💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DanB (Tennessee)
Posts: 2
Posted:
Is there a pressident on how long a Board of directors can enforce late payments. Our association has people that are delinquent for more than 5 years. I am now the president and I have to attempt to get our 33 home owners all on the same page paying regularly. Our CCR's clearly state that membership is mandatory upon buying a home in our sub.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Dan, obviously your HOA Board has done a lousy job of managing accounts receivable. Absolutely you can collect delinquent accounts. The means depends on your Declaration and the procedures established on collections.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
you can and should collect late dues. you owe it to the property owners who DID pay their dues, on time, all the time, to collect from those who have taken a free ride.

whenever i have doubts about late fees, collecting dues, etc. from folks, i think about what that message would say to the owners who DO pay on time every month. It gives me resolve to reward the GOOD owners, not the bad ones.
SwanB (Washington)
Posts: 199
Posted:
I bet you will receive fewer complaints than you think but you will hear from some people because that is human nature. Plan on it. But, also, plan on the checks coming in because that is the other side of humans-to do right.
I would agree with the idea of setting this up as fairly as possible with a payment plan option over a 12-month period or whatever you have in mind.
However, as a business owner, I must say it always amazes me when someone doesn't pay their bill after we have provided a service for them (?). Do they think we work for free? "Geez, you fixed my brakes and put a new clutch in my car. I didn't realize I needed to pay you for that."
LindaJ (California)
Posts: 21
Posted:
Dan, is there any reason you haven't put a lien on the homeowners' property for the amounts in arrears? Our association has a specific policy for placing liens on properties. First, the homeowner is notified in a letter of intent to place a lien, they are given a specific time to pay their balance in full (say, 30 days). If not paid, late fees continue to be assessed, a second letter is sent giving the date the lien will be filed, then the lien is filed.

This is the only way of assuring payment - someday!! Although they are supposed to notify the Board if they put their house up for sale, and the Board is always aware of new "for sale" signs (with the realtor's help, the Board can contact the closing company and the lien amount collected at closing), you need to file a lien with the county. If you don't, the owner could sell their home without your knowledge, you will have to spend money through the legal system to try and collect monies due, and it will cost all the owners money because the Board did not do a good job from the beginning.

Also, I would not agree with giving homeowners a payment plan option. Give them a specific date to make payment by (say, 30 days). If they have to take out a loan to make payment, that's not your fault. All other homeowners paid their bills. Assessing late fees does not "forgive" payments due on time. Your association needs the money to operate. The late fee is a penalty. I think you will be amazed at how many homeowners pay up quickly once they know you are serious. We had a lot of slackers, and lots of excuses, but this worked for our association.

I hope this helps.
JulieS (Georgia)
Posts: 412
Posted:
Our association has a 10% late fee applied 10 days after the due date and then $10 each month thereafter. Liens are automatically filed 90 days after the due date. The board has decided to be more aggresive in collections in that we are moving forward with lawsuits before the amount due is so high that it cannot be paid.

We have offered payment plans and as soon as a payment is not made, we move to the next step. This is the first year we moved forward with lawsuits and we are getting mixed results. One person who has never paid has their house for sale (great, lets collect from the liens and get someone in who will pay), another is refinancing (again, the liens will be paid and we will collect), another who owed almost $1,200 has paid up. Still, we have one or two who haven't done anything but once the court date is set maybe then they will do something.

I think the sooner you apply pressure and let the homeowner know the board is serious about collections, the less outstanding receivables you will have. We have some people who owe a few thousand and at this point, I'm sure it would be difficult for them to come up with the cash. The sooner you take action, the better for everyone.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
we used to apply leins for long overdue fees, but recent law changes in Arizona make getting a lein applied almost impossible for the average, small HOA... you need a court order, attorney, etc. now to do it.

