💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

MeganM1 (Delaware)
Posts: 14
Posted:
I am new to the site; I am searching for information, direction and advice. I will attempt to be as brief and concise as possible. I live in a community of less than 300 condos. I just recieved notice in the mail that the board unanimously vote to self manage. Apparently, this has been a goal for the council for than a year, but it has never been address in any minutes from meetings. need less to say, many of us home owners were floored. I am deeply concerned.
Here are my concerns presently, all with a management company at present: the property manager (who is also a homeowner) instructed the management company to charge the late fee of $25 for any condo fee received after the 11th; our bylaws state in several places it is the 15th. Several homeowners contacted the management company with documentation. Management company went back to the PM and the response was well, it has alway been the 11th!! Which would be against bylaws, correct? So, the PM has been assessing late fees that go against of bylaws and incorrectly charging her neighbors. Next item: property manager(home owner PM) told several of us that a special one time assessment of 37 dollars if not paid by the 11th(!!) would be charged a late of 25 dollars. According to condo docs it is 5% late fee, the 25 dollars is for month condo fee, the original late fee amount was a percentage of the monthly fee , but this was codified a few years ago to a 25 dollar flat fee which is close to the original percentage. I told the PM this was usury. to charge $25 on a $37 bill is 74%. Our condo docs are pursuant to the state code which indicate a fee of no more than 18%. I have other incidences where this PM's integrity has been called into question. If one takes the current situation and then adds into it a self managed council, I am afraid the result will be disastrous.
there is no absolutely no transparency. I think many homeowners feel they are being dictated to; that we are held accountable to the bylaws but the association is not. I do not feel that any of the council are corrupt but over zealous. The PM has me extremely concerned for she violating our docs and imposing financial penalties are her very own neighbors.
Please any insight would be most appreciated.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Well Megan,
Welcome to the world of association living.
First let me say I can't know enough to dictate right and wrongs for your community. If, as you say, and I believe you, your members are not being considered when decisions are made and the Board picks and selects and interprets what the documents say to their advantage, they are just one of many that slip into this trap. Then along comes someone like you that wants to question what they have done in the past and usually react as if the world is falling apart and they loudly proclaim everything was running smoothly until you got there.

Two approaches to take and both take time and patience. Work from the inside or work from the outside to make changes. I am not sure what you mean when you say the board voted to self manage. That usually means the Board members themself manage and do all the work. With over two humndred units, you really should stay away from the Board being involved in bookkeeping, collecting fees and such. Much better if the board serve as the watch dog for the association over the Property management. A good general manager and a good board are well worth the money spent.

But you, personally, should first do your homework with your documents, and make sure you are aware of state and local requirements, etc. This takes time and sometimes you can get great help from a board member that is open to your interests. There are devils hidden in every Hoa and condo, and most all can stand a critical look. First volunteer for a committee and spend a little more time observing and considering.

To work outside you need supporters, people willing to put the time, effort and guts to demand changes. Go with a small group to the board meeting and question them about these late fee practices, quote you covenants to the Board, see how you are received and then react accordingly. Do you feel comfortable talking to the Board? Do they weigh your words, are you interrupted, do they promise to address your concerns and get back to you. Get a feel of the place and try hard to be fair. Give them every consideration because if they are bent nothing you say will make a difference anyway, so why argue with them. Then get your little group together and see where to go from there. In other words, have a plan and know what you want to find out and see what you come up with.

That may be a start and it is always better to work together if at all possible. Sometimes it takes more.
PatrickH (California)
Posts: 204
Posted:
Hi Megan,

Welcome aboard! My thoughts are that an asociation as large as yours should never be self managed. It's way too much work for a handful of volunteers to accomplish with any degree of success, no matter how dedicated they are. A professional management company, (not an owner/manager as you have, another bad idea), would be much better for an HOA as large as yours.

Most management companies will handle the billing and receipts, have customer service people to receive calls from the members, prepare the Board booklets and financial statemenst for the Board meetings, handle documentation required by various government agencies, obtain bids and supervise repair projects and generally work as the facilitor between the membership and the Board of Directors.

In your situation questioning the date when the dues are considered late, a professional manager would take one look at your documents and agree with you, if your statement is correct about the dues being late after the 15th of the month. If the current property manager can't figure that out, then you're working with a poorly trained or inexperienced manager.

To get changes made, you and the other owners will have to speak up and press the Board to abide by the rules of your HOA. It's often not easy to change things that "have always been that way", but if you know you're right and have the documents to back you up. it can be accomplished.

