AB3 (Arizona)
Posts: 44
Posts: 44
Posted:
I'm new to my hoa board and don't think that the board acted in the best interest of the community on some issues. I'm not the only homeowners that feels this way. The only conclusion I can come to is the previous board took complaints from the homeowners as a personal attack. Here is the situation.
We move at snails pace on some issues and others seem to get done so fast nobody has time to get the information in the mail.
It took 1 year to submit 2 sets of 2 paint colors for the members to vote on. Because the vote was too close to call it took another year to present the winner. I don't get it either. Can the board go against how the majority of the membership voted?
Anyway, if the membership has to vote on the colors then doesn't the entire membership have to vote on how those colors are or aren't used?
Requests to paint a minor hard to see trim in the darker of the two approved colors were made they got denied without explaination other than cuz we said so. They grandfathered in the old color for those that painted in the 2 years it took to determine the colors that won. Another owner made a simaliar request at the annual meeting the board said it would not discuss the topic. The homeowner asked "can't the board change it's mind" the answer was "No". Did they prevented him from being heard AND prevented the members from voting. Is that acting in the best interest of the community and border line abuse of power?
Isn't the boards power to make decisions regarding the aesthetics of the community more so related maintenance, landscaping, and building maintenance? Is it possible this is a loop hole? We are all adults and people keep their homes well maintained. By changing our colors we created an eye sore. Plus one of the homes was painted the wrong color just before it was sold. It has been the wrong color for years. It will also most likely remain the wrong color until it needs to be painted due to aging not because it is the wrong color. Yet the board refuses to let people paint a hard to see portion of their home in the darker approved color. It doesn't make sense.
Do the bylaws and CCR's have to specifically state what the board must obtain membership vote on how the homes are painted?
How the board can make rules restricting what the owners can and can't do without board approval. Yet the boards authority to act without membership approval just gets broader and broader.
I believe that board members are the ones that are carrying out the wishes of the owners. However, how can that occur when they don't know what the majority of the owners want? They want the homeowners to get more involved but they will not do anything to encourage them to get involved. I've never seen them survey the owners they only do maybe 2 social events a year. Where is the compromise?
As an officer and owner what do I need to do to place limitaions on the boards power to act without obtaining a vote of the entire membership? Is there something somewhere that I'm not seeing or information I'm missing here or am I just stupid.
We move at snails pace on some issues and others seem to get done so fast nobody has time to get the information in the mail.
It took 1 year to submit 2 sets of 2 paint colors for the members to vote on. Because the vote was too close to call it took another year to present the winner. I don't get it either. Can the board go against how the majority of the membership voted?
Anyway, if the membership has to vote on the colors then doesn't the entire membership have to vote on how those colors are or aren't used?
Requests to paint a minor hard to see trim in the darker of the two approved colors were made they got denied without explaination other than cuz we said so. They grandfathered in the old color for those that painted in the 2 years it took to determine the colors that won. Another owner made a simaliar request at the annual meeting the board said it would not discuss the topic. The homeowner asked "can't the board change it's mind" the answer was "No". Did they prevented him from being heard AND prevented the members from voting. Is that acting in the best interest of the community and border line abuse of power?
Isn't the boards power to make decisions regarding the aesthetics of the community more so related maintenance, landscaping, and building maintenance? Is it possible this is a loop hole? We are all adults and people keep their homes well maintained. By changing our colors we created an eye sore. Plus one of the homes was painted the wrong color just before it was sold. It has been the wrong color for years. It will also most likely remain the wrong color until it needs to be painted due to aging not because it is the wrong color. Yet the board refuses to let people paint a hard to see portion of their home in the darker approved color. It doesn't make sense.
Do the bylaws and CCR's have to specifically state what the board must obtain membership vote on how the homes are painted?
How the board can make rules restricting what the owners can and can't do without board approval. Yet the boards authority to act without membership approval just gets broader and broader.
I believe that board members are the ones that are carrying out the wishes of the owners. However, how can that occur when they don't know what the majority of the owners want? They want the homeowners to get more involved but they will not do anything to encourage them to get involved. I've never seen them survey the owners they only do maybe 2 social events a year. Where is the compromise?
As an officer and owner what do I need to do to place limitaions on the boards power to act without obtaining a vote of the entire membership? Is there something somewhere that I'm not seeing or information I'm missing here or am I just stupid.