TomS12 (Florida)
Posts: 19
Posts: 19
Posted:
I've just been selected to a committee of 5 in a FL HOA to get competing MC bids for 2009 due to an outcry from a growing number of discontent community members. Our committee has held 3 meetings so far and as I get deeper into this and get to know "both sides" within the community, I'm beginning to see the politics within our committee.
For example: The chairman of OUR committee was appointed by a member of the BOD who also happens to be our committee's BOD liason. The president of the BODs step-father AND mother both WORK for the current MC (see where this is going?) and I just found out that one of our other committee members (I'll call him "Joe") is good friends with the BOD president and regularly plays cards with his stepfather! I find it impossible for him to remain impartial and unbiased under the circumstances.
So, I'm taking it upon myself to call and have private discussions with the other 2 committee members to see if they are "insiders" or not. I'm trying to determine if the establishment of our committee is just being done to placate the "outsiders" within the community with no real intention of seriously considering a MC change.
So, I am considering doing the following at our next meeting and welcome YOUR opinion/suggestions(s):
1. Suggest removal of Joe from the committee because of his close personal relationship with the BOD president and his stepfather/mother who works for the MC.
2. Ask each committee member (and the BOD liason) to explain, individually, WHY they believe the committee was set up in the first place.
3. Demand that NO communication of any kind take place between committee members and the BOD or MC without approval of the committee.
4. Ask that BOD liason only attend committee meetings per our request.
5. Ask that ALL ONGOING detailed findings, opinions, and recommendations of the committee re: prospective MCs NOT be disclosed to ANYONE outside the committee (including the BOD) until ALL results are compiled and sealed bids submitted.
For example: The chairman of OUR committee was appointed by a member of the BOD who also happens to be our committee's BOD liason. The president of the BODs step-father AND mother both WORK for the current MC (see where this is going?) and I just found out that one of our other committee members (I'll call him "Joe") is good friends with the BOD president and regularly plays cards with his stepfather! I find it impossible for him to remain impartial and unbiased under the circumstances.
So, I'm taking it upon myself to call and have private discussions with the other 2 committee members to see if they are "insiders" or not. I'm trying to determine if the establishment of our committee is just being done to placate the "outsiders" within the community with no real intention of seriously considering a MC change.
So, I am considering doing the following at our next meeting and welcome YOUR opinion/suggestions(s):
1. Suggest removal of Joe from the committee because of his close personal relationship with the BOD president and his stepfather/mother who works for the MC.
2. Ask each committee member (and the BOD liason) to explain, individually, WHY they believe the committee was set up in the first place.
3. Demand that NO communication of any kind take place between committee members and the BOD or MC without approval of the committee.
4. Ask that BOD liason only attend committee meetings per our request.
5. Ask that ALL ONGOING detailed findings, opinions, and recommendations of the committee re: prospective MCs NOT be disclosed to ANYONE outside the committee (including the BOD) until ALL results are compiled and sealed bids submitted.