Good luck and let us know how things work out.
MeganM1 (Delaware)
Posts: 14
Posted:
I thank both you who have responded thus far. I agree that self management is not ideal. From my research ( which I have been doing vigorously)I have read much about the folly of communities as large as mine attempting is noble endeavor. That written, relations between the council and homeowners is not optimal. For self management to work effectively, I feel that this should have been a community wide goal, something all of us enter into together and worked toward together; not an " oh, by the way,". Couple this situation, with my post about the property manager and I smell problems already. The first meeting since this news "broke" is about a week. I plan on addressing my concerns to the President directly about the property manager. But, what do you recommend I put forth about the self management. Should we, the people, have been consulted?
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Megan, If you are in an area where there are multiple Property managements companies, visit each and get some written information on what each offers. I really suspect your Board has already done that and should be prepared to recomend to the "Council", the council is usually considered to be the owners and the total of all members is the Council of Co-owners, the Board is the Board not the council.

Your appraisal is, by law of averages likely to be pretty close to accurate and what you point out are repeated time after time in HOA's.
Not uncommon for the relationship between council and board to be strained, and of course, you want to avoid this as it is counter productive. Give this some thought.

The obligation of all the owners, board and council is to the Real Property. The Board has no mandate to insure you have a democratic society. It does have a Fiduciary responsibility to insure the health and welfare of the Property and so does every other member agree to protect the Real Property. Looked at this way the natural action to be democratic and all things to all people fade. All decisions are then made clincally and not emotionally. This is hard for people to accept because they don't like to hear it, but it is true, and much more reasponsible than majority rules. Majority doesn't rule, especially in a condo where the vote is apportioned and nearly all condos should have apportioning. So from the get go, democratic rule is in trouble and impossible. In a Condo, you own the right to live in and buy a designated area, and sell this right. All else is owned jointly and each is responsible, but not equally. The decisions of whether you are going to have a self managed or property management is not a decision made on what who thinks what. It has to be a decisions on what is good for the Real Property and no way with this many members is the real property going to be served by self management. Most folks will agree with most of what I am saying, I think I am right.

Anyway if, at the meeting, if things deterirate to the Board playing dictator, make them aware of what they are doing and try to insert some of your objections into the written minutes, you will probably need them in the near futrure if you are going to turn the place around. Certainly don't get off on the wrong foot with the Board, it will take time and effort to get to where you want to go and the more folks on your side the quicker chance takes place.
MeganM1 (Delaware)
Posts: 14
Posted:
I am a little confused. There is no board of directors. It is merely home owners acting on the council, who are elected every year. I wholeheartedly agree with protecting real property. I have thru my research found several articles regarding buyer beware of the self managed condo or HOA association. Since I have lived here for three years, this April will be the third change in management companies. I can not stress enough that this is a community with a tarnished local reputation as it is: failing decks and chimneys, roof replacement all since I have moved in. all of these issues are being address, and I praise the association's efforts. But this is a lot of work. The council is making this decision without discussing this with its homeowners. Even if our consent is not necessary surely communicating the council's desires is more beneficial than just dropping this bomb. Please respond how not having a BoD affects this issue if at all. What happens once the council goes forth with self management and all are voted off or decide not to run? Because eventually, the council will change, either at this annual meeting or the next. I appreciate your insights and knowledge.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
The elected members of your council are your Board of Directors.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Megan,
Lets go back to square one.
Answer these questions:

1. What do you have in the way of governing Documents?
a. Do you have a state Statute concerned with HOA's or Condos?
b. Are you Incorporated and Licensed by the state?
c. Do you have a Master Deed, Declaration and Charter?
d. Do you have By-laws and rules and restrictions.
e. Who do you send your checks to?
f. Do you view financial reports?
g. Are there minutes of your meetings.

There certainly is a lot of confusion here and it is more than just semantics. You seem to have a understanding of what may be required to run your condo and on the other hand, sound like you have no understanding at all, which confuses those of us trying to answer your concerns.

If you are unsure of any of the above, see if you can find out this stuff from a Board (Council) member, or your management company. You need to know what ison file at the Courthouse from the time your association was accepted from the developer. Unless you can acquire this information or something similar it may be that your state has no requirements except to be listed as a corporation. Then you are left with following the corporation laws of the state. You still must follow the corporation Laws of the state even if you have a chartered association.

