💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DanielL3 (Louisiana)
Posts: 65
Posted:
VERY SIMPLY...Can the membership of an Association recall a member of an HOA board that was appointed by the board?
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
IMO yes, simply follow the directions in your CC&R's on how to recall a director.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
It all depends upon what your gov. docs. and/or state law say. In AZ an appointed director can only be removed, with or without cause, by the person appointing him. Written notice must be given to the director and the BOD.
DanielL3 (Louisiana)
Posts: 65
Posted:
State Law...I live in Louisiana and the laws on HOAs are very very basic and simple.
DanielL3 (Louisiana)
Posts: 65
Posted:
I was under the impression that an officer of a Board or a member of a board can only be removed by what entity that placed them their.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Daniel,

That is exactly what the law is in AZ as I mentioned earlier. Since LA doesn't have much in the way of state laws and apparently your gov. docs. are silent on this, that is the rule I would recommend your board adopt. That, IMO, is the fairest way. If the membership elects someone to the board only the membership can recall that person. If the board elects or appoints someone to the board only the board can remove that person.

JosephW (Michigan)
Posts: 882
Posted:
Since LA doesn't have much in HOA law, look to your documents first, then to the state's corporate law, if your association is incorporated. Generally, the board can remove any officer not elected by the owners, but only the owners can remove a board member once elected. Of course none of this holds true while the developer controls the association. If the person on the board you wish to remove was appointed to fill an unexpired term of a board member who resigned or left, then check the corporate law carefully, because I think it would take a vote of the owners to remove that person.

Mary, we may be confusing director and officer. IN AZ, I understand the board can remove an appointed officer, but can they remove an appointed board member (director) who was appointed to fill an unexpired term? Or do they have to use the recall?

Joe

Joseph West
Official HOATalk.com Sponsor
Community Associations Network, LLC
www.CommunityAssociations.net

*See legal notice below (end of page) or go to www.hoatalk.com/legal
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Joe,

I understand it can be confusing as to whether officer or director is meant. However, everyone should be aware that, unless the members actually elect the officers, all the board members are technically directors. Some of the directors are then elected by the board as officers.

Actually the AZ statutes do not refer to officers at all, only directors. An appointed director can only be removed by the person who appointed him, which I suppose could be the entire board. The statute pertaining to this is contained in the non-profit corp. title. In the HOA title there is a statute dealing with recall of board members, other than board members appointed by the declarant. A petition must be presented to the board, the board calls a special meeting and the members vote on the recall.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Mary - I don't get your reasoning.

The way you have worded this, the General Membership could recall the entire board EXCEPT the ones that were appointed by the Board.

I still go back to my original position that the General Membership can recall Board members (directors). All officers are Board members. HOW they got there is not the issue. Once in, that person is a director and has the same rights, responsbilities and role as any other one. There are no "classes" of Board members.

Am I missing something here?
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
DanielL3: The membership does not need the authority to RECALL an appointed Board member who is now acting as the President. It is the other Board members who can unappoint her as I have stated.

However, you need to determine first IF it is the other Board members, and residents who make up the majority, who are equally as unhappy with her as you are. If so, a signed petition would be in order from the majority membership with a special meeting for the purpose of removing the appointed Board member. You would have to review your docs on the requirements and process to request and hold a special meeting. In this way the Board is fully aware of the power of the majority to express their view.

Otherwise, IF it is the rest of the Board who does not wish to have her continue in her appointment, they only need to declare her unappointed and appoint another to finish the term period left.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Mary - I don't get your reasoning.

The way you have worded this, the General Membership could recall the entire board EXCEPT the ones that were appointed by the Board.

I still go back to my original position that the General Membership can recall Board members (directors). All officers are Board members. HOW they got there is not the issue. Once in, that person is a director and has the same rights, responsbilities and role as any other one. There are no "classes" of Board members.

Am I missing something here?

Susan,

Yes, what you're missing is that fact that I've stated AZ law. Whether I like the law or not that's the way it is here. If a board member is appointed he can only be removed by the person who appointed him. You cannot recall someone you did not elect! Perhaps in MI you can, but not in AZ. And, in LA anything goes because the HOA laws are very slim. If the gov. docs are silent on the issue then I guess the board can do whatever they wish!
MaryW5 (Arizona)
Posts: 10
Posted:
How do you go about removing a member of the Board of Directors in Arizona who was approved by the association membership.

