💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

EdieL (Virginia)
Posts: 86
Posted:
During my time in watching this form, I am quite amazed at how many
times posting state "go to court". For an individual(or group but not having
majority) to challange a BOD is quite difficult. I have been there and done this.
After spending approx. $20,000.00 in legal fees, only to have the HOA/BOD attorney
continue to file motion after motion, an individual or group soon runs out of
money. The BOD and attorney however is always spending other peoples money,
(homeowners) If BOD's had to spend their own $$, homeowners would probably have
more of a voice when bringing an issue. Any Thoughts?
Edie
ClaudeV (Florida)
Posts: 86
Posted:
EdieL, BOD's are volunteers. The HOA is comprised of ALL members, not just the BOD. An HOA is not a "person", it is a faceless entity registered with the state like anyother business. HOA's are not for profit organizations. Monies collected are for the upkeep of the common areas shared by all members. No one "profits" from HOA fees.

In your Commonwealth, as in our state, there is a law or laws that govern HOA's and the BOD is charged with compliance of those laws and the daily operation of the HOA for the benefit of ALL members.

You have avenues of recourse short of going to court. In Florida a member can complaint to the state and if the complaint is deemed valid, the state/court will appoint a moderator. If moderation doesn't solve the problem/issue, the court can and WILL appoint an arbitrator. Both sides present their cases and the arbitrator makes a ruling that carries the weight of the court. Both parties must abise by the ruling. End of case. The HOA will pay for the moderator and arbitrator, HOWEVER, if the HOA wins the case, they have legal recourse to sue the other party to recoup the HOA's funds.

Check your statutes governing HOA's. Educate yourself better than the BOD and you'll be better prepared to win your issue with them.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ClaudeV on 06/08/2008 10:28 AM
EdieL, BOD's are volunteers. The HOA is comprised of ALL members, not just the BOD. An HOA is not a "person", it is a faceless entity registered with the state like anyother business. HOA's are not for profit organizations. Monies collected are for the upkeep of the common areas shared by all members. No one "profits" from HOA fees.

In your Commonwealth, as in our state, there is a law or laws that govern HOA's and the BOD is charged with compliance of those laws and the daily operation of the HOA for the benefit of ALL members.

You have avenues of recourse short of going to court. In Florida a member can complaint to the state and if the complaint is deemed valid, the state/court will appoint a moderator. If moderation doesn't solve the problem/issue, the court can and WILL appoint an arbitrator. Both sides present their cases and the arbitrator makes a ruling that carries the weight of the court. Both parties must abise by the ruling. End of case. The HOA will pay for the moderator and arbitrator, HOWEVER, if the HOA wins the case, they have legal recourse to sue the other party to recoup the HOA's funds.

Check your statutes governing HOA's. Educate yourself better than the BOD and you'll be better prepared to win your issue with them.

Claude,

Sorry, but everything is not so cut and dried as you want to make it seem. Perhaps FL has a process in effect that may prevent the h/o from having to file a lawsuit against the board in order for them to comply with the law. In AZ we have a process also, however, when the HOA loses a dispute they just file an appeal in superior court and the h/o is back to square one!! Most states do not have a govt agency to step up to the plate and slap the board members' hands when they break the law. In most instances the board knows this and will oftentimes just say, "so sue us!!" We here on this forum don't have to tell the homeowners to take their board to court; the board has probably already beat us to the punch. But, Claude, don't get me wrong. I'm not against HOA boards. I've been there, done that. I know there are a lot of good ones out there. Many of the members of those good boards are participating right here in this forum! I'm just talking about the ones who don't live up to their fiduciary resp. and thumb their noses at the laws that have been put into place to protect homeowners. I agree, education is a must; but that education isn't a guarantee you will win your issue. A much better indicator might be -- how deep are your pockets?
JohnK3 (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 967
Posted:
I'll bite. $20K in legal fees to (try to) accomplish what?
MaryN (Virginia)
Posts: 125
Posted:
Virginia has a new law going into effect on July 1, 2008. For $25 a property owner may file a complaint against the HOA. Individual board members can be fined up to $1000 per offense. Attorney's who specialize in HOA law will be hear the cases.
$20,000 is the amount that several of us property owners have spent on current litigation..over what? Selective enforcement..and the finding that our community isn't a mandatory HOA..was never properly set up in the first place..and don't qualify under the VA State Statues for HOA's...so what did the BOD do? Without a meeting, because one wasn't required ..wrote totally new CCR's..signed by a simple majority..(asking some people as often as 8 times)..they voted some from the sub-division as mandatory members and some are not..those that are not don't even qualify as voluntary members..but they got to vote to change the covenants that apply to everyone in the subdiviion. When we questioned what was going on..we were told "sue us!" That's just the tip of the iceberg...It's been almost a year..we will hopefully be in Circuit Court in Sept.
I am in favor of HOA's..but..there are BOD's and BOD's..I have no idea what is going to happen to our community..the VA Supreme Court has ruled 2 times in a case like ours and ruled in our favor..not an HOA and without a 100% vote will not become one..
MaryN
EdieL (Virginia)
Posts: 86
Posted:
MaryA1
Your right- how deep are your (the) pockets!
JohnK3
BOD to accomplish their own agenda versus what was their authority
in the CCR's, Articles of Inc., Bylaws. Hanging their hats on
Articles of Inc. that state the BOD has the powers to interpretate
the CCR's. Their interpretation is wrong. No one knows better that me
because I wrote the CCR's.
MaryN
Sounds like you been there done that. POA attorneys, I think, sometimes know they
have stuck a fat hog. Keep it going and keep getting paid! Almost like free money!!
Will check the new Va. Law when passed. Thanks
Edie
GloriaM (North Carolina)
Posts: 829
Posted:
Mary:

Even if you are not a mandatory HOA do your governing documents give indemnification to your board members? If so the D&O insurance would protect them from ever being sued individually for serving on a board.
MikeS1
Posts: 668
Posted:
Mary - I've can't find any references to this new July 1 law that you reference. Do you have any links to this? Tk.
MaryN (Virginia)
Posts: 125
Posted:
Try this link:
http://www.chadwickwashington.com/jsp/content/resources/newsletters/0805_chadwick_newsletter.pdf
I think it explains the bill..should have interesting impact..I suspect it will take time to get it all up and running.
MaryN
MicheleD (Kentucky)
Posts: 4,491
Posted:
I think I would have spent my $20,000 running an HOA-wide campaign to oust and replace the board before going to court over it.

