FelineP (California)
Posts: 3
Posts: 3
Posted:
I live in California and belong to an HOA of 100 condominiums. There are two sections to our complex, A untis and B untis. The accounts are kept seperate so we have A reserves and B reserves. Over the past 5 years we have been paying a second maintenance man to do dryrot repair/replacement. He was given this job because he was "a friend" of 3 of the board members. We complained that he wasn't doing his job and in fact he and the other maintenance man were just sitting in the clubhouse every day drinking beer. Since they weren't doing their job, they hired a crew of labor guys to come and do the repairs. They were directed by the maintenance men to caulk and paint over all the dryrot. Our complaints fell on deaf ears for weeks. Finally, several members of the board stepped down and one maintenance man was let go. The problem is that all the money that was spent, was spent for nothing. ALL the work has to be redone as the dryrot included "extensive structural damage" All of it covered up. Many homeowners feel that this was gross negligence by several of the previous board as they would not listen to our complaints due to their personal relationships with the employees. Now they want to emergency assess us 4000.00 each now and then possibley another 20,000 to 40,000 later. One big problem with this is that the drunken maintenance men were allowed to do all the coding on the accounts for this dryrot repair and painting and they didn't code things properly which caused B reserves to pay for A unit repairs etc. It is the B units being assessed at this time. We want an audit before the assessment because of the improper coding but the board is saying "no". We were given a 26 day notice to pay the 4000 dollars by May 1, 2008. Is there anyway to stop this assessment until we can have an audit of the two reserve accounts. B reserves had to borrow funds from the A reserves to pay for the redo of the work and we know that the B reserves doesn't owe the amount the A reserves says because B paid for part of A repairs. It's so confusing but any advice is greatly appreciated.