So now, we just promise to do it, and promise to charge the entire legal costs to the back due account. Usually, that works, since no one wants to pay their $400 fines and fees along with $3000 in legal action fees.
MichaelA1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 11
Posted:
Our bylaws allow us to place a lien on the property that is behind in their dues. It also allows us to foreclose on the property if the owner doesn't pay up. Our state laws allow the other homeowners to sue the board members if they do not enforce the rules. So between all these, if a board member doesn't want to be sued, then they need to place liens and or foreclose on properties that are not paid up.

We've recently gone through this with an owner who is more than 12 months behind. Every effort was made to collect the dues, including striking a deal on how it would be paid. When the owner defaulted on paying current and past due assessments, the board decided to foreclose.

At the sale, the HOA was represented by our attorney who placed the first bid at the value we needed to recover the money owed to the HOA. Since the property was worth far more than the money owed, even if we won the bid, the HOA could have turned around and sold it rather quickly and made a lot extra for the homeowners.

We do NOT like to place liens or foreclose on people, however, if we let it slide, it isn't fair to those who do pay. We would me sorely negligent if we did nothing to those who didn't pay and just let the rest of the owners carry the full load.

Best regards,
Michael
HaroldS (Arizona)
Posts: 906
Posted:
Brian - If by "fees" you mean assessments, Arizona law has an automatic lien on assessments until paid - you don't need to file a lien for unpaid assessments -"The association has a lien on a unit for any assessment levied against that unit from the time the assessment becomes due. The association's lien for assessments, for charges for late payment of those assessments, for reasonable collection fees and for reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred with respect to those assessments may be foreclosed in the same manner as a mortgage on real estate."
It is for fines that you cannot file a lien without first getting a judicial judgement. Also non-liened unpaid fines cannot be collected thru escrow when a property is sold. So if you're going to apply fines, and they are not paid, your only recourse to collect is via attorneys and court and a judicial judgement. Guess who wrote that bill? Harold
GeorgeW1 (Arizona)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Hi. We are in the same predicament. The last board let monthly dues slip by and now we have owners owing more in late charges than the original balance owed. Does anyone have any experience with the "forgiveness" program, similar to the one day IRS offer or the library program, where one can pay his/her balance within a specified time period without penalty? The thought is that at least the association gets the outstanding funds and gets back on track. Would love to hear your thoughts.
BradP (Kansas)
Posts: 2,640
Posted:
I think in this situation you should give the option of a payment plan to get everyone on the same level. Obviously you have every right to place liens, assess late fees and demand payment right away. However, it is partyly the previous boards fault for not enforcing and collecting. You run a huge risk of alienating a lot of people if you demand it now, that could and probably will come back to be a problem. The people that have paid on time have little to gripe about. The board is now collecting past due amounts so everyone will be on the same field.

IF it were me I would announce an amnesty plan, pay up in 12 months, or else we will assess all back due late fees and place a lien on your home. WE did something similar here, we had about 5-7 homes that for some reason we were not aware of when they closed. We had past due amounts anywhere from $100-$300. In the end we decided to collect the money and not assess late fees because it was a combination of faults.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
I would like your thoughts on this situation. A property has two owners, #1 & #2. They purchased in late November and #1 made the December assessment payment. The following year monthly coupons were received with an assessment of $XX but #1 made no payments. The next year monthly coupons were received with an assessment of $YY and for the first time owners were notified on the coupon there was a late charge of $25 if not paid by the 5th of the month. Finally, the mortgage company who was collecting for the association realize no payments had been made or over 12 months.

The owners were sent their first dilinquency notice after 16 month. The Board met with #1 and set up an agreement to make payments plus start paying on the delinquent amount. Only #1 was offered and signed this payment agreement. After 6 months the Board wanted to change the payment plan and again asked #1 to sign a new payment agreement. #1 refused and did not make any more assessment payments.

Five months passed and #2 was made aware for the first time of the situation and was threatened with forclosure. #2 requested a Hearing with the Board and asked to review the record to determine if the amounts of assessment, late charges, and interest were proper.