I am guessing that you need to have a long taalk with a Board member and discuss the questions I posed. This is by no means the end all, just a place to get started. Someone is driving your bus and probably under some legal resource. They could be doing a great job, but, they need to provide sources for their members to understand their structure and explain their action and justify them legally. That is loosely how things are supposed to work, and somehow your association appears to be working. It is not necessary for me to have all the answers to mu questions but if you can answer them you, will be in a better position to see your problems. And last and also important. There is no better thing you can do for your community than to volunteer to get involved with your management.
MeganM1 (Delaware)
Posts: 14
Posted:
answers:
1: yes we have governing docs. there is a specific law called the unit property act; this is referenced in our docs.
B to my knowledge, the association is NOT an inc. at least not yet. The self managing was just announced. The council has legal counsel and I am confident that they have been advised about the importance of non profit status and becoming inc'd.
C: yes to the master deed, declaration and charter.
D: yes to the bylaws and rules and regs.
e; currently, we are sending our fees to a management company. As a third party they have informed the bard that the board can not access late fees until the date specified in the docs. The board told then MC to do it anyway and the MC refused.
However, the contract with the MC ends next month. After that a resident will be collecting the fees. Apparently, she has been hired. This information was divulged in the letter the homeowners received informing us of the self-management. Even though this service the resident is providing is limited, fidelity insurance is required??? What about anything else?
F: financial reports are included in the minutes, however, I have not seen a budget in over a year.
G: There are minutes, but I have not been getting them. I had to contact the MC to have them send them out. The Property manager is responsible for this. It seems that many in the community are not getting them either.

I agree with you that I have no idea. I have enough information to get my self into trouble!! While I am not a lawyer, I think my understanding of the condo docs is pretty good, that written, it is certainly possible that another interpretation on some points may differ.

I am a little hesitant to call the president, but I see that it is a must. The Property manager and i have had a row regarding her interpretations of these docs. Specifically the late fees that are being assessed. i want to make this clear. I am not delinquent on any dues, however if the condo docs stipulate a certain procedure than lets follow that. If it is not liked then lets amend it.

I can not stress enough my reservations. The new part time accounts receivable position has been filled by a board member. In one portion of this letter it says "volunteers; another portion says "hired". Is this splitting hairs? Perhaps, but this all goes back to " where is the communication"?

i appreciate all of your insights. I am cramming as much information in, as I possibly can. There are most definatly gaps in my education. When I attend the meeting to speak up, I want to have as much information as possible. I am not looking for a witch hunt. I am looking to what is best for this community and its property values.
Also, I have this foreboding feeling from the way that things have been handled in the past that have not been discussed that this sentiment may apply: " power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. I am open to being wrong on this account and would fully embrace it.

As always, thank you!!
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
How about some of my betters start posting some view for this lady to consider. Off the top of my head, I would guess, lawyer or no lawyer, they are headed for trouble. No doubt about it.The board (council) says they are doing every under the advice of their lawyer. Maybe this state in different. I can't see where they have been structure wise to have three management companies in three years. Help me out here Paul, and Donna, lay some good stuff on this post. All I can really see is bad news.

MORE COMMENTS PLEASE
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
robert, i agree with you and sympathize with Megan. her board is out of the loop, out of control, out of their minds. they need a reality adjustment, one can only hope it comes sooner, and cheaper, than later.

On the other hand, it should be of some comfort to know that the HOA is improving the resale value of her property. that's what HOA's do, right? So if nothing else good comes from this, megan can at least hold on to that thought as all else around her crumbles.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
BrainB,
I appreciate the first part of your remarks.

The last part is Hogwash and you know it. A well run Hoa or Condo does attrack buyers which raises the value of the property when economic conditions are right. A badly run association does just that. They make bad decisions and this effects the vitality of the association. And it is easy to overlook the long term effects of bad management. With most associations apathy is a real problem and the election of the owners to let things slide cause problems for years after the act. Our condo is 27 years old and some restriction have never been enforced by any board and the present one is following the past. Hopefully we have some irons in the fire that come April a constructive change will be made. One Board member is actively working for change and if we can drum up a little interest we should be in good shape, We have the people needed to run a tight ship it is just a matter of putting them in position.

