Quote:
Posted By MicheleD on 04/25/2008 9:16 AM
Brian said: " Can I say "Well, I delivered my dues, promptly and on time. I deposited it in the US mail, addressed and properly stamped. That's good enough to be deemed "delivered", right?""
Sure, you can SAY that, and sure, you can "deem" it delivered.
Sadly, we can't "deem" your account "paid," however, since we can't deposit air or best intentions, so payment has got to clear the bank to be valid and keep your account current.
But to a much finer point, we (the HOA) didn't agree to the reverse in any contract with the homeowner, however, by agreeing to abide by the HOA documents upon taking title of their deed, the homeowner agreed to our "definition" of what constitutes a "delivered notice" from us to them.
So, just curious and a bit off topic, but do you stay up at night to think of ridiculous and contrary and basically unreasonable iterations of any and every possible scenario of everything?
Maybe cut back on the caffeine?
=-)
lol.. nope, but some cities have been found at fault for using the same logic in the issuance of traffic tickets. COurts have upheld that simply "mailing" the citation is not the same as the law (sometimes) requires. The cities use almost the exact same language, but courts say "nope, does not meet the standard" and invalidated the traffic tickets. The court's language has tended to be that if the city says "well, mailing is the same as delivering", that the ticketed people could use the same response about their payments.
You make an excellent point that as an owner, I agree to your statement when i buy. that helps clear your arguement and defend it nicely. I would give your HOA a "win" on this arguement, but I would caution others who don't have such language to be cautious, and make sure they can prove due diligence in their delivery methods.