#2 found the records of the association were totally inadequate. There was no record showing amounts of assessments, or late charges, or interest had ever been approved. No budgets had been approved nor ratified by the members; and there were no records on election of Board members. Accounting records were extremely limited and not in compliance with any acceptable accounting practices. Neither owner ever received a monthly notice of late charges or interest, yet other owners had received notices on late charges and also had late charges waived. They were the only owners who have ever been charged interest. Also, the Board is in violation of state statutes including having no policies and procedures on delinquent accounts.

This is one extreme example of how poorly some HOA's are managed by their Board. One more thing, the President is living out of state for the last year of her term on the Board!

The question I have is: What assessments, late charges, and interest do you think #2 should be responsible to pay?
LisaS (Illinois)
Posts: 341
Posted:
It depends on how the property is deeded I would think. If they are titled joint tenants, then they should be jointly and separably liable.

In our CCrs, the documents state that notice to one owner constitutes notice to all of a property. As well, agreement by one is binding on all.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
I agree Lisa, both are liable. The next questions are:
a) Do you think late charges should be made before notification to an owner that there are late charges and the amount?
b) Do you think interest should be charged before notifying the owners there is an interest charge and its percentage?
c) Do you think any portion of the assessments, the late charges, and the interest are valid? And if so, which ones and what portion of each?

Remember there is no proof that any amount for assessment, for late charge, nor for interest were ever properly approved; and a state statute required the Board to establish policies and procedures for delinquent accounts and the Board failed to comply.
LindaJ (California)
Posts: 21
Posted:
RogerB, as Lisa stated, our covenants clearly state that notification to one owner constitutes notice to all and agreements are binding to all owners of the property. The Board must enforce the rules "equally" to all homeowners. If there is no written rule or law about late fees, then they should not be charged. To protect ourselves, all "intents" are thoroughly provided in writing to the homeowner(s) prior to action.

I agree with charging late fees and interest on unpaid assessments. But assuming late fees and interest charges were not previously disclosed (in documents provided at closing or subsequently given to the homeowners in writing) or otherwise permitted by law, the additional charges would not be valid. However, the original assessments charged at the beginning of each year must be paid, assuming all homeowners were charged the same amount. At closing, the buyers would have paid the current assessment. Subsequent assessment amounts must be within the association rules and any additional amounts must be communicated to the homeowners prior to increasing the assessments. If the association rules do not specify the Board's right to increase the monthly assessment or there was no prior notification to homeowners, the current assessment charged would be equal to the original monthly assessment amount.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Obviously I am not communicating my questions effectively on this somewhat complex situation. I agree with everything posted but does not address my real questions. Do there have to be documents to support the AMOUNTS charged and must the owners be advised in advance of the AMOUNTS charges they may incur?

The Declaration does provide for assessments, late charges, and interest charges. This is common in most Declaratins. But HOA documents do not specify the AMOUNT of the assessment, the AMOUNT of the late charge, and only a range of percent interest. The Declaration requires the Board to approve the annual budget which includes the AMOUNT of the annual assessment; and to submit it to the members for ratification at the annual meeting. This is common practice.

My concern is about are complying with the Declaration by voting on the amount of the assessment; and documenting the vote in the minutes of the Board meeting and the annual members meeting. If there are no minutes showing the Board approved the budget and there are no minutes showing the members ratified the budget, then how can the AMOUNT of the assessment be justified? I believe the minutes must document the AMOUNT of the assessment and the amount of the late charge or else these charges are not valid. This may seem like a technicality, but what should happen if this went to court?

Also, I believe owners should be notified in advance on the AMOUNT of a late charge and the PERCENT interest charged on a delinquent account. This HOA is in Colorado where there is a law (effective 1/1/06) requiring all common interest communities to have Rules and Regulations (policies and procedures) on delinquent assessments. This HOA is in violation of that law. On a previously thread there was discussion on how this law is enforced. The conclusion was by being taken to court by some owner. So what should happen if this went to court? BTW the losing party would be liable for both parties legal expenses according to the new law.

I appreciate any opinions offered.

MichaelA1 (North Carolina)
Posts: 11
Posted:
As with anything that addresses am issue regarding if it will stand up in court, a lawyer is recommended for the answers. With me being a Sunday morning litigator (as opposed to a Sunday morning quarterback), I would think I could make a good argument to make the fees and charges stand. If a range is specified in the HOA documents and the interest charges are within that range, then it seems it would be legal and binding.