I rarely recommend homeowners take the board to court as anything other than a very last resort after first attempting to remove them from the board an trying to engage more homeowners to care.

MaryN (Virginia)
Posts: 125
Posted:
We tried everything we could think of. A District Court Judge spent over an hour explaing to the BOD why they couldn't do what they had done..they walked out and laughed.."it's just his opinion and he's just a traffic court judge"..We made up packets with the controlling legal docs..several of us ran for the BOD, got elected. The BOD has 5 members, 2 of them were part of our group. After 2 weeks, 3 of the BOD met on the road, did a mailout..and never told the other 2. One of those 2 left out was the elected President. He knew nothing about the mailout until it arrived in his mailbox. He called the other 3 BOD members and was told..majority rules..it didn't make any difference if we had a meeting or not..we would have won..if you don't like it, Sue us! 2 BOD members resigned..and the BOD put their friends in the vacant seats. If this new law had been enacted prior to our problems we might not have had to go this route.
Believe me, we have tried everything we could think of..looking back..there is nothing else we could have done other than move..spending all that money makes us all sick..and we're not done yet.
MaryN
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Wow - those minutes of the meetings must be wild!!

By the way, unless there are approved minutes of the meetings, documenting all actions, all this is just folks "acting out."

Big question is: who is paying for all these mailings, etc?

Who has control of the checkbook, at this point?
MaryN (Virginia)
Posts: 125
Posted:
The BOD is in control of the checkbook. The money to pay the legal bills is being taken from the road fund..I guess the reserver fund..We just had our annual meeting. On the agenda..estimates for a massive road project..we had a lot to say about the estimates, the 2 estimates they got(never did a check to see if the companies were legit, ask for references, etc)..thank God didn't even get to a vote..another item..installation of a wireless internet tower on the only property that the HOA owns..which has houses our wells and generator ..the person who owns the property on 3 sides wasn't informed this was going to be on the agenda..several of us had contacted the county and found out that if we objected the special permit would most likely be denied..another issue was the free for life internet service that is generally provided to the owner of the property of the tower..we suspect someone was expecting to get that perk..there was nothing in it for the association..again it was voted down.
Minutes..the secretary read the outline of her minutes, but forgot all the attachments..the majority of the property owners voted to ok the minutes from 07 anyway..oh, one more item..they informed the owners, at the end of the meeting, Not on the agenda..they are about to pay for a "safety light" at the entrance of our community..the bill would run about $8 a month. It was not discussed at the last announced board meeting, never showed up anywhere else..except..as an "I almost forgot to mention, before I close the meeting..." Our attorney got on the phone and told their attorney..who didn't have any idea they were planning projects..I think we put a stop to them..we will go to court and file a stop motion if we have to..they are just getting themselves in deeper and deeper..and costing us more and more money..
MaryN
MikeS1
Posts: 668
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MaryN on 06/09/2008 3:41 PM
Try this link:
http://www.chadwickwashington.com/jsp/content/resources/newsletters/0805_chadwick_newsletter.pdf
I think it explains the bill..should have interesting impact..I suspect it will take time to get it all up and running.
MaryN

Mary, Thanks for the link - That's quite a piece of legislation.

Our State Legislature (you know that same one that brought us the crazy DWI fines last year that were subsequently repealed.?) has seen fit to pass more crazy laws this year that somewhat protect the Homeowner and HOA communitiy to some extent. I suppose it's time that the HOAs were finally held responsible to operate within the laws of Virginia. Not that I'm against HOAs, but some of them are flying blind without radar. (Checks and balances are always usually welcome.. I think?) It's nice that the State has taken some measures to try to mitigate the number of defalcation cases that we've recently seen.

I got the impresssion that State of Virginia is hurting for money, but they (IMO), can create more bureaucracy by setting up this new Board and then fund it by charging the PMs and the HOAs for it's admin.

This will be really interesting to follow as they implement this new law.
KirkW1 (Texas)
Posts: 1,665
Posted:
I think that challenging the BOD in court alone would be a major mistake. I would spend some money on fliers to hand deliver to every home in the organization letting them know where their money was going. Some may not care, but you only need a vocal few to effect change.

It is interesting to note that a HOA board in my area (Dallas-Ft Worth) spent a ton of money suing several members. Now, the original defendant is the president of the board. His two co-defendants are also on the board. In short, as the owners became aware of where their money was being spent, they joined a recall effort.

You are quite correct that you need a lot of resources to take on the HOA board in court. And those who fought the board successfully in Frisco TX fortunately had legal insurance to help pay for their fight. (So you may want to join a prepaid legal before embarking on trying to dislodge a board.)

I can say that before our transition meeting I went and collected some proxies mostly to ensure that the quorum was met. As it happened, I collected as many proxies as people sent in from the packet that went out to the members. And this was in the course of about 4 hours of work. If you have a beef, I would start with getting your neighbors upset with the board. Follow that with a proxy push and look to unseat the jerks. I would do as much of this under the weather as possible.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here