Is there a specific form that you must use and do you send a note to the President of the Board or the entire association.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Mary W,

I presume you mean he was voted on by the members, not approved.

Copied below is the statute you must follow. This is the planned community statute. If you live in a condo, ARS 33-1243 applies but it reads the same.

33-1813. Removal of board member; special meeting

A. Notwithstanding any provision of the declaration or bylaws to the contrary, the members, by a majority vote of members entitled to vote and voting on the matter at a meeting of the members called pursuant to this section at which a quorum is present, may remove any member of the board of directors with or without cause, other than a member appointed by the declarant. For purposes of calling for removal of a member of the board of directors, other than a member appointed by the declarant, the following apply:

1. In an association with one thousand or fewer members, on receipt of a petition that calls for removal of a member of the board of directors and that is signed by the number of persons who are entitled to cast at least twenty-five per cent of the votes in the association or one hundred votes in the association, whichever is less, the board shall call and provide written notice of a special meeting of the association as prescribed by section 33-1804, subsection B.

2. Notwithstanding section 33-1804, subsection B, in an association with more than one thousand members, on receipt of a petition that calls for removal of a member of the board of directors and that is signed by the number of persons who are entitled to cast at least ten per cent of the votes in the association or one thousand votes in the association, whichever is less, the board shall call and provide written notice of a special meeting of the association. The board shall provide written notice of a special meeting as prescribed by section 33-1804, subsection B.

3. The special meeting shall be called, noticed and held within thirty days after receipt of the petition.

4. For purposes of a special meeting called pursuant to this subsection, a quorum is present if the number of owners to whom at least twenty per cent of the votes or one thousand votes, whichever is less, are allocated is present at the meeting in person or as otherwise permitted by law.

5. If a civil action is filed regarding the removal of a board member, the prevailing party in the civil action shall be awarded its reasonable attorney fees and costs.

6. The board of directors shall retain all documents and other records relating to the proposed removal of the member of the board of directors for at least one year after the date of the special meeting and shall permit members to inspect those documents and records pursuant to section 33-1805.

7. A petition that calls for the removal of the same member of the board of directors shall not be submitted more than once during each term of office for that member.

B. For an association in which board members are elected from separately designated voting districts, a member of the board of directors, other than a member appointed by the declarant, may be removed only by a vote of the members from that voting district, and only the members from that voting district are eligible to vote on the matter or be counted for purposes of determining a quorum.

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Mary after reading the 33-1813 statute you posted I see the confusion over your previous post.

"Yes, what you're missing is that fact that I've stated AZ law. Whether I like the law or not that's the way it is here. If a board member is appointed he can only be removed by the person who appointed him. You cannot recall someone you did not elect! Perhaps in MI you can, but not in AZ. And, in LA anything goes because the HOA laws are very slim. If the gov. docs are silent on the issue then I guess the board can do whatever they wish!"

Only BOD members appointed by the DECLARANT cannot be recalled; which is standard language in most CC&R's. If the member was appointed by the BOD to fill someone's place that appointed member could be recalled the same as any other member.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
AnnJ1 (Florida)
Posts: 122
Posted:
MaryA1...
WOW! You had me so interested in your recall process in Arizona that I took a looksee at your statutes to see how they differ from Florida's
I noticed the following and in my non-legal look at it. It appears that if a director is elected by the membership, resigns and the board appoints a replacement to fill the term, this (appointed) replacement director can only be recalled by the membership who elected the original director and not the board.
Am I reading this right? Perhaps I'm in the wrong section?

Ann
........................Title 10 - Corporations and Associations .......
Chapter 31 DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS-NONPROFIT CORPORATIONS
10-3808. Removal of directors elected by members or directors

C. Notwithstanding subsection B, paragraph 8, a director elected by the board to fill the vacancy of a director elected by the members may be removed with or without cause by the members, but not by the board of directors.
......................

Subsection B, paragraph 8
8. Except as provided in subsection C, a director elected by the board may be removed with or without cause by the vote of two-thirds of the directors then in office or any greater number as is set forth in the articles of incorporation or bylaws.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Ann,

Yes you're reading it the same way I would. But then we have ARS 10-3809 - removal of designated or appointed directors which says an appointed director can only be removed by the person who appointed him. IMO, there's a fine line between the BOD electing or appointing a director.