The owners have a responsibility to pay their fair share. Anyone not paying is causing others to pick up an uneven responsibility, which of course isn't fair. Late fees and interest need to be applied, otherwise some people won't pay on time and do what's right.

Since your documents provide for a specific range for fees and interest, and those fees and interest charged are within that range, then the HOA documents are being followed. Everyone in the HOA knows they are supposed to pay their dues and assessments and that they should be paid on time. From what you said, your HOA documents stipulate a range of interest and fees charged if it isn't paid. Therefore, each owner knows before hand what the penalty can be for not paying.

I would recommend that the board convene and make changes to the way they do business and start providing minutes for each meeting. With our HOA, we distribute minutes via email to homeowners and via snail mail (regular mail) if requested. Minutes are stored in the HOA office or storage for as far back as we've been an HOA.

But, this like anything else, is just my opinion.

Best regards,
Michael
DarcyB (Colorado)
Posts: 1
Posted:
Thanks for your reply Michael. One very important correction to your post "HOA documents stipulate a range of interest and fees charged if it isn't paid. Therefore, each owner knows before hand what the penalty can be for not paying." This isn't what I posted. I posted the owner did not know before hand what the penalty would be for not paying; nor did the documents provide a range of fees, only a range of percent interest (which starts at none)."

Suppose you moved into a common interest ownership community for the first time and never received any notice of late charge and interest amounts, how would you react if the President tried to add over a thousand dollars to your account?

And please don't assume this is my Declaration or my situtation
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Hmmmm. Somehow on my last message I was logged in as my wife, DarcyB.
This situation for not for either of us
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
I'm disappointed more people did not respond to this case history. I think it can provide food for thought on several very important issues:

1) It is critical for an association and its Board to document financial decisions by approval of motions which are documented in the minutes. Accurate and thorough minutes are critical.

2) It is important for every association to have a collection policy and distribute it to all owners. In this case there was a Colorado statute with which the Board failed to comply. How do you think a judge would react to this?

3) Owners should only be responsible for charges AFTER they are advised on the amount of those charges. Otherwise how do they know what they owe?

4) In my opinion owner #2 owes:
a) All assessment charges since the annual budgets were not challenged.
b) Late charges could be applicable after receiving coupons which made them aware there was an amount for a late charge. However late charges were not billed; not applied consistently to all owners; and no approval by the Board was ever documented in minutes. Therefore part or all of the late charges since 1/1/05 should also be waived.
c) No percent interest on delinquent accounts was provided to owners; no other owners were ever charged interest; and no approval of a percent interest to charge was ever documented in minutes. Therefore no interest should be charged.

5) Certain Board members are guilty of improper conduct and possibly discrimination. It is critical for Board members to act in good faith. They have a fiduciary responsibility and can be sued. In this case their Articles of Incorporation does not have wording which provides a "corporate shield". Hopefully their insurance would protect them.

Board members, you may wish to review this case history carefully.

BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
i would be amazed if any court would uphold a covenant that stated notice to one person constitutes notice to all.

I can see that being abused so badly... a board passes a motion, tells only each other, then it is considered "law of the land" to all... it need not even be recorded publicly.

wow...
BillyH (Georgia)
Posts: 9
Posted:
I have recently become secretary treasurer for a condominium project with 62 units. We have a couple of units which are in arrears for approximately 2 to 3 years. I have only found out today that liens filed against these properties are useless because of foreclosures. These liens are $5000 to $6000 each.
RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
Billy, I would not presume the liens are useless. You may want to check with a good HOA attorney. The lien is against the property and may carry over to the new owner. You may also qualify for a super lien for 6 months of assessements. Meanwhile, I suggest you set up Rules and Regualtions on Delinquent Assessments so delinquencies do not get so far out. I have posted examples of Rules or you can go to cypressgreensHOA.com to view.
RonR (Arizona)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Good Information - Thanks to All.