Again, thanks for your input.
MeganM1 (Delaware)
Posts: 14
Posted:
the condos around here suffer from the conceptions pepole have of the condo association. Good, bad or indifferent, when you buy a condo you get the whole enchilada. That written, ours is a great community, but the bad management companies have taken their toll. So much repair has gone on since I moved in it is unbelievable. I don;t know really what else is left. So, from that stand point the association has done well. But there is not nor has there ever been communication. You write of committees. ha ha ha hah what are those? We don't have those.
here is a question: the closed meetings: are those minutes or agenda or even topics made public?
I am just really concerned about the future. With such a high condo fee for what you get, I think a lot needs to be reined in.
I mean how do we as a community know if our council has bitten off more than they can chew? Aren't they reading the same material as I am??
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
MeganM1: If you refer to Community Assoc. Network (on this page to the left in yellow) and search for info by State, you will find the state docs for your community. In them, it is stated all meetings are to be communicated to residents by public notice posted 7-days prior to the date; and via mail 14 days prior. All meetings are to be open to residents.

IF this is not happening in your community, then you need to convey state requirements to your Board and Prop.Mgr. Request to have financial status put on the meeting agenda and request copy of the budget as approved for 2008 with a time for questions.

Once you see notice of the meeting and the agenda topics, you can then be prepared. Communication is key in any association. Perhaps you want to volunteer to be on a 'newsletter' committee which would assist the Board in conveying pertinent info to the community.

RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Megan, Minutes are to reflect what actions were taken by the Board (Council). Regards closed meetings: It is possible that you have a state law that states all meetings in association will be open meeting. In my state (SC), there is no clear reference to open meetings. That will be addressed formally this April and with luck our present custom will be changed by vote of the council (members here), It probably will require an amendment but maybe not, we'll see.

The action of your Board (Council) to switch to self managememt is reckless, IMHO. It should be aired throughly by a members, not just at a meeting or an e-mail announcement, but individual contact with each owner. If you are incorporated in the state, I doubt it is legal to do. I am sure a good read of your documents and anything the state requires would prove to be fruitful. It is absolutely the wrong thing to do to hire any owner to handle money, especially a former Board member.

If you know the name of their attorney, you might contact him and ask if he has sent a written opinion of this self management. Also ask the Board to see the copy of the Lawyers letter. They probably will fight you on this but you have a right to see this correspondence or any other Regime records. Are you dues and fees apportioned? Are you located in a city limits. The city and county may have some juridiction over your Association.

A great community (your description) would not allow the Board to act in this manner. Maybe there are others interested in what is going on and you don't know about it. All Boards have to make an effort to communicate. Lot of times the reason they give for not informing the owners is the apathy of the members. That is not a valid explanation as it is their mandate to extablish effective communication, but this apathjy is common and a heavy weight on the association that costs everyone money day to day and big money in the long run.

Have you been to the court house to look up your initial documents, copy them and see how they compare with the ones you operate under and check your state on line services to look for your regimes name under business list or corporations. Also check you Court record of the county to see if there are past court cases or active one and see how many entry have been made with your Regimes name on them. Check your developers name and see if he has any ties with the Regime.

If you can contact ten neighbors that are interested, pool some money and pay some other lawyer to give you an assessment of what is going on. Your local BBB may be able to help there and also check your Regime name withe the BBB for information. In formation is power, the more information the more power.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Thank you Paul, good post.
GeraldT4
Posts: 1,022
Posted:
MeganM1 - Just want to comment on your statements about the minutes. Mailing them to each owner may not be a requirement. If your governing documents require it, than you should be provided. Or if your state law requires it, than you should be provided. However, typically minutes from previous meetings are to approved at an open meeting, filed in the association minute book/binder, and then, and here's the important part, made available to unit owners. Available means posted in a prominent location. Typically owners can provide requests to the MC or Board to have access to the minute book for their review.

Given your post, and what I believe to be the broad violation on a top down, bottoms up level, I strongly suggest the non-board member owners gather, mail a written petition request from more than a quorum of the community to each Board member's home address certified mail return receipt requested. Include a comprehensive outline of what you want to occu, and the volunteers that are willing to form the committees necessary to accomplish that end. AND make clear that failure to accomplish your requests will be considered a breach of fiduciary duty and will result in the removal of all Board members, all at the same time. Time to organize, take control, volunteer, step up to the plate by all owners. Otherwise, it's one or two leading the brigade and that will eventually and logically peter out.
MeganM1 (Delaware)
Posts: 14
Posted:
The hired accounts recievable is a a current member at large. How does this change your opinion?

I have read the docs over and over, I can't find anything pertaining to self management specifically.

The docs do reference closed meetings and stipulates meeting schedules. I will look closely into this one.

As far as my comment on the great community. Perhaps it would have been better to put it thus: the potential is there is for it to be a great community. It has a lot going for it: location and the like. so many things in its favor.

