RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
SusanW1 1/2,
What do your documents say about special assessments? Ours read special assessment are to be used to meet expenses when the Dues Assessment are predicted to not meet the dues assessment expenses.
We have had a special assessment for the last 7 years, and they are now calling this a Capital Assessment. Now this year they want to have another special assessment in addition to the one that has been running for seven years, they want to have another starting next month, with no expiration date, same as other one. They will both total around $1000.00 for 65 five units. Total of 65K.
There is nothing in our documents that mentions a capital assessment, in fact if memory sewrves it was first called and passed as a Special assessment. Our past boards seem to strive and make things complicated and legally borderline, and there will be a complete change by next year but I meet the same resistance in getting them to watch what they are doing. The latest debacle is this special assessment business. Never has been any accounting of this special assessment other that some explanation that they collected around $450,000 for thia capital thing, have spent about this amount and now this is supposed to justify another special assessment that will last to 2014.
I am very concerned that this program already has them in fiduciary trouble and here's why. To pass a special assessmenr it takes a majority of the apportioned vote to pass. Since they always use proxys and actually suggest to our owners if the can't attend they assign their proxy to a board member and list the names of the board on the proxy instructionss. Of course the Board always can control any elections or voting on anyhing at the annual meeting, and they have done it for years.
Now, as far as dues (fees) are concerned, in order to have a quorum you need 66 2/3rds vote. This is a lot harder to get than fifty %, so I expect the reason for these continual special assessments is to be able to control the vote. Also our MD says the Board can on;y raise the dues the CPI for this area and anything else has to be by brought up to voite and requires 66 2/3 vote.
I have tried to tell them, if nothing else this practice could be taken as a way to control the vote systematically. I have told them to call a special meeting to amend our documents that allows for a 10% majority to reach quroum. Then you could do away with the proxys and all ballots would be secret and if people don't want to vote, then don't vote, just like a general election.
They think I am trying to cause trouble.
Forgive my long post.
What do your documents say about special assessments? Ours read special assessment are to be used to meet expenses when the Dues Assessment are predicted to not meet the dues assessment expenses.
We have had a special assessment for the last 7 years, and they are now calling this a Capital Assessment. Now this year they want to have another special assessment in addition to the one that has been running for seven years, they want to have another starting next month, with no expiration date, same as other one. They will both total around $1000.00 for 65 five units. Total of 65K.
There is nothing in our documents that mentions a capital assessment, in fact if memory sewrves it was first called and passed as a Special assessment. Our past boards seem to strive and make things complicated and legally borderline, and there will be a complete change by next year but I meet the same resistance in getting them to watch what they are doing. The latest debacle is this special assessment business. Never has been any accounting of this special assessment other that some explanation that they collected around $450,000 for thia capital thing, have spent about this amount and now this is supposed to justify another special assessment that will last to 2014.
I am very concerned that this program already has them in fiduciary trouble and here's why. To pass a special assessmenr it takes a majority of the apportioned vote to pass. Since they always use proxys and actually suggest to our owners if the can't attend they assign their proxy to a board member and list the names of the board on the proxy instructionss. Of course the Board always can control any elections or voting on anyhing at the annual meeting, and they have done it for years.
Now, as far as dues (fees) are concerned, in order to have a quorum you need 66 2/3rds vote. This is a lot harder to get than fifty %, so I expect the reason for these continual special assessments is to be able to control the vote. Also our MD says the Board can on;y raise the dues the CPI for this area and anything else has to be by brought up to voite and requires 66 2/3 vote.
I have tried to tell them, if nothing else this practice could be taken as a way to control the vote systematically. I have told them to call a special meeting to amend our documents that allows for a 10% majority to reach quroum. Then you could do away with the proxys and all ballots would be secret and if people don't want to vote, then don't vote, just like a general election.
They think I am trying to cause trouble.
Forgive my long post.