It is my understanding (Arizona) that late fees and penalties from Assessments not being paid must be collected within 3 years or they can not be inforced by a lien.
The only way to keep them from becoming uncollectable is to file a formal law suit for foreclosure. Thus requiring in long running situations, that a foreclosure must be filed every three years to protect the association.

Anyone from Arizona have information. And a legal reference? Interesting enough, I have asked my HOA Management Company and get no anwere.
WilliamT (Arizona)
Posts: 489
Posted:
Here's the AZ statute:

33-1807. Lien for assessments; priority; mechanics' and materialmen's liens

http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/33/01807.htm&Title=33&DocType=ARS
RonaldW (South Carolina)
Posts: 901
Posted:
Posted By BrianB on 06/20/2006 8:18 PM

i would be amazed if any court would uphold a covenant that stated notice to one person constitutes notice to all.

Sometimes a property is owned by several people, a company, a partnership, etc. It would not be possible to notify each individual member of such an organization. Think of your county property taxes. The tax notice is sent to the address on record, not to each individual owner.

I can see that being abused so badly... a board passes a motion, tells only each other, then it is considered "law of the land" to all... it need not even be recorded publicly. wow...


A board can only pass motions that the CC&Rs give it the authority to pass. Every owner should have examined the CC&Rs before investing in the property.

Our CC&Rs define the penalty for late payment including the option of the HOA to take the delinquent owner(s) to court.


Ron
SC
RonR (Arizona)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Thank you for reference to Az 33-1807.

I understand that any assessments, fees, penalties over three years old that have not been secured by a court order of foreclosure are no longer collectable by the Association.

I am somewhat confused by the next statement in 33-1807 - ....Fees, charges, late charges.....pursuant to section 33-1803 are not enforceable as assessments. Does this mean that only the Associations assessments can be collected?

Also, as an aside. Our Management company (collects assessments, pays our authorized bills, sends accounting reports)has NEVER informed our Association that our Assessments in arrears are reaching a date when they are no longer collectable and therefore no longer an assest of the Association. Isn't this a normal duty of such an organization?
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
Ron, you are correct in your examples.. I was thinking more of the county notifying one single owner in the county of a change in the property taxes, and considering that one person to have been "notice enough" for all owners in the county. In general, i was meaning that a board should not make rules in secret, hide them from the owners, and expect compliance to them...
WilliamT (Arizona)
Posts: 489
Posted:
Ron,

Your MC should be giving you monthly AR aging reports which show which homeowner is delinquent and for how many months. That report should be included in the monthly board pac that goes to the Treasurer and the President. The MC should be following the steps outlined in the collection proceedings and keep the board informed each month of the steps they are taking. I'm sure Roger can elaborate on this for you.

I read every line of our board pac each month, and have the MC give a report of the aging status in the open meeting . Because of AZ law, we are very careful to not mention names of those who are delinquent. Nor is there any hint as to who the delinquents are.

Even without the law, we do not feel that we should be embarassing anyone by discussing their finances in an open meeting. The aging report is only so all board members are shown that the MC is doing their job in collection. Normally we carry a 5% delinqency rate and no one goes over 60 days. Recently we had someone hit 90 days and a notice to file a lein was given.

Of course we have an automatic lein in AZ and cannot foreclose until an account is delinquent for one year or $1200 in assessments, which every happens first.

The reference to 33-1803, as I understand it, means that an HOA can not obtain a lein and foreclose on fines for CC&R violations (other than delinquent dues assessments) without first obtaining a civil judgement for those fees.

Example, if someone is fined $200 for continued parking violations, for example, the HOA would have to get a civil judgement prior to filing a lein and seeking foreclosure.

However, on that subject, someone made a great case on the forum for making a deal with the violator to forgive the fines if the violations are corrected. That makes for good community relations and helps to solve violations amicably.

If we run into that situation, we will try that same approach. We want to keep a very friendly relationship with our neighbors while still maintaining high standards of covenant enforcement. We feel that is a good way of obtaining more positive community involvement.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here