Thanks to all for hte great information.
Oh here is an interesting tid bit: council want to amend the rent ratio by amending the condo docs. So they are going door to door to chat iwht the homeowner. It sure would have been nice if the same condiseration was applied to the self management decision.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
MeganM1: Apparently, your Condo Board is trying to trim the fat from outgoing expenses and have made the decision to eliminate one large expense by managing association issues themselves, rather than paying a management company.

Rather than belaboring this issue, why not try to support the Board in their decision? It does sound like they want to be wise in their spending efforts and have chosen this as one way to do it. Granted, it may not be the best and most efficient way, but the Board will have to find that out themselves. Without benefit of a management company and a property mgr. the Board will learn quickly of the many pitfalls which can occur. But, sometimes experience is the best teacher.

Wish them well, hope for the best, and just maybe, within a few months time the association will learn that the Board is doing a good job, and it was a wise decision to save money by not having a manager. Time will tell the tale.

MeganM1 (Delaware)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Paul,
The board is most defintely trimming the fat. " support the board in their decision". in their decision. I guess this is the crux of the problem in a nut shell. I will support the board. But I think it is important that communication needs to be open and both ways.
Hoping for the best??!!! This is my biggest invenstment, I am a bit more consrvatative when it comes to my assets. I prefer to leave as little as possible to chance.
I thank you for the input.
GeraldT4
Posts: 1,022
Posted:
MeganM1 - I do believe the members need to support the Board in their decisions. However, given the details of your post, I think the members would be doing themselves a disservice if did not communicate their wishes to the board, en mas. I too am a bit conservative when it comes to my #1 investment. In my association self-management is a decision that must be voted approved by 70% in favor of the community.
RobertR1 (South Carolina)
Posts: 5,164
Posted:
Well Paul, we can't agree all the time. I read this Board as doing exactly what they get together and decide. I am not accussing them of anything illegal but it sure sound they are getting close if not over the line. I think Gerald senses trouble here also, and he has a pretty good instincts in my opeinion.
Now the Board wants to change the apportionment. This is next to imposssible by our documents as it requires a 100% vote. Three project managers in three years, hiring a Board Member to control funds, now wanting to change ratios, going door to door to solicit support but making no formal announcement of what they are doing. I am not saying all this is true, I don't know, but our friend Megan doesn't seem to have a personal agenda at this point which endorses her validity. Maybe Megan just don't know how to find out things or maybe the Board is hiding something, but something is wrong and it is time for a big flashlight to shine on the management of this Condo. It will probably have to be done in house and it will cause all kinds of problems but in the end, all will be better off when all are open about what is going on. I just can't endorse giving the Board Carte blanc to continue down the road they seem to want to go. They first need to understand, "It is not their money, the money belongs to the owners, the board must handle these fund openly and constructively and anyone can object if they are not comfortable. It is the Boards mandate to make the owners comfortabl with their management.
MeganM1 (Delaware)
Posts: 14
Posted:
That was some response Robert! I have no other personal agenda other than this is my home. So you all know, I am the pain neighbor who reads her docs and doesn't get involved. I stay out of the politics of all of it. But I don't think I can do that anymore. I have a bad feeling about what is happening, all I am looking for are answers. That is it.
I will bring up the information I have found and asked the board to answer them. I will not be accusatory, surely there is no harm in asking, and if everything is above board, which I hope they are, there should be no problems.
I apreciate all of the information. you all have helped about immensely.
Thank you!!
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
Megan: Have you considered the suggestion of volunteering? You state there are no volunteers, there is no communication, so it sounds like the Board IS IT!

You think this Board wants to run the show so why not challenge them by offering your services as a volunteer. A Newsletter Committee is an excellent option in which to convey news from the Board and from the neighborhood.

Do you think this is an option you would consider?
MeganM1 (Delaware)
Posts: 14
Posted:
Paul,
this is an excellent idea. A newsletter would be the perfect answer. I will offer this up as a suggestion.
I want to thank you and everyone else who responded. The information that you all have is incredible. every reply has provided me with information and perspective.
PaulM (Pennsylvania)
Posts: 1,347
Posted:
MeganM1: We are very glad that you are open to volunteering your time and effort for the good of the community. It's always the easier road to take to sit back, observe and offer criticism---but, you have chosen the high road in serving and assisting to effect some good things in your community! Kudos to you!

Once YOU start the ball rolling on the path of serving, there is no telling what a group working together can accomplish. The sky's the limit! All with the emphasis in working for the good of the community as a whole! Please keep us updated on your progress.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here