JC3
Posts: 286
Posts: 286
Posted:
What would happen if one board member filed suit against another, as far as director and officer insurance, state law, etc?
A service of:
Community123.com
Professional websites for HOAs & condos, since 2004
Professional websites for HOAs & condos, since 2004
🎁 1st year FREE for HOATalk members! →
suit by board member
Started by JC3 • 9 replies • 1244 views
💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.
Create Free Account →
⚡ Takes 30 seconds
Already a member? Log in
SusanW1
Posts: 5,197
Posts: 5,197
Posted:
That would be a personal lawsuit, and unless the HOA was named in the suit, the issue is between 2 people.
What is the charge?
What is the charge?
KirkW1
Posts: 1,659
Posts: 1,659
Posted:
If the lawsuit has any relation to what has happened as an act of the board, then the HOA's insurance would in fact come into play to for the defendant. The insurance will not help the plaintiff.
BradP
Posts: 2,548
Posts: 2,548
Posted:
Kirk is right, if the basis of the suit is HOA related the defendant would have the ability to use the D & O insurance of the association. The plantiff is on their own.
NicoleO4
Posts: 157
Posts: 157
Posted:
I am most curious what is the cause of the legal action?
BrianB
Posts: 2,787
Posts: 2,787
Posted:
maybe i am just thinking weird, but wouldn't it depend on the details of the case whether the D&O insurance would handle the plaintiff or the defendant, or neither?
MaryA1
Posts: 6,993
Posts: 6,993
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BrianB on 06/23/2008 8:11 AM
maybe i am just thinking weird, but wouldn't it depend on the details of the case whether the D&O insurance would handle the plaintiff or the defendant, or neither?
maybe i am just thinking weird, but wouldn't it depend on the details of the case whether the D&O insurance would handle the plaintiff or the defendant, or neither?
Brian,
Good question? How about this one. Why shouldn't it cover both as we're talking about two board members? How does the ins co decide -- draw straws???
JohnK3
Posts: 964
Posts: 964
Posted:
Mary,
Ins. policies typically contain one duty and one possible duty for the insurer. The duty is to "defend" an insured. The possible duty is to "indemnify," as in pay the entire or partial loss/cost of the action. So, as stated by others, the plaintiff is on his/her own dime.
Ins. policies typically contain one duty and one possible duty for the insurer. The duty is to "defend" an insured. The possible duty is to "indemnify," as in pay the entire or partial loss/cost of the action. So, as stated by others, the plaintiff is on his/her own dime.
BrianB
Posts: 2,787
Posts: 2,787
Posted:
thanks John... that helps explain it.
I guess in some of the situations i can think of, the insurer might simply say "we suggest you seek outside counsel" to the defendant, and just not cover anyone.
I guess in some of the situations i can think of, the insurer might simply say "we suggest you seek outside counsel" to the defendant, and just not cover anyone.
JohnK3
Posts: 964
Posts: 964
Posted:
Brian,
The insurer has the duty to defend including associated costs. Could be with an in-house attorney, a "captive" firm, or an outside lawyer with whom it has experience. It would be rare for the insurer to allow an insured to choose counsel, though not impossible.
The insurer has the duty to defend including associated costs. Could be with an in-house attorney, a "captive" firm, or an outside lawyer with whom it has experience. It would be rare for the insurer to allow an insured to choose counsel, though not impossible.
🎯 You've read this entire discussion
Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:
- ✓ Ask follow-up questions
- ✓ Share your experience
- ✓ Get expert advice
- ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →
⚡ Takes 30 seconds
Already a member? Log in here