If you're interested, in AZ we also have statutes specific to HOAs. They are contained in Title 33; Chapter 9 for condos and Chapter 16 for planned communities.

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Mary with all due respect and I am by no means an expert in AZ HOA matters but I believe the appointed director you reference in ARS 10-3809 is a Declarant appointed director not someone the BOD elects/appoints to fill a vacant spot. If it applies to an HOA at all. I thought that was Title 33 but if you go with Title 10 look at 10-3808 section C.

10-3808. Removal of directors elected by members or directors
A. A director may be removed from office pursuant to any procedure provided in the articles of incorporation or bylaws.
B. If the articles of incorporation or bylaws do not provide a procedure for removal of a director from office:
1. The members may remove one or more directors elected by them with or without cause unless the articles of incorporation provide that directors may be removed only for cause.
2. If a director is elected by a class, chapter, region or other organizational or geographic unit or grouping only the members of that class, chapter, region, unit or grouping may participate in the vote to remove the director.
3. Except as provided in paragraph 9, a director may be removed under paragraph 1 or 2 only if the number of votes cast to remove the director would be sufficient to elect the director at a meeting to elect directors.
4. If cumulative voting is authorized, a director may not be removed if the number of votes, or if the director was elected by a class, chapter, region, unit or grouping of members, the number of votes of that class, chapter, region, unit or grouping, sufficient to elect the director under cumulative voting is voted against the director's removal.
5. A director elected by members may be removed by the members at a meeting by written consent or by written ballot of the members authorized to vote on such removal. If the removal is to occur at a meeting, the meeting notice shall state that the purpose or one of the purposes of the meeting is removal of the director.
6. In computing whether a director is protected from removal under paragraphs 2 through 4, it is assumed that the votes against removal are cast in an election for the number of directors of the class to which the director to be removed belonged on the date of that director's election.
7. An entire board of directors may be removed under paragraphs 1 through 5.
8. Except as provided in subsection C, a director elected by the board may be removed with or without cause by the vote of two-thirds of the directors then in office or any greater number as is set forth in the articles of incorporation or bylaws.
9. If, at the beginning of a director's term on the board of directors, the articles of incorporation or bylaws provide that the director may be removed for missing a specified number of meetings of the board of directors, the board of directors may remove the director for failing to attend the specified number of meetings. The director may be removed only if a majority of the directors then in office vote for the removal.
C. Notwithstanding subsection B, paragraph 8, a director elected by the board to fill the vacancy of a director elected by the members may be removed with or without cause by the members, but not by the board of directors.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Glen,

I doubt that the Title 10 statute applies to declarant control mainly because the Title 10 statutes are for non-profit corps. In AZ we have 2 sets of statutes that apply: Title 10, chapter 24-30 for HOAs that are nonprofit corps (most, if not all) and Title 33, chapter 9 for condos and chapter 16 for planned communities.

Regarding the Title 10 statutes, I believe there is some confusion between 10-3808 and 10-3809, unless I'm reading the latter one wrong. One must keep in mind these statutes are for corporations where some things are done differently. Perhaps a corporate officer can appoint someone as director without a vote of the other board members. But since these statutes also apply to HOAs, I guess it would be up to the board to decide if that person was "appointed" or "elected".
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Glen,

In answer to your remark: "If the member was appointed by the BOD to fill someone's place that appointed member could be recalled the same as any other member."

This remark was made after reading the Title 33 recall statute: 33-1813. It appears that way, IF you don't look at the Title 10 statutes. This is a classic example of a legislator writing a bill and not taking into consideration other laws that may apply. This is another statute the HOA attorneys would call the "HOA attorney enabling act" -- a common phrase around here.

HaroldS (Arizona)
Posts: 906
Posted:
Unt so Mary: If Title 10 and Title 33 statues conflict, why are you giving precedent to Title 10? Just curious.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 7,043
Posted:
Harold,

Quite frankly, the thread wasn't about recall so I didn't think of that statute until later when I responded to Glen.

But, why are you so bent on picking apart all my responses? Why don't you just state your opinion, which is what I've done. We're all entitled to interpret however we wish and we're not always going to agree on the interpretation. This is not a site where anyone is expecting legal advice.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here