even if we changed the covenants to purposely exclude utility trailers and RV's would the change apply to those persons who already owned trailers and RV's?

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
This is why it's not such a good idea to try to list "all" possible scenarios in CCRs or Bylaws. What is good in '98 no longer is valid or current in '08.

The governing documents should direct the Board to either write a policy or direct the board to form a committee that writes policies.

What are we going to do in 10 years when we have flying cars and combination boats/cars? and roof-top pools and, heck, just imagine what else!
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Jano2,
Go to top of this page and on the right you will find a little search button, Click on the and search Mobile Homes. Scan through the results I am sure you will find something interesting.

But as Susan says, times are changing fast and association are going to have to step up and make their own rules, which means, siting down and deciding what they want their covenants to read and if they don't address problems adequately, then change them to make them effective for your associaion, and legal. But I suspect your issue is going to require some people will have to agree to disagree and one side will pay for a lawyer. The Association document as intrepreted by the board should stand and any challenge would have to be made regards their decision. Better for everyone if the Board gets sued rather than the Board sues. Then the judge is likely to say, go back and settle this among yourselve.
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
Unfortunately most people don't realize that short of a definition in the documents, you should look to common usage and/or what the dictionary says. And here is the definition according to Websters:
Quote:
: a dwelling structure built on a steel chassis and fitted with wheels that is intended to be hauled to a usually permanent site


Quote:
... "No mobile home, trailer, tent, barn, tree house, or other similar outbuilding or structure shall be placed on any lot at any time either temporarily or permanently."

Now I would say due to context that a utility trailer is not covered here. I would further state that trying to restrict a person parking their motor home will likely fail as long as they don't use it as shelter or storage shed. Now a travel trailer could get tricky. I would not want to personally be the test case though I would lean toward allowing them as well. (With the caveat that they not be used for shelter or some storage shed.)
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
....the phrase "temporarily" comes into play too.

So a utility "trailer", according to our board, would qualify.

As would an RV.

JosephW (Michigan)
Posts: 882
Posted:
In the short term, look to the state's licensing definitions of mobile homes and trailers and use those. They'll at least be defensible in court. In the meantime, work on cleaning up the language.

Joe

Joseph West
Official HOATalk.com Sponsor
Community Associations Network, LLC
www.CommunityAssociations.net

*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
i think i am in michele's side on this one:

to me, an RV is indeed a mobile home. Mobile home and travel trailer are almost synonymouse to me. A tougher call, for me at least, would be if they pulled a 24 x 72 "Trailer" into the lot and anchored it to a foundation. Those are often thought of as "mobile homes", but once you take the wheels off, and anchor it, it isn't mobile at all anymore.

THe trailer is easier: if it's license, or should be licensed, as a trailer, it's a trailer: boat trailer, old truck bed used to haul trash and brush, camper on wheels, etc.. they are trailers.

KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
I personally think that if intent has any bearing that travel trailers and RVs are not addressed in the phrase. It seems clear to me that the author was restricting what could be used for an outbuilding, not trying to keep your boat from visiting.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
and Kirk's comment is why anyone thinking of writing a new rule, covenant, procedure, etc. should take the extra time to spell out as much of the intent as possible.

Taking an extra 40 words when crafting a law to flesh out the intent, scope, application, etc. would be soooooo much nicer in the years to follow. It's not a telegram, you don't pay by the word, so flesh out your rules!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here