ChuckB2 (Washington)
Posts: 14
Posts: 14
Posted:
I am in the process of rewriting our CC&Rs and will submit them to homeowners prior to our annual meeting later in the month.
As a board we sent out letters asking for people to submit recommendations for changes and have received absolutely nothing in return. Even though we provided a formatted form to be used for submissions.
I have been to each home several times now delivering documents and such and the universal response has been "yes the CC&Rs need to be changed " and "yes, we are willing to help with community projects", "we are really happy that the new board is doing something", so I am reasonably confident that people will support good change.
Our current CC&R is loaded with references to the home builder and the protective convenants pretty much point directly back to them as the enforcer via the HOA. Many of the protective aspects are clearly designed to enhance the builders ability to sell the homes and many others are typical boiler plate that don't really reflect the current times.
Since nobody chimed in with recommendations, my current approach is to modify the CC&Rs and show exactly what was changed then ask for an up or down vote. I could submit each change independently but feel that with so many changes it will be problematic and confusing. I have no problem entertaining new recommendations at the time of the meeting and incorporating them at that time. What happens if the changes are voted down? The alterantive is to enforce the rules as currently stated or simply run the HOA from the perspective of maintaining the common areas. I hope it doesn't come to that since a few run down, neglected homes will hurt everyone. When maintained, this is a very pleasent neighborhood that is pleasing to the eye.
I have not added anything completely new but I have clarified or become more specific in the statements. Also, all reference to the builder and his rights have been removed or replaced with statements pointing back to the association. An example of one change has to do with pets and a very ambiguous statement concerning the number. The original wording was difficult and it appeared that the intent was to prevent someone from running a kennel. Now I simply state that you can't breed dogs as part of a business and run a kennel for keeping other peoples pets. If you do have a dog that has pups then you just need to make sure they find new homes elsewhere as part of a normal process. (I am paraphrasing here and generalizing and the rules apply to cats as well)
Our association is about 8 years old with 40 homes and has been very poorly run from the time the builder left the area (around 2003). For example, a past president selectively enforced rules while ignoring his own extreme violation. This has caused a lot of hard feelings amongst homeowners and probably is some of the reason for the apathy that I am seeing. Some people just don't care and enforcement of some basic rules is, in my opinion, a necessity. Others, many in fact, go the extra mile when it comes to maintaining their property.
The HOA is an absolute necessity because we have over 140 acres of common area, not including the storm holding ponds and the road. There simply is no way to just abandon things. Taxes need to be paid, the road needs to be maintained, the ponds need annual maintenance, the electricity for the street lights needs to be paif for..... on and on. Our HOA is isolated and surrounded either by greenbelt or farm land so we do not come under any city statutes. We do, of course, follow the county and state statutes.
My overall goal is to be reasonable and simple while still taking care of the common areas and maintaining home values. In the 9 months the new board has done a number of things that show the homeowners the positive aspects of an HOA while attempting to heal the bad feelings from the past.
I would appreciate any recommendations from people that have gone through this process as well as any critical comments about my methods. The tone of my message may make it appear that I am doing this unilaterally, but that is not the case. I have been working closely with the other board members on these issues and we have had many discussions on the issues. Since this website has so much to offer it ceratinly cannot hurt to hear what others have to say.
Thanks
Chuck
As a board we sent out letters asking for people to submit recommendations for changes and have received absolutely nothing in return. Even though we provided a formatted form to be used for submissions.
I have been to each home several times now delivering documents and such and the universal response has been "yes the CC&Rs need to be changed " and "yes, we are willing to help with community projects", "we are really happy that the new board is doing something", so I am reasonably confident that people will support good change.
Our current CC&R is loaded with references to the home builder and the protective convenants pretty much point directly back to them as the enforcer via the HOA. Many of the protective aspects are clearly designed to enhance the builders ability to sell the homes and many others are typical boiler plate that don't really reflect the current times.
Since nobody chimed in with recommendations, my current approach is to modify the CC&Rs and show exactly what was changed then ask for an up or down vote. I could submit each change independently but feel that with so many changes it will be problematic and confusing. I have no problem entertaining new recommendations at the time of the meeting and incorporating them at that time. What happens if the changes are voted down? The alterantive is to enforce the rules as currently stated or simply run the HOA from the perspective of maintaining the common areas. I hope it doesn't come to that since a few run down, neglected homes will hurt everyone. When maintained, this is a very pleasent neighborhood that is pleasing to the eye.
I have not added anything completely new but I have clarified or become more specific in the statements. Also, all reference to the builder and his rights have been removed or replaced with statements pointing back to the association. An example of one change has to do with pets and a very ambiguous statement concerning the number. The original wording was difficult and it appeared that the intent was to prevent someone from running a kennel. Now I simply state that you can't breed dogs as part of a business and run a kennel for keeping other peoples pets. If you do have a dog that has pups then you just need to make sure they find new homes elsewhere as part of a normal process. (I am paraphrasing here and generalizing and the rules apply to cats as well)
Our association is about 8 years old with 40 homes and has been very poorly run from the time the builder left the area (around 2003). For example, a past president selectively enforced rules while ignoring his own extreme violation. This has caused a lot of hard feelings amongst homeowners and probably is some of the reason for the apathy that I am seeing. Some people just don't care and enforcement of some basic rules is, in my opinion, a necessity. Others, many in fact, go the extra mile when it comes to maintaining their property.
The HOA is an absolute necessity because we have over 140 acres of common area, not including the storm holding ponds and the road. There simply is no way to just abandon things. Taxes need to be paid, the road needs to be maintained, the ponds need annual maintenance, the electricity for the street lights needs to be paif for..... on and on. Our HOA is isolated and surrounded either by greenbelt or farm land so we do not come under any city statutes. We do, of course, follow the county and state statutes.
My overall goal is to be reasonable and simple while still taking care of the common areas and maintaining home values. In the 9 months the new board has done a number of things that show the homeowners the positive aspects of an HOA while attempting to heal the bad feelings from the past.
I would appreciate any recommendations from people that have gone through this process as well as any critical comments about my methods. The tone of my message may make it appear that I am doing this unilaterally, but that is not the case. I have been working closely with the other board members on these issues and we have had many discussions on the issues. Since this website has so much to offer it ceratinly cannot hurt to hear what others have to say.
Thanks
Chuck